Spacecraft Navigation Kipp Cannon Ryerson University, March 14th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Spacecraft Navigation

Kipp Cannon Ryerson University, March 14th 2015

slides.tex

Challenges

◮ Distance: light travel time forces spacecraft to be autonomous,

repair is not possible so robustness and exhaustive pre-flight testing is essential.

◮ Distance to space station: 400 km = 1 ms. ◮ Distance to Moon: 384.4 × 103 km = 1.28 s ◮ Distance to Sun: 149.6 × 106 km = 500 s ◮ Distance to Mars upon arrival on Hohmann transfer orbit: ∼ 14 min ◮ Current distance to Voyager 1: 19.4 × 109 km = 18 h slides.tex

Challenges

◮ Speed: not possible to carry enough fuel to significantly alter course,

so only small corrections are possible after initial launch

◮ “Sound barrier” = 0.3 km/s ◮ Low Earth orbit (LEO) requires a speed of 8 km/s = 29 × 103 km/h ◮ Leaving the Earth requires a speed of 11 km/s = 40 × 103 km/h ◮ Leaving Mars requires a speed of 5 km/s = 18 × 103 km/h ◮ Leaving the Solar system (starting at Earth) requires a speed of

42 km/s = 151 × 103 km/h

slides.tex

Challenges

◮ Precision: enormous distances travelled and inability to make

significant course changes along the way forces guidance system to be extremely precise.

slides.tex

Challenges

◮ Absence of local reference: no solid ground or even atmosphere with

which to measure the effects of flight control actions e.g., pressing gas in car doesn’t always result in forward movement, but by

• bserving through window it is usually easy to determine if it has or

not.

slides.tex

Challenges

◮ Relativity: space and time are curved so radio signals do not follow

straight lines in our solar system, clocks at different locations do not run at the same speeds, and the large speeds of spacecraft also cause clocks to run at different speeds.

◮ Not important for people, but important for precision navigation.

slides.tex

Elements of Spacecraft Navigation

◮ Spacecraft only rarely burn fuel, so flight is almost entirely pure

• rbital motion — free-fall under the influence of gravity alone.

◮ Using knowledge of the physical laws governing orbital motion, only

a small number of measurements are needed to determine the spacecraft’s location and trajectory:

◮ primary tool is distance from Earth and rate of change of distance. ◮ in some cases position on sky (e.g., using radio interferometers or by

timing occultations)

◮ for attitude control spacecraft generally measures apparent positions

• f planets and/or stars from its location (e.g., wrt background stars
• r wrt its instruments)

◮ the latter also allows for position determination but not as accurate

as ground-based range/range-rate measurements.

slides.tex

Tools

◮ On-board star sighting telescopes. ◮ On-board planetary limb cameras. ◮ Most important: radio range finding

◮ Coherent link with coded pulses is established with spacecraft and

monitored over a period of time.

◮ Allows distance to be measured to ±1 m.

◮ When things go wrong:

◮ Loss of attitude leads to misalignment of high-gain antenna with

Earth — no longer possible to communicate, loss of radio ranging.

◮ Spacecraft carries backup omni-directional antenna — can

communicate in all directions but with very bad quality signal.

◮ Compensate with enormous powerful transmitter on Earth and blast

command signal to spacecraft to try to correct attitude.

◮ Goldstone antenna has 500 kW transmitter on 70 m dish. slides.tex

Take-Away Message

◮ It’s not easy. ◮ There aren’t any tricks for making it easier. ◮ Relies very heavily on understanding of physics: spacecraft motion is

mostly inferred using knowledge of physics.

slides.tex

Interstellar Navigation

◮ Obviously never attempted. ◮ Radio ranging from Earth is impractical due to vast distances. ◮ Might be possible to use pulsars as navigation beacons, use quasars

for attitude reference and cosmic microwave background for velocity reference.

◮ Techniques are mostly speculative, but there is research on this

problem.

slides.tex