Site-Specific and Regional PMP Studies Current HMRs Completed - - PDF document

site specific and regional pmp studies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Site-Specific and Regional PMP Studies Current HMRs Completed - - PDF document

Site-Specific and Regional Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Studies Ed Tomlinson, PhD 2009 Western Regional Dam Safety Forum San Francisco, California January 15, 2009 PO Box 680 Monument, Co 80132 (719) 488-9117 e-mail:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Site-Specific and Regional Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Studies

Ed Tomlinson, PhD

2009 Western Regional Dam Safety Forum San Francisco, California January 15, 2009

PO Box 680 Monument, Co 80132 (719) 488-9117 e-mail: awaadmin@comcast.net www.appliedweatherassociates.com

Site-Specific and Regional PMP Studies

– Current HMRs – Completed Site-Specific and Regional Studies – Key Tasks – Procedures – Examples

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Probable Maximum Precipitation

  • Definition: The theoretically

theoretically greatest depth of precipitation for a given duration that is physically physically possible possible over a given storm area at a particular geographic location geographic location at a certain time of year (HMR 59, 1999)

  • Types of PMP studies:

– Generalized (Hydrometeorological Reports, HMRs) – Site-Specific

  • Individual drainage basin
  • Regional

Current NWS HMRs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Regional PMP Studies

EPRI Wisconsin/Michigan PMP Study 1993 Nebraska Statewide PMP Study 2008 Arizona Statewide PMP Study Begin Feb 2009

Recent FERC Approved Site- Specific PMP Studies

Upper and Middle Dams FPLE Maine Hydro 2003 Great Lake Sacandaga/Stewarts Bridge Reliant Energy 2005 Blenheim Gilboa Pump Storage 2008 New York Power Authority

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Current FERC PMP Studies

Lewis River, Washington PacifiCorp Initiated Nov 2008

State Site-Specific PMP Studies

Approved Colorado Ohio New Jersey Nebraska New York Potential new studies Oregon California Virginia Pennsylvania

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Method for Computing PMP Values

  • No physically based theoretical method (yet)
  • Observed extreme rainfall events are used
  • Three primary steps

– – Maximization Maximization procedures are applied – – Transpositioning Transpositioning procedures are applied – – Enveloping Enveloping procedures are applied

  • Storm separation method used in

HMRs 57 & 59

Do Site-Specific PMP Studies Provide Improved PMP Values?

  • Attributes:

– More storms considered – New technologies used – Problems in the HMRs corrected – Topographic features addressed

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Key Tasks for Site-Specific PMP Studies

  • Identify extreme storm types

– Evaluate the use of HMR procedures for each storm type

  • Identify unique topography

– Moisture depletion by upwind mountain barriers – Precipitation enhancement/decrease – Effects on storm center location

  • Review HMR procedures used for the basin location

– Identify inconsistent assumptions

Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Findings

  • Homogeneous Climate Regions

– Select storms for each region – Transposition

  • nly in the

same region

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Findings

  • Storm Maximization, Dewpoint Analyses

– 12-hour vs 6-hour persisting dewpoints – 12-hour persisting vs 6-hour average

  • Observed dewpoint values
  • Hour

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

  • Td

68 67 69 69 72 75 75 74 75 73 70 69 68 65 66 65 65 65 67 66

  • ! Rainfall Event !
  • 12-hour persisting: 65
  • 6-hour persisting: 72
  • 6-hour average:

74

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Updated Procedures

  • Maximum Dewpoint Climatology

– HMR 59 produced new dewpoint climatologies

  • 3- and 12- persisting maximum dewpoint values

– Nebraska statewide PMP study produced new dewpoint climatologies

  • 6-, 12-, and 24-hour average dewpoint values
  • 20-, 50- and 100-year return frequencies
  • Sea surface temperatures used for some storms

– Subjective techniques used in HMRs 57 & 59

  • Not documented

– Objectives techniques used in other site-specific PMP studies

Recalculation of the Distance from the Coast curve in HMR 51

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Examples of Site- Specific PMP Study Results

  • FPL Maine Hydro Upper

and Middles Dams

– Upwind moisture barrier defined – Sea surface temperatures used

Hysplit Upwind Trajectories

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Barrier Moisture Depletion Analysis

