Stakeholder Workshop Officers and local cycling, walking and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

stakeholder workshop
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Stakeholder Workshop Officers and local cycling, walking and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stakeholder Workshop Officers and local cycling, walking and community groups Watford and Three Rivers LCWIP 6 th October 2020 1 Introductions Background on Local Cycling and Walking 2 Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs) 3 Overview of LCWIP for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Watford and Three Rivers LCWIP

6th October 2020

Stakeholder Workshop

Officers and local cycling, walking and community groups

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Workshop Agenda

1 2 3

Introductions Background on Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans (LCWIPs) Overview of LCWIP for Watford and Three Rivers

4 5

Workshop Session 1: Network Planning for Cycling Workshop Session 2: Network Planning for Walking

6

Next Steps

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introductions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Housekeeping

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Background to

LCWIPs

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background

Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy (CWIS) issued in 2016. It set objectives to:

  • Increase cycling activity
  • Reverse decline in walking
  • Reduce rate of cyclists Killed or Seriously Injured
  • Increase the percentage of children usually walking to

school The Cycling & Walking Investment Strategy encouraged local authorities to produce LCWIPs as a strategic approach to increasing cycling and walking. Other new guidance and funding

  • Gear Change- A bold vision for Cycling and Walking
  • Cycle infrastructure design (LTN 1/20)
  • Emergency Active Travel Fund
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background

Technical Guidance on preparing LCWIPs issued in 2017 LCWIPs are a long-term evidence based approach to developing cycling and walking networks, ideally over a 10 year period Involves High-level planning of schemes for future funding opportunities Aim to enable meeting of targets set out in CWIS Three key outputs

  • Cycling and walking network plan
  • A prioritised programme of infrastructure

improvements for future investment

  • A Technical Report setting out supporting evidence and

analysis Two-year DfT Technical support commission Lessons learnt - benefiting from experience elsewhere Guidance will be refreshed

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

The Six Stages of LCWIP

1

Determining Scope Establish geographical extent Arrangements for governance Engagement approach

2

Gathering Information Data on existing travel patterns Data on existing conditions Data on origins and destinations (trip generators)

3

Network Planning for Cycling Establish desire lines for cycle movement Establish routes Audit priority routes Determine improvements

4

Network Planning for Walking Core walking zones Identify pedestrian routes Audit priority routes Determine improvements

5

Prioritising Improvements Develop a prioritised plan for future investment

6

Integration and Application Integrate outputs with other planning and transport policies and delivery plans

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 2. LCWIP for Watford

and Three Rivers - Context

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Watford Three Rivers + 5km buffer

Geographical Scope

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Cycling mode share to work is very low (no more than 5% in some locations) Cycling accounts for trips of: Up to 1 mile (<2%) 1-3 miles (<5%) 3-5 miles (3%) All reasonable cycling times! 1 mile = 6 min cycle 5 miles = 30 min cycle

Gathering Information – Existing Travel Patterns (Cycling)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

A quarter of trips less than a mile are not walking trips Walking mode share to work – highest in Watford wards. Low elsewhere

Gathering Information – Existing Travel Patterns (Walking)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Physical

  • Lack of physical infrastructure
  • Variable provision
  • Lack of connectivity
  • Severance
  • Safety and security
  • Topography

Other

  • Social/ cultural attitudes
  • Health
  • Lack of knowledge, awareness or

training Not conducive to use for less confident cyclists. Significant scope to improve the attractiveness of walking and cycling Developing an LCWIP is the next step to address this

Gathering Information – Existing Barriers

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Stakeholder Engagement. First step in your involvement- More opportunities in later stages

  • f the LCWIP

1

Determining Scope

2

Gathering Information

3

Network Planning for Cycling Opportunity to comment on the draft cycling network identified

4

Network Planning for Walking Opportunity to comment on the draft Core Walking Zones

5

Prioritising Interventions Opportunity to comment on prioritised list of measures and High level intervention types

6

Integration and Application Public consultation on final document (tbc)

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 3. Network Planning -

Building the cycle network

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Building the cycle network

Focussing on key origins and destinations, including future sites. Layered approach – adding layers of information to provide a comprehensive picture Identify where people will want to travel to and from now and in the future

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Network Planning: Building the cycle network- identifying desire lines

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Origins and Destinations

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Network Planning Desire Lines Watford and Three Rivers

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Network Planning Desire Lines – Key Trends Watford and Three Rivers

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Network Planning – Establishing Routes N.b. Indicative of how demand could fit to the existing network

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Workshop Session 1: Network Planning for Cycling

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Consider

Where do cycling routes need to go? Are there any routes that are missing? Consider journeys you could cycle but don’t currently What would be the priority routes?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Rickmansworth (Blue)

Where do cycling routes need to go? Are there any routes that are missing? Consider journeys you could cycle but don’t currently What would be the priority routes?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Watford (Red)

Where do cycling routes need to go? Are there any routes that are missing? Consider journeys you could cycle but don’t currently What would be the priority routes?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Croxley (Olive) Oxhey/ Carpenders (Green)

Where do cycling routes need to go? Are there any routes that are missing? Consider journeys you could cycle but don’t currently What would be the priority routes?

slide-27
SLIDE 27

North (Pink)

Where do cycling routes need to go? Are there any routes that are missing? Consider journeys you could cycle but don’t currently What would be the priority routes?

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • 4. Network Planning

Building the walking network

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Network Planning Identifying ‘Core Walking Zones’

Source: Department for Transport LCWIP Guidance

Core Walking Zones

  • Areas such as the town centres

with multiple key destinations

  • All routes within these are

important to assess as part of the LCWIP Key Walking Routes

  • Routes providing access to the

Core Walking Zones

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Walking network planning

Co Core Wal alking Zon

  • ne

1km buffer— ’walkable’ area

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Network Planning – Identifying Core Walking Zones

Focus on biggest potential to increase walking Based on clusters of trip attractors Identified 5 Core Walking Zones These are also centre designations 1km buffer showing walkable area where pedestrian routes will be defined.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Network Planning – Identifying Core Walking Zones

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Workshop Session 2: Network Planning for Walking

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Consider

Do you agree that these are the priority core walking zones? What are the key walking routes to each Core Walking Zone Think about journeys you could walk but don’t currently

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

CWZ Rickmansworth

What are the key walking routes to each Core Walking Zone Think about journeys you could walk but don’t currently

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

CWZ Watford Centre& North Watford

What are the key walking routes to each Core Walking Zone Think about journeys you could walk but don’t currently

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

CWZ Chorleywood

What are the key walking routes to each Core Walking Zones Think about journeys you could walk but don’t currently

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

CWZ Oxhey

What are the key walking routes to each Core Walking Zones Think about journeys you could walk but don’t currently

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Next steps

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Brighton LCWIP - Analysis to date Mott MacDonald 7 May 2020

Next steps

Develop draft networks

Taking onboard comments from this session

Identify high level measures Engagement

Stakeholder engagement on high level measures and network prioritisation

Public Consultation

Details TBC

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Thank you

Chris.harte@mottmac.com Maryrose.Dovey@hertfordshire.gov.uk