Southeast Galt School Closure Review ARC Meeting #1 January 18, 2012 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

southeast galt school closure review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Southeast Galt School Closure Review ARC Meeting #1 January 18, 2012 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Southeast Galt School Closure Review ARC Meeting #1 January 18, 2012 Presentation Outline Demographics & Enrolment Funding Southeast Galt Goals Review Process Demographics & Enrolment Population Growth Population


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Southeast Galt School Closure Review

ARC Meeting #1 January 18, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

  • Demographics & Enrolment
  • Funding
  • Southeast Galt
  • Goals
  • Review Process
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Demographics & Enrolment

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Population growth has two primary contributors:

– Natural increase (births minus deaths); and – Net migration (immigration minus emigration)

Population Growth

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Baby Boom Baby Bust Baby Bust Echo Baby Boom Echo

Number of Births ‐ Canada

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Population Projections ‐ Ontario

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • The composition of

the immigrant population has changed over the past 30 years

  • Larger proportion
  • f immigrants from

traditionally non‐ Catholic countries

Changing Composition of Immigrants ‐ Canada

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Regional Population Projections

Source: Ministry of Finance, Ontario Population Projections Update, Spring 2011

Waterloo Region Population Projections

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Entering JK in 2011 Source: Ontario Registrar

Live Births – Waterloo Region

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Steady 5 Year Trend

Live Births vs. WCDSB JK Enrolment

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Board‐wide Student Yields

0.301 0.289 0.266 0.256 0.246 0.236 0.15 0.17 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.35 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 Student Yield Projected Historic

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Board‐wide Elementary Enrolment

13000 13500 14000 14500 15000 15500 16000 16500 17000 17500 18000 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 Total Students Projected Historic

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Funding

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Funding Types

  • Capital

– New schools – Additions

  • Operating

– Staffing – Resources for students – Maintenance (custodial, utilities, minor repairs) – Transportation – Renewal (large maintenance/replacement projects)

  • Separate funding envelope
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Capital Funding

  • New schools & additions are funded on a case by case basis

(Capital Priorities). – School boards submit a business case to the Ministry of Education. – Individual projects and funding is determined by the Ministry.

  • Some capital projects can also be funded through the

proceeds of the sale of properties (Proceeds of Disposition Reserve)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Operating Funding

  • Most of the funding is provided on a per pupil basis board‐

wide – Based on a school size of approx. 450 students – Median elementary enrolment is 296 students (266 FTE) – Median elementary school capacity is 325 pupil places

  • Small schools, schools operating below capacity and

inefficient schools are effectively funded by removing resources from other schools in the system

  • A fixed amount of money is given for Renewal projects on a

yearly basis. – Based on square footage per student

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Southeast Galt

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Existing Boundaries

Existing Schools:

  • Holy Spirit
  • St. Ambrose
  • St. Anne
  • St. Francis
  • St. Vincent de Paul

Future School Site:

  • Southeast Galt
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Growth/Decline

‐50 ‐53 ‐2 +91 +65

  • Comparison of 2006/07

enrolment vs. 2011/12

  • St. Ambrose – New

development east of Dundas has offset the decline on the west side.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Student Distribution

Higher concentration of students in newer housing at the south end

  • f the Southeast Galt

study area Significant number of

  • ut of boundary

students

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Residential Development

Planned residential development New community to be developed east of Dundas Street Earliest possible dates:

  • Housing starts 2014
  • WCDSB school 2015
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Student Yields

0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 0.800 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

HOLY SPIRIT

  • ST. AMBROSE
  • ST. ANNE, C
  • ST. FRANCIS, C
  • ST. VINCENT DE PAUL

Board Average

slide-23
SLIDE 23

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

  • ST. VINCENT DE PAUL
  • ST. FRANCIS
  • ST. ANNE
  • ST. AMBROSE

HOLY SPIRIT Total Capacity

Enrolment vs. Capacity

Projected Historic

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Utilization

135% 83% 59% 95% 161% 157% 94% 54% 81% 191%

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 HOLY SPIRIT

  • ST. AMBROSE
  • ST. ANNE
  • ST. FRANCIS
  • ST. VINCENT DE

PAUL Capacity 2011 Enroment 2016 Projected Enrolment

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Walking Webs

  • Walking distance:
  • JK‐Gr.3 = 0.8km
  • Gr.4‐Gr.8 = 1.6km

(shown on map)

  • Significant overlap in

walking areas

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Transportation

  • Slightly over 50% of

students in this area are deemed “walkers”

  • Hazard means that

students are within walking distance but are bussed due to a hazard such as a missing sidewalk, unsafe crossing

  • f busy streets, etc.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Holy Spirit

  • Enrolment projected to

increase due to development east of Dundas Street

  • 2 additional kindergarten

rooms required for FDK

Region of Waterloo Air Photo: 2009

200 400 600 800 1000

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Holy Spirit

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • St. Ambrose
  • 2.7 acres with very little green

play space

  • Enrolment growth is related to

development east of Dundas Street

Region of Waterloo Air Photo: 2009

100 200 300 400

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  • St. Ambrose
  • Partnership with Dolson Pool (City of Cambridge) and St. Ambrose Parish
slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • St. Anne
  • Declining enrolment may

impact curriculum delivery

  • Partnership with Alison

Park Neighbourhood Association (City of Cambridge)

Region of Waterloo Air Photo: 2009

50 100 150 200 250 300

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  • St. Anne (C)
slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • St. Francis
  • 1 additional kindergarten room

required for FDK which is problematic due to: – Small site size – Open concept classrooms & building layout

Region of Waterloo Air Photo: 2010

100 200 300 400

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  • St. Francis
  • Insufficient Administrative and Special Education space
slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • St. Vincent de Paul
  • Approx. 100 out of boundary

students

  • 2 additional classrooms

required for FDK

  • Built in 1988 with modular

construction (re‐locatable)

Region of Waterloo Air Photo: 2009

100 200 300 400 500

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

  • St. Vincent de Paul
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Southeast Galt School

  • WCDSB has an elementary

school site reserved in the Southeast Galt subdivision (East of Dundas St.)

  • Potential joint venture

project with the City of Cambridge, Cambridge Libraries and Waterloo Region DSB

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Goals

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Goals of the Review

  • Determine the ideal long‐term location and size for each

Southeast Galt school.

  • Determine long‐term enrolment boundaries within the Southeast

Galt Planning Area to balance enrolment amongst the schools.

  • Explore the long‐term sustainability of the schools in Southeast

Galt with particular focus on the impact of small schools.

  • Establish the boundary and size of a new elementary school east
  • f Dundas Street.
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Goals of the Review

  • Address site size and/or facility issues at St. Ambrose, St. Francis

and St. Vincent de Paul.

  • Determine how the full day kindergarten program can be fully

implemented by 2014.

  • Maximize the number of walkers.
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Questions?

slide-37
SLIDE 37

School Closure Review Process

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Ministry

  • Board Policy APF008: Pupil Accommodation Review Process

– Part A – Boundary Review Process – Part B – School Closure Review Process

  • Ministry Guideline

– Pupil Accommodation Review Guideline – Oct 31, 2006 – Revised Guideline – June 26, 2009 – Administrative Review

Policy Requirements

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Accommodation Review Committee (ARC)

Committee Composition: – School Superintendent (Chair) – Two parent representatives from each school in the review – Principal from each school included in the review – Chief Financial Officer (or designate) – Senior Manager of Capital Planning – Chief Managing Officer – Two Trustees (non‐voting members) – One business representative (where possible) – One municipal representative (where possible) – One parish representative (where possible)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Initiate Review & Form ARC (Nov. 14/11) School Information Profiles Public Consultation #1 (End‐February) Preliminary Options Public Consultation #2 (Mid‐April) Revise Options Public Consultation #3 (Mid‐June) Preferred Option & Recommendations Public Consultation #4 (Mid‐October) ARC Final Report to Director of Education Director’s Report to Board 3 Board Meetings (Nov 2012‐Jan 2013)

Review Process