stops as yields
safety effects of the idaho law
stops as yields safety effects of the idaho law but first, some - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
stops as yields safety effects of the idaho law but first, some local outrage Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning CP 298-5 S pring 2008 Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning CP 298-5 S pring 2008
safety effects of the idaho law
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
safety effects of the idaho law
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Passed in 1982, the “Idaho Law”:
stop sign as a yield sign;
Advocates in other states, including California, have proposed this, but politically it is difficult, particularly given opposition from high-level “ vehicular cyclists.” S erious efforts have occurred t wice in Oregon.
Evidently, no one has studied the effects of this law.
inform the debate over whether to adopt the rule in other states.
Source: http://www.velorution.biz/images/Velorution%20- %20Yield%20sign%20held%20by%20girls%20small.jpg (accessed May 3, 2008)
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Many everyday bicyclists support this designation. They argue:
can travel j ust as fast with lower visibility and lower maneuverability;
–Better sensory awareness (hearing, seeing, vibration) –Travel speeds are slower –Choosing speed to take intersection enhances safety and mobility
the energy and versatility benefits of bicycling; allow bicycling its full glory
igns and signals are an imposition of motor vehicle dominance.
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Some, notably Vehicular Cyclists, oppose this designation.
They argue: “ Bicyclists fare best when they act as and are treated as vehicles”
lippery slope when treated differently; will lose rights (based on important history);
–(Laws can be changed.)
S
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
A primary concern is that of child safety.
tudies generally support that instruct ion and parental rules are effective
–Increases awareness –Changes behavior (compliance) –Reduces inj ury
upervision is key with or without the law Net herlands, 13x fewer fat alit ies, begin educat ing in kindergart en.
(Pucher, 2002) Source: www.bikearlington.com/cImg/rodeo12.jpg
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
“Kurt’s Family,” http://www.biketreasurevalley.org/node/136
Age adjustments are one of the most important issues in comparing places.
A stops as yields law could be specified for those above a certain age, e.g., age 16 and above, j ust as helmet laws are often for minors or age 16 and below.
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Compare Idaho’s places:
– S ize and density – Percent bicycling (by age, gender, S ES , etc.)
– Facilities – Culture
– Temperature – Precipitation
– Topography – Altitude
Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008
Population 42,000; Bronze star from LAB (engineering) Population 204,027; No bicycle-friendly designation found.
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Unique environment, hard to match, but supportive & some data exists:
bike to work
cenic Cycling is Nearby (S PIN)
tate Community Bicycle Congress
Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Coeur d’Alene:
imilar issues as Boise
Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pullman, Washington & Moscow, Idaho pair nicely :
Source: google maps, map view, accessed May 3, 2008
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pullman, Washington & Moscow, Idaho pair nicely :
Source: google maps, map view, accessed May 3, 2008
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Pullman, Washington & Moscow, Idaho pair nicely :
Source: google maps, map view, accessed May 3, 2008 Source: http://pedals2people.org/blog/blogs/p2p/archive/2007/09.aspx, accessed May 3, 2008
Village Bicycle Project is based in Moscow
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Differences between places: Data? Observations?
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
% Disobeying Signal % Disobeying Stop Sign % Ride-out Crashes Santa Barbara 5 17 6 Austin 8 20 14 Gainesville 12 38 11
Data Approach:
Observational Approach:
How often?
Of interest:
Source: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES: FINAL REPOR. William W. Hunter, J. Richard Stewart, Jane C. Stutts, Herman H. Huang, and Wayne E. 1999, FHWA-RD-99–034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
% Disobeying Signal % Disobeying Stop Sign % Ride-out Crashes Santa Barbara 5 17 6 Austin 8 20 14 Gainesville 12 38 11
Data Approach:
Observational Approach:
How often?
Of interest:
Source: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES: FINAL REPOR. William W. Hunter, J. Richard Stewart, Jane C. Stutts, Herman H. Huang, and Wayne E. 1999, FHWA-RD-99–034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA
“In Gainesville… many bicyclists ran stop signs, but … motor vehicles had adapted to this behavior and crash risk was minimal.” – Hunter et al.
G a i n s e v i l l e : S a f e t y i n N u m b e r s ?
2.27X SAFER!?
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Video analysis, comparable intersections:
afe to Dangerous continuum
– Correlates to inj ury rates?
Source: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES: FINAL REPOR. William W. Hunter, J. Richard Stewart, Jane C. Stutts, Herman H. Huang, and Wayne E. 1999, FHWA-RD-99–034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Very supportive, some data exists:
datasets:
ignals, but no stop signs
urveys?
for longitudinal analysis
Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008
– “YOU MUST COME TO OUR OFFICE.”
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Very supportive, some data exists:
datasets:
ignals, but no stop signs
urveys?
for longitudinal analysis
Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008
– “YOU MUST COME TO OUR OFFICE.” S
évi for Lorien Technologies Wiki Commons. http:/ / en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ Image:Microfiche_card.JPG
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Comparing cities by Census and reported collisions:
Limit at ions: t oo many t o ment ion.
Source: ACS 2006. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/SQuest05.pdf
BUT IT’ S THE BES T WE GOT. Like a taxi with your (motor? ) bike? (Am. Comm. S urvey is unusable.)
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
S
BAKERS FIELD BOIS E S ACRAMENTO
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
BOISE 185,787 104,591 1.56% 103 to 127 39,078 (21.03% ) 17.4% 2913.1/ sq mi. (69% ) 2800 ft 0.0630 to 0.0776 0.000 2000 Census/SWITRS, 1999 IDAHO Population Workforce (>16 years) % Bicycling to work Bicycle Inj uries 2000 Population under 15 % Higher Education Population Density Elevation Inj ury-Commute Ratio Fatality-Commute Ratio SACRAMENTO 407,018 166,419 1.35% 225 93,395 (22.95% ) 19.8% 4189.25/ sq. mile <200 ft 0.1012 0.0016
LIKE TO REPEAT FOR MULTIPLE YEARS
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
BOISE 185,787 104,591 1.56% 103 to 127 39,078 (21.03% ) 17.4% 2,913.1/ sq mi. 2800 ft 0.0660 to 0.0880 0.000 2000 Census/SWITRS, 2000 IDAHO Population Workforce (>16 years) % Bicycling to work Bicycle Inj uries 2000 Population under 15 % Higher Education Population Density Elevation Inj ury-Commute Ratio Fatality-Commute Ratio BAKERSFIELD 247,057 99,769 0.53% (1/ 3) 84 68,023 (27.53% ) 8.8% 2,184.4/ sq mi (75% ) 400 ft 0.1591 0.0019
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
ACS limitation: cannot use
S WITRS report limitations:
WITRS , 2002-2006).
) Idaho data limitations:
General limitations:
(Evidently.)
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Apart from safety issues, what would be the effect of massive implementation of the Idaho Law?
Fault and Citations avoided:
Energy saved? Bicycling increases? Inj ury avoided?
afer when clarified (avoid yougo-noyougo conflicts)
Design effects (traffic calming on bikeways):
The effect of long-distance bicycling on ulnar and median nerves: an electrophysiologic evaluation of cyclist palsy. Akuthota, et al. 2005. American Journal of Sports Medicine.
Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry
Jason Meggs Phone: (510) 725-9991 Email: j meggs@ berkeley.edu