status of geant4 in lhcb s easo ral 30 9 2002 the lhcb
play

Status of GEANT4 in LHCb S. Easo, RAL, 30-9-2002 The LHCb - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Status of GEANT4 in LHCb S. Easo, RAL, 30-9-2002 The LHCb experiment. GEANT4 is used for simulating: RICH testbeam data, HCAL testbeam data. GAUSS Project: LHCb Simulation using GEANT4 with GAUDI. Summary. LHCb Experiment


  1. Status of GEANT4 in LHCb S. Easo, RAL, 30-9-2002 • The LHCb experiment. • GEANT4 is used for simulating: RICH testbeam data, HCAL testbeam data. • GAUSS Project: LHCb Simulation using GEANT4 with GAUDI. • Summary.

  2. LHCb Experiment Precision Measurements of CP violation in the B Meson System. � Large Sample of Events with B d and B s Mesons. � Most of the b hadrons are produced at small polar angles. LHCb: Single Forward Arm Spectrometer with Open Geometry . � From the CP asymmetries in the final states of B-meson decays, Measure CKM Angles. This design is being modified to optimize the performance of LHCb.

  3. RICH detectors in LHCb • To identify charged particles in the momentum range 1-150 GeV/c. • Two detectors: RICH1, RICH2. Momentum range RICH1: Aerogel 2 � 10 GeV/c C 4 F 10 < 70 GeV/c RICH2: CF 4 <150 GeV/c. • Photo Detectors: Baseline solution- HybridPhotodiodes (HPD). • RICH test beam presented: To test the performance of the Aerogel radiator.

  4. Test beam Set-up at CE RN Test Test beam Set-up at CE RN Beam from CERN-PS : p¯ and p/p in the range 6 – 10 GeV/c (? p/p = 1%)

  5. Hybrid • Bialkali photocathode, K 2 CsSb Hybrid • Fountain shaped electric field, Photo demagnification factor ˜ 2.3 Photo • Silicon pad sensor 2048 pixels (16 sectors x 128 pads 1x1 mm² Detectors Detectors 2.3x2.3 mm² granularity on ph.cathode ) AEROGEL test beam Quantum Efficiency of the 4 photocathodes > 20% ( λ =280-380nm)

  6. Simulation of the Testbeam Setup using GEANT4. Mirror Rad. of Curvature=1185 mm. Four Pad Hpds are used. Hpd Mirror Vessel Filter Aerogel

  7. Optical Transmission in Aerogel Green Lines: Photons. Rayleigh Scattered Photons Photons Transmitted without Scattering

  8. Verification of Aerogel and Filter Transmissions Generate Photons: • With a uniform wavelength distribution from 170 to 950 nm. • Uniform X and Y coordinates of origin. • With Z coordinate of origin at 180mm (upstream of Aerogel). • With direction along the Z axis. An Aerogel Tile simulated with: A=0.9368, C=0.00719 micrometer**4/cm. C=Clarity, A=Surface scattering constant. Transmission = A exp(-C * thickness/ wavelength **4 ).

  9. Verification of Aerogel Transmission Red: Photons incident on Aerogel Tile Blue: Photons transmitted out of aerogel from the opposite side, but in the same direction. nm Black: Blue/Red Green: Expected Transmission . nm Photon wavelength in nm

  10. Cherenkov Radiation in Aerogel • Typical Run Configuration in the Testbeam: • 9 GeV/c Pions. • One Novosibirsk Aerogel Tile with thickness = 4 cm. • Filter: Glass D263. • Nitrogen Gas at 1 bar and 292 Kelvin in the Vessel.

  11. Refractive Index of Aerogel Novosibirsk Tile 7*8*4 cm. At 400 nm, Ref.Index=1.03066.

  12. A Typical event in the Testbeam Red lines: Charged particle Green lines : Photons.

  13. Cherenkov Radius on the Photocathode Peak at 146.4 mm. Tails from Rayleigh Scattered Photons. Radius in mm.

  14. Photoelectric Effect at the HPD. •Standard Geant4 processes not applicable in this case. •A Special class created to generate the photoelectrons, which is derived from a GEANT4 base class. •This process uses the quantum efficiency data and the results of Fountain focussing tests. Electron Energy: High Voltage applied. Direction: From Fountain focussing. • The quantum efficieny data includes the loss of photons by reflection at the Hpd quartz window surface.

  15. Photoelectric Effect at the HPD. Red lines: Charged particles Green lines : Photons HPD Quartz Window, Silicon detector .

  16. Hit Creation in the Si Detector. • Implemented using a special process class since the standard Geant4 procedure somewhat too complicated for this purpose. • The Photoelectrons loose all their energy in the Silicon. • The backscattering causes a loss of efficiency in creating hits. • Efficiency = 1.0 - B* N/S where N = threshold cut in terms of width of the pedestal = 4 S= Signal to noise ratio=10 B= backscattering probability=0.18.

  17. Test beam results Test beam results Test beam results • 9 Gev/c p ¯ beam • 4 cm aerogel Novosibirsk • noise/pad < 2% Ring region sect 8 Sector #4 sect 4 Out of ring Sector #8

  18. Photoelectron Yield Photoelectron Yield Photoelectron Yield No Filter Filter D263 Novosibirsk Data 9.7 ± 1.0 6.3 ± 0.7 4 cm MC 11.5 ± 1.2 7.4 ± 0.8 12.2 ± 1.3 9.4 ± 1.0 8 cm 14.7 ± 1.6 10.1 ± 1.1 results are normalised to 2p acceptance 1.13± 0.21 0.67 ± 0.11 4 cm 0.87 ± 0.09 0.55 ± 0.06 (off-ring) Contributions to the total error in MC . 1.38 ± 0.23 1.25 ± 0.21 8 cm 1.34 ± 0.15 0.94 ± 0.10 (off-ring) • QE (+- 10%) 10% results are in units of 10 ¯ ² /cm ² Contributions to total error in real data per • ref. Index variation (+- 5%) 3% HPD • backscattering (+- 2% ) 2% • clarity (+- 2%) 2% • background subtraction (± 1s): 1-> 8% • beam divergence (+-1%) 1% • inefficient or noisy pads : 2-> 7% • Extrapolation to full ring : 5% • separation of on-ring/off-ring (± 2mm): 5 % • signal losses outside ADC thresholds (± 1s): 2%

  19. Cherenkov Angle reconstruction • Results per single photoelectron single photoelectron in (mrad): No filter Filter D263 Thickness ? c ? c s ? s ? 250.0 5.4 247.1 5.0 Data 4 cm MC Aerogel from 248.7 4.0 246.8 3.1 Novosibirsk 246.8 5.8 245.4 4.8 Data 8 cm 245.0 3.9 243.7 3.0 MC Components of s ? in mrad for the case with filter. Pixel size : 1.3 Beam divergence: 0.7 Chromatic: 2.5 Alignment: 2->4 (not included in s ? MC ) Emission Pt: 1.1

  20. HCAL Test beam • HCAL is a sampling device made out of steel as absorber and scintillating tiles are active material. • The scintillating tiles run parallel to the beam axis. • It will provide data for the LHCb hadron trigger. • Using testbeams , the response to particles incident at various angles is studied and is being compared those from simulation.

  21. Energy Response in HCAL Response to 50 GeV/c Pions Histogram : Real Data Dots: Simulation • Testbeam Data , GEANT3 (MICAP +FLUKA). • HCAL TDR. •Testbeam Data, GEANT4. I.Belyaev+A.Berdiouguine et. al

  22. Data and G3 Energy Resolution of HCAL • Testbeam Data, GEANT3 • GEANT3 with GEISHA, FLUKA,MICAP • Testbeam Data , GEANT4 • G4+GEISHA agrees with G3+GEISHA. • Need help to understand and use G4 with QGS+CHIPS Data and G4 • Data � G4 ( QGS+CHIPS) G4(GEISHA) I.Belyaev + A. Berdiouguine et. al

  23. Status of the GAUSS Project • Current MC productions in LHCb use GEANT3. • GAUSS: To simulate LHCb using GEANT4 . • GIGA interface: to use GEANT4 with the GAUDI Framework. Ref: Presentation by W. Pokorski on Wednesday. • Geometry Input: XML database. A version available for all the detectors in LHCb. • Input events: From Pythia or other similar programs through the HEPMC interface into GEANT4. • A first version of the whole Simulation chain is now working. • Starting to study the response of the detectors in detail.

  24. RICH1 with a Particle Gun RICH1 Event Display XML � G4 � OpenGL Pion with 7 GeV/c. Cherenkov Photons In Aerogel and C 4 F 10 . Rayleigh scattering Switched off for Illustration.

  25. Summary • RICH testbeam simulation is performed using GEANT4. • Results of this simulation is compared with Real Data. • HCAL test beam data comparison with GEANT4 in progress. • A Project to perform the LHCb simulation using GEANT4 has started. • We are expecting lot of interactions between the GEANT4 collaboration and LHCb in the coming years.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend