Spin Hamiltonian and Order out of Coulomb Phase in Pyrochlore Structure of FeF3
arXiv: 1407.0849
Farhad Shahbazi in collaboration with Azam Sadeghi (IUT) Mojtaba Alaei (IUT) Michel J. P. Gingras (UWaterloo)
1
Spin Hamiltonian and Order out of Coulomb Phase in Pyrochlore - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Spin Hamiltonian and Order out of Coulomb Phase in Pyrochlore Structure of FeF3 Farhad Shahbazi in collaboration with Azam Sadeghi (IUT) Mojtaba Alaei (IUT) arXiv: 1407.0849 Michel J. P. Gingras (UWaterloo) 1 Outline Experimental
arXiv: 1407.0849
Farhad Shahbazi in collaboration with Azam Sadeghi (IUT) Mojtaba Alaei (IUT) Michel J. P. Gingras (UWaterloo)
1
ab initio DFT method
2
3
G.Ferey et al, Revue de Chimie minerale 23, 474 (1986)
FeF3)
Fe − F − Fe = 142.3 Fe − F − Fe = 152.15 Fe − F − Fe = 141.65
TN = 110K TN = 365K
TN = 20 ± 2K
µ = 4.45µB
µ = 4.07µB
µ = 3.32µB Fe+3 : 3d5 µfree−ion = 5µB
4
5
tetrahedra
lattice point basis
reside on the corners of the tetrahedra
in/all-out (AIAO) ordering
Fe+3
6
Results: Deviation from Curie-Weiss law even at T=300K. sign of transition at T~20K
J.N. Reimers, et al, Phys. Rev. B, 5692 (1991);
7
FeF3?
8
Why the transition temperature is too small in Pyr-FeF3?
neighbour classical Heisenberg Anti-ferromagnet is highly degenerate on pyrochlore lattice. This model remains disordered down to zero kelvin.
Lett 80, 2929; Phys. Rev. B 58, 12049 (1998)
9
What is the origin of non-coplanar “AIAO” ordering?
where does the spin-obit coupling may come from?
10
11
Abinitio DFT Calculation
Heff = J1 2 X
hi,ji
X
a6=b
na
i · nb j + B
2 X
hi,ji
X
a6=b
(na
i · nb j)2 + D
2 X
hi,ji
X
a6=b
ˆ Dab · (na
i × nb j)
12
13
Direct DM vectors
Energy Landscape of biquadratic term for Single Tetrahedron
DM interaction fixes this state to the all-in or all-out directions. The location of the saddle point is
which have triple degeneracy. DM interaction fixes these states to xy, xz or yz planes, depending which two spins are collinear.
Q = X
<i,j>
(Si.Sj)2 = B(1 − 2 sin2 φ cos θ + (3 + cos2 φ) cos2 θ + cos2 φ).
φ = π/2, θ = cos−1(1/3)
/4 /2 3/4
/2 3/4
2 3 4 5 6
Q
1 2 3 4 5 6
φ = 0, π; θ = π/2 φ = π/2; θ = 0
14
EAIAO/N = −J1 + B/3 − 2 √ 2D Ecoplanar/N = −J1 + B − √ 2D
15
AIAO order parameter
Order parameter Binder’s cumulant
Finite size scaling Results
M = hmiT m = Σi,aSa
i .ˆ
da/N
Um(T) = 1 − 1 3 < m4 > < m2 >2
Tc/J1 = 0.0601(2) β = 0.18(2) ν = 0.60(2) J1 = 32.7eV → Tc =≈ 22K
M = L−β/νM(tL1/ν)
16
17
The critical exponents of specific heat and AIAO susceptibility α + 2β + χ = 2.0(1) α = 0.44(3), χ = 1.20(3)
parameter in a tetrahedron
18
mn =
4
X
a=1
Sa · da
19
R = h(S1 · S2)(S3 · S4) + (S1 · S3)(S2 · S4) + (S1 · S4)(S2 · S3)i
20
˜ R ≡ |(S1 · S2)(S3 · S4) − (S1 · S3)(S2 · S4) + (S1 · S4)(S2 · S3)|
21
UE(T) ⌘ 1 1 3 hE4i hE2i2
Binder Forth energy cumulant
U min
E
(L) = U ∗ + AL−d + O(L−2d)
22
R = 1 2 h 1 − 2 sin2 φ cos θ + (3 + cos2 φ) cos2 θ + cos2 φ i
φ = 0, π; θ = π/2 φ = π/2; θ = 0
Proof of coplanarity above transition temperature R = ˜ R = 1 ⇒ n ˜ R = |1 − sin2 θ(1 + cos φ)|
23
Irreducible representations of tetrahedron group
ΛE,1 ≡ 1 √ 3 h (S1 · S2) − 1 2(S1 · S3) − 1 2(S1 · S4) − 1 2(S2 · S3) − 1 2(S2 · S4) + (S3 · S4) i
ΛE,2 ≡ 1 2 h (S1 · S3) − (S1 · S4) − (S2 · S3) + (S2 · S4) i
λGlobal
E
= 4 N "⇣ X
tetra
ΛE,1 ⌘2 + ⇣ X
tetra
ΛE,2 ⌘2 #
λLocal
E
= 4 N "X
tetra
E,1 + Λ2 E,2
24
χLocal
E
= N T h h(λLocal
E
)2i hλLocal
E
i2i
λGlobal
E
= 4 N "⇣ X
tetra
ΛE,1 ⌘2 + ⇣ X
tetra
ΛE,2 ⌘2 #
λLocal
E
= 4 N "X
tetra
E,1 + Λ2 E,2
25
f(q) = h|S⊥(q)|2i S⊥(q) = S S · q/q2 S(q) = X
ri
Si exp(iq · ri)
26
27
0.018 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 0.015 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
J2 J3a
AIAO- Phase Modulated- Phase FeF3 *
The effect of second and third neighbor exchange interactions
The mean field phase diagram Q = 0 Q 6= 0
neighbour AF Heisenberg, biquadratic and DM interactions, precisely describes the magnetic properties
states is proposed above transition temperature.
28
29