simulation of wcpo skipjack
play

Simulation of WCPO Skipjack Joe Scutt Phillips* , Alex Sen Gupta, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Individual-based Methods for Simulation of WCPO Skipjack Joe Scutt Phillips* , Alex Sen Gupta, Erik van Sebille, Inna Senina, Patrick Lehodey & Simon Nicol * University of New South Wales WCPFC SC12, Aug 2016, Bali Individual-based Model of


  1. Individual-based Methods for Simulation of WCPO Skipjack Joe Scutt Phillips* , Alex Sen Gupta, Erik van Sebille, Inna Senina, Patrick Lehodey & Simon Nicol * University of New South Wales WCPFC SC12, Aug 2016, Bali

  2. Individual-based Model of Tuna Movement and Distribution SC11 recommendations included: • “ [regarding] information related to identifying changes in the spatial distribution of skipjack (including range contraction) in response to increase in fishing pressure… SC11 recommends that WCPFC12 take note of the analyses completed to date and that further work on this issue be undertaken, including: – more extensive skipjack tagging activities, including in sub-tropical and temperate regions to provide better information on stock connectivity and movement ” PTTP work plan also recommended that analyses of movement data from tagging should: • “ provide external validation to [movement] estimates from within MFCL and SEAPODYM. ”

  3. Individual-based Model of Tuna Movement and Distribution Aims: • Build a individual-based model of skipjack tuna distribution in the WCPO • Use to quantify sensitivity of tuna distribution to: – Variable resolution ocean forcing fields – Alternative behaviours and foraging strategies – Effect of small and meso-scale interactions (tuna-prey, tuna- tuna, tuna-FAD etc.) • Examine connectivity and movement estimates used in MULTIFAN-CL and SEAPODYM • Not an ecosystem dynamics model! • An “assumption analyser ”

  4. Simple SEAPODYM IBM - SIMPODYM • ‘Spin - up’ SEAPODYM interim -NEMO-PISCES • Recruit single cohort at age 4-months, and use as initial conditions for biomass distribution • Package biomass into schools of ‘super - individual’ particles • Advect single cohort using same ocean forcing fields used in SEAPODYM and equivalent taxis behaviours • Diffuse with individual behaviours in response to same prey field given by SEAPODYM • Keep only natural mortality • Run until final age-class and compare!

  5. SEAPODYM - Overview Ocean current fields U & V

  6. SEAPODYM - Overview Habitat Field Integrated across 6 prey groups Prey field * f(Temp pref, Oxy pref, Prey pref) Ocean current fields U & V

  7. SEAPODYM - Overview SKJ Density (each age-class) Habitat Field Integrated across 6 prey groups Prey field * f(Temp pref, Oxy pref, Prey pref) Ocean current fields U & V

  8. SEAPODYM - Overview Behaviour • Tuna density diffuses • Advection by ocean SKJ Density currents (each age-class) • Active movement following habitat gradient Habitat Field Integrated across 6 prey groups Prey field * f(Temp pref, Oxy pref, Prey pref) Ocean current fields U & V

  9. Habitat Field Integrated across 6 prey groups Prey field * f(Temp pref, Oxy pref, Prey pref) Ocean current fields U & V

  10. Individual- based “SIMPODYM” • Number of individuals in school • Continuous age (and mortality) • Continuous position Particle “super - individuals” • Recorded trajectories • Memory of fields sampled (e.g. forage components) • Variable behaviours Habitat Field Integrated across 6 prey groups Prey field * f(Temp pref, Oxy pref, Prey pref) Ocean current fields U & V

  11. Individual- based “SIMPODYM” • Number of individuals in school • Continuous age (and mortality) • Continuous position Particle “super - individuals” • Recorded trajectories • Memory of fields sampled (e.g. forage components) • Variable behaviours Potentially use raw forage biomass and simulate direct spatial interactions in 3D Ocean current fields U & V

  12. Individual- based “SIMPODYM”

  13. Individual- based “SIMPODYM” • Compare particle densities with SEAPODYM biomass • Examine differences across grid resolutions • Use a baseline to begin deviating using alternative assumptions

  14. Example – Habitat Sampling  Strong gradient -> move in direction fast  Weak gradient -> move in direction slow  Good habitat -> move slowly

  15. Example – Habitat Sampling  Strong gradient -> move in direction fast  Weak gradient -> move in direction slow  Good habitat -> move slowly  In real ocean, no gradient information  Animals use clues and sample their environment  We will use individual- level gradient information

  16. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls

  17. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls • Movement simulation tool for pelagic species

  18. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls • Movement simulation tool for pelagic species • Use in analysis and design of tagging experiments

  19. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls • Movement simulation tool for pelagic species • Use in analysis and design of tagging experiments • Parameterise from conventional tag data 30 20 Lat 10 0 -10 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 Long

  20. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls • Movement simulation tool for pelagic species • Use in analysis and design of tagging experiments • Parameterise from conventional tag data • Horizontal and vertical movement from electronic tags

  21. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls • Movement simulation tool for pelagic species • Use in analysis and design of tagging experiments • Parameterise from conventional tag data • Horizontal and vertical movement from electronic tags • Incorporate feedbacks between environment and individuals (particularly FADs) Hello!?

  22. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls • Movement simulation tool for pelagic species • Use in analysis and design of tagging experiments • Parameterise from conventional tag data • Horizontal and vertical movement from electronic tags • Incorporate feedbacks between environment and individuals (particularly FADs) • Eddy-resolving resolution ocean forcing

  23. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls

  24. Thinking Ahead – IKAMOANA tool Individual-based Kinesis, Advection and Movement of Ocean ANimAls

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend