Stakeholder Workshop: June 18, 2020 2 Outlin line Introductions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

Stakeholder Workshop: June 18, 2020

Outlin line

• Introductions
• Why Are We Here?
• What We’ve Heard?
• How Did We Address Your Concerns?
• What are the Recommendations?
• Q&A
• Where do we go from here?

2

3 RP-2 North Sub-Plan Area RP-2 South Sub- Plan Area

Focus A us Area

Includes 865 housing units in the Balm Community Plan

Study O Over erview ew

• Understand the vision for future

development and obtain input from the community

• Evaluate and recommend changes to

current RP-2 policies and regulations

• Review infrastructure needs in Balm

4

Sched edule e (Subject t to Change)

Develop Initial Recommendations March – April 2020

• Infrastructure Needs

(Transportation, Public Utilities, Environmental)

Policy Recommendations & Updates Summer/Fall

• Policy updates

Summer

• PC Hearing and BOCC Transmittal

Summer

• Moratorium Deadline

Fall

Public Outreach March – July 2020

• Community Open House #1

March 11, 2020

• Online Survey

March 11 – April 2, 2020

• Community Work Session

April 7, 2020

• Stakeholder Work Session

TODAY!

• Community Open House #2

July 22 or 23, 2020

5

6

14% of Focus area 8% of the Focus area + Other RP-2 Outside USA

Environmentally P Protected Land

ELAPP (defined):

• Acquired ELAPP: Land acquired for

preservation

• Approved ELAPP: Land meets the ELAPP

program requirements. The property hasn’t been volunteered for preservation by landowner

Approved ed D Dev evel elopmen ents

7

19% of Focus area 30% Focus area + Other RP-2 Outside USA 19% of the Focus area 31% of the Focus area + Other RP-2 Outside USA

Approved Planned D Developments

Land A Analysis S Summary

8

DRAFT

Category Study Area % of Total Focus Area + Other RP-2 Outside USA % of Total Parks and Protected Land* 869 14% 909 8% Non-Vacant Land 1,211 20% 2,983 27% Approved Planned Developments 1,146 19% 3,375 31% Vacant Developable Lands (Not in Approved/Pending) 2,912 47% 3,699 34% Total Acreage 6,138 100% 10,966 100%

*Inlcudes ELAPP Acquired Lands

What We’v ’ve H Heard rd? – Commu munity O Outreac ach

9

What We’v ’ve H Heard rd –

• Community Open House # 1 – March 11th, 2020
• Online Survey #1 – March 11th through April 2nd, 2020
• Community Work Session - April 7th, 2020
• Online Survey # 2 – April 7th – April 17th, 2020
• Stakeholder Interviews – March – May, 2020

10

11

What We’v ’ve H Heard rd

What could be improved in the community? (Select all that apply)

12

72% 71% 64% 56% 32% 15% 9% 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Protection of wildlife habitats Discourage suburban development in a rural area Infrastructure to support new developments (roads, utilities etc.) Encourage farming Add grocery stores, local retail, restaurants, etc. Other (please specify) Add more suburban development in a rural area Add affordable housing

What we’v ’ve h heard rd – Online S e Survey eys

Main Themes: Not ranked, main themes listed

• Rural feeling
• Green space/trails
• Large yards
• Peace and Quiet
• Lots of choices for retail
• Mix of residential and agriculture
• Minimal crowding, density
• Country setting but Close to Tampa
• Chain restaurants/shopping centers

Main Themes: Not ranked, main themes listed

• FishHawk
• Rural
• Westchase
• Balm as is
• Lakewood Ranch
• Brooksville
• Wesley Chapel
• Sun City Center
• Sundance on Highway 301
• Fort Lonesome
• Ruskin

What do you like most about your community? What are examples of other communities you like?

13

What We’v ’ve H Heard rd

Stakeh eholder er I Inter erview ews

Development community

• Current commercial requirements don’t work
• Little developable land left in the RP-2 areas
• Would like to see design guidelines
• Not in favor of planned villages, make it more

about mobility

14

Stakeh eholder er I Inter erview ews

Community

• Supporting infrastructure before development
• Density – no greater than 2 dwelling units per

acre (not in favor of clustering, TDR, would like to see ½ acre lots)

• Preserve green and natural spaces
• 250’ setbacks
• Minimize light pollution
• Include local commercial opportunities

15

How D w Did W We A Address Y Your C Concerns?

16

17

• Buffering requirements
• Improve/include design standards
• Include housing styles/sizes

Stre rengthen R Rura ral C Chara racter

Pre reserv rve O Open S Space ce

• Encouragement of open space
• Protect and encourage farming in

available areas and related businesses

18

Develop p plan fo for i infr frastructure i improvements

• Develop a mobility plan
• Identify water and sewer improvements
• Continue to identify sites for schools,

libraries, parks, etc.

• Allow developer credits for providing

external infrastructure or other community uses

19

Revise C Comme mmercial al R Requireme ments

• Revise commercial requirements
• Include community benefits

20

What are the Recommendations?

21

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Amend the Comprehensive Plan Consolidate and reorganize policies County, Planning Commission Add clear references/linkages (to Comp Plan and LDC) County, Planning Commission Recategorize Planned Villages (2 areas - south/north) County, Planning Commission Update clustering: Add different lot sizes, home types, etc., clearly define density/intensity and what counts as open space County, Planning Commission Update/replace commercial standards with community benefits County, Planning Commission Include/update design rules County, Planning Commission Develop a mobility and commercial node map County, Development Community, Market professionals TDRs: Coordinate TDR efforts (consider Balm as "sending area" and others as "receiving area") County, Planning Commission

Timing Action Responsible Party

22

Amend t the Comprehensive P Plan (Deliverables as part of this study)

Timing Defined:

• Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
• Short-term (Within 4 years)
• Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Update Land Development Code Add corresponding regulations from Comprehensive Plan updates County Allow certain community benefits to replace commercial component County Add design standards - include neighborhood centers, walkability, buffering, conservation, drainage, etc. County, Planning Commission Landscape/buffering standards, menu of options for 250' setback County, Planning Commission Create checklist with required/optional design standards County, Planning Commission Remove planned village graphic County

Timing Action Responsible Party

23

Amend the Comprehensive Plan

Update L Land Development C Code (Deliverables as part of this study)

Timing Defined:

• Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
• Short-term (Within 4 years)
• Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Schools/Civic uses: Site in neighborhoods, design for biking/walking and provide connections (on-going) Development community, County, School Board Further discuss public safety concerns with borrow pits County, Planning Commission Water/Sewer Infrastructure: Coordinate with future development County Clarify Planned Development Process for the area for new regulations County, Planning Commission TDRs: further discuss and explore TDR framework County, Planning Commission TDRs: Stakeholder Coordination: Convene residents/farmers, development community to discuss TDR process further. County, Planning Commission ELAPP: Coordinate possibility of connecting ELAPP north/south of focus area County, Planning Commission, Development Community

Timing Action Responsible Party

24

Other P Potentia ial F l Follo llow-up A Actions (Outside of this study)

Timing Defined:

• Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
• Short-term (Within 4 years)
• Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Mobility: Develop a mobility master plan (local connectivity, substandard roads, multimodal) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Explore using TECO easements for trail network County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct roadway improvements in CIP and LRTP (Big Bend, CR 672, etc.) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct improvements on substandard roadways, intersection improvements, sidewalks County, MPO, Planning Commission Revenue: Explore additional revenue sources (i.e. TIF, MSTU/MSBU) County Affordable Housing: Continue to discuss affordable housing and transit options County, Community & Stakeholders, Planning Commission Coordinate additional rural architectural standards/overlay County, Planning Commission

Timing Action Responsible Party

25

Other P Potentia ial F l Follo llow-up A Actions (Outside of this study)

Timing Defined:

• Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
• Short-term (Within 4 years)
• Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

Establish d diffe fferent d development a areas

• Recategorize

Planned Villages

• Encourage different levels
• f development
• South Sub-Planning

Area/Village

• North Sub-Planning

Area/Village

26

What are TDRs?

Transfer potential to build new homes from one area “sending areas” to another “receiving areas.” Preserves land in sending areas while allowing those landowners to be compensated. Recommendations:

• Coordinate with the broader south county TDR

update

• North area “receiving area” and South area

“sending area”

27

Transfe fer o

• f D

Development R Rights

Allow certain community benefits to replace commercial component

• Land dedication for town center
• Multimodal connections to existing

commercial

• Other infrastructure improvements in

nearby commercial nodes (Balm downtown, other nodes, etc.)

• Land dedication for community gardens,

smaller farming lots, farmers markets, or related farming business opportunity

• Land dedication for office uses

Updat ate C Comme mmercial al S Standar ards

28

Density bonuses for:

• Different housing types and sizes
• Additional open space and preservation for farming
• Utilize Conservation subdivision standards
• Land dedicated for preservation or ELAPP
• Additional optional infrastructure funding or off-site

improvements

• Land dedication: schools, daycares,

civic or community uses etc.

• Green/sustainable building patterns
• Rural architectural style for buildings

Com

• mmunit

ity B y Benefit its

29

• Buffering
• 250’ with minimum landscape standards on the periphery
• If Less than 250’ is to be approved greater buffering requirements
• Multimodal access/circulation
• Green and open space
• Conservation measures
• Water conservation, lighting, etc.

More S Specifi fic Design R Rules

30

Questions a and A Answers

31 31

Wh Where D Do

• We G

Go F

• From H

Here?

32

• Additional project information is found on the project website. Please stay

connected- bit.ly/residentialplanned

• Please fill out the brief survey on the project website (4 questions)
• Comments received during the stakeholder meeting will be used to edit/review

recommendations.

For more information Contact:

Mariann Abrahamsen, AICP Planning Commission T: 813-273-3774 ext. 353 marianna@plancom.org

Than ank you you!

33