STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN
October 5, 2017 Presenters: Hawkeye Sheene, Brian Van Lienden
T A C K I C K O F F M E E T I N G
STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN T A C K I C K O F F M E E T I N G - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN T A C K I C K O F F M E E T I N G October 5, 2017 Presenters: Hawkeye Sheene, Brian Van Lienden Agenda Introductions SWRP Overview SWRP Schedule TAC Roles and Responsibilities SWRP Goals and
October 5, 2017 Presenters: Hawkeye Sheene, Brian Van Lienden
T A C K I C K O F F M E E T I N G
2 10/4/2017
3 10/4/2017
Integrated plan focusing on regional watershed-based storm water priorities and developing multiple benefit projects for upcoming funding
4 10/4/2017
awarded SWRCB Prop 1 grant funding to complete a Storm Water Resource Plan (SWRP) by July 2018
receive state grant funding for storm water and dry weather runoff capture projects
5 10/4/2017
Identification
Collaboration
Schedule
Participation
6 10/4/2017
Task 1: Project Management Task 2: Monitoring Task 3: Technical Advisory Committee Task 4: Data Collection and Watershed Identification Task 5: Storm Water Resource Plan Development Task 6: Technical Studies to Support Development of SWRP Task 7: Stakeholder Outreach, Education, and Public Participation
7 10/4/2017
8 10/4/2017
Establish TAC Develop SWRP Components and Protocols Solicit and Prioritize Projects Draft Storm Water Resources Plan Address Comments on Plan Final Storm Water Resources Plan
JULY APR-JUN MAR AUG-NOV AUG OCT-DEC 2018
Anticipated funding solicitation
2017
11 10/4/2017
development
feedback deadlines
14 10/4/2017
Meeting Month Meeting Topic/Purpose Face-to-Face Conference Call/Webinar TAC Kickoff Meeting October 5, 2017 Kickoff meeting (SWRP process, schedule and goals); Proposed project solicitation and prioritization process ✓ TAC Meeting #1/ Stakeholder Meeting #1 (Coordinate with ESIRWMP SC/PAC Meeting #6) October 23, 2017 Project solicitation opens; project prioritization process ✓ TAC Meeting #2 (Coordinate with ESIRWMP SC/PAC Meeting #7 / ESIRWMP Meeting #2) November 2017 Project solicitation, Project Website ✓ TAC Meeting #3/ Stakeholder Meeting #2 (Coordinate with ESIRWMP Meeting #3) December 2017 Project prioritization results ✓ TAC Meeting #4 January 2018 SWRP Draft Implementation Strategy, Special Studies Update; Outreach Update ✓ TAC Meeting #5 March 2018 SWRP Administrative Draft review and comment ✓ Public Workshop #1 April 2018 Public Draft presentation and comment solicitation ✓
16 10/4/2017
challenges and opportunities for managing storm water and dry weather runoff
projects that provide multiple benefits to help achieve watershed and regional planning goals
Environmental Resources Community / Stakeholder Engagement Flood Management Water Quality Water Supply
18 10/4/2017
19 10/4/2017
20 10/4/2017
County
Merced – Lower Stanislaus
Stanislaus, Upper Merced, Lower Calaveras – Mormon Slough
21 10/4/2017
22 10/4/2017
goals
Waterbodies
into groundwater basins (where feasible)
23 10/4/2017
(Nitrogen (Ammonia and Nitrates) and Phosphorus)
24 10/4/2017
25 10/4/2017
Establish TAC Develop SWRP Components and Protocols Solicit and Prioritize Projects Draft Storm Water Resources Plan Address Comments on Plan Final Storm Water Resources Plan
JULY APR-JUN MAR AUG-NOV AUG OCT-DEC 2018
Anticipated funding solicitation
2017
Management System
project info as ESIRWM
etc.
specific to SWRP:
Additional Benefits
SWRP Project
Water Quality Water Supply Flood Management Environment Community
identify, quantify, and prioritize potential storm water and dry weather runoff capture projects. (Wat. Code, § 10562, subd. (e).)
Can the project be sponsored by an eligible applicant? Yes/No Is the project a storm water or dry weather runoff project? Yes/No Does the project provide 2 or more SWRP Main Benefits? Yes/No Does the project provide at least one SWRP Additional Benefit? Yes/No
regional funding
benefits to maximize water supply, water quality, flood management, environmental, and community benefits within the watershed
benefits and support beneficial uses)
space in DACs with a deficit of such areas.
