singular metrics and the calabi yau theorem in non
play

Singular metrics and the Calabi-Yau theorem in non-Archimedean - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Singular metrics and the Calabi-Yau theorem in non-Archimedean geometry Mattias Jonsson University of Michigan Tuesday February 14, 2012 Joint work with Charles Favre and S ebastien Boucksom Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau


  1. Singular metrics and the Calabi-Yau theorem in non-Archimedean geometry Mattias Jonsson University of Michigan Tuesday February 14, 2012 Joint work with Charles Favre and S´ ebastien Boucksom Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  2. Plan ◮ The Calabi-Yau theorem over C . ◮ A non-Archimedean analogue. ◮ Idea of proof. Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  3. Metrized line bundles on complex projective manifolds ◮ X = smooth, complex proj. variety = ⇒ X cplx manifold. ◮ L → X line bundle. ◮ � · � metric on L : ◮ Picture! ◮ A section s ∈ Γ( U , L ) gives rise to function � s � on U . ◮ � · � is continuous if � s � ∈ C 0 ( U ) for all s . ◮ � · � is smooth if � s � ∈ C ∞ ( U ) for all s . ◮ Say ( L , � · � ) is a metrized line bundle . ◮ Curvature form c 1 ( L , � · � ) of a smooth metrized line bundle: ◮ c 1 ( L , � · � ) is a closed (1 , 1)-form on X . ◮ c 1 ( L , � · � ) | U = − dd c log � s � , s ∈ Γ( U , L ), s � = 0. ◮ dd c = 1 2 π ∂∂ is a differential operator. ◮ De Rham class of curvature form is c 1 ( L ) ∈ H 2 ( X , Z ). ◮ Metric is positive if the curvature form is positive. ◮ By Kodaira, L admits positive metric iff L is ample. Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  4. The Calabi-Yau theorem ◮ Define “curvature volume form” c 1 ( L , � · � ) n . This is: ◮ smooth volume form on X . ◮ smooth positive measure of mass c 1 ( L ) n if metric is positive. ◮ Calabi-Yau Theorem : if L is ample and µ is a smooth positive measure on X of mass c 1 ( L ) n , then there exists a unique (up to scaling) positive metric � · � on L such that c 1 ( L , � · � ) n = µ. (1) ◮ Can view (1) as nonlinear PDE, the Monge-Amp` ere equation . ◮ Ko� lodziej generalized this to the case when µ is a positive, not too singular measure. Metric is then (only) continuous. ◮ Our main result is a non-Arch version of Ko� lodziej’s theorem. ◮ Lots of things to define to make sense of this! Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  5. Berkovich spaces ◮ K = non-Archimedean field. ◮ Will work with K := k (( t )), char k = 0. ◮ Norm on K : | t | = e − 1 (trivial norm on k ). ◮ Valuation ring is k [[ t ]]. ◮ X = smooth projective variety over K . ◮ X an = analytification of X as Berkovich space: i Spec A i , then X an = � ◮ If X = � i (Spec A i ) an , where (Spec A i ) an = { mult. seminorms on A i extending norm on K } ◮ Can understand X an through integral models of X . Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  6. Models and Berkovich spaces ◮ A model of X is given by a flat, projective morphism X → Spec k [[ t ]] with generic fiber X . Write X 0 for special fiber. ◮ Picture! ◮ Work mainly with SNC models : ◮ X is regular; ◮ X 0 = � I ∈ I b i E i has simple normal crossing support. ◮ for J ⊂ I , E I := � i ∈ J E i is empty or irreducible. ◮ To SNC model X associate dual complex ∆ X . Picture! ◮ Have retraction X an → ∆ X and embedding ∆ X ֒ → X an . ◮ Thm : X an ∼ → lim − X ∆ X . ← ◮ Can visualize X an when X = curve. Picture! ◮ As in complex case, will write X = X an . Justified by GAGA. Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  7. Metrics on line bundles ◮ How to metrize a line bundle L → X ? ◮ Extend L (somehow) to line bundle L on SNC model X . ◮ Get continuous metric � · � L on X such that � s � L = 1 for every local frame s of L . ◮ Such a metric is called a model metric . ◮ Say that � · � L is semipositive if L is (relatively) nef, i.e. ( L · C ) ≥ 0 for every proper curve C ⊆ X 0 . ◮ Def [S.-W. Zhang] A continuous metric � · � is semipositive if it is the uniform limit of semipositive model metrics. ◮ This implies that L is nef (on X ). Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  8. The Chambert-Loir measure ◮ Consider line bundle L with semipos. cont. metric � · � . ◮ Chambert-Loir defined positive measure c 1 ( L , � · � ) n on X = X an of mass c 1 ( L ) n . ◮ When L is an extension of L to an SNC model X with special fiber X 0 = � i ∈ I b i E i , then c 1 ( L , � · � L ) n = � b i ( L| E i ) n δ x i i ∈ I is an atomic measure. ◮ In general, c 1 ( L , � · � ) n is constructed using approximation. Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  9. A non-Archimedean Calabi-Yau theorem Thm . Assume X is algebraizable and L is ample. Let µ be a positive measure on X of mass c 1 ( L ) n supported on some dual complex ∆ X . Then there exists a semipositive continuous metric � · � on L such that c 1 ( L , � · � ) n = µ . The metric is unique up to a multiplicative constant. ◮ X algebraizable means X = Y ⊗ F K , where: ◮ F = function field of curve having K as a completion ◮ Y = smooth projective F -variety. ◮ Previous results: ◮ Kontsevich-Tschinkel (2001): sketch for µ = Dirac mass. ◮ Thuillier (2005): X = curve. ◮ Yuan-Zhang (2009): uniqueness. ◮ Liu (2010): existence when X = abelian var. Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  10. Steps in proof ◮ Write problem “additively” using forms and weights rather than line bundles and metrics. ◮ Given reference model metric � · � 0 on L , write � · � = � · � 0 · e − ϕ for some function ϕ ∈ C 0 ( X ). ◮ Equation c 1 ( L , � · � ) n = µ becomes Monge-Amp` ere equation ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n = µ, where ω = c 1 ( L , � · � 0 ) is the curvature form (to be defined). ◮ Solve the Monge-Amp` ere equation using variational method going back to Alexandrov (1937). We follow approach by Berman-Boucksom-Guedj-Zeriahi (2009) over C . ◮ In this approach, also use singular metrics: ϕ �∈ C 0 ( X ). Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  11. Forms, positivity and model functions ◮ Introduce notions parallel to the complex case. ◮ A model function is a model metric on O X . ◮ Gubler: Stone-Weierstrass = ⇒ the set D ( X ) of model functions is dense in C 0 ( X ). ◮ A closed (1 , 1) -form ω ∈ Z 1 , 1 ( X ) on X is a numerical class of an R -line bundle L on some model X . ◮ A semipositive form ω ∈ Z 1 , 1 + ( X ) is the class of a nef line bundle on some model X . + ( X ) is a semipositive form, define ω n as positive ◮ If ω ∈ Z 1 , 1 (atomic) Radon measure on X using intersection theory. ◮ Have operator dd c : D ( X ) → Z 1 , 1 ( X ). Image consists of line bundles that are numerically trivial on X . Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  12. The class of ω -psh functions ◮ Fix a semipositive form ω ∈ Z 1 , 1 + ( X ). ◮ A model function ϕ is ω -psh if ω + dd c ϕ is semipositive. ◮ A general function ϕ : X → R ∪ {−∞} is ω -psh if it is a limit of ω -psh model functions. ◮ Topology on PSH( X , ω ): uniform conv. on dual complexes. ◮ Thm . The convex set PSH( X , ω ) / R is compact. ◮ Thm . Any ω -psh function is a decreasing pointwise limit of ω -psh model functions. ◮ Proofs use techniques from alg. geometry (multiplier ideals). Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  13. Energy of model functions ◮ Define the energy of a model function ϕ as n 1 � ϕ ( ω + dd c ϕ ) j ∧ ω n − j . � E ( ϕ ) := n + 1 X j =0 ◮ Easy to see that E is concave and Gateaux differentiable with E ′ ( ϕ ) = ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n . ◮ If ϕ ∈ PSH( X , ω ) ∩ D ( X ) maximizes the functional � F µ ( ψ ) := E ( ψ ) − ψ µ X over D ( X ) then ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n = µ as desired. ◮ Problem: no reason for there to be a maximizer! ◮ Idea: extend E and F µ to PSH( X , ω ). Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  14. Energy of ω -psh functions ◮ Define the energy of ϕ ∈ PSH( X , ω ) as E ( ϕ ) := inf { E ( ψ ) | ψ ∈ PSH( X , ω ) ∩ D ( X ) , ψ ≥ ϕ } . ◮ Get an usc functional E : PSH( X , ω ) → R ∪ {−∞} . ◮ Hypotheses = ⇒ µ continuous functional on PSH( X , ω ). ◮ Thus F µ = E − µ has maximizer ϕ ∈ PSH( X , ω ). ◮ Would like to say ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n = µ . ◮ Question: how to define ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n ? ◮ Answer: follow complex approach by Bedford-Taylor, extended by Guedj-Zeriahi. ◮ Problem: PSH( X , ω ) is a convex set, not a vector space! ◮ Solution: use envelopes . Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  15. Envelopes, differentiability and orthogonality ◮ Given any function f : X → R ∪ {−∞} define P ( f ) := sup { ϕ ∈ PSH( X , ω ) | ϕ ≤ f } ∗ , the ω -psh envelope of f . Picture! ◮ Differentiability : if E ( ϕ ) > −∞ , then the function D ( X ) ∋ f �→ E ( P ( ϕ + f )) ∈ R is Gateaux differentiable, with derivative ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n . ◮ If ϕ minimizes E − µ , this yields ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n = µ , as desired. ◮ Differentiability follows from: ◮ Orthogonality : if f ∈ D ( X ), then (picture) � ( f − P ( f ))( ω + dd c P ( f )) n = 0 . ◮ This in turn reduces to the “BDPP” thm in alg. geometry. Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

  16. Regularity ◮ At this point, have found ϕ ∈ PSH( X , ω ) such that E ( ϕ ) > −∞ and ( ω + dd c ϕ ) n = µ . ◮ Following Ko� lodziej, can use capacity estimates to show that ϕ is in fact continuous. ◮ Unclear if there is an analogue of Yau’s Theorem ( µ and ϕ smooth). Mattias Jonsson Singular metrics and Calabi-Yau

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend