site related issues
play

Site related Issues Andreas S. Schwarz XFEL Project Meeting, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Site related Issues Andreas S. Schwarz XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 1. Site Decision 2. Plan Approval Procedure 3. Next Steps XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 1 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz 1. Site Decision


  1. Site related Issues Andreas S. Schwarz XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 1. Site Decision 2. Plan Approval Procedure 3. Next Steps XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 1 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  2. 1. Site Decision • BMBF decision February 5 th , 2003: – Decide to fund 50% of the XFEL project – Support continuing R&D DESY effort on Linear Accelerator Physics and Technology – Postpone decision of site for the Linear Collider ⇒ Separation of the two parts of the TESLA proposal both in time and approval status ⇒ Is the Ellerhoop site under these circumstances still the best solution? – Unclear time line of the LC – No present connection to the DESY infrastructure – Potentially large interference between XFEL operation and TESLA construction likely XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 2 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  3. Site Decision ff. • February 2003: DIR appoints small group of people to investigate sites that are closer to DESY with Ellerhoop as the reference site J. Schneider (chair), R. Brinkmann (co-chair), L. Hänisch, W. Bialowons, T. Tschentscher, L- A. Rump, R.-D. Heuer, J. Rossbach, R. Klanner • Basic boundary conditions – Minimal interference with a future TESLA route – Must be better than the reference site • In total O(15) meetings – Many (!) possible sites investigated; basically group into options (a) start at DESY (b) end at DESY • Decision by DESY directorate end October 2003: Propose the ”Schenefeld” site for the European XFEL Project XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 3 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  4. Site Decision ff. ⇒ Why is this a good site? o No interference with long term plans re. city infrastructures (e.g. U-Bahn) o The areas for the experimental halls and the access shafts are ‘open country’ o Injector on DESY site allows direct connection to DESY infrastructure (Kryo Halls, PETRA, HERA) o The area where the photons are generated shows relatively low vibration o Small interference with DESY experimental operations during construction phase o Small interference with present plans for TESLA route o Photon beam lines can be routed horizontally o Large ‘open country’ area near Schenefeld allows for extension plans o Good connection to city transport network (ÖPNV, roads) o … o (in total O(30) points used in analysis and comparison of sites) XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 4 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  5. Site Decision ff. “Schenefeld” site start at DESY, end south of the city of Schenefeld (Schleswig-Holstein)

  6. Note: slightly different route from proposed one… Just for illustration… Exp. Hall XS1 Inclination approx 0.4 degrees Schenefeld DESY One possible option, has to be reviewed! XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 6 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  7. TESLA XFEL TESLA damping ring XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 7 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  8. Note: slightly different route from proposed one…just for illust ration… XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 8 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  9. XDU2 XDU1 XS3 Düpenau XS4 XS2 Note: slightly different route from proposed one…just for illust ration… XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 9 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  10. 2. Plan Approval Procedure (‘Planfeststellungsverfahren’) • Why? – It is prescribed for large building projects that affect an appreciable part of the public domain – It is mandatory(!) to get approval to build the XFEL • How? – Need a law that requests it • Staatsvertrag between Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein needs to be generated – It is led by a public authority • Organizes the procedure • Leads the proceedings • Conducts scoping date • Receives and surveys the ‘plan approval documents’ • Approves the ‘plan’ • In our case: ‘Landesbergamt Clausthal-Zellerfeld’ XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 10 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  11. Plan Approval Procedure ff. • When? (Tentative only!) – 10/2003: initiate Staatsvertrag 1 st draft prepared, entered into the discussion process (governments) • • Hope: ratified by 2/2004? – ~2/2004: • Landesbergamt gets installed as public authority for the Plan Approval Proced ure of the XFEL • DESY initiates environmental study (“Umweltverträglichkeitsstudie”) to measure impact of the XFEL project on the existing environment – Needs to cover one full vegetation period – Mapping of biotope (bugs, birds, plants, …) – ~ 3/2004: • “Scoping Date”: possibly affected public parties get the chance to request further/special expert reports regarding environmental issues – Noise, geology, electro smog, …? – ~ End 2004: • Hand in the planning documents to the Landesbergamt – ~ End 2005: Plan approved? – ~ Beginning 2006: Start? XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 11 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  12. 3. Next Steps • We need to review the TDR supplement design Examples: • Is the layout in the TDR supplement really the final/best answer? – Physics case revisited – Beam distribution – Low energy line – Beam dump locations – Placement and number of access halls • Is the tunnel long enough for upgrade options – Seeding? • How to we treat the planned future site extension? – Needs to be an option that can indeed be realized later – Interference of construction with operations when extension realized? • Where do we need to adapt to the new site/constraints? – Length – Depth – Groundwater – Connection to DESY infrastructure – ??? XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 12 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  13. Next Steps ff. • Preparation of the Plan Approval Procedure documents – To be done in parallel to the above • Description of buildings (tunnel + halls) • Construction procedures and impact on environment • What is in the buildings and what is it used for • Aspects of operations (power, water consumption, failure analysis, risk analysis, safety, …) – Contributors: • DESY • External engineering firms • Experts with reports on selected items • Environmental study bureau • ??? – A (limited…) amount of paperwork for many of you will be unavoidable… – Organization is in preparation – stay tuned… XFEL Project Meeting, November 5 th , 2003 13 Site related Issues A.S. Schwarz

  14. The End

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend