Status of the LHCb Experiment LHCb RRB meeting 24 April 2002 on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

status of the lhcb experiment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Status of the LHCb Experiment LHCb RRB meeting 24 April 2002 on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CERN-RRB-2002-070 Status of the LHCb Experiment LHCb RRB meeting 24 April 2002 on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Tatsuya Nakada CERN and Univ. Lausanne 1 The LHCb Collaboration, 45+3 institutes (No change since September 2001) France: FR


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Status of the LHCb Experiment

LHCb RRB meeting 24 April 2002

  • n behalf of the LHCb Collaboration

Tatsuya Nakada CERN and Univ. Lausanne

CERN-RRB-2002-070

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The LHCb Collaboration, 45+3 institutes (No change since September 2001)

France:FR Annecy, Clermont-Ferrand, CPPM Marseille, LAL Orsay Germany:DE

  • Tech. Univ. Dresden, Phys. Inst. Univ. Heidelberg, KIP Univ. Heidelberg,

MPI Heidelberg, Italy:IT Bologna, Cagliari, Ferrara, Firenze, Frascati, Genoa, Milan,

  • Univ. Rome I (La Sapienza), Univ. Rome II(Tor Vergata)

Netherlands:NL NIKHEF Poland:PL Cracow Inst. Nucl. Phys. & Tech. Univ. of Mining and Metallurgy, Warsaw Soltan Inst. Spain:ES

  • Univ. Barcelona, Univ. Santiago de Compostela

Switzerland:CH

  • Univ. Lausanne, Univ. Zürich

UK:GB

  • Univ. Bristol, Univ. Cambridge, Univ. Edinburgh, Univ. Glasgow, IC London,
  • Univ. Liverpool, Univ. Oxford, RAL

CERN Brazil:BR UFRJ, CPBF China:CN IHEP(Beijing), Tsinghua Univ. Russia:RU BINP, INR, ITEP, IHEP, PNPI Romania:RO IFIN-HH (Bucharest) Ukraine:UA

  • Inst. Phys. Tech. (Kharkov), Inst. Nucl. Research (Kiev)

MoU missing signatures: BMBF(Germany), Poland, Brazil, China

Technical Espoo-Vantaa Inst. Tech. (Finland), Geneva Engineering School (Switzerland) Associates: CEFET-RJ (Brazil)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

LHCb “Classic” detector, side view

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Approved in April 2000 Approved in Feb 2001 Approved in Feb 2001 Approved in Nov 2001 Approved in Nov 2001 Approved in Feb 2002 Approved in April 2002

Still to come Inner Tracker Trigger Computing TDR’s

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

General remarks

Magnet: most of money committed. manufacturing tests. Ecal&Hcal: most of the money for raw material committed. module assembly started. Adaptation work of the experimental area in progress. LHCb-light optimization (reducing material budget) affects: VELO minor design change RICH-1 major design change (B field) Tracking(OT/IT) fewer stations but each with better performance Adjusting the construction plan to the new LHC schedule

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Magnet

Well into the production funding responsibility: CF

Al-conductor (manufacturer: Holton GB) Coils (manufacturer: SigmaPhi FR) Yoke (manufacturer: Jebens DE) Power converter -common with ALICE- Thyristor (manufacturer: Schneider Electric FR) Transformer (manufacturer: Trasfor CH)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Bending of the Al conductor

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Calorimeters

funding responsibility: ES, FR, RO, RU, UA, CERN, CF

Detectors

E-cal, H-cal: procurement of material, module assembly

  • n schedule, within budget

SPD-Preshower: EDR completed

Electronics

E/H-cal and Preshower front-end ASIC chips PRR completed, ready for production

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Calorimeters

ECAL : module assembly

490 modules were produced

Assembly rate ~10 modules/day

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Master plates Spacer plates Scintillator tiles HCAL : Production of steel converter and Scintillator

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Preshower : Fiber Gluing Machine

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Re-optimisation

Beam pipe: Be-Al alloy (possibly the first 25 mrad cone with Be)

Current baseline:

  • Tracking strategy being adapted to this configuration
  • Testing robustness, optimizing TT1

Detector designs to reduce material budget: VELO: reduced number of stations (21 vs 25 in TDR) RICH-1: composite mirror and light mirror support Tracking: reduced number of stations (4 vs 9 in TDR) TT1(before the magnet), ST1-ST3(after the magnet) but possibly with larger IT(Si) coverage Small B field @ RICH-1, by removal of shielding plate

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

LHCb-light layout, side view

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

B track efficiencies and ghost rates as functions of pT and p

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Submission of “LHCb-light TDR” toward the end of this year.

