md3311 simulation results
play

MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 24, 2023 •274 likes •483 views

MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 2 Introduction Measurement Results Simulation Results Conclusion 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 3 Introduction 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 4

  2. MD3311 Simulation Results Joschua Dilly 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 2

  3. Introduction Measurement Results Simulation Results Conclusion 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 3

  4. Introduction 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 4

  5. The Story so far • Amplitude Detuning present in flat orbit measurements during commissioning 2016. • Corrected octuploes in the IRs for commissioning 2017. • Amplitude Detuning present during commissioning 2018 when crossing scheme applied. • MD3311 (June 2018) • Investigation of different error sources via simulations (Now) 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 5

  6. Simulation Parameters • Replicating IP5 crossing as close to MD3311 as possible • 160 ➭ rad X’ing angle • .55 mm Separation • -1.8 mm Offset • IP1 crossing same as IP5 but without offset. • Setting A5, A6, B4, B5, B6 errors separately and A5,A6,B5,B6 together. • WISE error models, averaged over 60 seeds. • Calculating detuning values via PTC at different stages: • nominal: Without any errors • errors arc: Applied errors in the arcs ( M[B,Q] ) • errors mqx: + errors in the MQX ( MQX ) • errors mb ip: + errors in the MB of the IP ( MB[XW,RC,X,RB,RS,W] ) • errors all: + remaining MQ-errors ( MQ[Y,M,MC,ML,TL,W] ) • corrected: After Triplet and D1,D2 Correction (via MQX, MBX, MBRC) 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 6

  7. Measurement Results 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 7

  8. Measurements Beam 1 0.0016 ± 0.0011 B1 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0103 ± 0.0009 B1 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.1122 ± 0.0113 B1 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0088 ± 0.0151 B1 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0646 ± 0.0024 B1 H-Kicks Full X'ing 0.0065 ± 0.0025 B1 H-Kicks Full X'ing 3 3 ×10 ×10 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 0.0081 ± 0.0278 B1 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0062 ± 0.0028 B1 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.1081 ± 0.0236 B1 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0060 ± 0.0031 B1 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing ×10 3 ×10 3 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 • Strong detuning in ∂ Q x ∂ 2 J x with IP5 crossing, less with full. • Small/No detuning in ∂ Q y • Crossterms not quite clear. ∂ 2 J y . 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 8

  9. Measurements Beam 2 0.0149 ± 0.0011 B2 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0076 ± 0.0025 B2 H-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0032 ± 0.0010 B2 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0041 ± 0.0014 B2 H-Kicks IP5 X'ing ×10 3 ×10 3 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 2 J x [ m ] ×10 3 0.0024 ± 0.0012 B2 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0124 ± 0.0015 B2 V-Kicks Flat-Orbit 0.0038 ± 0.0026 B2 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing 0.0252 ± 0.0024 B2 V-Kicks IP5 X'ing ×10 3 ×10 3 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Q x Q y 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 1.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 2 J y [ m ] ×10 3 • X’ing On: Small detuning in ∂ Q y ∂ 2 J y ∂ 2 J x , positive in ∂ Q y • X’ing Off: Small detunings; negative in ∂ Q x ∂ 2 J y . 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 9

  10. Simulation Results 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 10

  11. A5 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 20000 10000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 0 10000 20000 l c x p l d l c x p l d l c x p l d a r q l a r q i a l e a r q i a l e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r o r r o r r o e e r o e c e r o e c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 20000 10000 Beam 2 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 0 10000 20000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t m b s t i s i s m i s m c m s m r c m s m r c r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 11

  12. A6 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 30000 20000 10000 0 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 30000 20000 10000 Beam 2 0 ANHX0100 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 12

  13. B4 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 150000 100000 50000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 0 50000 100000 150000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 150000 100000 Beam 2 50000 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 0 50000 100000 150000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 13

  14. B5 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 60000 40000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 20000 0 20000 40000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 60000 40000 Beam 2 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 20000 0 20000 40000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 14

  15. B6 Errors Flat-Orbit IP5 X'ing IP1 X'ing IP1 & IP5 X'ing 60000 40000 20000 Beam 1 ANHX1000 ANHY0100 ANHX0100 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l c x p l l d a r q l r q i a e r q i a e n a i a e n a n a m b t m b s t m b s t i s c m i s m c m i s m c m s m r e r e r e r s o r s o r s o o o r r o o r s r r o o r s r r n o s r r n r o r r n r o r r r r r o r r e o r r e o r r o e e r o c e r o c e r c r r r r e r e r e r r e e e 60000 40000 20000 Beam 2 ANHX1000 ANHX0100 ANHY0100 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 l c x p l d l c x p l d a l c x p l l d a l a l r q i a e r q i a e r q i a e n a n a m b t n a m b t i m b s t i s c i s c m s m c m s m r m s m r r e r s e r s e r s o o o o r o o o r o o r s r r r s r r r s r r n r o r r n r o r r o n r o r r o r r o r r o e r r o e e r o e c e r c e r c r r e r e r e r r r e e e • 28.01.2019 MD3311 Simulation Results 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Grid simulation (AliEn) Outline GRID simulation Simulation tool Ptolemy (Berkeley)

Grid simulation (AliEn) Outline GRID simulation Simulation tool Ptolemy (Berkeley)

Eugen Mudni Technical university Split -FESB Grid simulation (AliEn) Outline GRID simulation Simulation tool Ptolemy (Berkeley) Simulation architecture Simulation software environment Some results 2 GRID simulation

358 views • 16 slides
A case study of implementing simulation results in emergency stroke care Dr Thomas Monks

A case study of implementing simulation results in emergency stroke care Dr Thomas Monks

A case study of implementing simulation results in emergency stroke care Dr Thomas Monks University of Exeter Medical School Talk Overview Implementation of simulation results any evidence? Background to the simulation study

512 views • 40 slides
Outline Kln test simulation Full simulation of the test experiment with the symmetric

Outline Kln test simulation Full simulation of the test experiment with the symmetric

Outline Kln test simulation Full simulation of the test experiment with the symmetric triple cluster: Event generation GEANT4 simulation Tracking and sort of the data Results Francesco Recchia Universit di Padova

475 views • 15 slides
Outline Narcisse Ngada DESY, MKK 1) What is simulation ? 14.05.2014 2) Why simulation ? 3)

Outline Narcisse Ngada DESY, MKK 1) What is simulation ? 14.05.2014 2) Why simulation ? 3)

Simulation Outline Narcisse Ngada DESY, MKK 1) What is simulation ? 14.05.2014 2) Why simulation ? 3) Principles of simulation 4) Types of simulation Analog simulation Numerical simulation 5) Conclusion 1. What is simulation ? 2.

1.08k views • 54 slides
RPC Simulation Vincent Franais 3 fvrier 2016 Vincent Franais (LPC) RPC Simulation 3

RPC Simulation Vincent Franais 3 fvrier 2016 Vincent Franais (LPC) RPC Simulation 3

RPC Simulation Vincent Franais 3 fvrier 2016 Vincent Franais (LPC) RPC Simulation 3 fvrier 2016 1 / 15 Gas and Geometry 1 Simulation 2 Avalanche multiplication model Diffusion Results 3 Signal and charge induction Threshold

197 views • 15 slides
UMBC A B M A L T F O U M B C I M Y O R T 1 (10/2/07) I E S R C E O V U

UMBC A B M A L T F O U M B C I M Y O R T 1 (10/2/07) I E S R C E O V U

Programmable Logic Devices Simulation and TestBenches CMPE 415 Event-Driven Simulation Simulation is used to verify the design. CAD tools incorporate logic-level simulation to reduce simulation com- plexity and time. In Verilog, signals are

275 views • 16 slides
PROTO60 - First Simulation Results Position Reconstruction Daniel Bremer , Peter Drexler, Tobias

PROTO60 - First Simulation Results Position Reconstruction Daniel Bremer , Peter Drexler, Tobias

PROTO60 - First Simulation Results Daniel Bremer Settings Energy Reconstruction PROTO60 - First Simulation Results Position Reconstruction Daniel Bremer , Peter Drexler, Tobias Einer, Werner D oring, Till Kuske, Markus Moritz, Rainer

349 views • 9 slides
Robotic Deformable Object Cutting From Simulation to Experimentation Philip Long, Wisama Khalil

Robotic Deformable Object Cutting From Simulation to Experimentation Philip Long, Wisama Khalil

Introduction Simulation Control Scheme Simulator Results Experiments Experimental Results Future Work Robotic Deformable Object Cutting From Simulation to Experimentation Philip Long, Wisama Khalil and Philippe Martinet IRCCyN Ecole

727 views • 38 slides
Using Erlang for Distributed Simulation for the Derivation of Fault Tolerance Measures Nils M

Using Erlang for Distributed Simulation for the Derivation of Fault Tolerance Measures Nils M

Motivation Theory Erlang Simulation Results Conclusion Using Erlang for Distributed Simulation for the Derivation of Fault Tolerance Measures Nils M ullner August 19, 2008 1 / 28 Motivation Theory Erlang Simulation Results

1.15k views • 79 slides
Why Bayesian methods in Simulation? Simulation Simulation Model Inputs BAYESIAN IDEAS

Why Bayesian methods in Simulation? Simulation Simulation Model Inputs BAYESIAN IDEAS

Outline Why Bayesian methods in Simulation? Simulation Simulation Model Inputs BAYESIAN IDEAS Output Random Simulated Statistical, pr FOR DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION: Y r Numbers Variates Control,

473 views • 20 slides
Turbo Receiver Design for MIMO Relay ARQ Transmissions Halim Yanikomeroglu Carleton University,

Turbo Receiver Design for MIMO Relay ARQ Transmissions Halim Yanikomeroglu Carleton University,

Cooperative Communications Relay ARQ System Information-Theoretic Analysis Simulation Results I Signal-Level Sub-Packet Combining Simulation Results II Conclusion and Perspectives Related Works Turbo Receiver Design for MIMO Relay ARQ

765 views • 47 slides
The Modelling and Simulation Process 1. History of Modelling and Simulation 2. Modelling and

The Modelling and Simulation Process 1. History of Modelling and Simulation 2. Modelling and

The Modelling and Simulation Process 1. History of Modelling and Simulation 2. Modelling and Simulation Concepts 3. Levels of Abstraction 4. Experimental Frame 5. Validation 6. Studying a mass-spring system 7. The Modelling and Simulation

692 views • 34 slides
1 7 8 Types of simulation models Dynamic simulation models Stochastic vs. deterministic.

1 7 8 Types of simulation models Dynamic simulation models Stochastic vs. deterministic.

2 Outlines Simulation Modeling in Animal Health Management: Introduction: What is simulation modeling? A Stochastic Bio-economic Model of Bovine Intramammary Why simulation modeling is used? Infections (IMI) What are the

484 views • 14 slides
1 Simple example of simulation Slide 4 Evaluation of expected value of production E(V)

1 Simple example of simulation Slide 4 Evaluation of expected value of production E(V)

(Monte Carlo) Simulation (Monte Carlo) Simulation Slide 1 What is simulation? Simulation is an attempt to model a real world system in order to: Obtain a better understanding of the system (including interactions) Physiological

376 views • 8 slides
Introduction to Simulation Introduction to Simulation Gambling Game Reading: Law, Sections 1.1,

Introduction to Simulation Introduction to Simulation Gambling Game Reading: Law, Sections 1.1,

Introduction to Simulation Introduction to Simulation Gambling Game Reading: Law, Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.8 Definitions More on Simulation Key Issues in Simulation Peter J. Haas Basic point estimates and confidence intervals Discrete-Event

