Sole-sourcing Update Medical Care Advisory Committee (MCAC) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sole sourcing update
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Sole-sourcing Update Medical Care Advisory Committee (MCAC) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sole-sourcing Update Medical Care Advisory Committee (MCAC) Thursday, December 19, 2019 1 P URPOSE To reduce Medicaid spending To increase beneficiary access To improve quality To streamline service To increase beneficiary


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Sole-sourcing Update

Medical Care Advisory Committee (MCAC) Thursday, December 19, 2019

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

PURPOSE

  • To reduce Medicaid spending
  • To increase beneficiary access
  • To improve quality
  • To streamline service
  • To increase beneficiary satisfaction
  • To address the needs of a specific population
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

SUGGESTIONS

Sole-sourcing should be the lowest-cost, most streamlined approach. But the provider/distributor network must be able to meet demand smoothly when there is significant utilization. The state should review for network adequacy, particularly when life- sustaining items are involved. Fragmentation of services and unnecessary hardship for beneficiaries may be created in the following situations:

  • Different MCPs contract with different sole-source

providers.

  • A single MCP has multiple sole-source specialty providers.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

FREEDOM OF CHOICE

Individuals should be able to opt out of dealing with sole-source providers. Certain DMEPOS suppliers could be enrolled as "legacy" providers.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

DATA TO BE COLLECTED AND METRICS TO BE

MONITORED

  • Baseline performance measures (established in advance)
  • Opt-out ratios
  • Utilization trends
  • Customer satisfaction
  • Provider satisfaction
  • Correlated healthcare

(e.g., incontinence items / UTIs / pharmaceuticals)

  • HEDIS measures
  • PMPM costs
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

CONSIDERATIONS & RED FLAGS

  • Stakeholder review w/open comment period
  • Establish time limits on sole sourcing (termination clause)
  • Consideration of service delivery systems (e.g., lower acuity

services)

  • Oversight by state agency (e.g., periodic review of

utilization, complaints, costs)