[PPT] - South Dakota Board of Regents Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Hearing PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

South Dakota Board of Regents

Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Hearing Joint Appropriations Committee

January 31 – February 1, 2017

Sen. Larry Tidemann

Chair

Rep. David Anderson

Chair

Sen. John Wiik

Vice Chair

Rep. Jean Hunhoff

Vice Chair

1

SLIDE 2

Stewardship of Public Higher Education in South Dakota

2

John W. Bastian Harvey C. Jewett Kathryn Johnson Jim Morgan Conrad Adam Pam Roberts Bob Sutton

Vice President

Kevin Schieffer

Secretary

Randy Schaefer

President

SLIDE 3

Board of Regents’ Vision

Randy Schaefer, President

3

SLIDE 4

The 2020 Mission Statement

The South Dakota Board of Regents’ mission is to provide an excellent, efficient,

accessible, equitable, and affordable public university and special schools system

that improves South Dakota’s overall educational attainment and research

productivity,

while enriching the intellectual, economic, civic, social, and cultural life of the state, its

residents, and its communities.

4

SLIDE 5

65 Percent by 2025!

Goal is based on projections that roughly 65 percent of all jobs in our state will

require some level of postsecondary education by 2020.

Data from Georgetown University Public Policy Institute’s Center on Education and the Workforce.

5

SLIDE 6

Projected Revenues from Meeting 65% Goal

$107,600,000 $0 $20,000,000 $40,000,000 $60,000,000 $80,000,000 $100,000,000 $120,000,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 State Revenues

6

Source: NCHEMS; CLASP

SLIDE 7

Growth in Economic Impact

Annual economic impact of the state’s public universities has grown by 35 percent since 2010!

2016
SD public universities generate about $2.66 BILLION

in annual economic impact to South Dakota.

2010
SD public universities generate about

$1.97 BILLION in annual

economic impact to South Dakota.

7

Source: The Economic Impact of the SD Public University System, November 2016

SLIDE 8

University System and Special Schools

8

SLIDE 9

Regents’ Mission Includes Schools Serving Special K-12 Populations in South Dakota

South Dakota School for the Blind & Visually Impaired
Aberdeen campus
Meets educational needs of students birth to 21 who are blind, visually impaired, or multi-

handicapped.

Curriculum blends academic coursework and expanded core curriculum skills to address each

student’s individual learning modes and achieve his/her maximum independence.

Statewide outreach
Outreach vision consultants provide

information, recommendations, and assistance to students, families, and educators across the state. 9

SLIDE 10

Regents’ Mission Includes Schools Serving Special K-12 Populations in South Dakota

South Dakota School for the Deaf
Statewide outreach
Comprehensive educational evaluations and assistance with instructional

design, serving children, parents, and teachers across South Dakota.

Bilingual deaf education program
ffered through contract with

Harrisburg School District.

10

SLIDE 11

SDSD/SDSBVI Teachers’ Salary Increase

Amount needed to match public school teacher increase from

last year

South Dakota School for the Deaf - $59,508
South Dakota School for the Blind & Visually Impaired -

$86,985

11

LRC Budget Briefing, Pages 49-52

SLIDE 12

Higher Education in South Dakota

12

SLIDE 13

Higher Education

Attracts income
Generates income
Attracts business
Enhances individual wealth

13

SLIDE 14

Attracts Income

$272 million in federal money in FY16
Compares to $197 million from state’s General Fund

14

Source: SDBOR FY2017 Fact Book

SLIDE 15

Economic Impact of the South Dakota Public University System

15

Study Sponsors
SD Board of Regents
SD Chamber of Commerce &

Industry

Research Team
Michael Allgrunn, Associate Professor
f Economics, USD
Travis L. Letellier, Visiting Assistant

Professor of Economics, USD

Joslynn Clauson, Research Assistant

SLIDE 16

Generates Income

$2.66 BILLION
South Dakota public universities

generated about $2.66 billion of annual economic impact to South Dakota.

State’s investment was $197 million in

Fiscal Year 2016.

16

Source: The Economic Impact of the SD Public University System, November 2016

SLIDE 17

Generates Income

$162 MILLION
Sales and property tax revenues due

to economic activity generated by the public universities.