330 views • 9 slides
Simulation Simulation CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO SIMULATION 2 MODELING CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Simulation Simulation CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO SIMULATION 2 MODELING CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

Introduction to Simulation Simulation CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO SIMULATION 2 MODELING CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO SIMULATION 3 MODELING Simulation Modeling Paradigm that creates simplified representations of complex systems Generates

540 views • 22 slides
Logistic Regression for Nominal Response Variables Edpsy/Psych/Soc 589 Carolyn J. Anderson

Logistic Regression for Nominal Response Variables Edpsy/Psych/Soc 589 Carolyn J. Anderson

Logistic Regression for Nominal Response Variables Edpsy/Psych/Soc 589 Carolyn J. Anderson Department of Educational Psychology I L L I N O I S university of illinois at urbana-champaign Board of Trustees, University of Illinois c Spring

1.5k views • 98 slides
2020 Inflation Review Technical workshop 13 August 2020 Jonathan Seymour, Assistant Director

2020 Inflation Review Technical workshop 13 August 2020 Jonathan Seymour, Assistant Director

2020 Inflation Review Technical workshop 13 August 2020 Jonathan Seymour, Assistant Director Robyn Pickering, Director Warwick Anderson, General Manager, Networks Finance & Reporting aer.gov.au 1 Workshop purpose Opportunity to

604 views • 32 slides
W HAT IS SESSION DIRECT ? # 2017ACA CAP SessionDirect is a separate processing environment

W HAT IS SESSION DIRECT ? # 2017ACA CAP SessionDirect is a separate processing environment

S ESSION D IRECT Michial Armstrong Quentin Moore PHOTOGRAPH CREDIT MICHAEL HIBBLEN KUAR NEWS Building Bridges # 2017ACA CAP Ar Arkansas kansas Cour Court t Automa utomation tion Pr Prog ogram am Syst Systems ems Conf Confer

319 views • 15 slides
Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership

Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership

Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Rendering Third-Party Legal Opinions on LLC Status, Power, Action, Enforceability and Membership Interests Drafting Defensible Opinions and Minimizing Preparer Liability Risks

875 views • 62 slides
The Federal Circuit month at Month at a Glance A PATENT IS NOT A HUNTING LICENSE WRITTEN

The Federal Circuit month at Month at a Glance A PATENT IS NOT A HUNTING LICENSE WRITTEN

M A R C H 2 0 0 4 Last The Federal Circuit month at Month at a Glance A PATENT IS NOT A HUNTING LICENSE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION MUST SHOW POSSESSION OF CLAIMED INVENTION Because the patent at issue did not provide any guidance that would allow

123 views • 8 slides
Regulation in Water Markets and Competition in the Water Industry The Case of Scotland (UK)

Regulation in Water Markets and Competition in the Water Industry The Case of Scotland (UK)

Regulation in Water Markets and Competition in the Water Industry The Case of Scotland (UK) Infraday 7 th /8 th October 2011 Dipl.-Wirt.-Math. Nicole Annett Mller IWW Water Centre, Mlheim a. d. Ruhr PhD candidate, TU Dortmund 1

699 views • 36 slides
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/ Standard & Special Flash Candidate Countries

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/ Standard & Special Flash Candidate Countries

http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/ Standard & Special Flash Candidate Countries Eurobarometer Eurobarometer Eurobarometer 2001 2004 Since 2011 (Flash EB 331 ff.) Since 2004 (EB 62 ff.) The GALLUP Organization Central & Eastern

555 views • 16 slides
Qu Qu bien bien ! Mtodo de espaol para nios Mtodo en tres niveles Principiante

Qu Qu bien bien ! Mtodo de espaol para nios Mtodo en tres niveles Principiante

Te esperan peran nuev evos os amigos gos ! Qu Qu bien bien ! Mtodo de espaol para nios Mtodo en tres niveles Principiante a Intermedio-Bajo MCER : A1- A2.1 Los Autores Mady Musiol Magaly Villaroel Componentes

635 views • 37 slides

More recommend