State-Wide Planning and State-Wide Planning and F INAL RE PORT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

state wide planning and state wide planning and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

State-Wide Planning and State-Wide Planning and F INAL RE PORT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OPE GA RE VI E W State-Wide Planning and State-Wide Planning and F INAL RE PORT Management of Information Management of Information Technology Technology JANUARY a r e port by 2006 the Offic e o f Pro g ra m E va lua tio n


slide-1
SLIDE 1

State-Wide Planning and State-Wide Planning and Management of Information Management of Information Technology Technology

a r e port by

the Offic e o f Pro g ra m E va lua tio n & Go ve rnme nt Ac c o unta b ility

F INAL RE PORT

JANUARY

2006

OPE GA RE VI E W

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OPEGA Interim Report: State-Wide Information Systems Management Slide 2

About the Re vie w

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 3

Purpo se ―――――――――――――――――

Is information technology (IT) being planned for and managed in a way that:

  • maximizes the effectiveness and efficiency of

State government; and

  • keeps the State’s exposure to associated

risks at an acceptable level?

OPE GA Se e ks to Answe r the Que stion…

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 4

Q4 ‘05 Q1 ‘06 Q2 ‘06 Q3 ‘06 Q4 ‘06 Q1 ‘07 Q2 ‘07 Q3 ‘07 Q4 ‘07 Q1 ‘08 Q2 ‘08 Q3 ‘08 Q4 ‘08 Q1 ‘09 Q2 ‘09 Q3 ‘09 Q1 ‘10 Q1 ‘10 Q3 ‘10 Q4 ‘10

Inhe r ite d c ur r e nt c onditions F r

  • m pr

e 2005 Ne w OIT Manage me nt te am hir e d Se pt ‘05 F ully imple me nte d E nte r pr ise Or ganization 2008 - 2010 OPE GA/ JWI Risk Asse ssme nt Se pt-Nov ‘05

Purpo se ―――――――――――――――

OPE GA’ s re vie w wa s pe rfo rme d during the initia l pha se s o f OI T Co nso lida tio n.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 5

  • Co mb ine d hig h le ve l Be st Pra c tic e e va lua tio n with

I T Risk Asse ssme nt

  • Co nduc te d re se a rc h o n:

– Sta te ’ s histo ry re la te d to I T – Curre nt o rg a niza tio n a nd pla ns fo r I T – Ro le o f I T in g o ve rnme nt – Mo de ls a nd b e st pra c tic e s re la te d to the pla nning a nd ma na g e me nt o f I T in g o ve rnme nt

  • Pa rtne re d with c o ntra c te d te a m o f spe c ia lize d I

T a udito rs to c o nduc t Risk Asse ssme nt

Me tho ds――――――――――――――――

To answer this question, OPEGA …….

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 6

  • Be st Pra c tic e Mo de ls we re tho se c o nsiste ntly

ide ntifie d b y:

– F e de ra l GAO a nd OMB – NASCI O – Custo me r Ma na g e me nt Co mmunity F

  • rum
  • OPE

GA c o mpa re d c urre nt Sta te situa tio n a nd pla ns to mo de ls

  • Risk Asse ssme nt b a se d o n COBI

T , a n industry sta nda rd fra me wo rk fo r I T risk ma na g e me nt

  • Risk Asse ssme nt to o k b ro a d surve y a ppro a c h

invo lving 31 Sta te o rg a niza tio na l units

Me tho ds ――――――――――――――――

slide-7
SLIDE 7

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 7

Wha t is a Risk Asse ssme nt? ―――――

Government/Quality Objectives What are we trying to ac hie ve ? Risks or Threats to Achievement What c o uld go wro ng? Ho w like ly is it? What’s the po te ntial impac t? Controls Ho w do we pre ve nt it, de te c t it o r re duc e its impac t?

Hig h Risk L

  • w

Risk

L ike lihood Impac t

Exposure What’s the like liho o d and impac t with c o ntro ls in plac e ?

Is it Acceptable?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 8

Risk Asse ssme nt Re sults ―――――

  • JWI

de live re d a de ta ile d re po rt o f the ir re sults to OPE GA in No ve mb e r 2005; re po rt b e c a me pa rt

  • f OPE

GA’ s wo rking pa pe rs

  • De live ra b le s fro m JWI

inc lude d de ta ile d Risk Ma trix a nd re c o mme nde d 3 ye a r a udit pla n

  • De ta ils we re sha re d with CI

O & ke y sta ff; a lso sha re d with GOC a s I nte rim Re po rt

  • Re sults we re inte g ra te d with b e st pra c tic e s

e va lua tio n to de ve lo p finding s/ o b se rva tio ns fo r this re po rt

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OPEGA Interim Report: State-Wide Information Systems Management Slide 9

Bac kgr

  • und
slide-10
SLIDE 10

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 10

  • L

ike a ll o the r o rg a niza tio ns, g o ve rnme nt ha s b e c o me re lia nt o n I T

  • I

T ha s b e c o me a func tio n o r “pro g ra m” tha t itse lf ne e ds to b e he ld a c c o unta b le to pub lic

  • I

T pro vide s c ritic a l infra struc ture tha t must b e c a re fully de ve lo pe d, ma inta ine d a nd ma na g e d

Ro le o f I T in Go ve rnme nt ――――――

slide-11
SLIDE 11

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 11

*Enterprise Architecture Management *IT Investment Management IT Human Capital Management Organizational Structure Management Stra trategic Pl tegic Planning anning *Risk Management Business Continuity & Security Management Fiscal Management Process Process Te Technol nology Peopl People

Fig Figure 3 re 3. Re Relat lation

  • nsh

ship ip amon among g Mana Management nt Contro Controls, Peo , People, le, Proc Processes, and esses, and Techno chnolo logy gy

Modified from US Modified from US GAO GAO

*Knowledge Management Customer Relations Management

I nstitutio na l pra c tic e s, tha t b ring to g e the r pe o ple , pro c e sse s a nd te c hno lo g y to a c hie ve g o a ls, se rve a s hig h- le ve l ma na g e me nt c o ntro ls to mitig a te I T risks. Ma ine ’ s I T is imma ture in re g a rd to ma ny

  • f the se

pra c tic e s. *Be st pra c tic e mo de ls fo r the mo st unfa milia r pra c tic e s a re disc usse d in re po rt.

Be st Pra c tic e s in I T ――――――――――

slide-12
SLIDE 12

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 12

  • I

T de ve lo pme nt in e nviro nme nt o f ra pid te c hno lo g y c ha ng e ; dra stic c ha ng e s in po lic y a nd ma nda te s

  • F

e de ra l g o ve rnme nt funding o f I T g o e s dire c tly to Sta te a g e nc ie s to suppo rt spe c ific pro g ra ms

  • I

mpe tus fo r ve rtic a l inte g ra tio n re sulte d in I T

  • pe ra tio ns

“silo -e d” in e a c h Sta te a g e nc y; I T re so urc e de c isio ns ma de a t a g e nc y le ve l

E vo lutio n o f I T in Ma ine ―――――――

Vertical IS Silos

Figu Figure 4. IS In re 4. IS Integration tegration

Silos = Agency Data Arrows = IS Compatibility

Federal State Local Legislature Education DHHS Program DHHS Program Corrections

slide-13
SLIDE 13

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 13

  • F

ra g me nte d a ppro a c h ha s re sulte d in:

– Curta ile d c a pa c ity to pe rfo rm c o re sta te -le ve l func tio ns – Unc o ntro lle d e xpe nditure o n unc o o rdina te d c o ntra c ts; la c k o f inve stme nt in I S infra struc ture – I ne ffic ie nc ie s, duplic a tio n o f e ffo rts, a nd misse d

  • ppo rtunitie s
  • F

ra g me nte d a ppro a c h with re so urc e c o nstra ints ha s c re a te d I T c ulture o f “o pe ra tio na l e xpe die nc y”

E vo lutio n o f I T in Ma ine ―――――――

slide-14
SLIDE 14

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 14

  • Ope ra tio na l e xpe die nc y ha s re sulte d in:

– L a c k o f me a ning ful fina nc ia l a nd ma na g e me nt info rma tio n – No e nte rprise -wide stra te g ic pla nning fo r I T – L a c k o f sta nda rd, Sta te -wide pro je c t ma na g e me nt pro c e sse s – Ag e nc ie s c o nsta ntly re a c ting to I T c rise s – E xpe nsive re tro fitting o f ne w syste ms – We a k c he c ks a nd b a la nc e s in a c q uisitio ns a nd c o ntra c t o ve rsig ht – E mplo ye e s ha mpe re d b y o ut o f da te syste ms o r pro b le ma tic ne w o ne s

E vo lutio n o f I T in Ma ine ―――――――

slide-15
SLIDE 15

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 15

  • De spite pro b le ms with fra g me nte d a ppro a c h,

Ma ine ha s b e e n slo w to a do pt “e nte rprise ” a ppro a c h to I T

  • Atte mpts to c o o rdina te o r c e ntra lize so me I

T func tio ns b ro ug ht so me suc c e sse s b ut ha ve no t b e e n fa r-re a c hing e no ug h

  • Pla nning fo r ma jo r tra nsfo rma tio n to e nte rprise

a ppro a c h fina lly c o mme nc e d in 2003 with a ppo intme nt o f c urre nt CI O

E vo lutio n o f I T in Ma ine ―――――――

slide-16
SLIDE 16

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 16

  • Re a l tra nsfo rma tio n b e g a n in 2005 with

c o nso lida tio n o f E xe c utive b ra nc h I T into the Offic e o f I nfo rma tio n T e c hno lo g y unde r CI O

  • OI

T c o nso lida tio n:

– inte g ra te s re la tive ly inde pe nde nt I T “unive rse s” tha t ha d va rying re so urc e s a nd prio ritie s – mo ve s Sta te to wa rd I T struc ture tha t a llo ws pla nning & ma na g ing fro m a n “e nte rprise ” pe rspe c tive

  • E

xpe c t 3-5 ye a rs b e fo re full b e ne fits a re re a lize d.

E vo lutio n o f I T in Ma ine ―――――――

slide-17
SLIDE 17

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 17

OI T Org a niza tio n ――――――――――

OIT Resource Sharing

CIO Council IT Executive Committee

CIO

Enterprise Technology Services IT Strategies, Policies and Planning Agency IT Leadership Boards & Committees Statutory: InforME, GeoLibrary, MCJUSTIS, etc. Non-statutory: GIS Executive Committee, ISMG, Accessibility, etc. Partnerships with Agencies focused

  • n delivery & planning of IT

services & projects supporting Agency business initiatives Delivery of Managed Services Enterprise Strategic IT Planning, Policies, Performance Management, and Project Management Oversight Resource management based on service level agreements and priorities of the Administration's leadership Office of Information Technology Final Draft - June 16, 2005 Overall OIT Model

slide-18
SLIDE 18

OPEGA Interim Report: State-Wide Information Systems Management Slide 18

Conc lusions

slide-19
SLIDE 19

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 19

Conclusions

  • A. F
  • r so me time no w, Sta te ’ s histo ric a l

a ppro a c h to pla nning a nd ma na g ing I T ha s no t b e e n a de q ua te to :

  • Ma ximize e ffe c tive ne ss a nd e ffic ie nc y
  • K

e e ps risks to a c c e pta b le le ve ls

Culture o f o pe ra tio na l e xpe die nc y ha s put pla nning , risk ma na g e me nt, so und po lic ie s a nd pro c e dure s o n b a c k b urne r

State is c ur r e ntly e xpose d to unac c e ptable le ve l

  • f IT
  • r

e late d r isk

slide-20
SLIDE 20

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 20

  • B. OI

T c o nso lida tio n is po ise d to sig nific a ntly impro ve situa tio n a s it ta ke s a n e nte rprise a ppro a c h to pla nning a nd ma na g e me nt

  • f I

T a c ro ss E xe c utive b ra nc h

Conclusions

Some additional e le me nts ne e d to be adde d to OIT ’s Str ate gic Plan. E nte r pr ise doe s not c ur r e ntly inc lude Judic ial and L e gislative br anc he s.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 21

  • C. Suc c e ss o f tra nsfo rma tio n e ffo rts de pe nds
  • n CI

O’ s c a pa b ilitie s a nd suppo rt fro m E xe c utive a nd L e g isla tive b ra nc he s. Re la te d risks ne e d to b e mo nito re d a nd ma na g e d b y le a de rs in b o th b ra nc he s.