17

Source: The Economic Impact of the SD Public University System, November 2016

SLIDE 18

Generates Income

5,628 full-time jobs
Public universities directly supported 5,628

jobs in South Dakota.

21,950 other jobs
Other South Dakota industries generated

21,950 jobs as a result of the state’s public universities.

18

Source: The Economic Impact of the SD Public University System, November 2016

SLIDE 19

Attracts Business

Workforce
Family benefits
Social and

economic climate

19

Business expertise
Research partnerships

SLIDE 20

Milken Institute Study on Economic Development

20

A Matter of Degrees:

The Effect of Educational Attainment on Regional Economic Prosperity

SLIDE 21

Milken Institute Study

A Matter of Degrees: The effect of educational attainment

n regional economic prosperity
Key findings:
Education increases regional prosperity.
Better educated, bigger benefits.

21 ’

SLIDE 22

Enhances Individual Income

Source: Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce. (2011). The college payoff: Education, Occupations, Lifetime Earnings. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/tasha.dannenbring/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/QG3X22NQ/collegepayoff-complete.pdf Note: Salary wage calculations based on median earning data, numbers in millions..

22

$0.973 M $1.547 M $1.727 M $2.268 M $2.671 M $3.252 M $3.648 M $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 Less than HS Some College Associate Bachelor's Master's Doctoral Professional

+59% +78% +133% +175% +234% +275%

Median Lifetime Earnings in Millions 22

SLIDE 23

New U.S. High-Paying Jobs by Degree Level

2,800 152

39
500

500 1,500 2,500 3,500 Bachelor's Degree or Higher Some College or Associate Degree High School or Less 23

Source: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce (2015). Good Jobs are Back: College Graduates are First in Line

2010-2014

(in Thousands)

SLIDE 24

Impact of Education on Income

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 SD 24

Source: US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2013

States by Income and Education, 2013

Per Capita Income, 2013 Percent with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher

SLIDE 25

Strengthening South Dakota

Its Economic, Social, and Human Capital

25

Source: The College Board (2013). Education Pays; Institute for Higher Education Policy (1998). Reaping the Benefits: Defining the Public and Private Good of Going to College

SLIDE 26

Board of Regents’ Goals

Student Success
Increase degree production

26

SLIDE 27

Strategies to Achieve 65% Goal by 2025

Examples:

Enact proactive admission
Increase first-year enrollment of traditional-age

students

Marketing campaign for non-traditional students and

students with prior credits

Increase use of Prior Learning Assessment
College Application Week

27

SLIDE 28

Programs Fostering Early Completion

“15-to-Finish” models
Reduce credit-hour graduation requirement from 128

to 120

Co-requisite remediation models
Exploratory Studies – Reduce “catalog wandering”
Redesign General Education & transfer frameworks

28

SLIDE 29

Dual Credit Enrollments

29

1,333 2173 2590 1632 2307 352 371 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2014 2015 2016

HSDC Enrollments by Semester Type

Fall Enrollments Spring Enrollments Summer Enrollments

SLIDE 30

Dual Credit Grades

30 53.8% 29.3% 8.9% 2.3% 2.4% 3.1% 0.2%

High School Dual Credit Program Grades by Percentage

A B C D F W Other

Success Rates

ABC Rate: 92 percent since HSDC program started DFW Rate: 8 percent since HSDC program started

Increase in Success Rates:

Fall 2016 Semester ABC Rate: 94 percent

SLIDE 31

Affordability Measures Pay Off

31

Reduction of credit hours required for degree
Governor’s Dual Credit Program
Exploratory Studies

6%

5%

2% 4%

$20,000 $22,000 $24,000 $26,000 $28,000 $30,000 $32,000 Total Tuition & Fees for B.S. Degree 128 Credits 120 Credits 120 Credits w/Exp. Studies 120 Credits w/ 1 dual credit course 120 Credits w/3 dual credit courses

Savings = 17%

SLIDE 32

Improving System Completion

5,599 5,858 6,355 6,172 6,346 6,614 5,000 5,200 5,400 5,600 5,800 6,000 6,200 6,400 6,600 6,800 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

18% Increase in Total Graduates Since FY11

Total Graduates

32

SLIDE 33

At-Risk Student Completions

108 990 1,320 2,343 145 1,287 1,342 2,641 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 Amer.Ind Nontrad Underprepared Low Income FY11 FY16

12% 34% 30% 1.7%

33

SLIDE 34

Source: Peace Bransberger and Demarée K. Michelau. Knocking at the College Door: Projections of High School Graduates, 9th Edition. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2016.

9,391 10,000 7,500 8,000 8,500 9,000 9,500 10,000 10,500

Projected High School Graduates

34

SLIDE 35

2.48% 2.07% 12.05% 65.99% 5.68% 13.58% 14.90% 7.62% 0.00% 10.00% 20.00% 30.00% 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% Iowa Minnesota Montana North Dakota Nebraska Wyoming South Dakota Total

Source: Peace Bransberger and Demarée K. Michelau. Knocking at the College Door: Projections of High School Graduates, 9th

Edition. Boulder, CO: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2016.

35

Projected Growth of HS Graduates by State

SLIDE 36

South Dakota School of Mines Math at Mines

Requested, not recommended by the Governor
FY17 one-time appropriation of $250,000
$250,000 base funding to continue the program

36

Continuing Priority

LRC Budget Brief Page 35

SLIDE 37

Board of Regents’ Goals

Academic Quality and Performance
Document that academic programs are of the highest quality

37

SLIDE 38

Responsive Academic Programming

Rigorous approval process for new programs
Initial Intent-to-Plan request
Formal program approval

38

Campus Review

(Faculty, Departments, Committees, Industry Representatives)

Board Review & Approval System Review

(Board Staff, System Provosts/Presidents, Consultants)

SLIDE 39

Program Changes – 2014-16

39

Added Terminated

Undergraduate Associate & Bachelor’s Degrees 23 23 Undergraduate Minors 23 6 Graduate Degrees 14 3

SLIDE 40

Filling the Workforce Pipeline

Preparing South Dakotans for tomorrow’s workforce

40

Source: Regents’ Information Systems

1,732 1,203 1,086 620 554 526 502 358 327

2015-2016 Degrees from SD Public Universities

SLIDE 41

2020 Vision: The South Dakota Science and Innovation Strategy

1,559 1,630 1,693 1,734 1,860

500

1,000 1,500 2,000 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 STEM Graduates

Promote study in Science,

Technology, Engineering and Math

41

Source: Regents’ Information Systems

SLIDE 42

Academic Programming for Economic Development

42

2020 Vision: The South Dakota Science & Innovation Strategy prepared by the South Dakota EPSCoR Reach Committee identified five high-growth, STEM-oriented target sectors to drive a robust, higher-value future South Dakota economy.

1. Value-Added Agriculture & Agribusiness

BS, Precision Agriculture (SDSU) ’16 Minor, Meat Science (SDSU) ’15

SLIDE 43

43

2. Energy & Environment

Minor, Environmental Science (SDSMT) ’15 Minor, Petroleum Systems (SDSMT) ’14

3. Human Health and Nutrition

BS, Human Biology (SDSU) ’16 PhD, Health Sciences (USD) ’16 Certificate, Allied Health (NSU) ’15

Academic Programming for Economic Development

SLIDE 44

44

4, IT/Cyber Security/Information Assurance DSc, Cyber Security (DSU) ’14 Certificate, Bank Security (DSU) ’14

5. Materials & Advanced Manufacturing

AS, Manufacturing Technology (SDSU) ’16 BBA, Operational Analytics (USD) ’16

Academic Programming for Economic Development

SLIDE 45

Fact Check: What kind of graduates does a major South Dakota employer hire?

College majors of recently-hired graduates

working for Wells Fargo

Finance
Accounting
Business Administration, Business

Management, Business Marketing, Business Economics

Computer Science
Education-Teaching, Special Education
Speech Communications
Economics
Sociology
Agricultural Science, Agricultural

Business/Economics

Communications-Public Relations
Banking and Finance
Service Management
Music
Spanish
Biology

45

SLIDE 46

University of South Dakota Law School

Governor’s recommendation:

$1,200,000 one-time

FY17 General Bill adjustment
Senate Bill 32

46

LRC Budget Briefing, Page 18

SLIDE 47

Board of Regents’ Goals

Research and Economic Development
Increase annual research and contract expenditures

47

Advance knowledge
Enhance technology transfer and

commercialization

Catalyze economic development

SLIDE 48

Research is Economic Development

$102,563,284 $89,921,781 $0 $50,000,000 $100,000,000 $150,000,000 $200,000,000 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

SDBOR Research Activity FY02-FY16

Awards Expenditures

48

Source: SDBOR Office of Academic and Research Affairs

SLIDE 49

Research is Job Development

FY16 job creation – Faculty research efforts (FTE): 686
Research innovations – FY07-FY16
Invention disclosures – 508
Patent and intellectual property protections filed – 241
Patents/licenses issued – 138

49

Source: BOR system office

SLIDE 50

Governor Research Centers

A Snapshot of Success

Centers funded: 14 Funding leverage: 6:1 Students trained: 943 Innovations disclosed: 156 Patent filings: 70 Patents issued: 11 License agreements: 17 50

$136,692,895 $92,291,788 $41,156,646 $20,676,519

Research Funding: $290,817,848

Federal Private RCC Other State

SLIDE 51

Governor Research Centers and Economic Development

Twenty start-up companies affiliated with research centers have:
Created 187 jobs in South Dakota
Received 27 federal small business research (SBIR) awards, totaling

$7,877,510

Raised in excess of $23 million in private equity

51

SLIDE 52

Broader Impacts of the Governor Research Centers on University Research

20 40 60 80 100 120

Baseline (FY05) FY16 $55.5M $102.6M

Research Awards in Millions of Dollars

52 39 13 21 11 3

10 20 30 40 50 60

Disclosures Patent Filings Licenses

Technology Transfer

FY16 Baseline (FY07)

52

SLIDE 53

Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory

Governor’s recommendation:
$5 million in one-time funding
$800,000 in ongoing funds
Balance of funding
SDSU/ADRDL
Industry partners

53

LRC Budget Brief Pages 25

SD BOR Strategic Goal 3: Research and Economic Development

SLIDE 54

Statewide Continuing Priority

Dakota Lakes Research Farm
Requested, not recommended by the Governor
Important investment in precision agriculture research
$120,286 base funding
$75,000 one-time

funding

0.75 FTE

54

SLIDE 55

Board of Regents’ Goals

Affordability and Accountability
Reduce tuition and fee ranking to regional average
Create and capitalize on efficiencies

55

SLIDE 56

Focus on Efficiencies

Created a central electronic transcript processing center
Looking at new single-instance student system
New common tools provided for decision support
Centralizing and cataloging common reports
New library system with improved functionality
Continued focus on shared services

56

Continued focus on doing things more efficiently and effectively

SLIDE 57

System FTE Utilization

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Budgeted

System FTE Utilization

Utilized FTE Unutilized FTE

93.3% 93.2% 94.7% 94.1% 6.8% 6.7% 5.3% 5.9%

57

Overall system FTE budget reduced by 22.0 FTE in FY17.

SLIDE 58

Measuring Our Progress

Ensuring Accountability and Transparency

Board of Regents’ Fact Book
www.sdbor.edu/mediapubs/factbook/index.htm
Board of Regents’ Interactive Dashboards
www.sdbor.edu/dashboards
Board of Regents’ Strategic Plan – 17 System Metrics
www.sdbor.edu/theboard/StrategicPlan

58 58

SLIDE 59

Interactive Dashboard Reporting

Fall enrollment
High school transition
College matriculation
Freshmen migration
University affordability
Distance education

Access and Enrollment

59 59 59

SLIDE 60

Interactive Dashboard Reporting

Other Dashboard Categories

Institutional/peer analysis
BOR policies
State labor force (wages, labor force, employment projections)

60 60

SLIDE 61

Affordability Issues and Solutions

61

SLIDE 62

Decisions Driving Student Costs

Cumulative budget impact since FY99

Utility funding shortfall - $14,201,944
No inflation on operating base - $3,618,997
Health insurance shortfall - $14,485,060
Budget cuts - $26,861,982
Salary shortfall - $5,161,357
Reduction from 128 to 120 credit hours - $12,762,089
Total reduction to BOR budget - $77,091,429

62

SLIDE 63

Lower State Support Drives Higher Tuition

63

Source: SHEEO State Higher Education Finance (SHEF) Report, 2014

(Note: SHEF data adjusted for enrollment mix and cost of living, so numbers will differ from BOR Fact Book.)

