soil nitrogen and carbon management project
play

Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project John E. Sawyer Mahdi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project John E. Sawyer Mahdi Al-Kaisi Daniel Barker Marc Kruse John Lundvall Department of Agronomy Iowa State University Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project 43 Sites 2001-2003 Soil N and C


  1. Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project John E. Sawyer Mahdi Al-Kaisi Daniel Barker Marc Kruse John Lundvall Department of Agronomy Iowa State University

  2. Soil Nitrogen and Carbon Management Project 43 Sites – 2001-2003 Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  3. Project Objectives � Demonstrate potential of a new soil N test in Iowa corn production � Demonstrate corn N fertilization needs in corn following soybean � Demonstrate impact of N fertilization on short-term soil N - C change and CO 2 release Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  4. Project Methods � 2001-2003 � 43 Sites on Producer Fields Across Iowa � Corn-Soybean Rotation, with First-Year of N Rate Application � 0 to 200 lb N/acre in 40 lb N Increments � Determine Economic Optimum N Rate, N Fertilizer Response, Relative Yield � Monitor Corn N Status – Leaf Greenness � Multiple Soil Sampling by Depth and Time � Determine Soil N, C, and Illinois N Soil Test � Monitor CO 2 Emission Across Multiple Seasons Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  5. Many Procedures Evaluated for Assessing Plant-Available N � Indirect (crop rotation) � Plant vegetation � Yield, total N uptake, uptake with no applied N, concentration, plant sensing � Total soil N analysis � Inorganic N forms � Laboratory microbial incubation � Chemical extraction � Water, strong acids or bases, neutral salts � Analyze extract for C, total N, distillable NH 3 , ultraviolet adsorption Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  6. Hydrolyzable Amino Sugar-N Basis for Illinois Soil N Test � Mason-jar diffusion of amino sugar-N fraction of soil {Mulvaney and Khan, SSAJ 65:1284-1292} {Mulvaney et al., SSAJ 65:1164-1172} � Improved determination of amino sugar-N fraction � Indicated � “Pool” of readily mineralizable organic-N � Indicated corn responsiveness to N fertilization • Critical level 200 – 250 ppm (12-inch depth) � Potential for preplant soil sampling Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  7. Illinois Soil N Test Procedure Khan, Mulvaney and Hoeft (2001) � Weigh a 1-g sample of air dried soil (ground < 2 mm) into a Mason jar � Add 10 mL 2 M NaOH and swirl gently � Seal jar with lid assembly containing petri dish with 5 ml boric acid-indicator solution � Heat on hot-plate for 5-hr at 48-50 °C � Titrate boric acid solution to endpoint with standardized 0.01 M H 2 SO 4 � Critical level 225 - 235 ppm (12-inch depth) Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  8. Soil Test Results Same for Fall and Spring Samples 0-6 and 0-12 Inch Depth Fall versus Spring Soil Sampling Illinois N Soil Test Values 0-12 Inch, 2001 600 0-12 Inch, 2002 0-6 Inch, 2001 500 0-6 Inch, 2002 0-12 Inch, 2003 400 Fall (ppm) 0-6 Inch, 2003 300 200 100 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Spring (ppm) Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  9. Soil Test Results Not Related to N Response Relationship Between the Illinois N Soil Test (Spring 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) and Corn N Response 100 2001 90 2002 80 N-Fertilizer Response (%) 2003 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm) Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  10. Soil Test Results Not Related to Relative Yield Relationship Between the Illinois N Soil Test (Spring 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) and Relative Corn Yield 1.0 2001 2002 0.9 Relative Corn Yield (No N 2003 0.8 Control) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm) Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  11. Soil Test Results Not Related to Needed N Rate Relationship Between the Illinois N Soil Test (Spring 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) and Economic N Rate (10:1 Corn:N ratio) 200 2001 180 2002 Economic N Rate (lb N/acre) 160 2003 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm) Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  12. Soil Test Results Related to Total Soil N Illinois N Soil Test and Total Soil N (Spring or Fall 0-12 Inch Depth Samples) 4000 Total Soil N = -41.4 + 6.608*INST, R 2 = 0.86*** 2001 2002 2003 3000 Total Soil N (ppm) 2000 1000 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Illinois N Soil Test (ppm) Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  13. No-N (Control) Corn Yield Reflected N Response Relationship Between Control (No-N) Corn Yield and Yield Response to Economic Optimum N 100 43 S-C sites N Fertilizer Response, % 80 60 40 20 0 3 2 8 8 7 0 8 0 8 4 8 4 7 2 1 5 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Control (no-N) Yield, bu/acre Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  14. High Productivity Did Not Require High N Input Economic Optimum N Rate (10:1 Corn:N Price Ratio) Ranked by Site Maximum Fertilized Yield 200 180 Economic N Rate, lb N/acre 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 5 8 0 4 7 9 2 1 7 3 2 7 1 2 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 9 9 0 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Maximum Yield, bu/acre Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  15. Economic Optimum N Rate Varied Between Season Economic Optimum N Rate at Repeat Sites Year Site 2001 2003 Difference - - - - - - - - lb N/acre - - - - - - - - Boone-S 103 136 33 Louisa 73 117 44 Tama 38 101 63 Floyd 3 0 3 Economic optimum N rate calculated at 10:1 corn:N price ratio. Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  16. Corn Leaf Greenness Indicated N Need Relative R1 Stage Ear Leaf Chlorophyll Meter Reading vs. Applied N Rate Difference from Economic N Response 1.00 Relative Chlorophyll Meter 0.90 Reading 0.80 0.70 2002 N/C Sites 2001 N/C Sites 0.60 1999-2002 LTN Sites 2003 N/C Sites 0.50 -200 -160 -120 -80 -40 0 40 80 120 160 200 Difference in Average N Rate, lb N/acre Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  17. Corn Leaf Greenness Similar at V15 and R1 Relative Leaf Chlorophyll Meter Reading vs. Applied N Rate Difference from Economic N Response 1.00 Relative Chlorophyll Meter 0.90 Reading 0.80 0.70 C-S_V8 C-S_V15 0.60 C-S_R1 C-S_R3 0.50 -200 -160 -120 -80 -40 0 40 80 120 160 200 Difference in Average N Rate, lb N/acre Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  18. Carbon Dioxide Emission Rate Not Affected by Prior N App., Boone-S Site 2002 Soybean Crop 2002 300 0 lbs / A 80 lbs / A 250 Average CO 2 Emission Rate (lbs / A /day) 160 lbs / A ns ns 200 lbs / A 200 ns 150 ns ns ns ns ns 100 ns 50 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  19. Carbon Dioxide Emission Rate Higher With No Applied N, Boone-S Site 2003 Corn Crop 2003 300 0 lbs / A 80 lbs / A 250 Average CO 2 Emission Rate (lbs / A / day) 160 lbs / A 200 lbs / A 200 ns s 0.61 150 ns ns 0.44 s s ns 0.33 100 ns ns s 0.44 50 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  20. Cumulative Carbon Dioxide Emission Not Affected by Prior N App., Boone-S Site 2002 Soybean 2002 14000 ns 0 lbs / A ns 80 lbs / A 12000 ns 160 lbs / A Cumulative CO 2 Emissions (lbs / A) ns 10000 200 lbs / A ns 8000 ns 6000 4000 ns 2000 ns ns 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  21. Cumulative Carbon Dioxide Emission Not Affected by N Rate, Boone-S Site 2003 Corn 2003 14000 0 lbs / A ns 80 lbs / A 12000 Cumulative CO 2 Emissions Rate (lbs / A) 160 lbs / A ns 10000 200 lbs / A ns 8000 ns 6000 ns ns 4000 ns ns 2000 ns ns 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Days After Planting Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  22. Soybean Residue C and N Input to Soil Boone-S Site Fall 2002 N rate Dry Matter Total C Total N C:N Ratio - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - lb/acre - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 : 1 0 6267 a 2697 a 69 a 80 6025 a 2608 a 69 a 38 : 1 160 6590 a 2822 a 82 a 34 : 1 200 7385 a 3179 a 90 a 35 : 1 *Means with the same letters are not significantly different at Pr ≤ 0.05. Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  23. Summary � Illinois N Soil Test was not predictive of corn response to applied N or economic optimum N rate, and is not recommended for adjusting corn N fertilization on Iowa soils � Corn response to applied N varied across sites � Economic optimum N rate was not consistent between years at repeat sites Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  24. Summary � Corn yield with no applied N (control) generally reflected site responsiveness to applied N � Leaf greenness indicated corn N need � Large amounts of CO 2 were released and approximated residue carbon input Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

  25. Thank you to the many cooperators and individuals who helped make the project a success. Soil N and C Project, Iowa State Univ., 2004

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend