State Assessment Data ELA and Math Gr. 3-8 2012-13 Common Core - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
state assessment data
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

State Assessment Data ELA and Math Gr. 3-8 2012-13 Common Core - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 12, 2024 164 likes •427 views

White Plains Schools State Assessment Data ELA and Math Gr. 3-8 2012-13 Common Core Assessments 2012-2013: In the words of Commissioner of Education John B. King, Jr. more students struggled on this years test than in previous

slide-1
SLIDE 1

White Plains Schools State Assessment Data ELA and Math Gr. 3-8

2012-13

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Common Core Assessments 2012-2013:

In the words of Commissioner of Education John B. King, Jr.

  • “…more students struggled on this year’s test than in

previous years…because we changed the expectations for New York State students when we adopted the Common Core State Standards in 2010…”

  • “Our test results tell us that we have a long way to go.”
  • “The change in test scores does not mean that students

are learning less or that teachers and schools are performing worse than last year. Proficiency rates on the new Common Core assessments cannot be compared with last year’s proficiency results since the old scores are from an old test based on the former standards.”

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Changes to the 2012-13 Tests:

EL ELA:

  • Increased text complexity
  • Balance between fiction and non-fiction
  • More reading passages/longer test
  • Multi-step questions requiring deeper understanding
  • f content

Math: h:

  • Individual items incorporating multiple standards
  • Vocabulary-rich test questions
  • Multi-step questions requiring deeper understanding
  • f content
slide-5
SLIDE 5

2013 White Plains & NY State % Meeting ELA Standard (Levels 3 & 4)

31.0% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 31.0% 34.0% 35.0% 35.0% 29.0% 33.0% 35.0% 37.0%

  • Gr. 3
  • Gr. 4
  • Gr. 5
  • Gr. 6
  • Gr. 7
  • Gr. 8

State District

66

6 64 55 56 56 59 5 51

Percentile Ranks

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2013 White Plains & NY State % Meeting the Math Standard (Levels 3 & 4)

34.0% 36.0% 30.0% 30.0% 28.0% 27.0% 32.0% 34.0% 28.0% 30.0% 26.0% 34.0%

  • Gr. 3
  • Gr. 4
  • Gr. 5
  • Gr. 6
  • Gr. 7
  • Gr. 8

State District

50

49 54 54 54 54 54 54 72 72

Percentile Ranks

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ELA 2013 Gr. 3-8: Level 4s

5 3 13 14 9 10 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

  • Gr. 4
  • Gr. 8

WP 2012 WP 2013 NYS 2013

% of WP s stud udents nts achievi ving ng Level 4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Math 2013 Gr. 3-8: Level 4s

27 27 13 9 13 7 5 10 15 20 25 30

  • Gr. 4
  • Gr. 8

WP 2012 WP 2013 NYS 2013

% of WP s stud udents nts achievi ving ng Level 4

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2012 vs. 2013 Cohort Comparison % Meeting ELA Standard (growth across grades )

District Percentile Ranks

45 37 63 59 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

  • Gr. 3-4
  • Gr. 6-7

2012 2013

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2012 vs. 2013 Cohort Comparison % Meeting Math Standard (growth across grades )

District Percentile Ranks

32 42 49 54 10 20 30 40 50 60

  • Gr. 3-4
  • Gr. 6-7

2012 2013

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ELA 2013 Regional Comparison: Gr. 3-8

35 37 32 34 33 39 28 33 15 21 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 ELA g ELA gr. 4 ELA g ELA gr. 8 White Plains New Rochelle Tarrytown Ossining Port Chester

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Math 2013 Regional Comparison: Gr. 3-8

34 34 43 23 35 35 28 16 25 15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Mat ath h gr. 4

  • gr. 4

Mat ath h gr. 8

  • gr. 8

White Plains New Rochelle Tarrytown Ossining Port Chester

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Action Plan:

Impl plementi ementing ng th the e Com

  • mmo

mon n Core e Sta tandar ndards ds

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Steps Already Taken: “Building the Infrastructure”

  • Unpacking ELA, Math, and Literacy standards K-

12 during SCDs in Spring 2012

  • Attending BOCES trainings (teachers and admin)
  • Implementing task forces and summer projects

to study CCLS and revise curriculum

  • Balance fiction and non-fiction units
  • Embed “close reading” and writing to a prompt
  • Incorporate “text” across all disciplines
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Steps Already Taken: “Building the Infrastructure”

  • Conducting PTA Workshops
  • Forming a year-long committee to study

CCLS and implement new math program K-5 (Envisions)

  • Training gr. K-4 teachers on DIBELS
  • Universal screening – targeted interventions
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Steps Already Taken: “Building the Infrastructure”

  • Developing common district assessments K-12
  • Training gr. 1-11 ELA teachers in Great Books
  • Complex texts, critical thinking, comprehension
  • Interpretative Questions – Text based responses
  • Implementing new ELA curriculum 6-12 (SpringBoard)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Steps Already Taken: “Building the Infrastructure”

  • Revising & implementing new math curriculum 6-8
  • Training gr. 6-12 teachers in AVID strategies (WICOR)
  • Onsite PATH trainings for Math, Science, Social Studies,

Special Areas

  • Summer Institutes (teams from EV, HL, HS)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Next Steps

ELA

  • Continue implementing and adapting

new/revised ELA curriculum K-12:

Readers/Writers Workshop (K-5), SpringBoard (6- 12), Great Books (1-12), S44/Read 180 (6-12)

  • Balance fiction and non-fiction units
  • Embed “close reading” and writing to a prompt
  • Incorporate “text” across all disciplines
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Next Steps

MATH

  • Maximize use of Envisions (Year 2)
  • Learning Walks and Common Core workshops for K-5 principals
  • Common Core workshops for Instructional Coaches
  • Common Core mini-workshops at grade-level meetings
  • Lesson Study sessions for all K-5 teachers
  • Revised pacing maps & common assessments for math focus

standards

  • Continue implementing and adapting new Math

curriculum 6-8

  • Develop and implement new Algebra & Geometry

curriculum for middle school and high school

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Next Steps

  • Conduct grade level/dept meetings to

analyze state assessment data and review released sample test items in grades 3-8

  • Administer “mock” State assessments

grades 3-8 in ELA (January) and Math (Feb/March) to target test preparation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Next Steps

  • Continue training gr. 6-12 teachers on AVID

strategies (WICOR)

  • Onsite PATH trainings
  • Turnkey-trainings by AVID site teams
  • Use early department meetings and release day

in December to focus on developing/revising CCLS lessons across all disciplines

  • Partner with PreK providers to enhance literacy

instruction aligned with common core

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Academic Support:

Impl plementi ementing ng th the e Com

  • mmo

mon n Core e Sta tandar ndards ds

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ELA

  • Elementar

tary: y:

 Intervention Block (i-block)  Targeted small group instruction:

reading teachers, learning facilitator, ESOL teachers, special educators

 Early morning tutorial  Extended day program in gr. 1, 3-5  Summer Bridge Program in K/1

  • Middle

le School:

 Read 180/System 44 ELA Classes  7th and 8th grade: Achieve Program  After-school homework center

NYS AIS Requ quire irement ments: s: (students below cut point receive support)

  • Grade 3: 299 scale score
  • Grade 4: 296 scale score
  • Grade 5: 297 scale score
  • Grade 6: 297 scale score
  • Grade 7: 301 scale score
  • Grade 8: 302 scale score
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Math

  • Elementar

tary

 Extended Day Program  Early Morning Tutorial  Differentiated Learning Groups

 Using enVisions  Using flexible regrouping

following CFAs

  • Middle

le School

 Math Labs (Math 180 in gr. 6)  After-school homework center  Algebra Regents Prep

NYS AIS Requ quire iremen ments: ts: (students below cut point receive support)

  • Grade 3: 293 scale score
  • Grade 4: 284 scale score
  • Grade 5: 289 scale score
  • Grade 6: 289 scale score
  • Grade 7: 290 scale score
  • Grade 8: 293 scale score
slide-25
SLIDE 25

All the pieces fit…