Central Exclusive Production (CEP) at LHCb
Ronan McNulty (UCD Dublin)
- n behalf of the LHCb collaboration
Meson 2018 12 June 2018, Krakow.
- R. McNulty, CEP at LHCb
1
Central Exclusive Production (CEP) at LHCb Ronan McNulty (UCD - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Central Exclusive Production (CEP) at LHCb Ronan McNulty (UCD Dublin) on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Meson 2018 12 June 2018, Krakow. 1 R. McNulty, CEP at LHCb Overview 1. Central Exclusive Physics (CEP) 2. LHCb and HeRSCheL Detector 3.
1
2
NEW
p p
σelastic ≈ 35% σdiffractive ≈ 10% σinelastic ≈ 55%
3
σelastic ≈ 35% σdiffractive ≈ 10% σinelastic ≈ 55%
p p It’s QCD – but not as we normally see it. It’s colour-free
Pomeron (soft)
4
σelastic ≈ 35% σdiffractive ≈ 10% σinelastic ≈ 55%
p p It’s QCD – but not as we normally see it. It’s colour-free
Pomeron (soft)
5
Theory Experiment Future J/ψ , ϒ χc J/ψ J/ψ
σelastic ≈ 35% σdiffractive ≈ 10% σinelastic ≈ 55%
p p
Pomeron (hard and soft)
No activity “rapidity gap”
6
σelastic ≈ 35% σdiffractive ≈ 10% σinelastic ≈ 55%
p p Photon / Pomeron
“rapidity gap” “rapidity gap”
Photon / Pomeron Elastic diffractive: clean environment to study vacuum, and to produce mesons.
7
QED Photo-production Double pomeron exchange Laboratory to study
8
Experimentally: Reconstruct central system and identify rapidity gaps
Elastic Scattering Single Diffraction Double Diffraction Central Exclusive Production (elastic) Central Exclusive Production (inelastic)
y=-10 y=-2 y=0 y=2 y=10 Rough LHCb coverage
9
Veto (Run 1)
7,8 TeV
Elastic Scattering Single Diffraction Double Diffraction Central Exclusive Production (elastic) Central Exclusive Production (inelastic)
y=-10 y=-2 y=0 y=2 y=10 Rough LHCb coverage
10
Veto (Run 2)
13 TeV
11
12
13
14
15
JINST 13 (2018) P04017
16
17
Installation finished in 2014
18
19
Showers induced by high-rapidity particles interacting with machine elements Ideally wish to veto on any activity: threshold depends on signal and noise. JINST 13 (2018) P04017
20
arXiv:1806.04079
21
First bin is > 95% pure CEP QED di-muons.
arXiv:1806.04079
22
arXiv:1806.04079
23
CEP QED looks like empty-empty events Evidence for pile-up (much reduced in p-Pb/Pb-p running)
arXiv:1806.04079
24
25
γγ γP PP p-p Dominant p-Pb Enhanced Supressed Pb-Pb Strongly enhanced Enhanced Supressed
p/A p/A
Data-taking year Energy Integrated Luminosity Paper 2011 7 TeV 945 pb-1 JPG 41 (2014) 115002 2012 8 TeV 1985 pb-1 Data-taking year Energy Integrated Luminosity Paper 2011 7 TeV 945 pb-1 JHEP 09 (2015) 084 2012 8 TeV 1985 pb-1
Data-taking year Energy Integrated Luminosity Paper 2010 7 TeV 37 pb-1 JPG 40 (2013) 045001 2011 7 TeV 930 pb-1 JPG 41 (2014) 055002 2015 13 TeV 204 pb-1 arXiv:1806.04079
26
J/ψ ψ(2S) ϒ J/ψ+J/ψ J/ψ+ψ(2S) NEW
27
10.3204/DESY-PROC-2012-03/58 JHEP 11 (2013) 085
Purity: (found from data)
Number of events
Luminosity Efficiency: (found from data)
P(n) = µ ne−µ n!
Acceptance (MC)
28
29
arXiv:1806.04079
Signal Background
30
Regge theory:
Regge theory:
31
b-slope of signal is same with/without HeRSCheL b-slope of bkg changes (because you veto higher-pT events) New Technique:
ε known from QED sample Pure bkg sample obtained Subtract bkg from total => Signal derived
32
(consistent with 7 TeV pp and HERA extrapolation)
arXiv:1806.04079
33
Systematic uncertainties factor two smaller than previous analysis
NLO agrees better than LO
34
arXiv:1806.04079
LHCb measure Gap Survival Photon Flux Photo-production (HERA / fixed target) HERA measured power-law: Use this for W- solution (in previously measured region). LHCb measures W+
35
36
arXiv:1806.04079
37
arXiv:1806.04079:
38
LHCb-CONF-2018-003 (in preparation)
39
Coherent Incoherent (sensitive to nPDF and saturation)
40
HeRSCheL suppresses incoherent events Coherent Incoherent
LHCb-CONF-2018-003 (in preparation)
41
LHCb-CONF-2018-003 (in preparation)
42
p/A
43
44
g Bzdak, Motyka, Szymanowski, Cudell PRD 75 (2007) 094023 arXiv:0808.2216
Predictions in pessimistic-central-optimistic scenarios
45
Brodsky, Rathsman, Merino, PLB461 (1998) 114. Hagler, Pire, Szymanowski, Teryaev, EPJ26 (2002) 261. Bolz, Ewerz, Maniatis, Nachtmann, Sauter, Schoening, JHEP 1501 (2015) 151.
log10(x) 9 8 7 6 5 log10(Q2) [GeV2] 4 3 2 1
LHCb:
Collision between one well understood parton and
DGLAP-evolved parton.
46
y: 6 4 2 0 2 4 6
log10(x) 9 8 7 6 5 log10(Q2) [GeV2] 4 3 2 1
LHCb:
Collision between one well understood parton and
DGLAP-evolved parton.
J/ψ
47
y: 6 4 2 0 2 4 6
ρ
48
Double-pomeron-exchange processes Glue Laboratory Eur.Phys.J. C72 (2012) 1972 Inclusive X(3872) Clean environment for meson production. Spin and parity analysis possible.
49
Dimuon spectrum having required
JPG 41 (2014) 115002 JPG 41 (2014) 115002
J/ψ J/ψ ψ(2S)
Selection requirement: Require precisely 4 tracks, at least three identified as muons
50
LHCb estimates exclusive cross-section. 24+-9 pb Harland-Lang, Khoze, Ryskin: JPG 42 (2015) 5,055001 2-7 pb
Shape agrees well (theory normalised to data).
51
52
53
54
Clearly not exclusive
55
56
(indicative luminosities)
(~1nb-1) (~30nb-1) (~4ub-1) (~0.4ub-1)
57
58
LHCb-CONF-2011-022
Ldt = 37pb−1