Solar Hydroponics Monitoring Vehicles SAC Undergraduate Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

solar hydroponics
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Solar Hydroponics Monitoring Vehicles SAC Undergraduate Research - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solar Hydroponics Monitoring Vehicles SAC Undergraduate Research Project Tepher Ward ~ Michelle Mata ~ Juli Williams August 22, 2016 Team Members Tepher Ward Team Lead; Mechanical Design Michelle Mata V1 Arduino Programmer


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Solar Hydroponics Monitoring Vehicles

SAC Undergraduate Research Project

August 22, 2016 Tepher Ward ~ Michelle Mata ~ Juli Williams

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Team Members

 Tepher Ward – Team Lead; Mechanical Design  Michelle Mata – V1 Arduino Programmer  Juli Williams – V2 Raspberry Pi Programmer

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction to Hydroponics

 Soilless farming  Shipping container is 320 sq. ft.  Controlled environment  ReEnergize initiatives

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Requirements

 Solar Hydroponics Team

Remote control Data tracking via WiFi

 Environmental

Temperature ranges from 70 – 90 F Humidity ranges from 60% - 80%

 ReEnergize Program

Cost-efficient Adaptable for future enhancements

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Project Goal

The Hydroponics Monitoring Vehicles team set out to construct and compare two vehicles to determine which would be better suited to meet all needs, including end-user, environmental, and program requirements.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Design for V1

 Construction

 Tetrix parts  Tetrix motors

 Electronics

 Arduino UNO  WiFi Shield 101  Motor driver

 Programming

 Windows  Arduino IDE  Arduino libraries

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Design for V2

 Construction

 Hardware store parts  Tetrix motors

 Electronics

 Raspberry Pi (RPi)  Motor driver

 Programming

 Linux  Minibian  Apache

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results for V1

 Construction

 Constraints of components  Durability of parts

 Electronics

 Sufficient drivers

 Programming

 Arduino pin overrides  Shield limitations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results for V2

 Construction

 Adaptability of components  Durability of parts  Balance and weight distribution

 Electronics

 Sufficient drivers

 Programming

 Web-accessible controls  Controlled stops

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusions and Findings

 End-user Requirements Met

Both V1 and V2

 Environmental Requirements Met

Both V1 and V2

 Program Requirements Met

Arduino and Raspberry Pi V2 More Structurally Adaptable and Flexible V2 More Cost-efficient ($170 vs $420 for

materials)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Future of SAC’s RC-HMVs Line sensors Swivel-mounted front camera Better traction and weight distribution Data tracking via WiFi Camera hoisting mechanism Moisture-proof A cool name and logo!

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Acknowledgements

Team Advisors and Supports Sponsors

  • Mr. Steven Lewis – Director of Eco

Centro, Project Advisor

  • Mr. Klaus Bartels – Adjunct Faculty,

Physics, Engineering, and Architecture Department, Project Advisor

  • Mr. Ben Uresti – Academic Lab

Technician for the MESA Center, Technical Advisor

  • Ms. Bly Korseau – Engineering

Administrative Assistant

  • Ms. Barbara Knotts – Adelante Tejas Project

Grant Director

  • Ms. Patty Medina – Exitos Grant Director
  • Ms. Dee Dixon – MESA Center Coordinator
  • Ms. Sylvia San Miguel – Administrative Assistant
  • Ms. Susan Paddock – LSAMP/CIMA Grant Co-PI
  • Ms. Susan Espinoza – Director of College Grants

and Development

  • Dr. Robert Vela – SAC President
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Questions?