SLIDE 1 Some Schum humpeter erian Th Though ghts
rowth and nd Developm
ent
World Bank 8 June 2016
SLIDE 2
Peter Howitt
SLIDE 3
Joseph Schumpeter
SLIDE 4 Sch Schumpeterian g growth theor
- ry
- Long-run growth driven by innovations
- Innovations result from entrepreneurial activities motivated by
prospect of innovation rents
- Creative destruction: new innovations displace old technologies
SLIDE 5 Outlin line
- Introduction
- Growth enigmas
- Growth meets development
SLIDE 6 Growth eni enigmas
- Competition and growth
- The debate on secular stagnation
- Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
- Firm dynamics
SLIDE 7
Competition and growth: theoretical prediction
SLIDE 8
Competition and growth: empirical relationship
SLIDE 9
Richard Blundell
SLIDE 10
Competition, growth and distance to frontier
SLIDE 11
Competition and growth: the inverted-U relationship
SLIDE 12 Growth eni enigmas
- Competition and growth
- The debate on secular stagnation
- Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
- Firm dynamics
SLIDE 13 Secular stagnation?
- Gordon and the fruit-bearing tree approach
SLIDE 14 Secular stagnation?
- Dale Jorgenson
- Missing Growth
SLIDE 15
SLIDE 16 Missing G Growth from
Creative D Destruct ction
(Agh ghion
, Ber Bergeaud eaud, , Bop
, Kl Klenow, Li; 2 2016) 016)
- ABBKL argue that innovation involving creative destruction is not
properly taken into account by current measures of TFP growth
- Typically, whenever old products in the PPI are replaced by new
products, the statistical office (BLS) uses the price changes of surviving (incumbent) products to infer the overall inflation rate
- Using the Schumpeterian growth paradigm, we provide explicit
expression for economy-wide missing growth from creative destruction
SLIDE 17 Missing G Growth from
Creative D Destruct ction
(Agh ghion
, Ber Bergeaud eaud, , Bop
, Kl Klenow, Li; 2 2016) 016)
- We use two different methods to calibrate missing growth from
creative destruction:
- In the first exercise, we use micro data from the Longitudinal Business
Database (US Census) on the employment/payroll shares of entrants, exiters, and continuers in all non-farm business sectors
- In the second exercise, we use data on the flow and quality of patents
(exploiting information on patent citations) to estimate the arrival rates and stepsizes of the various kinds of innovation
- The two exercises yield missing growth estimates of comparable
magnitude, from 0.4 to 1 percentage point on average per year.
SLIDE 18 Growth eni enigmas
- Competition and growth
- The debate on secular stagnation
- Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
- Firm dynamics
SLIDE 19 5 10 15 20 25 30 1918 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Percentile Share U.S. Top 1% U.S. Top 0.1%
US Top 1% US Top 0.1%
Income shares at the very top over last 100 years: US top 1% increases from 9% in 1978 to 22% in 2012
Source: Atkinson, Piketty & Saez; High Income Database
SLIDE 20 Main i idea ea
- Innovation is a source of top income inequality which differs
from other sources (entry barriers,..)
- *Steve Jobs* versus *Carlos Slim*
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22 Why innovation
differs from
ces of
top
incr crease?
- Generates growth (we know)
- But in addition:
- Innovation does not seem to increase broad inequality
- Innovation positively correlated with social mobility (creative destruction)
SLIDE 23
SLIDE 24
SLIDE 25 By contrast, lobbying…
- Increases top income inequality
- Increases inequality at large
- Reduces social mobility
- Does not enhance growth
SLIDE 26 Growth eni enigmas
- Competition and growth
- The debate on secular stagnation
- Innovation, inequality, and social mobility
- Firm dynamics
SLIDE 27 Firm d dyn ynamic ics
- The empirical literature has documented various stylized
facts on firm size distribution and firm dynamics using micro firm-level data.
- the firm size distribution is highly skewed;
- firm size and firm age are highly correlated;
- small firms exit more frequently, but the ones that survive tend to
grow faster than the average growth rate.
SLIDE 28
Firm S Size D Distribution w with M Multiproduct Firms
SLIDE 29
SLIDE 30 Outlin line
- Introduction
- Growth enigmas
- Growth meets development
SLIDE 31 Gr Growth m meet d developmen ent
- Appropriate growth policy and the middle income trap
- Growth, development and firm dynamics
SLIDE 32
Competition, growth and distance to frontier
SLIDE 33
SLIDE 34
SLIDE 35 En Enhanci cing g prod
ctivi vity g growth i in advance ced cou
- untries
- Liberalization of product market
- Investment in higher education
- Liberalization of labor market
- Equity financing
SLIDE 36 En Enhanci cing g prod
ctivi vity g growth i in emergi ging m g market econ
- nom
- mies
- Foster technology transfers (Keller,…)
- Reallocate factors (Hsieh and Klenow,…)
- Improve management practices (Bloom and Van Reenen,…)
SLIDE 37 Gr Growth m meet d developmen ent
- Appropriate growth policy and the middle income trap
- Growth, development and firm dynamics
SLIDE 38 Gr Growth, d devel elop
and firm d dynam amics
- Hsieh and Klenow
- Akcigit, Alp and Peters
SLIDE 39
Link between the age and the size of firms
SLIDE 40
Distribution of firms productivity
SLIDE 41 Conclusion
- Schumpeterian growth theory is both, a new theory and also a new
way to do growth theory, through continuous dialogue with micro- econometricians and micro-data
- The purpose is both, to better understand the growth process and
also to rethink growth policy
- Addressing growth enigmas is useful, not only to satisfy our scientific
curiosity, but also for society