Southeastern Inflow Barrier - South Arm to Sugarloaf Mountain Average Barrier Height - 830 Meters / 2725 Feet

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1 51 101 151 201 251 301 351 401 451 501 551 601 651 701 751 801 851 901 951 1001 1051

Cell Number Barrier Elevation (Meters)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Examples of Site- Specific PMP Study Results

Southeast M oisture Inflow Barrier - The G reen, Berkshire, and Taconic M ountains Average Barrier H eight M inus 100 Feet: 2040 Feet

50 0 1 00 0 1 50 0 2 00 0 2 50 0 3 00 0 3 50 0 4 00 0 20 4 0 6 0 8 0 10 0 12 0 1 40 16 0 B arrier W idth in M iles Barrier Height in Feet

Average Barrier H eight Average Barrier H eight M inus 100 Feet Barrier Terrain H eight

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Northeast Moisture Inflow Barriers: Tuxedo Lake Drainage Basin Effective Barrier Height: 1400 feet

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Barrier 1 Average Elevation Barrier 2 Average Elevation Northeast Inflow Barrier 2 Northeast Inflow Barrier 1 Effective Barrier Height Northeast Inflow Barrier 1 Average Elevation: 1,461 feet Length: 66 miles Northeast Inflow Barrier 2 Average Elevation: 1,230 feet Length: 85 miles

Within Basin Orographics

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Within Basin Orographics

Within Basin Orographics

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Temporal Transposition Date 17-Aug Lat Long SSE@ 75 miles Stormcenter location 36.23 N 96.57 W 1,300 feet StormRepdewpoint location 35.23 N 96.06 W Storm E levation 930 feet Transposition dewpointlocation 40.20 N 95.88 W 1,300 feet Basin location 41.25 N 96.66 W 76.0 F with total precipitable water above sea level of 2.99 inches. 79.0 F with total precipitable water above sea level of 3.44 inches. 80.0 F with total precipitable water above sea level of 3.60 inches. 930 which subtracts 0.24 inches of precipitable water at 76.0 F 930 which subtracts 0.27 inches of precipitable water at 79.0 F 1,300 which subtracts 0.38 inches of precipitable water at 80.0 F 1,300 which subtracts 0.38 inches of precipitable water at 80.0 F 1.15 1.02 1.00 1.17 6Hours 12Hours 18 Hours 24Hours 30 Hours 36Hours 48 Hours 60Hours 72 Hours 18.4 23.4 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.7 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 17.6 17.8 18.0 18.1 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 15.4 15.6 15.7 15.8 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 13.3 13.4 13.6 13.7 14.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6Hours 12Hours 18 Hours 24Hours 30 Hours 36Hours 48 Hours 60Hours 72 Hours 21.5 27.4 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 22.5 22.7 22.9 23.1 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 20.6 20.8 21.1 21.2 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 18.0 18.3 18.4 18.5 19.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 15.6 15.7 15.9 16.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 8.5 8.7 8.8 9.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stormor StormCenter Name Hallett, OK StormDate(s) 2-Sep-1940 StormType MCC StormLocation 36.23 N 96.57 W StormCenter Elevation 930 Precipitation Total & Duration 24.00 Inches 12-hours USACE StormStudies SW 2-18 StormRepresentative Dewpoint 76.0F 12hr average StormRepresentative Dewpoint Location 35.23 N 96.06 W MaximumDewpoint 79.0F Moisture Inflow Vector SSE@ 75Miles In-place Maximization Factor 1.15 Temporal Transposition (Date) 17-Aug Transposition Dewpoint Location 40.20 N 95.88 W Transposition Max imumDewpoint 80.0F Basin Elevation 1,300 Transposition to Basin Adjustment Factor 1.02 Higherof Basin Elevation - Inflow Barrier Height 1,300 Elevation Adjustment Factor 1.00 Total Adjustment Factor 1.17 200 sq miles 500 sq miles 10 sq miles 100 sq miles The barrieradjustment factor is The total adjustment factor is The inflow barrier/basin elevation height is The transposition/elevation to basin factor is Hallett, OK StormName: StormDate: AWA Analysis Date: 5/10/2007 02-Sep-1940 1000 sq miles 5000 sq miles 1000 sq miles 10000 sq miles 20000 sq miles 10 sq miles 5000 sq miles 10000 sq miles 20000 sq miles

Storm Adjustment for Wanahoo, NE

AdjustedStorm Depth-Area-Duration Observ edStormDepth-Area-Duration 100 sq miles 200 sq miles 500 sq miles The in-place stormmaximization factor is The in-place stormelevation is The transposition basin elevation at Moisture InflowDirection: Basin E levation E ffective Barrier Height Notes:DAD values taken fromUSACEStorm Studies SW 2-18 The stormrepresentative dew point is The in-place maximumdew point is The transpositioned maximumdew point is The in-place stormelevation is

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stormor StormCenter Name Hallett, OK StormDate(s) 2-Sep-1940 StormType MCC StormLocation 36.23N 96.57 W StormCenter Elevation 930 Precipitation Total & Duration 24.00Inches 12-hours USACE StormStudies SW 2-18 StormRepresentative Dewpoint 76.0F 12hr average StormRepresentative Dewpoint Location 35.23N 96.06 W MaximumDewpoint 79.0F Moisture Inflow Vector SSE@ 75Miles In-place Max imization Factor 1.15 Temporal Transposition (Date) 17-Aug Transposition Dewpoint Location 40.20N 95.88 W Transposition MaximumDewpoint 80.0F Basin Elevation 1,300 Transposition to Basin Adjustment Factor 1.02 Higher of Basin Elevation - Inflow Barrier Height 1,300 Elevation Adjustment Factor 1.00 Total Adjustment Factor 1.17

Temporal Transposition Date 17-Aug Lat Long SSE@ 75 miles Stormcenter location 36.23 N 96.57 W 1,300 feet StormRepdewpoint location 35.23 N 96.06 W Storm E levation 930 feet Transposition dewpoint location 40.20 N 95.88 W 1,300 feet Basin location 41.25 N 96.66 W 76.0 F with total precipitable water above sea level of 2.99 inches. 79.0 F with total precipitable water above sea level of 3.44 inches. 80.0 F with total precipitable water above sea level of 3.60 inches. 930 which subtracts 0.24 inches of precipitable water at 76.0 F 930 which subtracts 0.27 inches of precipitable water at 79.0 F 1,300 which subtracts 0.38 inches of precipitable water at 80.0 F 1,300 which subtracts 0.38 inches of precipitable water at 80.0 F 1.15 1.02 1.00 1.17 The barrier adjustment factor is The total adjustment factor is The inflow barrier/basin elevation height is The transposition/elevation to basin factor is Hallett, OK StormName: StormDate: AWA Analysis Date: 5/10/2007 02-Sep-1940

Storm Adjustment for Wanahoo, NE

The in-place stormmaximization factor is The in-place stormelevation is The transposition basin elevation at Moisture InflowDirection: Basin E levation Effective Barrier Height Notes: DAD values taken fromUSACEStorm Studies SW 2-18 The stormrepresentative dew point is The in-place maximumdew point is The transpositioned maximumdew point is The in-place stormelevation is

slide-16
SLIDE 16

6Hours 12Hours 18 Hours 24Hours 30 Hours 36Hours 48 Hours 60Hours 72 Hours 18.4 23.4 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 19.2 19.4 19.6 19.7 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 17.6 17.8 18.0 18.1 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 15.4 15.6 15.7 15.8 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.9 13.3 13.4 13.6 13.7 14.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.7 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6Hours 12Hours 18 Hours 24Hours 30 Hours 36Hours 48 Hours 60Hours 72 Hours 21.5 27.4 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 22.5 22.7 22.9 23.1 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 20.6 20.8 21.1 21.2 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 18.0 18.3 18.4 18.5 19.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 15.6 15.7 15.9 16.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 8.5 8.7 8.8 9.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 4.6 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 200 sq miles 500 sq miles 10 sq miles 100 sq miles 1000 sq miles 5000 sq miles 1000 sq miles 10000 sq miles 20000 sq miles 10 sq miles 5000 sq miles 10000 sq miles 20000 sq miles AdjustedStorm Depth-Area-Duration Observed StormDepth-Area-Duration 100 sq miles 200 sq miles 500 sq miles

Example of Site-Specific Depth-Area Storm Analysis

Twenty-Four-Hour Depth-Area Curves for Maximized and Transpositioned Storm Events In the Great Sacandaga Lake Drainage Basin

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Rainfall Depth in Inches Storm Area in Square Miles

Westfield, Massachusetts Easton, Maryland Buck, Connecticut Zerbe, Pennsylvania Paterson, New Jersey York, Pennsylvania Peekamoose, New York Gorham, Maine Hector, New York Near Bolton, Canada Ripogenus Dam, Maine Canton, Connecticut

  • St. Pierre Baptiste, Canada

Newark, New Jersey Hartford, Ct Enveloping Curve HMR 51

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

  • The statewide PMP study was initiated with a

site-specific PMP study for the Wanahoo drainage basin

  • Peer reviewers

– Pat Diederich

  • Nebraska Dam Safety

– Mark Anderson, PhD

  • University of Nebraska

– Barry Keim, PhD

  • LSU

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

  • Objective: PMP analysis that includes

comprehensive evaluations of extreme rainfall storm events

– Extreme rainfall storm identification – Storm analyses of recent storms – Storm maximization – Storm transpositioning

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

  • Storm based methodology

– Identify historic extreme rainfall events – Analyze the storm Depth-Area-Duration (DAD) rainfall amounts

  • What was the actual storm rainfall?

– Maximize the storm rainfall “in-place”

  • How much more rainfall could the storm have potentially

produced if more moisture were available?

– Transposition the storm to Nebraska

  • Had the storm occurred in Nebraska, what would have been the

maximum rainfall produced?

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

– Complete a storm search to identify the most significant storms that could have potentially occurred over various locations in Nebraska

  • Over 35 years since the newest storm in HMR 51
  • Extreme rainfall storms that occurred over the midwestern US

– A review of characteristics associated each storm type will be provided

  • Synoptic storm systems
  • Mesoscale Convective Complexes (MCCs)
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

– For storms not previously analyzed, storm isohyetal and depth-area-duration (DAD) analyses were completed

  • Eight new storms identified, seven have been analyzed
  • Maximization and transposition factors determined

for new storms and re-evaluated for old storms

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

– Perform storm maximization and transpositioning of the most extreme storms various regions in Nebraska – 6-hour, 12-hour and 24-hour average maximum dewpoint values were used for storm maximization and transpositioning – New 6-hour, 12-hour and 24-hour average maximum dewpoint climatologies were computed

  • GEV distribution used
  • 20-year, 50-year and 100-year maps were produced
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

– Continuity in time and space for all the final PMP values – Comparisons with HMR 51 values

  • Explanations of the differences are being prepared

where possible

  • Since working papers for HMR 51 are not available,

it may not possible to explain the source of the differences between site-specific PMP values and the generalized HMR 51 PMP values

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Approach for Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

– Create a grid covering Nebraska and portions of surrounding states – Perform storm maximization and transpositioning of the most extreme storms to each of the grid point locations – 6-hour, 12-hour and 24-hour maximum average dewpoint values will be used for storm maximization and transpositioning – DAD curves for the largest transpositioned and maximized storms will be plotted at each grid point

Proposed Grid for Use in the Nebraska Statewide PMP Study

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

  • Storm Search

– Search the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) hourly and daily rainfall records – Identify maximum 6-hr, 24-hr/1-day, and 72-hr/3- day rainfall amounts within a the search box

  • (49.0/-108.0, 49.0/-85.0, 35.0/-108.0, and 35.0/-85.0)

– Additional data mining was done using the National Weather Service (NWS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and NCDC web services, various American Meteorological Society (AMS) journals, and Google internet storm searches

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

Storm Search Box With Storm event locations for the maximum 6-hr rainfall storm search

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

6-Hour Long List of Storms

  • Searched for and extracted the archived

NCDC hourly datasets for the 6-hr maximum precipitation within the define search box

– Greater than 4.5 inches

  • 169 storms identified

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

24-Hour Long List of Storms

  • Searched for and extracted the archived

NCDC hourly datasets for the 24-hr maximum precipitation within the define search box

– Greater than 6.0 inches

  • 138 storms identified
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

48-Hour Long List of Storms

  • Searched for and extracted the archived

NCDC hourly datasets for the 48-hr maximum precipitation within the define search box

– Greater than 7.5 inches

  • 155 storms identified

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

466 storms were included on the Long List of Storms

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Nebraska Statewide Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) Study

36 storms were included on the Short List of extreme storms

22 storms were used in HMR 51 6 storms were identified in the EPRI study 8 storms identified in the storm search

Storm Precipitation Analysis System (SPAS)

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • SPAS …
  • is a complete storm analysis software program
  • is a unique state-of-the-art storm centered depth-

area-duration (DAD) analysis system

  • uses the latest advancements of Geographic

Information Systems (GISs)

  • is largely automated, yet requires and allows plenty
  • f user (SPAS meteorologist) intervention.
  • uses the same basic principles used by the

National Weather Bureau

  • Consistency is achieved

What is SPAS?

  • Analyze major storms that have occurred since the

mid-50’s

  • Analyze current flood producing storms immediately

after they occur

  • Re-analyze historic storms

Storm Analyses Uses

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Storm Precipitation Analysis System (SPAS)

  • The Weather Bureau and the Corps of

Engineers completed detailed storm analyses for storms that occurred from the 1880’s through the 1950’s

  • Since the the 1950’s only a few

selected storms have been analyzed (e.g. Hurricanes Camille 1969 and Agnes 1972)

  • Site-specific PMP studies require

storm analyses

  • Runoff model calibration and

validation greatly benefit from accurate and detailed storm analyses

Examples of Site-Specific PMP Study Results

SPAS Storm Analysis vs NWS Analysis

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • The DAD results

compared favorably to previously analyzed storms, including:

  • 1. Westfield, MA, storm
  • f August 17-20,

1955

  • 2. Ritter, IA storm of

June 7, 1953

SPAS vs NWS DAD

SPAS Sq-Miles 6-hour 12-hour 24-hour 36-hour 48-hour 60-hour Total 10 7.96 11.48 16.40 19.10 19.11 19.47 19.70 100 7.22 10.72 15.20 17.77 17.76 18.23 18.47 200 6.99 10.27 14.28 16.91 16.84 17.39 17.54 1000 5.97 9.06 12.55 14.97 15.08 15.40 15.95 5000 4.14 6.45 9.25 11.70 12.02 12.35 13.05 10000 3.23 5.46 7.63 9.60 9.91 10.26 10.86 20000 2.24 4.03 5.91 7.66 7.97 8.22 8.77 Weather Bureau Sq-Miles 6-hour 12-hour 24-hour 36-hour 48-hour 60-hour Total 10 7.80 11.10 16.40 18.90 19.40 19.40 19.40 100 7.60 10.50 14.60 18.10 18.80 19.00 19.00 200 7.40 10.20 14.20 17.60 18.20 18.40 18.40 1000 6.20 9.20 12.40 15.90 16.20 16.40 16.40 5000 4.00 6.30 9.50 12.10 12.60 13.00 13.00 10000 3.10 5.00 8.00 10.00 10.60 10.80 10.80 20000 2.10 3.60 6.30 7.90 8.30 8.50 8.50 Percent Difference Sq-Miles 6-hour 12-hour 24-hour 36-hour 48-hour 60-hour Total 10 2.1% 3.4% 0.0% 1.1%

  • 1.5%

0.4% 1.5% 100

  • 5.0%

2.1% 4.1%

  • 1.8%
  • 5.5%
  • 4.1%
  • 2.8%

200

  • 5.5%

0.7% 0.6%

  • 3.9%
  • 7.5%
  • 5.5%
  • 4.7%

1000

  • 3.7%
  • 1.5%

1.2%

  • 5.8%
  • 6.9%
  • 6.1%
  • 2.7%

5000 3.5% 2.4%

  • 2.6%
  • 3.3%
  • 4.6%
  • 5.0%

0.4% 10000 4.2% 9.2%

  • 4.6%
  • 4.0%
  • 6.5%
  • 5.0%

0.6% 20000 6.7% 11.9%

  • 6.2%
  • 3.0%
  • 4.0%
  • 3.3%

3.2%

Generally within +/- 5% !!

  • Total storm – sum of all

hourly grids/maps.

Total storm (Hurricane Floyd) precipitation, New Jersey, September 14-18, 1999.

SPAS Output

Total Storm Map

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • The hourly

precipitation grids serve as the basis for much of the output statistics Hourly precipitation ending at 4 PM EST September 16, 1999 associated with

Hurricane Floyd.

Methodology (cont.)

Hourly Precipitation Grids (cont.)

Use of NEXRAD Weather Radar Data in SPAS Rainfall Analyses

– NEXRAD data are correlated with hourly rain gauge data

  • For each hour, coefficients are selected based on

the least square fit of the the Z-R equation to the available hourly rainfall observations

  • Rainfall amounts are computed for the domain

covered by the NEXRAD

– Result

  • Rainfall amounts are analyzed

– For each hour of the storm – At a spatial resolution of approximately 1 square kilometer

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Storm 1033 - Ogallala, NE July 6 (300 Z) - July 7 (600 Z), 2002

MAXIMUM AVERAGE DEPTH OF PRECIPITATION (INCHES)

Duration (hours) Area (mi2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 12 18 24 28 total 1 5.18 6.51 8.45 10.06 11.61 13.19 14.77 14.78 14.92 14.92 14.92 10 3.90 5.40 7.95 9.53 11.04 12.54 14.39 14.41 14.53 14.57 14.57 20 3.52 5.23 7.65 9.17 10.66 12.12 14.00 14.01 14.12 14.16 14.16 30 3.28 5.12 7.47 8.93 10.38 11.79 13.57 13.60 13.74 13.74 13.74 40 3.10 4.96 7.30 8.69 10.08 11.47 13.22 13.25 13.36 13.39 13.39 50 2.95 4.86 7.14 8.50 9.85 11.18 12.90 12.93 13.05 13.08 13.08 60 2.83 4.75 7.00 8.29 9.57 10.90 12.61 12.63 12.77 12.78 12.78 70 2.71 4.64 6.85 8.13 9.41 10.65 12.34 12.36 12.50 12.51 12.51 100 2.39 4.37 6.46 7.67 8.88 10.06 11.66 11.69 11.84 11.84 11.84 200 2.09 3.72 5.49 6.69 7.78 8.79 10.22 10.30 10.46 10.46 10.46 500 1.65 2.89 4.09 5.07 6.04 6.70 8.14 8.34 8.50 8.51 8.51 1,000 1.19 2.21 3.06 3.82 4.54 5.11 6.24 6.59 6.75 6.76 6.76 5,000 0.41 0.84 1.11 1.40 1.72 2.00 2.68 3.09 3.23 3.25 3.25

slide-32
SLIDE 32

NEXRAD Mass Curves

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Six-Hour Depth-Area Curves for Maximized and Transpositioned Storm Events In the Lake Wanahoo Drainage Basin

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Rainfall Depth in Inches Storm Area in Square Miles

Big Rapids, MI Bonaparte, IA Boyden, IA Collinsville, IL Cooper, MI Council Grove, KS Edgerton, MO Grant Township, NE Greeley, NE Ida Grove, IA Hayward, WI HMR 51 Hallett, OK Ironwood, MI Lambert, MN Medford, WI Meeker, OK Minneapolis, MN Paris Waterworks, IN Ritter, IA Stanton, NE Tomah, WI Warner, OK Cole Camp, MO Beaulieu, MN Enid, OK Forest City, MN Hale, CO Holly, CO Ogallala, NE Pawnee Creek, CO Savageton, WY Springbrook, MT

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Seventy-Two-Hour Depth-Area Curves for Maximized and Transpositioned Storm Events In the Lake Wanahoo Drainage Basin

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Rainfall Depth in Inches Storm Area in Square Miles

Beaulieu, MN Big Rapids, MI Boyden, IA Collinsville, IL Council Grove, KS Edgerton, MO Hayward, WI Ironwood, MI Lambert, MN Medford, WI Meeker, OK Stanton, NE Warner, OK HMR 51 Cole Camp, MO Enid, OK Forest City, MN Pawnee Creek, CO Savageton, WY Springbrook, MT David City, NE Prague, NE Envelop

slide-35
SLIDE 35

??? Questions ???