Conclusions

L e gislatur e has no r e al me c hanism for suppor ting and ove r se e ing e nte r pr ise -wide IT str ate gic plan and tr ansfor mation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

OPEGA Interim Report: State-Wide Information Systems Management Slide 22

F indings and Obse r vations

slide-23
SLIDE 23

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 23

Enterprise Architecture Management

  • a n o rg a niza tio na l b lue print tha t de fine s – in

b usine ss a nd te c hno lo g y te rms – ho w a n

  • rg a niza tio n o pe ra te s to da y, ho w it inte nds

to o pe ra te in the future a nd ho w it inte nds to g e t fro m he re to the re

OPE GA has 3 findings/ obse r vations r e late d to E AM

Ma ine is o nly b e g inning to de ve lo p E A to g uide I T de ve lo pme nt.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 24

F inding

De sc riptio ns o f “a s is” a nd “to b e ” e nviro nme nts ha ve no t ye t b e e n de ve lo pe d.

Manage me nt Ac tion

OI T will c re a te de sc riptio ns o f “a s is” a nd “to b e ” e nviro nme nts with a ll a ppro pria te e le me nts inc luding se q ue nc ing ste ps. CI O will pro vide re g ula r upda te

  • n pro g re ss to o ve rsig ht a nd

a dviso ry b o die s.

F inding 1 ――――――――――――――――

slide-25
SLIDE 25

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 25

F inding

Writte n po lic ie s a nd pro c e dure s a re e ithe r no n- e xiste nt, ina de q ua te o r inc o nsiste nt a c ro ss E xe c utive b ra nc h in a numb e r o f I T a re a s.

Manage me nt Ac tion

Sta nd a rdize d po lic ie s a nd pro c e dure s will b e de ve lo pe d, c o mmunic a te d a nd imple me nte d a c ro ss the e nte rprise . Hig h prio rity issue s first; o the rs a s time a nd re so urc e s pe rmit.

F inding 2 ――――――――――――――――

slide-26
SLIDE 26

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 26

Obse r vation

E nte rprise a ppro a c h is c urre ntly fo c use d o n E xe c utive b ra nc h a nd do e s no t inc lude Judic ia l o r L e g isla tive b ra nc he s; so me impro ve me nt

  • ppo rtunitie s will no t b e

re a lize d.

Re c omme ndations

A. Co nstitutio na l Offic e rs a nd re ps fro m Judic ia l a nd L e g isla tive b ra nc h sho uld a c tive ly pa rtic ipa te o n CI O Co unc il B. Judic ia l a nd L e g isla tive b ra nc he s sho uld e xplo re

  • ppo rtunitie s to c o ntra c t

with OI T

  • C. L

e g isla ture c o uld e sta b lish spe c ific g ro up to ma na g e E A a nd I T inve stme nt fo r who le sta te .

Ob se rva tio n 1 ――――――――――――

slide-27
SLIDE 27

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 27

Investment Management

  • se le c ting a nd c o ntro lling I

T spe nding so a s to ma ximize re turn o n inve stme nt a nd minimize risk.

OPE GA has 2 findings r e late d to IM

Ma ine do e s no t tre a t info rma tio n syste ms a s ma jo r c a pita l a sse ts re q uiring disc ipline d inve stme nt ma na g e me nt.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 28

F inding

Curre nt a c c o unting struc ture s a nd fina nc ia l pra c tic e s do no t pro vide vie w o f I T b udg e ts a nd e xpe nditure s a c ro ss the Sta te a s a who le , o r b y a ny spe c ific a c tivity, pro g ra m o r sta tute .

Manage me nt Ac tions

1. CI O will study fe a sib ility o f e sta b lishing I T a s a “pro g ra m” 2. CI O will initia te e ffo rt to mo dify a c c o unt c o de struc ture s 3. OI T is de ve lo ping ra te struc ture to re fle c t a c tua l c o sts

Re c omme ndation

Judic ia l a nd L e g isla tive b ra nc he s sho uld e xplo re e sta b lishing I T a s “pro g ra m”

F inding 3 ――――――――――――――――

slide-29
SLIDE 29

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 29

F inding

De c isio ns o n I T inve stme nts ha ve no t b e e n ma de fro m a n e nte rprise pe rspe c tive o r b y a c e ntra lize d Sta te e ntity.

Manage me nt Ac tions

1. OI T ’ s e nte rprise a rc hite c ture will g uide I T inve stme nts 2. Pro po se d o r re q ue ste d c a pita l inve stme nts in I T will b e re vie we d a nd a ppro ve d b y OI T ’ s Pro je c t Re vie w Co mmitte e

F inding 4 ――――――――――――――――

slide-30
SLIDE 30

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 30

Risk Management

  • a ddre ssing po te ntia l e ve nts o r situa tio ns tha t

thre a te n the suc c e ssful a c hie ve me nt o f

  • rg a niza tio na l o b je c tive s

OPE GA has 1 finding r e late d to RM

Ma ine ha s no t e mplo ye d risk ma na g e me nt a ppro a c h in ma king I T de c isio ns.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 31

F inding

Risk a sse ssme nt fo und 1% o f I T e nviro nme nt hig hly c o ntro lle d; 11% sa tisfa c to rily c o ntro lle d a nd 88% with unde sira b le le ve l

  • f c o ntro l. Sta te is e xpo se d to

una c c e pta b le le ve l o f I T

  • re la te d risk.

Spe c ific e xpo sure s a ddre sse d in o the r finding s a nd

  • b se rva tio ns. Ove ra ll re sults

indic a te ne e d fo r risk ma na g e me nt pro c e ss.

Manage me nt Ac tion

OI T will c o nstruc t risk ma na g e me nt pla n tha t b uilds o n risk a sse ssme nt re sults a nd wo rks to mitig a te prio rity risks. Pla n will inc lude

  • n-g o ing a udit a nd re vie w o f

risk o n spe c ific pro je c ts.

Re c omme ndation

OPE GA sho uld e sta b lish sc he dule o f I T re vie w to inc lude in future wo rk pla ns.

F inding 5 ――――――――――――――――

slide-32
SLIDE 32

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 32

Project Management

OPE GA has 2 findings r e late d to PM

We a k o r inc o nsiste nt pro je c t ma na g e me nt ha s b e e n re c urring ro o t c a use o f pro b le ms fo r syste m imple me nta tio n pro je c ts. OI T ha s c re a te d fo rma l Pro je c t Ma na g e me nt Offic e to impro ve q ua lity a nd de pth o f Sta te ’ s pro je c t ma na g e me nt c a pa b ilitie s.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 33

F inding

T he re ha s b e e n little e ffo rt to e nsure tha t individua ls ma na g ing I T pro je c ts, whe the r Sta te sta ff o r ve ndo rs, ha ve stro ng pro je c t ma na g e me nt c a pa b ilitie s.

F inding 6 ――――――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

1. OI T sta ff will b e e duc a te d in PM a nd will suppo rt a g e nc ie s 2. OI T will e sta b lish po lic y/ pro c e dure s re q uiring a g e nc ie s to e ng a g e OI T PMO b e fo re fo rmula ting syste m so lutio ns 3. OI T no w ha s re spo nsib ility fo r c o ntra c ting with ve ndo rs o n I T pro je c ts a nd will c o nside r PM c a pa b ilitie s during ve ndo r se le c tio n

slide-34
SLIDE 34

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 34

F inding

Sta te o f Ma ine la c ks e ffe c tive Syste m De ve lo pme nt L ife Cyc le (SDL C) pro c e ss a nd a tte nda nt pro je c t ma na g e me nt me tho do lo g y.

F inding 7 ――――――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tion

OI T Pro je c t Ma na g e me nt Offic e ha s a do pte d T e n Ste p PM me tho do lo g y a nd will b e a do pting a SDL C me tho do lo g y

slide-35
SLIDE 35

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 35

Security and Business Continuity

OPE GA has 3 findings r e late d to the se ar e as

Se c urity c o ntro ls re duc e risk o f lo ss o r da ma g e to I T a sse ts. Busine ss c o ntinuity pla ns a ssure c o ntinue d o pe ra tio ns if lo ss o r da ma g e a c tua lly o c c urs.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 36

F inding

Risk a sse ssme nt ide ntifie d we a kne sse s in physic a l a c c e ss se c urity c o ntro ls, pa rtic ula rly in re g a rd to Sta te ’ s prima ry da ta c e nte r.

F inding 8 ――――――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

OI T Se c urity Offic e r ha s de ve lo pe d a c tio n pla n to a ddre ss physic a l a c c e ss se c urity we a kne sse s in o rde r

  • f prio rity a c c o rding to risk

a sso c ia te d with e a c h. Ac tio n pla n wa s sub mitte d to OPE GA o n Ja nua ry 9, 2006. De ta ile d a c tio ns a re de sc rib e d in OPE GA re po rt.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 37

F inding

Syste m a c c e ss c o ntro ls do no t me a sure up to industry sta nda rds. Pro c e dure s a re ina de q ua te o r inc o nsiste ntly a pplie d a c ro ss e nte rprise ; fire wa ll rule s a re no t we ll do c ume nte d.

F inding 9 ――――――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

1. Ne w I T Se c urity Po lic y will c la rify tha t e sta b lishe d pa sswo rd po lic ie s a nd pro c e dure s a pply to who le E xe c utive b ra nc h 2. Pla ns a re b e ing de ve lo pe d to e nsure pa sswo rd po lic ie s a re e nfo rc e d a nd pa sswo rds a re e nc rypte d 3. I nde pe nde nt a udit o f fire wa ll rule s is pla nne d a nd sho uld pro duc e impro ve d do c ume nta tio n

slide-38
SLIDE 38

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 38

F inding

Busine ss Co ntinuity Pla nning is ina de q ua te a c ro ss E xe c utive b ra nc h; Sta te ’ s a b ility to c o ntinue to pe rfo rm func tio ns a nd pro vide se rvic e s fo llo wing lo ss o r da ma g e to I S infra struc ture is a t risk.

F inding 10 ―――――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tion

OI T will fa c ilita te BCP b y:

  • Co nso lida ting da ta c e nte rs
  • Asse ssing c urre nt pla ns
  • I

de ntifying we a kne sse s

  • Re c o mme nding re me die s

Sig nific a nt fina nc ia l a nd huma n re so urc e s re q uire d

Re c omme ndation

E a c h a g e nc y in a ll b ra nc he s o f Sta te g o ve rnme nt sho uld a lso de ve lo p its o wn BCP

slide-39
SLIDE 39

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 39

Knowledge Management

  • Ca pturing , unde rsta nding , a nd using the

c o lle c tive b o dy o f info rma tio n a nd inte lle c t within a n o rg a niza tio n to a c c o mplish its missio n

OPE GA has 5 obse r vation r e late d to KM

Ma ine ha s no t tre a te d kno wle dg e a nd the info rma tio n tha t suppo rts it a s a sse ts.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 40

Obse r vation

I na de q ua te a tte ntio n ha s b e e n g ive n to de sig ning info rma tio n syste ms tha t c re a te a c c o unta b ility a nd a re the mse lve s a c c o unta b le .

Manage me nt Ac tion

OI T will inve stig a te using kno wle dg e ma na g e me nt c o nc e pts inc luding :

  • De sig ning syste ms to pro duc e

pe rfo rma nc e da ta o n pro g ra ms

  • Using a uto ma te d to o ls to mo nito r

pe rfo rma nc e me tric s fo r info rma tio n syste ms

Re c omme ndation

L e g isla tive b o die s re spo nsib le fo r

  • ve rsig ht o f info rma tio n syste m

imple me nta tio ns sho uld ta ke a n inte re st in syste m d e sig n

Ob se rva tio n 2 ――――――――――――

slide-41
SLIDE 41

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 41

Obse r vation

Ab ility to c o mb ine da ta fro m diffe re nt so urc e s o r syste ms a c ro ss the e nte rprise is ve ry limite d. Sa me da ta is o fte n duplic a te d in se ve ra l syste ms.

Ob se rva tio n 3 ――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

1. OI T will de ve lo p da ta sta nda rds to b e g in c o difying c o mmo n da ta e le me nts a c ro ss multiple info rma tio n syste ms 2. Ne w syste ms will b e e va lua te d fo r c o mmo n da ta e le me nts tha t c a n b e sha re d o r a rc hite c te d a s a c o mmo n re so urc e ra the r tha n duplic a te d 3. OI T is inve stig a ting to o ls to a ssist in e xc ha ng ing da ta b e twe e n le g a c y syste ms

slide-42
SLIDE 42

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 42

Obse r vation

Pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt

  • ppo rtunitie s fo r I

T sta ff ha ve b e e n limite d b y re so urc e c o nstra ints thus limiting e xpo sure to ne w ide a s a nd te c hno lo g ie s tha t c o uld he lp ke e p Ma ine c urre nt.

Ob se rva tio n 4 ――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

OI T will fa c ilita te pro fe ssio na l de ve lo pme nt pro g ra m to ke e p te c hnic a l sta ff c urre nt a nd a ssure e me rg ing tre nds a re a ssimila te d to suppo rt the b usine ss.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 43

Obse r vation

T he we a lth o f a c c umula te d kno wle dg e po sse sse d b y OI T sta ff ma y b e lo st a s the y c ho o se to re tire o r o the rwise le a ve sta te e mplo yme nt.

Ob se rva tio n 5 ――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

Suc c e ssio n pla nning a nd kno wle dg e tra nsfe r we re c o nside ra tio ns in hiring the initia l OI T e nte rprise ma na g e me nt te a m; this fo c us will e xte nd thro ug ho ut the e nte rprise

slide-44
SLIDE 44

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 44

Obse r vation

T he Sta te ’ s I T is no t ye t b e ing we ll utilize d to sha re kno wle dg e a ro und pa rtic ula r to pic s.

Ob se rva tio n 6 ――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tions

OI T will wo rk to inc re a se use o f te c hno lo g y fo r info rma tio n sha ring o ve r time a nd a s re so urc e s pe rmit. OI T e xpe c ts to :

  • I

nve stig a te fe a sib ility o f a ppo inting a Chie f K no wle dg e Offic e r

  • Advo c a te tha t Da ta Ste wa rds

a nd Pro duc t Ma na g e rs b e de sig na te d

  • Co ntinue to fo ste r use o f

te c hno lo g y fo r sha ring info rma tio n whe ne ve r

  • ppo rtunitie s a rise
slide-45
SLIDE 45

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 45

Leadership and Oversight

OPE GA has 2 obse r vations r e late d to this r isk

One o f mo st re c o g nize d re a so ns fo r suc c e ss

  • f tra nsfo rma tio n e ffo rts so fa r is le a de rship o f

c urre nt CI O a nd Administra tio n suppo rt. Cha ng e s in le a de rship c re a te risk tha t tra nsfo rma tio n will b e disrupte d b e fo re tra nsfo rma tio n is fully ma ture .

slide-46
SLIDE 46

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 46

Obse r vation Po litic a l pro c e ss c re a te s risk tha t fre q ue nt sho rt-te rm le a de rship c ha ng e s will inte rfe re with lo ng - te rm stra te g ic pla nning fo r I T . CI O ma y c ha ng e a s e a rly a s Ja nua ry 2007.

Ob se rva tio n 7 ――――――――――――

Manage me nt Ac tion CI O ha s initia te d two pro ng e d a ppro a c h to mitig a te risk o f c ha ng e in le a de rship:

  • stre ng the n OI

T ma na g e me nt te a m

  • c re a te ne w, wid e ly suppo rte d

stra te g ic pla n Re c omme ndation L e g isla ture sho uld furthe r mitig a te this risk thro ug h:

  • a c tive suppo rt a nd o ve rsig ht
  • OPE

GA re vie ws

  • le g isla tio n re q uiring CI

O to ha ve c e rta in q ua lific a tio ns

slide-47
SLIDE 47

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 47

Obse r vation

L e g isla tive o ve rsig ht a c tivitie s de vo te d e xc lusive ly to the Sta te ’ s info rma tio n te c hno lo g y

  • n a n e nte rprise -wide b a sis

a re a b se nt.

Ob se rva tio n 8 ――――――――――――

Re c omme ndations

A. L e g isla ture sho uld suppo rt a ny a c tio ns ta ke n to e sta b lish I T a s a “pro g ra m” B. L e g isla ture sho uld a ssig n re spo nsib ility fo r o ve rsig ht o f e nte rprise -wide I T to e ithe r:

  • JS Co mmitte e o n Utilitie s

a nd E ne rg y; OR

  • JS Co mmitte e o n Sta te

a nd L

  • c a l Go ve rnme nt
slide-48
SLIDE 48

OPEGA Final Report: State-Wide Information Technology Management Slide 48

Que stions?