Stochastic Gravitational Wave Detection Nima Laal Oregon State - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stochastic gravitational wave detection
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stochastic Gravitational Wave Detection Nima Laal Oregon State - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stochastic Gravitational Wave Detection Nima Laal Oregon State University NANOGrav Collaboration Artwork by Sandbox Studio, Chicago with Corinne Mucha Taken from symmetrymagazine.org Stochastic Sources are: isotropic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stochastic Gravitational Wave Detection

Nima Laal Oregon State University NANOGrav Collaboration

Artwork by Sandbox Studio, Chicago with Corinne Mucha Taken from symmetrymagazine.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background (SGWB)

  • Sources are:

○ isotropic ○ independent ○ point-like ○ many ○ far away

  • Gravitational waves from such

sources correlate photons’

  • geodesics. Pulsar Timing

Array (PTA) is used to observe the correlations.

Animation by R. Hurt - Caltech / JPL

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Credit: NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT Collaboration via Nature

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Problem of Detection

Stochastic gravitational wave behaves like noise in a PTA data set; however, it is not the

  • nly source of noise. So, how

to tell if a noise is SGWB?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

You look for this Hellings and Downs curve, which is hard to extract from a PTA data, but it is THE definite proof for existence of SGWB.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The First Step: Noise Analysis

The easiest way to distinguish noises from each other is through their power spectral density. The Powerlaw Model:

Spectral index Power Amplitude Reference Frequency Frequency

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Colored Noise

Terminology

  • The most common colored

noises in a PTA data set are:

○ Red: any noise with positive spectral index ○ White: any noise with zero spectral index

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A Toy Model

A pulsar with only one white,

  • ne red, and one SGWB

component and all deterministic signals removed

All surviving signals are assumed to be random noises following a powerlaw spectral density model with SGWB noise having a spectral index of ! = 13/3 (red noise).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Data = GW + Red Noise + White Noise White noise dominates at high frequencies Red noise could dominate at low frequencies

slide-10
SLIDE 10

You see the problem? Not only the “SGWB” is weak, it is also hidden by high white noise signal. In addition, it is not deterministic!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

In reality…

  • SGWB is Red, and that is a

problem!

  • Deterministic signals need to

be removed

○ spin down period, ephemeris variation, pulsar sky location variation, equipment change,…

  • Stochastic signals need to be

understood and well modeled

○ SGWB, receiver noise, clock noise, interstellar medium fluctuations, …

  • Our models become

computationally expensive

slide-12
SLIDE 12

So, how do we do the noise analysis?

  • We simply wait long enough

(so far 15 years) for the red noises to dominate the white noises (at least in low frequencies)

  • We focus more on the lower

frequency bins of our data.

  • While waiting, we constantly

improve the effectiveness of

  • ur Bayesian models in

detecting any trace of a Red noise process that can potentially be a SGWB.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

We Detect!

Credit: NANOGrav 11 Year and 12.5 Year (draft) papers