SLIDE 1
1
2
SOFNA Streets and Sidewalks City Council Capital Budget Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SOFNA Streets and Sidewalks City Council Capital Budget Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
South of Forest Neighborhood Association (SOFNA) SOFNA Streets and Sidewalks City Council Capital Budget Review 2007-08 Fiscal Year May 15 th , 2007 1 South of Forest Neighborhood Association (SOFNA) Streets and sidewalks in the South of
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
3
Stevens Creek Winchester
SOFNA Represents a Unique Mix of Residential and Commercial Properties 268 Residential Properties 40 Commercial Properties 11 Streets
South of Forest Neighborhood – Santa Clara
BAREC
SLIDE 4
4
South of Forest Neighborhood - History
City of Santa Clara annexed fifteen separate residential areas in the SOFNA area over 24 years from 1961 to 1985
SLIDE 5
5
Safety and Street Conditions in Santa Clara
From the City’s Website:
“Santa Clara has a long tradition of quality public services and a well- maintained infrastructure.” “Santa Clara's physical conditions continue to receive the highest rating in Santa Clara County.” http://www.ci.santa-clara.ca.us/community/commu_community.html
“Inside Santa Clara” Newsletter – March 2006: Recognition from Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the highest pavement conditions of all jurisdictions in the nine Bay Area counties.
SLIDE 6
6
A Picture Paints A Thousand Words…
Tyler and Cecil Cypress and Cecil
SLIDE 7
7
A Picture Paints A Thousand Words…
3515 Cecil
Street is Buckling Non-SOFNA Streets Are In Good Condition
Westridge (North) Westridge (South)
SLIDE 8
8
A Picture Paints A Thousand Words…
Cypress and Cecil
Weeds Indicate Insufficient or Non-Existent Aggregate Base
277 Bel Ayre
Patching Not Feasible
Westridge and Forest
SLIDE 9
9
Asphalt Patching Does Not Address the Root Cause of SOFNA Street and Sidewalk Problems
Ongoing patching is not the solution due to the serious deterioration of the materials that comprise the street and sidewalks.
Area was constructed in the 1940’s and 1950’s Concrete and Asphalt is Beyond End-of-Life Subsoil Expands and Contracts Bed / Foundation Insufficient Lack of Street Crown (raised center) accelerates deterioration
Maintenance costs will continue to rise and will not address the liability risk exposure to the City.
SLIDE 10
10
Asphalt Patching Does Not Address the Root Cause of SOFNA Street and Sidewalk Problems
- Asphalt is not glue.
- Broken concrete will continue to “drift”
which reintroduces the mitigated safety risk.
- Asphalt is not city standard for
sidewalk material.
- Concrete is the standard for
sidewalks due to smooth finish which is less likely to create hazards. The useful life of a concrete road or sidewalk is approximately 40 years --
American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA).
The average life of concrete road is 30 to 35 years -- Federal Highway Administration.
SLIDE 11
11
Asphalt Patching Does Not Address the Root Cause of SOFNA Street and Sidewalk Problems
The Useful Life of Asphalt is Shorter Than Concrete. End-of-Life Asphalt will Experience Accelerated Deterioration.
“During Rainy Seasons, Water “Injected” in Cracks by Automobile Tires Contributes Significantly to Asphalt Breakdown.” – Tom Trumbull, Stevens Creek Quarry
SLIDE 12
12
Existing Vs. Standard
Streets and Sidewalks Have Not Been Replaced In ~65 Years. SOFNA area was built to the old County standards, which are significantly less than City standards. Existing Street Design Does Not Convey Rain Runoff Well. (City Engineer - Oct. 2006) Insufficient Base Increases Rate of Cracking. Street Design Inadequate for Modern Conditions. (City Engineer) Required Aggregate Base May Be Greater Than 6”.
SLIDE 13
13
Safety Risks in SOFNA Area
The City repaired streets and sidewalks in other areas that did not meet City safety standards
The 2006/07 Capital Improvement Project appropriates capital dollars for the City’s "Street Rehabilitation Program," for damaged streets that "create hazards for both motorists and pedestrians which may become a city liability. Repair removes possible liability and enhances ride quality."
- Standards – Streets, curbs and sidewalks do not comply with the City’s
- standards. The standards were adopted to provide protection to pedestrians
from vehicular traffic.
- Accessibility – Sidewalks are not accessible nor safe for wheelchairs, walkers,
and those with special needs.
- Liability – There is a delay between the time a hazard is reported and when
the condition is repaired.
SLIDE 14
14
Lack of Safety Risk Mitigation Increases The Chance of Injury Occurrence
Bicycle Injury Due To Pothole in South of Forest Neighborhood
Bryan Mendes - 11 Years Old December 2006
SLIDE 15
15
Safety Risks in SOFNA Area
Please Make It A Priority To Commit To Our Safety Please Make It A Priority To Commit To Our Safety Children Play
Here Elderly Citizens Reside Here Fitness Activities Take Place Here Families Live Out Their Dreams Here People We Love Are Here
SLIDE 16
16
Equity Concerns
Property taxes paid over the past 22 to 46 years have benefited other neighborhoods. It’s time for SOFNA. 1st Class Taxes; 2nd Class Standards
SLIDE 17
17
The Misguided “Guiding Principle”
SOFNA extensively investigated the City’s “guiding principle” for SOFNA. The City’s “guiding principle” of requiring an assessment district is inconsistent and the legally binding characteristics are questionable. Facts:
- Only 3 of the 15 annexed areas had certified petitions requiring an
assessment district for improvements.
- Only 1 of the 15 annexed area city council resolutions contained
requirements for assessment districts.
- There are no public records or disclosure to new home owners about the
assessment district requirement.
- The definition of an assessment district was not documented at the time the
petitions were signed. The “guiding principle” should not be binding.
SLIDE 18
18
An Assessment District May Be Inconsistent With State Law
California Constitution Article 13D
Assessment and Property-Related Fee Reform
Beginning July 1, 1997, all fees or charges shall comply with this section.
The properties in question must receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large in order to be assessed. Only special benefits are assessable. To be assessable, the special benefit must be greater than the general benefit.
From: California Constitution Article 13D Assessment and Property-Related Fee Reform
“Special benefit" means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute "special benefit."
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/.const/.article_13D
SLIDE 19
19
General vs. Special Benefits
Streets and sidewalks benefit everyone -- especially near prosperous businesses and busy traffic areas. Improving streets and sidewalks in the SOFNA area is a general benefit to the public at large. The general benefit to the public is more than the special benefit to the property owners. Streets in SOFNA area Connect with 3 Arterial Roads
1)
Stevens Creek Boulevard
2)
Winchester Boulevard
3)
Pruneridge Avenue
SLIDE 20
20
South of Forest Neighborhood – Traffic
Pruneridge Forest Stevens Creek 6 Lanes 4 Lanes 4 L a n e s Winchester
Valley Fair Mall Santana Row BAREC
S a n T
- m
a s
SLIDE 21
21
General Benefits Considerations - Government, Residents and Visitors
- Emergency Vehicles Access Arterial Roads
- Streets are Highly Trafficked by Non-Residents
(Santa Clara Commissioned Studies)
- Improvements Enhance Ride Quality for Everyone
- Non-Resident Traffic Expected to Increase with
possible development of BAREC and Westfield Valley Fair
General Benefits
SLIDE 22
22
In Conclusion
Summary
- Issues with Safety, Accessibility and Liability Exist.
- Concrete and Asphalt are Many Years Beyond End-of-Life.
- 1st Class Taxes; 2nd Class Standards.
- The “Guiding Principle” for an Assessment is Open To Challenge.
- Requiring Assessment District May Be Inconsistent With State Law.
- Improvements in the SOFNA area are a General Benefit to the Public.