Some Schum humpeter erian Th Though ghts on on Gro rowth and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

some schum humpeter erian th though ghts on on gro rowth
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Some Schum humpeter erian Th Though ghts on on Gro rowth and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some Schum humpeter erian Th Though ghts on on Gro rowth and nd Developm opmen ent World Bank 8 June 2016 Peter Howitt Joseph Schumpeter Sch Schumpeterian g growth theor ory Long-run growth driven by innovations Innovations


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Some Schum humpeter erian Th Though ghts

  • n
  • n Gro

rowth and nd Developm

  • pmen

ent

World Bank 8 June 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Peter Howitt

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Joseph Schumpeter

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Sch Schumpeterian g growth theor

  • ry
  • Long-run growth driven by innovations
  • Innovations result from entrepreneurial activities motivated by

prospect of innovation rents

  • Creative destruction: new innovations displace old technologies
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outlin line

  • Introduction
  • Growth enigmas
  • Growth meets development
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Growth eni enigmas

  • Competition and growth
  • The debate on secular stagnation
  • Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
  • Firm dynamics
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Competition and growth: theoretical prediction

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Competition and growth: empirical relationship

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Richard Blundell

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Competition, growth and distance to frontier

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Competition and growth: the inverted-U relationship

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Growth eni enigmas

  • Competition and growth
  • The debate on secular stagnation
  • Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
  • Firm dynamics
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Secular stagnation?

  • Gordon and the fruit-bearing tree approach
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Secular stagnation?

  • Dale Jorgenson
  • Missing Growth
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Missing G Growth from

  • m C

Creative D Destruct ction

  • n

(Agh ghion

  • n,

, Ber Bergeaud eaud, , Bop

  • ppart,

, Kl Klenow, Li; 2 2016) 016)

  • ABBKL argue that innovation involving creative destruction is not

properly taken into account by current measures of TFP growth

  • Typically, whenever old products in the PPI are replaced by new

products, the statistical office (BLS) uses the price changes of surviving (incumbent) products to infer the overall inflation rate

  • Using the Schumpeterian growth paradigm, we provide explicit

expression for economy-wide missing growth from creative destruction

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Missing G Growth from

  • m C

Creative D Destruct ction

  • n

(Agh ghion

  • n,

, Ber Bergeaud eaud, , Bop

  • ppart,

, Kl Klenow, Li; 2 2016) 016)

  • We use two different methods to calibrate missing growth from

creative destruction:

  • In the first exercise, we use micro data from the Longitudinal Business

Database (US Census) on the employment/payroll shares of entrants, exiters, and continuers in all non-farm business sectors

  • In the second exercise, we use data on the flow and quality of patents

(exploiting information on patent citations) to estimate the arrival rates and stepsizes of the various kinds of innovation

  • The two exercises yield missing growth estimates of comparable

magnitude, from 0.4 to 1 percentage point on average per year.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Growth eni enigmas

  • Competition and growth
  • The debate on secular stagnation
  • Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
  • Firm dynamics
slide-19
SLIDE 19

5 10 15 20 25 30 1918 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Percentile Share U.S. Top 1% U.S. Top 0.1%

US Top 1% US Top 0.1%

Income shares at the very top over last 100 years: US top 1% increases from 9% in 1978 to 22% in 2012

Source: Atkinson, Piketty & Saez; High Income Database

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Main i idea ea

  • Innovation is a source of top income inequality which differs

from other sources (entry barriers,..)

  • *Steve Jobs* versus *Carlos Slim*
slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Why innovation

  • n d

differs from

  • m ot
  • ther sou
  • urce

ces of

  • f t

top

  • p 1% i

incr crease?

  • Generates growth (we know)
  • But in addition:
  • Innovation does not seem to increase broad inequality
  • Innovation positively correlated with social mobility (creative destruction)
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

By contrast, lobbying…

  • Increases top income inequality
  • Increases inequality at large
  • Reduces social mobility
  • Does not enhance growth
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Growth eni enigmas

  • Competition and growth
  • The debate on secular stagnation
  • Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
  • Firm dynamics
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Firm d dyn ynamic ics

  • The empirical literature has documented various stylized

facts on firm size distribution and firm dynamics using micro firm-level data.

  • the firm size distribution is highly skewed;
  • firm size and firm age are highly correlated;
  • small firms exit more frequently, but the ones that survive tend to

grow faster than the average growth rate.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Firm S Size D Distribution w with M Multiproduct Firms

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Outlin line

  • Introduction
  • Growth enigmas
  • Growth meets development
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Gr Growth m meet d developmen ent

  • Appropriate growth policy and the middle income trap
  • Growth, development and firm dynamics
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Competition, growth and distance to frontier

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

En Enhanci cing g prod

  • duct

ctivi vity g growth i in advance ced cou

  • untries
  • Liberalization of product market
  • Investment in higher education
  • Liberalization of labor market
  • Equity financing
slide-36
SLIDE 36

En Enhanci cing g prod

  • duct

ctivi vity g growth i in emergi ging m g market econ

  • nom
  • mies
  • Foster technology transfers (Keller,…)
  • Reallocate factors (Hsieh and Klenow,…)
  • Improve management practices (Bloom and Van Reenen,…)
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Gr Growth m meet d developmen ent

  • Appropriate growth policy and the middle income trap
  • Growth, development and firm dynamics
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Gr Growth, d devel elop

  • pment, a

and firm d dynam amics

  • Hsieh and Klenow
  • Akcigit, Alp and Peters
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Link between the age and the size of firms

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Distribution of firms productivity

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Conclusion

  • Schumpeterian growth theory is both, a new theory and also a new

way to do growth theory, through continuous dialogue with micro- econometricians and micro-data

  • The purpose is both, to better understand the growth process and

also to rethink growth policy

  • Addressing growth enigmas is useful, not only to satisfy our scientific

curiosity, but also for society