Stormw ormwate ter Inf nfrastr astructur ucture e Fu Fund - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stormw ormwate ter inf nfrastr astructur ucture e fu fund
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stormw ormwate ter Inf nfrastr astructur ucture e Fu Fund - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stormw ormwate ter Inf nfrastr astructur ucture e Fu Fund nding ing Stud udy Finance, Administration and Audit Committee Meeting, March 31, 2014 1 The e Ob Object ectiv ives es of the e Stormw rmwater ter Infr frastr


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Stormw

  • rmwate

ter Inf nfrastr astructur ucture e Fu Fund nding ing Stud udy

Finance, Administration and Audit Committee Meeting, March 31, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The e Ob Object ectiv ives es of the e Stormw rmwater ter Infr frastr astruct uctur ure e Funding g Study dy

  • Understand our stormwater asset needs
  • Develop a comprehensive stormwater program
  • Develop a funding framework for the stormwater

program

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Bac ackgrou

  • und

nd for r the Study dy

  • Council direction at CW (WS) Rpt. No. 1, Item 3, February 2009

– “That staff examine funding models for the implementation of the Storm Water Management Retrofit Program and report back to a future Committee of the Whole Meeting”

  • Since 2009, studies, new activities and capital projects have been

completed or programmed into the capital budget

  • 2014-2017 Budget Guideline and Instructions

– New User Fees and Service Charges: Departments are encouraged to explore and submit new user fee and service charge opportunities for existing non-revenue generating services.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Ob Objec ectiv tives es of Stormw rmwate ter r Ma Mana nageme ement nt

  • Maintain the natural hydrologic cycle
  • Prevent an increased risk to flooding
  • Prevent undesirable stream erosion
  • Protect water quality

An Introduction to Stormwater Management Planning and Design (MOE, 2003)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

St Stormw

  • rmwater

ter Ma Mana nagement ement in in V Vaughan ughan

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Vaughan’s Stormwater Management Activ tivitie ties

Asset

Management

O&M Capital Projects Studies (Existing Infrastructure) Stormwater Master Plan Resident Programs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Impa pacts cts of Climate te Chan ange e and d Lack k of Compr prehe ehensiv nsive e SWM WM Prog

  • gram

am

August 2005 June, July 2008 August 2011 July 2013

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Risks Associated ted with Short, , Intens ense Storms ms an and Lac ack of Co Comprehens ehensive e SW SW Pr Program am

Quickly rising water in rivers and streams Overland flow routes, pipes and ponds must be maintained to allow water to reach destination Woody and other debris must be managed within water courses to avoid blockages at culverts, outfalls, bridges, etc

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Mu Munici cipal pal Liabi bility ty

  • $9M lawsuit over flooding served against Amherstburg

(Nov 2013) CBC News

  • Thunder Bay $375M flood lawsuit moves ahead (Sep

2013) CBC News

  • Lisgar Flooding (in Mississauga) leads to $200 million

lawsuit (June 2012) YorkRegion.com

  • City of Stratford Agrees to Settle Class Action Suit

Related to 2002 Flood (March 2010) Press Release City

  • f Statford
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Vaughan’s Stormwater Assets

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Vaughan’s Current Stormwater Assets

Underground Infrastructure and Ponds Waterways and Overland Flow Routes Approximately

  • 850 km pipes
  • 15,000 catch basins
  • 73,000 storm connections
  • 2400 culverts
  • 100 ponds
  • Rivers
  • Streams
  • Streets
  • Ditches
  • Grassed Swales
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Capi pital tal and O& O&M M Costs ts Compa parison rison agai ainst nst Asset set Val alue ue (in Mi Millions)

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Stormwater $1 billion Roads $900 million

O&M and Capital

Annual O and M Capital Investment

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Studies dies have e identi ntified ied capit pital al works s and d furthe ther r studies dies

Study Capital Work Identified Further Studies Identified SWM Retrofit Study (2009) $50 million* Ponds SWM Master Plan $2.12 million $1.25 million Undesirable erosion in streams Phase 2 Drainage Study $ 1.5 million Focused studies

  • n 7 areas (flood

mitigation) Total $ 53.62 million $1.25 million

*adjusted for inflation 3% per year

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Impo portanc tance e of O& O&M M to Climate te Chang nge e Risk k Ma Mana nagement ement

  • Engineers Canada, Adapting Infrastructure to a Changing Climate: Risk

Assessment and Good Engineering Practices

“Much can be accomplished within

  • perations, maintenance and redevelopment

policies, procedures and cycles” “It’s not always about ‘building a bigger pipe’”

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Current ent Op Oper erati tions

  • ns and Ma

Maintena tenance nce

  • Inspection activities mostly programmed for capital

works needs

  • Pond maintenance is limited and is based on available

funds, not necessarily on needs

  • Proactive inspection and cleaning of catch basins,

channels and watercourses

  • Programmed maintenance activities are limited due to:

– staffing resources – O&M funded from wastewater consumption rates

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Future e O& O&M M and Capi pital tal Funding ing Need eds

  • Stormwater Master Plan identified new infrastructure

which will need to be maintained

– Developers pay to build the infrastructure but future users (City) fund future repairs and ongoing operations and maintenance costs

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Current ent Stormw rmwater ter Funding ng

  • Projects have traditionally been funded from Gas Tax,

Infrastructure Grants and Road Infrastructure Reserve

  • Over the last decade, the City of Vaughan, has collected

for stormwater needs in combination with wastewater consumption rates

  • Operations and maintenance is funded from wastewater

consumption rates

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Ot Other er municipali ipalitie ties

  • Many municipalities have implemented or are in the

process of implementing a dedicated stormwater funding framework

– Markham – Richmond Hill – Aurora – Kitchener – Waterloo – Mississauga

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Stormw rmwate ter r Infr frastr astruct uctur ure e Funding ng Study dy Go Goal

A balanced approach to a stormwater funding framework through level of service review and examining funding options

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Stormw rmwate ter r Infr frastr astruct uctur ure e Funding ng Study dy

  • Calculate service life costs based on repair, retrofit and

eventual replacement, operations and maintenance costs

  • Determine level of service based on best practices

LCC and LOS Review

  • Tax vs. Rate
  • Tiered vs. Straight Dollar Figure
  • Calculated based on permeable area on property
  • Other funding options

Funding Options and Models

  • Policy for application of funding framework
  • Stormwater By-law

Policy and By-law Development

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Public ic Consu sulta ltati tion

  • n and Engagement

ement Plan

  • Communication campaign to promote and define

stormwater management, the role of the resident and the role of the City

  • Public Consultation and Education through Stakeholder

Advisory Committee

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Proposed posed Study dy Schedu edule le

Project Start

  • Spring

2014

Council Information Report

  • March 31,

2014

SW Assessment, LCC and Funding Analysis

  • 2014

Public Engagement and Consultation

  • 2014

Report to Council

  • Early

2015

Public Engagement and Consultation

  • 2015

Final Report, Council Presentation

  • Late spring

2015

2016 Budget Process for Funding Framework Implementation

  • Fall 2015

Storm Water Funding Framework Implementation

  • 2016

*

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Qu Quest stions?

  • ns?
slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Risk k and Resp sponse nse Strate tegies gies

High Level Risks Response Strategies Resistance from ICI sector Consultation and Engagement Plan Resistance from residents Consultation and Engagement Plan Simple funding framework is perceived as inequitable Define guiding principles at start

  • f project

Complicated funding framework is difficult to manage and has resource impacts Balance between funding and storm water program needs