Regional Watershed Priorities Points Located on public land? 4 Help achieve the goals of an existing TMDL? 4 Reduces discharges into a 303(d) Water Body? 2 Identified in an existing study/planning document? 2 Recharges storm water into a groundwater basin? 4 SWRP Main Benefits and Additional Benefits Points Providing SWRP Main Benefits Points per benefit provided Additional points if a quantitative metric is provided 4 2 Providing SWRP Additional Benefits Points per benefit provided Additional points if a quantitative metric is provided 2 1 Technical Document used to quantify benefits Design Document Environmental Assessment/EIR Feasibility Study Another Planning Document 4 3 2 1
Hawkeye Sheene 415.321.3427 hsheene@woodardcurran.com RMC, a Woodard & Curran Company Leslie Dumas, P .E. D.WRE 916.999.8778 ldumas@woodardcurran.com RMC, a Woodard & Curran Company
33 10/4/2017
Benefit Category Main Benefit Water Quality Increased filtration and/or treatment of water Water Supply Water supply reliability Conjunctive Use Flood Management Decreased flood risk by reducing runoff rate and/or volume Environmental Environmental habitat and/or improvement, including:
Instream flow improvement Increased urban green space Community Employment opportunities provided Public education
Benefit Category Additional Benefit Water Quality Nonpoint source pollution control Reestablished natural water drainage and treatment Water Supply Water conservation Flood Management Reduced sanitary sewer overflows Environmental Reduced energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, or provides a carbon sink Reestablishment of natural hydrograph Water temperature improvements Community Community involvement Enhance and/or create recreational and public use areas
Sources:
information
UWMPs, AWMPs
Regional Report, Mid-San Joaquin Regional Flood Management Plan, etc.
TMDLs, IRWMPs
Bulletin 118
documents, Permits, Recharge studies, Disadvantaged community information, City and County ordinances
37 10/4/2017
Channel)
TMDL Priority Pollutants Pollutant Removal Unit (Reduction Indicators) Methylmercury Sulfate – measured via EC µs/cm Total mercury in sediment mg/kg pH Fish tissue mg/kg Mercury Total mercury (THg) ng/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) mg/L Ratio between mercury and TSS (Hg/TSS) mg/kg Concentrations of Hg in fish tissue mg/kg Diazinon Ceriodaphnia dubia mortality % mortality of population Ceriodaphnia mortality % mortality of population Acute toxic units (TUa) µg/L Chronic toxic units (TUc) µg/L Chlorpyrifos Acute toxic units (TUa) µg/L Chronic toxic units (TUc) µg/L Selenium Selenium µg/L Salt / Salinity TDS mg/L EC (surrogate for TDS) µs/cm Boron Boron mg/L Diuron Diuron µg/L NOEC (freshwater green algae) µg/L EC50 (freshwater green algae) EC50 Dissolved Oxygen Ammonia (as N) mg/L Phosphate (much less significant) mg/L per 303(d) listed waterbody impairments, add bacteria and pyrethroids
and San Joaquin Rivers
Ceres, Oakdale, Newman, Waterford, Riverbank, Patterson, Hughson
40 10/4/2017
Stanislaus Multi-Agency Storm Water Resource Plan
TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SIGN-IN SHEET - 10/5/2017
N A M E A G E N C Y P H O N E # E M A I L A D D R E S S A D D R E S S
( > \ \ To r v
[ V \ 0 "OTkyn
^ DlLjQ^S ^ / W b < l j i . 3 r D ^ A i ^ . C J D T ^
Tiucrt^ *SrT
yi^6<l^j?ro '?,5:35y
K I C I
C\-V^ PaHeys^TT) roera nos @ci. paHe^y
C a a X
poeo>c(£Lp-7 Pa.4jer^yi^ ^S^ua
94r\■8~lH-■^^7-^8
X I I I
' . M c i < ' < ^ a . i A @ C ( h < ) ^ u r z r f ^ r | < r .
^ [01 Ue^Ct^-oCzL^
°i5"SSU>
4-Z/
Leslie
I d o w ^ ^ j ^ M a ^ c
9 6 ^ 1
j c x
^ C
M t " '
^ ( k p Q . 4 h
'lb.
'C T e-^X-Uy 5i!E.</^^
m^'^hCA 9^35--^
M
^ u t l A W a v ^ z
C ^ i l y
/ U
U s t
V ) C i l u a r Y z ^ K i f ^ f e a g
. i i fi 1
1 1 > T Z a
^ k , S A V ^ ^ C , 4
' ) S J S 9
A u ) U e S U C M j L
4|^-?,21>310C)
\ i ; k f t k x e g W O i J c W I c
l U r t ,
/ 0 | s 4 -
J
SaA^n/jbLO CA '^ife.'Tn "ST
I 2 & q a i ' c i c ^ J■l 1 t J l ' \ Z | 1 f ^
\5P-5
SAc-ii,\A'^To QJ\
1