split scope definites
play

Split-scope definites How the can mean two things at once Dylan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Split-scope definites How the can mean two things at once Dylan Bumford 18 February 2016 New York University Definite description Wisdom: the NP refers to the single salient NP in the context the hat = x , where x is


  1. Split-scope definites How ‘the’ can mean two things at once Dylan Bumford 18 February 2016 New York University

  2. Definite description Wisdom: ‘the NP’ refers to the single salient ‘NP’ in the context � the hat � = x , where x is the unique relevant hat Proposal: Definite determination split into two subprocesses. � the hat � = one ( · · · ( some hat )) When things intervene, ‘the hat’ may end up one among many Payoffs: • Haddock readings • Relative superlatives • Possibly other strange readings of quantificational adjectives • Emerging uniformity in the theory of cardinal modification 1/17

  3. Definite description Wisdom: ‘the NP’ refers to the single salient ‘NP’ in the context � the hat � = x , where x is the unique relevant hat Proposal: Definite determination split into two subprocesses. � the hat � = one ( · · · ( some hat )) When things intervene, ‘the hat’ may end up one among many Payoffs: • Haddock readings • Relative superlatives • Possibly other strange readings of quantificational adjectives • Emerging uniformity in the theory of cardinal modification 1/17

  4. Definite description Wisdom: ‘the NP’ refers to the single salient ‘NP’ in the context � the hat � = x , where x is the unique relevant hat Proposal: Definite determination split into two subprocesses. � the hat � = one ( · · · ( some hat )) When things intervene, ‘the hat’ may end up one among many Payoffs: • Haddock readings • Relative superlatives • Possibly other strange readings of quantificational adjectives • Emerging uniformity in the theory of cardinal modification 1/17

  5. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  6. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  7. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  8. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  9. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite (2) the table with the apple and the banana [Horacek 1995] Nothing especially salient about the relevant fruit 2/17

  10. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite 2/17

  11. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in · · · Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  12. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in · · · Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  13. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in · · · Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  14. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in y Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  15. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in y Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  16. Haddock descriptions (1) the rabbit in the hat [Haddock 1987] What about H2? cf. # The hat is my favorite Constraint Satisfaction Problem x y Unique x and y satisfying these simultaneous rabbit x constraints x in y Noncompositional. Worse, circular! hat y 2/17

  17. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  18. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  19. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  20. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  21. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  22. Relative superlatives (2) the girl who got the fewest leters [Szabolcsi 1986] ??? ???? (3) a. * When was there the rabbit in the garden? b. When were there the most rabbits in the garden? (4) the rabbit in the biggest hat 3/17

  23. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in hat y 4/17

  24. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in · · · hat y 4/17

  25. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in · · · hat y 4/17

  26. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in · · · hat y 4/17

  27. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in y hat y 4/17

  28. Relative superlatives via constraint satisfaction? x y rabbit x (5) the rabbit in the biggest hat x in y hat y 4/17

  29. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  30. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  31. Decomposing definiteness Dynamic Semantics • Denotations are sets of assignments The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process • Indefinites introduce nondeterministic referents if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  32. Decomposing definiteness Dynamic Semantics • Denotations are sets of assignments The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process • Indefinites introduce nondeterministic referents if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  33. Decomposing definiteness Dynamic Semantics • Denotations are sets of assignments The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process • Indefinites introduce nondeterministic referents if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  34. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  35. Decomposing definiteness The basic idea: definiteness is a two-step process if � � { g ν | g ∈ G } �   � �   � = 1 G    # otherwise { ν �→ x | hat x } 1 ν the ν hat some ν 5/17

  36. Teasing the pieces apart (6) the [rabbit in the hat] (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  37. Teasing the pieces apart some some (6) the [rabbit in the hat] one one (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  38. Teasing the pieces apart (6) one [ some rabbit in [ one [ some hat]]] (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  39. Teasing the pieces apart some some (6) the [rabbit in the hat] one one (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

  40. Teasing the pieces apart some some (6) one [ one [ some rabbit in some hat]] one one (7) the [rabbit in the biggest hat] 6/17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend