Eardisland Feasibility Study Claire Storer Principal Engineer 1 - - PDF document

eardisland feasibility study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Eardisland Feasibility Study Claire Storer Principal Engineer 1 - - PDF document

10/01/2015 Eardisland Feasibility Study Claire Storer Principal Engineer 1 1. Questionnaire Analysis 2. Flood Data Review 3. Potential Alleviation Options 2 1 10/01/2015 Questionnaire 73 responses 3 areas: Flood History


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/01/2015 1

Eardisland Feasibility Study

Claire Storer Principal Engineer

1

  • 1. Questionnaire Analysis
  • 2. Flood Data Review
  • 3. Potential Alleviation Options

2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/01/2015 2

3

Questionnaire

73 responses 3 areas:

  • Flood History
  • Priorities / Concerns
  • Actions / Solutions

~30% response rate Average length of

  • ccupancy – 20 years

38% households receive flood warnings

4

Flood History

Flooding experienced at property – internal / external (%) Restricted access to property (%) Contact with other householders experiencing flooding to property (%) 15 66 18 6 responses stated internal flooding had occurred Disruptive flooding – indicated to occur every year or so Main events – Feb 2014, Jul 2007, Oct 1998

slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/01/2015 3

5

Flood History

~ 2/3 responses stated a cause

64% 25% 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Watercourse Highway Flows Overland Flows

% attributed primary cause of flooding

6

Concerns & Priorities

12% 38% 15% 15% 8% 3% 0% 3% 2% 3%

Listed as top priority

Insurance premiums Actual flood damage to property Impact on house values Loss / disrupted access to your property Loss / disrupted access affecting the parish Impact on emergency services Impact on the environment Impact on businesses/local services Stress/worry over whether flooding will occur Access to medical care

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/01/2015 4

7

Concerns & Priorities

22% 18% 18% 14% 7% 7% 4% 3% 3% 3%

Listed in top 3 priorities

Insurance premiums Actual flood damage to property Impact on house values Loss / disrupted access to your property Loss / disrupted access affecting the parish Impact on emergency services Impact on the environment Impact on businesses/local services Stress/worry over whether flooding will occur Access to medical care

8

Concerns & Priorities

Main concerns:

  • Insurance premiums
  • Flood damage to property
  • Impact on house values
  • Loss / disrupted access to property

Frequent flooding causing disruption and more severe flooding causing property damage of equal importance

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/01/2015 5

9

Actions & Solutions

40% 30% 10% 8% 5% 3% 3% 2% 0% 0% 0%

Alleviation measures % responders listed as most effective

Increased maintenance to watercourses Increased maintenance of drains and sewers An upgrade of existing drainage systems to increase capacity Measures to control the direction of overland flows Upstream flood storage Enlarged watercourse channels or culverts Formal raised flood defences Other measures to prevent floodwaters entering properties Better information on flood risk to prepare for floods Improved flood warning

10

Actions & Solutions

19 11 56 81 89 44 25 50 75 100 Assisting with clearing drains or channels Involvement in Eardisland Parish Council Flood Working Group Would you support an increase in precept in order to fund minor works

% responders willing and able to help reduce the impacts of flooding in the parish

Unwilling and/or or unable Willing and able

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/01/2015 6

11

River Flooding

EA River Arrow model

12

Area 1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/01/2015 7

13

Area 2

14

Area 3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/01/2015 8

15

Area 4

16

Area 5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

10/01/2015 9

17

Area 6

18

Area 7

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/01/2015 10

19

Surface Water Flooding

20

Potential Alleviation Options

Screening to shortlist options for further assessment 30 measures identified Type Of Measure:

  • Do Nothing / Minimum
  • Source Control – Land use; sustainable drainage; Flood storage; River regulation
  • Pathway modifications – Ground raising; Flood defences; Channel & structure

improvements; Property protection.

  • Resilience – Flood plans; Modelling & mapping; Property resilience; Emergency

planning Screening criteria:

  • Area benefitting
  • Standard of protection
  • Feasibility
  • Risks
  • Physical constraints
  • Environmental
  • Social factors / land ownership
  • Cost
  • Maintenance
  • Likelihood of funding
  • Potential for community led delivery
slide-11
SLIDE 11

10/01/2015 11

21

The Long List!

22

Shortlisted Options

Following identified to potentially warrant further investigation as part of the study:

  • Remove / lower weir at Mill Stream offtake
  • Channel improvements (Southall Brook principally)
  • Tadpole Bridge improvements
  • Overland flow routing
  • Property flood protection / resilience

Following identified to potentially provide benefit but further work not proposed as part of this study:

  • Business continuity / resident flood plans
  • Flood risk identification & mapping (likely to support a scheme)
  • Improved emergency preparedness, response & planning