Iowa Minnesota Montana Nebraska North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming National Average Appropriations Per FTE $5,335 $5,327 $4,939 $7,840 $7,888 $4,878 $15,561 $6,552 Net Tuition Revenue Per FTE $8,118 $7,111 $5,505 $5,401 $6,752 $8,221 $2,761 $5,777 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000

FY14 Public Postsecondary Education Educational Appropriations and Net Tuition Revenue Per FTE

SLIDE 64

Student Affordability – #1 Priority

Thank you for supporting tuition freezes in FY15 & FY17!

Tuition and Mandatory Fees Dollar Change From Prior Year Percent Change From Prior Year FY13* $7,675.62

$45.43
0.6%

FY14 $8,038.50 $362.88 4.7% FY15 $8,038.50 $0.00 0.0% FY16 $8,475.00 $436.50 5.4% FY17 $8,503.75 $28.75 0.3% *Net change, including reduction from 128 to 120 credit hours 64

SLIDE 65

State Support Impacts Affordability

FY15 and FY17 tuition freezes, supported by Gov. Daugaard

and the Legislature, improved affordability for SD students.

65

Source: BOR Fact Book FY 2017

State support of South Dakota public higher education increased from 41% to 46% over the past five years.

51% 55% 52% 51% 47% 44% 41% 41% 43% 44% 44% 46% 49% 45% 48% 49% 53% 56% 59% 59% 57% 56% 56% 54% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Projected

General Student

SLIDE 66

66

$13.57 $201.62 $481.14 $645.95 $779.47 $952.34 $958.01 $1,561.22 $1,798.81 $0.00 $200.00 $400.00 $600.00 $800.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,400.00 $1,600.00 $1,800.00 $2,000.00 South Dakota Montana Nebraska Iowa North Dakota Colorado Total/Average Minnesota Wyoming

In the Region: Need-Based Funding per Pell Eligible Student

SLIDE 67

Shared Responsibility Model

Source: WICHE: States in the Drivers Seat

67 67

SLIDE 68

South Dakota Opportunity Scholarship

68

2016-17 academic year: 3,875 recipients funded
Total of 14,721 recipients over program’s lifetime

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 1,217 1,220 1,239 1,252 1,300 2,432 2,533 2,606 2,577 2,575 New Recipients Continuing Recipients

3,649 3,753 3,845 3,829 3,875

SLIDE 69

Opportunity Scholarship Recipient Placement

69 Average placement rate of recipients is 70.1% over last 5 years.

Source: BOR Graduate Placement Dashboard 72.6% 67.9% 70.8% 70.7% 68.9% 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14

Placed by Graduation Year

(in South Dakota)

SLIDE 70

South Dakota Opportunity Scholarship

Governor’s recommendation for

additional funding: $412,798

Scholarship award increased Fall 2015

from $5,000 to $6,500

1,300 new students each year

70

LRC Budget Briefing, Pages 12-15

SLIDE 71

Student Funding of Buildings – Unique to South Dakota

Iowa: General obligation bonds or general funds cash
Minnesota: General obligation bonds
Montana: General obligation bonds or general funds cash
Nebraska: General funds cash
North Dakota: General funds cash
Wyoming: General funds cash

71

SLIDE 72

Funding New Facilities and Major Renovations

Academic Buildings

HEFF – 11.5 percent of tuition projected to generate $28.2 million in FY18
$16.2 million for M&R
$14.3 million for SD Building Authority lease payments
New buildings when cash flow permits
In the last 20 years:
HEFF - $274 million
Grants and private fundraising by presidents

and foundations - $270 million

State funding - $64.8 million

72

SLIDE 73

FY18 Additional M&R Investment

(estimates)

2% goal - $27 million
Student contribution - $17.4 million
State contribution - $8.7 million
Needed to meet goal - .9 million

LRC Budget Briefing Pages 8-9

73

SLIDE 74

Maintenance and Repair

Thank you, Governor Daugaard and Legislature!
M&R investments protect significant building and infrastructure assets
Governor recommends $918,737 for M&R
2 percent replacement value

74

LRC Budget Briefing Pages 8-9

Fiscal Year Replacement Value (in millions) M&R Allocated (in millions) % of Replacement Values

FY14 $1,135,770,710 $18,590,650 1.6% FY15 $1,184,230,289 $20,068,760 1.7% FY16 $1,260,771,828 $22,563,326 1.8% FY17 $1,291,889,484 $25,837,790 2.0% FY18 $1,354,015,821 $27,080,316 2.0%

SLIDE 75

System Budget Adjustments

Central Office FTE Use
Utility adjustments
Federal and other authority adjustments
Research grants and contracts
Senate Bill 19

75

SLIDE 76

76

35%

SLIDE 77

77

SLIDE 78

Board of Regents Central Office FTE Use

78

FY16
Budgeted – 75.3
Used – 60.1
FY17
Budgeted – 70.3
Board office – 23.0
Regents Information Systems – 25.0
Enrollment Services Center – 12.3
South Dakota Library Network – 9.0
Academic initiatives – 1.0
Remaining unfilled - 10
2.0 FTE Enrollment Services Center
6.0 FTE South Dakota Library Network
2.0 FTE Regents Information Systems

SLIDE 79

Central Office – FY18 Governor’s Recommended Budget Items

Lease payment adjustments
($3,502) general funds for annual lease payment
$656,535 other fund authority for SDSU Performing Arts Center
Other fund authority
$3,672,951 for research grants and contracts
$500,000 other fund authority for Regents Information Systems

79

LRC Budget Brief Pages 6-10

SLIDE 80

FY18 Utility Support for Academic Facilities

Based on FY16 usage and additional square footage
Senate Bill 20 - Realign utility funding

Governor’s recommendation: Reduction of $2,574,186

LRC Budget Brief Pages 17, 24, 34, 38, 42, 46, 50 & 52

80

SLIDE 81

Federal and Other Informational Budgets

Senate Bill 19
Research Grants and Contracts Funds
Elimination of excess budget authority
More accurate budgeting

81

SLIDE 82

Federal Fund Authority

82 FY17 Federal Fund Authority Budget Fund Authority Transferred to Informational Budget Reduction of Federal Fund Authority

Central Office $574,447 $0 $0 USD $13,547,785 $7,917,246 ($5,630,539) USD-SSOM $11,932,296 $9,177,870 ($2,754,426) SDSU $30,849,738 $24,000,000 ($6,849,738) SDSU-EXT* $8,564,458 $2,000,000 ($2,564,458) SDSU-AES* $17,830,207 $7,250,000 ($6,973,652) SDSM&T $34,219,819 $15,219,810 ($19,000,009) NSU $1,983,236 $1,978,117 ($5,119) BHSU $4,958,587 $4,277,168 ($681,419) DSU $5,545,182 $3,445,182 ($2,100,000) SDSD/SDBVI $201,361 $0 $0 Total $130,207,116 $75,265,393 ($46,559,356)

*SDSU-EXT and SDSU-AES both have federally appropriated funds of $4 million and $3,606,555, respectively.

SLIDE 83

Other Fund Authority

83 FY17 Other Fund Authority Budget Fund Authority Transferred to Informational Budget Fund Authority Transferred to Tuition Budget Adjustment to Other Fund Authority

Central Office $45,641,056 $3,672,951 $0 $4,829,486 USD $109,908,163 $5,665,623 $10,990,406 ($13,301,059) USD-SSOM $19,840,657 $1,403,821 $1,221,441 $3,289,429 SDSU $196,825,758 $5,600,000 $17,602,595 ($22,625,432) SDSU-EXT $2,423,536 $300,000 $0 ($400,000) SDSU-AES $15,432,703 $5,500,000 $0 ($1,500,000) SDSM&T $47,933,352 $2,310,100 $750,000 ($9,457,257) NSU $26,589,864 $325,530 $4,454,938 ($1,427,115) BHSU $37,056,671 $634,850 $11,461,982 ($4,415,584) DSU $26,438,356 $1,840,000 $8,509,954 ($800,000) SDSD/SDSBVI $1,161,964 $0 $0 $0 Total $529,252,080 $23,579,924 $54,991,316 ($45,807,532)