slide 1
play

Slide 1 ___________________________________ Systemic Therapy for - PDF document

Slide 1 ___________________________________ Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer Paul A. Bunn, Jr, MD, Dudley Professor, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center, ___________________________________ Aurora, CO, USA


  1. Slide 1 ___________________________________ Systemic Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer Paul A. Bunn, Jr, MD, Dudley Professor, Univ. of Colorado Cancer Center, ___________________________________ Aurora, CO, USA ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Consultant: Amgen, Allos, AstraZeneca, Abraxis, Bayer, Biodesix, Boehringer- Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi- Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, OSI/Genentech/Roche, Poniard, Sanofi Aventis ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 2 ___________________________________ SCLC Epidemiology and Etiology ___________________________________ Epidemiology – ~26,000 cases in US annually – Worldwide • 10-20% of lung ca in males • 10-30% in women ___________________________________ – Causes 35,000-40,000 of 160,000 lung cancer deaths annually Etiology ___________________________________ – TOBACCO 90% – Other respiratory carcinogens, underlying lung disease, familial clusters ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 3 ___________________________________ US SCLC Age-Adjusted Incidence Rates: 1973 – 1997 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. Data from Ries et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-1997. National Cancer Institute; 2000. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

  2. Slide 4 ___________________________________ SCLC Biology • Tumor suppressor loss/silencing ___________________________________ – 3p loss in 90% of tumors • FHIT, VHL, RAR,RassF1 – Other genes: p53, RB in 80-90% ___________________________________ – Aberrant methylation: RASSF1 • Expression of activating genes – MYC, BCL-2 ___________________________________ • Cellular pathways – GRP,IGF, c-KIT,TGF-b, PKC, PI3K ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 5 ___________________________________ Survival by IASLC proposed TNM stage 100% Median Deaths / N in Months ___________________________________ IA 17 / 25 31 IB 14 / 19 35 80% IIA 8 / 15 68 IIB 84 / 101 17 IIIA 332 / 384 13 60% IIIB 424 / 481 12 IV 1400 / 1439 8 ___________________________________ 40% 20% ___________________________________ 0% 0 5 10 15 Years After Enrollm ent ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 6 ___________________________________ Phase III Trials in Extensive SCLC: Prior to 2000 ___________________________________ Regimen Ref MST (mo) CAV vs CAV/PE Evans *8.0 vs 9.6 CAV vs PE vs CAV/PE Fukuoka 9.9vs9.9v11.8 ___________________________________ CAV vs PE vs CAV/PE Roth 8.3vs8.6vs8.1 VIP vs VP Loehrer *9.1 vs 7.3 ___________________________________ *p<0.05 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

  3. Slide 7 ___________________________________ Any New Treatment Options? Chemotherapy • Picoplatin • Topo I Inhibitors • Amrubicin ___________________________________ – Irinotecan Targeted Agents – Topotecan • Antiangiogenics • Dose intensification ___________________________________ • HDAC inhibitors • Pemetrexed • BCL2 inhibitors • Radiation • Maintenance ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 8 ___________________________________ Irinotecan vs Etoposide & Cisplatin:ED SCLC Noda et al 2002 Lara et al. 2009 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 9 Meta analysis EP vs IP ___________________________________ Jiang et al. J. Thor. Oncol. 5,867,2010 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 5(12):1986-1993,2010. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

  4. Slide 10 ___________________________________ Topotecan PO vs. BSC for Relapsed SCLC • RR 7%, SD 44% Overall Survival ___________________________________ Arm Med 6-mo Surv. Surv ___________________________________ BSC 13.9 26% wk Topo 25.9 49% wk ___________________________________ O’ Brien et al, JCO 2006 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 11 ___________________________________ Any New Treatment Options? Chemotherapy • Picoplatin • Topo I Inhibitors • Amrubicin ___________________________________ – Irinotecan Targeted Agents – Topotecan • Antiangiogenics • Dose intensification ___________________________________ • HDAC inhibitors • Pemetrexed • BCL2 inhibitors • Radiation • Maintenance ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 12 ___________________________________ Intensified Chemotherapy ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Jiang et al. Lung Cancer 65,214,2009 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

  5. Slide 13 ___________________________________ Randomized Trial of TEP vs EP in Extensive SCLC ___________________________________ No. %GR Febrile Rx Pts. OR CR MS 1YS ¾ PMN PMN EP 74 48% 4% 11.5 46% 39% 13% ___________________________________ TEP+G 62 50% 3% 10.5 46% 44% 24% ___________________________________ Proc. ASCO. 2000;19:484a. ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 14 ___________________________________ Phase III Pemetrexed/CB vs Etop/CB Eligibility Pem 500 mg/m 2 , d 1 R  ES-SCLC Cb AUC 5, d 1  A every 21 days x 6 cycles PS 0-2  No prior chemo N Prophylactic folic acid, B 12 , dexamethasone Stratification factors D ___________________________________  Center O  PS M  LDH  Gender I  Age Z E 100 mg/m 2 , d 1, 2, 3  No. metastatic sites Cb AUC 5, d 1 every 21 days E  History of brain metastases x 6 cycles ___________________________________ Median (95% CI) Probability Without Pem-Cb: 3.68 (3.38, 4.2) E-Cb: 5.32 (5.03, 5.85) Socinski, ASCO 2008 Log rank p<.0001 Event PFS HR = 1.79 (90% CI: 1.49, 2.15) ___________________________________ Socinski, ASCO 2008 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 15 ___________________________________ PCI in ED SCLC: Time to Symptomatic brain mets & Survival ___________________________________ Time to Sx. Br. Mets Overall Survival 100 100 90 90 80 1 year: 14.6% vs. 40.4% 80 1 year: 27.1% vs. 13.3% 70 HR: 0.27 (0.16-0.44) 70 HR: 0.68 (0.52-0.88) p=0.003 ___________________________________ 60 p<0.001 60 50 50 40 Control 40 30 30 PCI 20 20 PCI Control 10 10 ___________________________________ 0 (mo) 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 Months from moment of randomization Months from moment of randomization ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

  6. Slide 16 ___________________________________ More extensive RT for ED SCLC? Ongoing trials ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 17 ___________________________________ Maintenance Therapy for SCLC:Hanna Trial Hanna, Ann Oncol 13: 95, 2002 Etoposide 50 mg PO CR/PR/SD ___________________________________ 21 of 28 days x 3 R SCLC-ED Cis/Etop/Ifos A N = 233 x4 cycles N D Observation N = 144 ___________________________________ Endpoint Maintenance Observation Progression-Free Surv (mo) 8.2 6.5 Median Survival (mo) 12.2 11.2 1-year Survival (%) 51.4 40.3 ___________________________________ 3-year Survival (%) 8.8 1.8 • An appropriate place for minimally toxic targeted therapies? ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 18 ___________________________________ Results of Maintenance Chemo in SCLC Topotecan vs Placebo: ECOG • Progression-free survival ___________________________________ significantly better with maintenance topotecan (3.7 vs. 2.3 mo) • Overall survival was no ___________________________________ different (9.3 vs. 8.9 mo) • Grade 4 neutropenia 60%, thrombocytopenia 13% ___________________________________ • Grade 4/5 infection 1.8% ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend