stops as yields safety effects of the idaho law but first, some - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stops as yields
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

stops as yields safety effects of the idaho law but first, some - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stops as yields safety effects of the idaho law but first, some local outrage Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning CP 298-5 S pring 2008 Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning CP 298-5 S pring 2008


slide-1
SLIDE 1

stops as yields

safety effects of the idaho law

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

but first, some local outrage…

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

slide-7
SLIDE 7

stops as yields

safety effects of the idaho law

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

background

Passed in 1982, the “Idaho Law”:

  • Allows bicyclists to treat

stop sign as a yield sign;

  • Red light as stop sign.

Advocates in other states, including California, have proposed this, but politically it is difficult, particularly given opposition from high-level “ vehicular cyclists.” S erious efforts have occurred t wice in Oregon.

Evidently, no one has studied the effects of this law.

  • To better understand the benefits and drawbacks of the law would better

inform the debate over whether to adopt the rule in other states.

Source: http://www.velorution.biz/images/Velorution%20- %20Yield%20sign%20held%20by%20girls%20small.jpg (accessed May 3, 2008)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

arguments for

Many everyday bicyclists support this designation. They argue:

  • A bicycle is a hybrid between car and pedestrian;
  • pedestrians (including runners and people using wheelchairs) don’ t have to stop, and

can travel j ust as fast with lower visibility and lower maneuverability;

  • Motorists usually don’ t stop either, but present more risk & do more damage;
  • Bicyclists are more motivated to and better able to identify and avoid danger

–Better sensory awareness (hearing, seeing, vibration) –Travel speeds are slower –Choosing speed to take intersection enhances safety and mobility

  • The Idaho Law promotes bicycling;
  • The energy to stop and start is very significant;
  • The law codifies existing behavior, so would reduce penalization and resentment
  • Tethering bicycles to motor vehicle rules is bicycle inferiorit y complex and squanders

the energy and versatility benefits of bicycling; allow bicycling its full glory

  • S

igns and signals are an imposition of motor vehicle dominance.

  • Walkers and bikers wait at expensive signals designed to maximize motor throughput
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

arguments against

Some, notably Vehicular Cyclists, oppose this designation.

They argue: “ Bicyclists fare best when they act as and are treated as vehicles”

  • S

lippery slope when treated differently; will lose rights (based on important history);

  • Respect from the public comes from being law-abiding.

–(Laws can be changed.)

S

  • me cyclists and non-cyclists alike express safety concerns
  • Won’ t this promote dangerous behavior?
  • Won’ t people get in more crashes?
  • What about the children?
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

children?

A primary concern is that of child safety.

  • Children are in the highest risk group.
  • Does a law change child behavior?
  • In Idaho, children are taught to stop at signs
  • S

tudies generally support that instruct ion and parental rules are effective

–Increases awareness –Changes behavior (compliance) –Reduces inj ury

  • S

upervision is key with or without the law Net herlands, 13x fewer fat alit ies, begin educat ing in kindergart en.

(Pucher, 2002) Source: www.bikearlington.com/cImg/rodeo12.jpg

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

“Kurt’s Family,” http://www.biketreasurevalley.org/node/136

Age adjustments are one of the most important issues in comparing places.

A stops as yields law could be specified for those above a certain age, e.g., age 16 and above, j ust as helmet laws are often for minors or age 16 and below.

a boise family

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

study design

Compare Idaho’s places:

  • With places that don’ t have the rule
  • Borders 6 states, 1 Canadian province
  • Match on:
  • Population:

– S ize and density – Percent bicycling (by age, gender, S ES , etc.)

  • Land use
  • Bicycle friendliness:

– Facilities – Culture

  • Climate:

– Temperature – Precipitation

  • Geography:

– Topography – Altitude

Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008

Population 42,000; Bronze star from LAB (engineering) Population 204,027; No bicycle-friendly designation found.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

Boise

Unique environment, hard to match, but supportive & some data exists:

  • Census: 1.65%

bike to work

  • Altitude: 2800 ft. (high desert)
  • Density: 2913.1/ sq mi.
  • Bicycle culture: YES!
  • Boise Bike Week
  • Treasure Valley Cycling Alliance
  • S

cenic Cycling is Nearby (S PIN)

  • Boise S

tate Community Bicycle Congress

  • CommuterRide (County)
  • Boise Bicycle Proj ect
  • Not much bike theft?

Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008

  • Garren. 2007.5th and Grove Sts. www.flickr.com/photos/ecosnake/360132530/
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

smaller towns

Coeur d’Alene:

  • Pop. 42,000
  • Also unique in many ways:
  • S

imilar issues as Boise

  • LAB Bronze star, Engineering
  • Geographic barriers
  • Is there a good match?

Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

little places

Pullman, Washington & Moscow, Idaho pair nicely :

  • Both are college towns, similar sizes, although Pullman is more hilly
  • Unfortunately, neither keeps collision records
  • Public records act request would take months
  • Border town concern: does proximity negate effects of law?

Source: google maps, map view, accessed May 3, 2008

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

little places

Pullman, Washington & Moscow, Idaho pair nicely :

  • Both are college towns, similar sizes, although Pullman is more hilly
  • Unfortunately, neither keeps collision records
  • Public records act request would take months
  • Border town concern: does proximity negate effects of law?

Source: google maps, map view, accessed May 3, 2008

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

little places

Pullman, Washington & Moscow, Idaho pair nicely :

  • Both are college towns, similar sizes, although Pullman is more hilly
  • Unfortunately, neither keeps collision records
  • Public records act request would take months
  • Border town concern: does proximity negate effects of law?

Source: google maps, map view, accessed May 3, 2008 Source: http://pedals2people.org/blog/blogs/p2p/archive/2007/09.aspx, accessed May 3, 2008

Village Bicycle Project is based in Moscow

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

methodology

Differences between places: Data? Observations?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

% Disobeying Signal % Disobeying Stop Sign % Ride-out Crashes Santa Barbara 5 17 6 Austin 8 20 14 Gainesville 12 38 11

getting the goods

Data Approach:

  • Rates of bicycle inj uries and fatalities?
  • Data scarce and incompatible
  • Must differentiate children from adults

Observational Approach:

  • Video of behavior:
  • How risky?

How often?

  • Drivers too.
  • Conduct surveys?

Of interest:

  • More or less likely to use a bicycle?
  • Motorists more or less aware?
  • Adaptation has been seen elsewhere

Source: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES: FINAL REPOR. William W. Hunter, J. Richard Stewart, Jane C. Stutts, Herman H. Huang, and Wayne E. 1999, FHWA-RD-99–034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

% Disobeying Signal % Disobeying Stop Sign % Ride-out Crashes Santa Barbara 5 17 6 Austin 8 20 14 Gainesville 12 38 11

getting the goods

Data Approach:

  • Rates of bicycle inj uries and fatalities?
  • Data scarce and incompatible
  • Must differentiate children from adults

Observational Approach:

  • Video of behavior:
  • How risky?

How often?

  • Drivers too.
  • Conduct surveys?

Of interest:

  • More or less likely to use a bicycle?
  • Motorists more or less aware?
  • Adaptation has been seen elsewhere

Source: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES: FINAL REPOR. William W. Hunter, J. Richard Stewart, Jane C. Stutts, Herman H. Huang, and Wayne E. 1999, FHWA-RD-99–034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA

“In Gainesville… many bicyclists ran stop signs, but … motor vehicles had adapted to this behavior and crash risk was minimal.” – Hunter et al.

G a i n s e v i l l e : S a f e t y i n N u m b e r s ?

2.27X SAFER!?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

comparing behavior

Video analysis, comparable intersections:

  • Bicycle rates
  • Amount of compliance
  • Level of Risk
  • S

afe to Dangerous continuum

  • Validate!

– Correlates to inj ury rates?

Source: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE LANES VERSUS WIDE CURB LANES: FINAL REPOR. William W. Hunter, J. Richard Stewart, Jane C. Stutts, Herman H. Huang, and Wayne E. 1999, FHWA-RD-99–034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

boise data

Very supportive, some data exists:

  • GIS

datasets:

  • Roads
  • Bike routes (recent bicycle plan)
  • S

ignals, but no stop signs

  • S
  • me bike counts
  • Collision database NOT geocoded
  • Untapped resource: advocacy stories
  • S

urveys?

  • Collisions: Excel for 1997 on
  • Can hand-codify back to 1987
  • Unfortunately, there’ s nothing around 1982

for longitudinal analysis

Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008

  • Wait, this just in: MICROFICHE!

– “YOU MUST COME TO OUR OFFICE.”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

boise data

Very supportive, some data exists:

  • GIS

datasets:

  • Roads
  • Bike routes (recent bicycle plan)
  • S

ignals, but no stop signs

  • S
  • me bike counts
  • Collision database NOT geocoded
  • Untapped resource: advocacy stories
  • S

urveys?

  • Collisions: Excel for 1997 on
  • Can hand-codify back to 1987
  • Unfortunately, there’ s nothing around 1982

for longitudinal analysis

Source: google maps, terrain view, accessed May 3, 2008

  • Wait, this just in: MICROFICHE!

– “YOU MUST COME TO OUR OFFICE.” S

  • urce: Ianaré S

évi for Lorien Technologies Wiki Commons. http:/ / en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ Image:Microfiche_card.JPG

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

simple ecological study

Comparing cities by Census and reported collisions:

Limit at ions: t oo many t o ment ion.

Source: ACS 2006. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/SQuest05.pdf

BUT IT’ S THE BES T WE GOT. Like a taxi with your (motor? ) bike? (Am. Comm. S urvey is unusable.)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

CLIMATES

S

  • urce: http:/ / www.eldoradocountyweather.com/ current/ climate/ us-city-climates.html

BAKERS FIELD BOIS E S ACRAMENTO

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

sacramento v. boise: capitals compared

BOISE 185,787 104,591 1.56% 103 to 127 39,078 (21.03% ) 17.4% 2913.1/ sq mi. (69% ) 2800 ft 0.0630 to 0.0776 0.000 2000 Census/SWITRS, 1999 IDAHO Population Workforce (>16 years) % Bicycling to work Bicycle Inj uries 2000 Population under 15 % Higher Education Population Density Elevation Inj ury-Commute Ratio Fatality-Commute Ratio SACRAMENTO 407,018 166,419 1.35% 225 93,395 (22.95% ) 19.8% 4189.25/ sq. mile <200 ft 0.1012 0.0016

LIKE TO REPEAT FOR MULTIPLE YEARS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

bakersfield v. boise: compared

BOISE 185,787 104,591 1.56% 103 to 127 39,078 (21.03% ) 17.4% 2,913.1/ sq mi. 2800 ft 0.0660 to 0.0880 0.000 2000 Census/SWITRS, 2000 IDAHO Population Workforce (>16 years) % Bicycling to work Bicycle Inj uries 2000 Population under 15 % Higher Education Population Density Elevation Inj ury-Commute Ratio Fatality-Commute Ratio BAKERSFIELD 247,057 99,769 0.53% (1/ 3) 84 68,023 (27.53% ) 8.8% 2,184.4/ sq mi (75% ) 400 ft 0.1591 0.0019

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

data challenges

ACS limitation: cannot use

  • lumps taxi rides and motorcycle rides with bicycling in their “ other” category.
  • I wrote them to request & emphasize importance (for Census 2010 too!)
  • Please writ e t hem as well and follow-up t o t heir form response.

S WITRS report limitations:

  • Inj ury is one category (does not match Idaho KABCO scale)
  • No age data by city
  • California, roughly 25%
  • f inj uries are under 16 years (S

WITRS , 2002-2006).

  • In 2006, under 15 made up 10.3%
  • f fatalities and 20.7%
  • f inj uries.
  • Begins in 2000, so no 1999 exact comparison; also, delete after 10 years (!?

) Idaho data limitations:

  • Fault and who suffered inj ury not specified (assume bicyclist, most severely)

General limitations:

  • how does police classification of failure to yield differ?
  • Are we sure both ignore bicycle-only collisions?

(Evidently.)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

implications of adoption

Apart from safety issues, what would be the effect of massive implementation of the Idaho Law?

Fault and Citations avoided:

  • Bicyclists are more protected by law

Energy saved? Bicycling increases? Inj ury avoided?

  • Repetitive stress inj ury increases with repeated hard stops
  • Are there other dangers from stopping?
  • Personal safety, rear-ending?
  • S

afer when clarified (avoid yougo-noyougo conflicts)

Design effects (traffic calming on bikeways):

  • Increased use of stop signs leads to increased emissions and noise?
  • May work against adoption of barriers and other forms of traffic calming

The effect of long-distance bicycling on ulnar and median nerves: an electrophysiologic evaluation of cyclist palsy. Akuthota, et al. 2005. American Journal of Sports Medicine.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Pedestrian & Bicycle Planning – CP 298-5 – S pring 2008 – Jason Meggs: Idaho Law Inquiry

thank you

Jason Meggs Phone: (510) 725-9991 Email: j meggs@ berkeley.edu