  • re-optimized LHCb detector design:

configuration of the tracking stations, VELO modifications RICH-1 design

  • performance bench marks:

tracking efficiencies and physics event yields.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Experimental area

DELPHI dismantling completed. Necessary modification work started.

POINT 8 - UX85 March 2002 Pillar Head Wall

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

VELO

Vacuum tank and mechanics:

  • last design review by the machine groups in April 2001
  • next review in autumn 2002
  • many progresses have been made to validate the design -

funding responsibility: CH, DE, GB, NL test of the vacuum system

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

rectangular bellow prototype

wakefield suppressor test

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

RF foil Si Hybrid Support

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Beetle 1.1 0.25µm CMOS SCTA-VELO DMILL Two radiation hard FE chip prototypes NB: Beetle is the choice for IT and Pile-up.

VELO choice will be made in Autumn.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Outer tracker

Construction of a long (3m) prototype module in Heidelberg Installed in HERA-B

funding responsibility CN, DE, NL, PL, CERN, CF ST1-ST3 in LHCb-light are identical to T7-T9 in OT-TDR

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

OT electronics

TLK2501 TLK2501 TLK2501

OTIS OTIS OTIS OTIS

GOL TLK2501

byteserial-parallel decoder/buffer logic FPGA 16 data 16..128 data valid

G-Link

L1 trigger TTCrx Logic

L0-Id L1-Id counter

event header generator ECS CC-Pc memory manager

Logic

9Mb buffer SRAM

  • r QDR

+0 L0-ID BC-Id .. .. .. +23 L0-ID BC-Id ID-buffer

derandomizer zero suppression derando- mizer buffer data 18..72 event completion

  • utput - buffer

S-Link OTIS OTIS OTIS OTIS

GOL

OTIS OTIS OTIS OTIS

GOL

OTIS OTIS OTIS OTIS

GOL

L1 – buffer board

20Mbyte/s 18.6 Mbyte/s 1.6 Gbps 1.28 Gbps 5.2 Gbps

1.96 Gbps

5.2 Gbps

L1 throttle

DLL: Resolution < 400 ps. Lock Time < 2 µs reached. MEMORY: Tested, fully functional OTIS 1.0 available in July/August

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Bump-bonded assemblies Assemblies on carrier Chips on wafer HPDs

RICH

funding responsibility: GB, IT, CERN HPD R&D Review in June

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

RICH-2 EDR in progress

3d CAD model Assembling the prototype windows

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

LHCb-light →Some redesigning work needed for RICH-1 engineering design: LHCb-light TDR

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Muon

funding responsibility: BR, IT, RU, CERN wiring machine soldering machine wire pitch measurement machine production tools being prepared

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Recuperation of iron blocks from the CERN neutrino beam line for the muon shield front-end board with CARIOCA chip

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Inner Tracker funding responsibility CH, DE, ES, UA

TDR to be submitted autumn of 2002

Si test, detector design and electronics development work in progress and on schedule. Si beam test with Beetle chip

Si ladder thermal test

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Trigger funding responsibility:

Level-0: FR(Calo, µ), IT(Calo), NL(Pile-up) Level-1: CH, DE Higher levels: CF (online filter farm)

TDR to be submitted beginning of 2003

design and prototype construction and testing work in progress and on schedule

735 ns

Level-1 SCI network prototype data transfer test result

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Computing

Online: DAQ and ECS

funding responsibility: CF TDR approved (MoU cost) main responsibility = CERN however missing manpower → help needed from the collaboration

Offline: Software and Computing infrastructure

mid 2004: to be confirmed in alignment with other LHC experiments and LHC-Grid project Performance study for the remaining TDRs: with OO based software and events generated in FR, IT, GB, NL and CERN.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Computing agreement

Core task for the Online and Offline CERN: institutional commitment + manpower contribution from the collaboration → Commitment expressed in a form of “agreement” First signed agreement Event visualization with LAL In preparation GRID related activities (UK) Analysis framework (Brazil) GEANT4 (Russia) SPECS (LAL) etc.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Summary

  • Majority of the TDRs submitted and approved.
  • Construction of Magnet and E/H-Cal modules

proceeding in time and within the budget.

  • Adjustment of the construction plan

to the new LHC schedule in progress.

  • Re-optimization of the detector proceeding as planned.

No cost over-run. Full detector should be ready for the 2007 physics run.