stochastic equations of super l evy process with general
play

Stochastic Equations of Super-L evy Process with General Branching - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stochastic Equations of Super-L evy Process with General Branching Mechanism Xu Yang (Joint work with Hui He and Zenghu Li) Beijing Normal University June 18, 2012 Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L evy Process with General


  1. Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism Xu Yang (Joint work with Hui He and Zenghu Li) Beijing Normal University June 18, 2012 Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 1 / 11

  2. Content Introduction Main results Proof of Theorem 2 Further result: SPDE driven by α -stable noise Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 2 / 11

  3. Introduction Let { X t : t ≥ 0 } be a binary branching super-Brownian motion (SBM). Then X t ( dx ) = X t ( x ) dx and the density is the unique positive weak solution to (Konno-Shiga (1988) and Reimers (1989)): ∂ X t ( x ) = 1 X t ( x ) ˙ � 2 ∆ X t ( x ) + W t ( x ) , t ≥ 0 , x ∈ R , (1) ∂ t where ˙ W t ( x ) is the derivative of a space-time Gaussian white noise (GWN). • The pathwise uniqueness for (1) is unknown. Progress: Perkins, Sturm, Mytnik, etc. • Xiong (2012) studied the pathwise uniqueness to SPDE for the distribution function process of the SBM. Pathwise uniqueness to similar equation see Dawson and Li (2012). • This talk is to generalize the result of Xiong (2012) to the super-L´ evy process with general branching mechanism. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 3 / 11

  4. Introduction Let { X t : t ≥ 0 } be a binary branching super-Brownian motion (SBM). Then X t ( dx ) = X t ( x ) dx and the density is the unique positive weak solution to (Konno-Shiga (1988) and Reimers (1989)): ∂ X t ( x ) = 1 X t ( x ) ˙ � 2 ∆ X t ( x ) + W t ( x ) , t ≥ 0 , x ∈ R , (1) ∂ t where ˙ W t ( x ) is the derivative of a space-time Gaussian white noise (GWN). • The pathwise uniqueness for (1) is unknown. Progress: Perkins, Sturm, Mytnik, etc. • Xiong (2012) studied the pathwise uniqueness to SPDE for the distribution function process of the SBM. Pathwise uniqueness to similar equation see Dawson and Li (2012). • This talk is to generalize the result of Xiong (2012) to the super-L´ evy process with general branching mechanism. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 3 / 11

  5. Introduction Let { X t : t ≥ 0 } be a binary branching super-Brownian motion (SBM). Then X t ( dx ) = X t ( x ) dx and the density is the unique positive weak solution to (Konno-Shiga (1988) and Reimers (1989)): ∂ X t ( x ) = 1 X t ( x ) ˙ � 2 ∆ X t ( x ) + W t ( x ) , t ≥ 0 , x ∈ R , (1) ∂ t where ˙ W t ( x ) is the derivative of a space-time Gaussian white noise (GWN). • The pathwise uniqueness for (1) is unknown. Progress: Perkins, Sturm, Mytnik, etc. • Xiong (2012) studied the pathwise uniqueness to SPDE for the distribution function process of the SBM. Pathwise uniqueness to similar equation see Dawson and Li (2012). • This talk is to generalize the result of Xiong (2012) to the super-L´ evy process with general branching mechanism. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 3 / 11

  6. Introduction Let { X t : t ≥ 0 } be a binary branching super-Brownian motion (SBM). Then X t ( dx ) = X t ( x ) dx and the density is the unique positive weak solution to (Konno-Shiga (1988) and Reimers (1989)): ∂ X t ( x ) = 1 X t ( x ) ˙ � 2 ∆ X t ( x ) + W t ( x ) , t ≥ 0 , x ∈ R , (1) ∂ t where ˙ W t ( x ) is the derivative of a space-time Gaussian white noise (GWN). • The pathwise uniqueness for (1) is unknown. Progress: Perkins, Sturm, Mytnik, etc. • Xiong (2012) studied the pathwise uniqueness to SPDE for the distribution function process of the SBM. Pathwise uniqueness to similar equation see Dawson and Li (2012). • This talk is to generalize the result of Xiong (2012) to the super-L´ evy process with general branching mechanism. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 3 / 11

  7. • D ( R ) := { f : f is bounded right continuous increasing and f ( −∞ ) = 0 } . M ( R ) := { finite Borel measures on R } . There is a 1-1 correspondence between D ( R ) and M ( R ) assigning a measure to its distribution function. We endow D ( R ) with the topology induced by this correspondence from the weak convergence topology of M ( R ) . • The branching mechanism φ : � ∞ ( e − z λ − 1 + z λ ) m ( dz ) . φ ( λ ) = b λ + c λ 2 / 2 + 0 • M ( R ) -valued { X t } process is called a super-L´ evy process if � E µ � � exp [ −� X t , f � ] = exp {−� µ, v t �} , ∂ ∂ t v t ( x ) = Av t ( x ) + φ ( v t ( x )) , v 0 ( x ) = f ( x ) . Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 4 / 11

  8. • D ( R ) := { f : f is bounded right continuous increasing and f ( −∞ ) = 0 } . M ( R ) := { finite Borel measures on R } . There is a 1-1 correspondence between D ( R ) and M ( R ) assigning a measure to its distribution function. We endow D ( R ) with the topology induced by this correspondence from the weak convergence topology of M ( R ) . • The branching mechanism φ : � ∞ ( e − z λ − 1 + z λ ) m ( dz ) . φ ( λ ) = b λ + c λ 2 / 2 + 0 • M ( R ) -valued { X t } process is called a super-L´ evy process if � E µ � � exp [ −� X t , f � ] = exp {−� µ, v t �} , ∂ ∂ t v t ( x ) = Av t ( x ) + φ ( v t ( x )) , v 0 ( x ) = f ( x ) . Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 4 / 11

  9. • D ( R ) := { f : f is bounded right continuous increasing and f ( −∞ ) = 0 } . M ( R ) := { finite Borel measures on R } . There is a 1-1 correspondence between D ( R ) and M ( R ) assigning a measure to its distribution function. We endow D ( R ) with the topology induced by this correspondence from the weak convergence topology of M ( R ) . • The branching mechanism φ : � ∞ ( e − z λ − 1 + z λ ) m ( dz ) . φ ( λ ) = b λ + c λ 2 / 2 + 0 • M ( R ) -valued { X t } process is called a super-L´ evy process if � E µ � � exp [ −� X t , f � ] = exp {−� µ, v t �} , ∂ ∂ t v t ( x ) = Av t ( x ) + φ ( v t ( x )) , v 0 ( x ) = f ( x ) . Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 4 / 11

  10. Our aim in this talk is that under a mild condition on A , { Y t } , defined by Y t ( x ) = X t ( −∞ , x ] , is the pathwise unique solution to � t � t � Y s ( x ) Y s ( x ) ds + √ c Y t ( x ) = Y 0 ( x ) − b W ( ds , du ) 0 0 0 � ∞ � t � Y s − ( x ) � t z ˜ A ∗ Y s ( x ) ds , + N 0 ( ds , dz , du ) + (2) 0 0 0 0 where W ( ds , du ) is a GWN and ˜ N 0 ( ds , dz , du ) compensated Poisson random measure (CPRM), A ∗ denotes the dual operator of A . • Xiong (2012): A = ∆ / 2 and b = ˜ N 0 = 0. • Key approach: connecting (2) with a backward doubly SDE. Xiong (2012) used an L 2 -argument. We use an L 1 -argument. • For M ( R ) -valued process { X t } , its distribution { Y t } is D ( R ) -valued. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 5 / 11

  11. Our aim in this talk is that under a mild condition on A , { Y t } , defined by Y t ( x ) = X t ( −∞ , x ] , is the pathwise unique solution to � t � t � Y s ( x ) Y s ( x ) ds + √ c Y t ( x ) = Y 0 ( x ) − b W ( ds , du ) 0 0 0 � ∞ � t � Y s − ( x ) � t z ˜ A ∗ Y s ( x ) ds , + N 0 ( ds , dz , du ) + (2) 0 0 0 0 where W ( ds , du ) is a GWN and ˜ N 0 ( ds , dz , du ) compensated Poisson random measure (CPRM), A ∗ denotes the dual operator of A . • Xiong (2012): A = ∆ / 2 and b = ˜ N 0 = 0. • Key approach: connecting (2) with a backward doubly SDE. Xiong (2012) used an L 2 -argument. We use an L 1 -argument. • For M ( R ) -valued process { X t } , its distribution { Y t } is D ( R ) -valued. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 5 / 11

  12. Our aim in this talk is that under a mild condition on A , { Y t } , defined by Y t ( x ) = X t ( −∞ , x ] , is the pathwise unique solution to � t � t � Y s ( x ) Y s ( x ) ds + √ c Y t ( x ) = Y 0 ( x ) − b W ( ds , du ) 0 0 0 � ∞ � t � Y s − ( x ) � t z ˜ A ∗ Y s ( x ) ds , + N 0 ( ds , dz , du ) + (2) 0 0 0 0 where W ( ds , du ) is a GWN and ˜ N 0 ( ds , dz , du ) compensated Poisson random measure (CPRM), A ∗ denotes the dual operator of A . • Xiong (2012): A = ∆ / 2 and b = ˜ N 0 = 0. • Key approach: connecting (2) with a backward doubly SDE. Xiong (2012) used an L 2 -argument. We use an L 1 -argument. • For M ( R ) -valued process { X t } , its distribution { Y t } is D ( R ) -valued. Xu Yang (BNU) Stochastic Equations of Super-L´ evy Process with General Branching Mechanism June 18, 2012 5 / 11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend