Simulation of Gauge-Higgs models using the worm algorithm Y. Delgado - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

simulation of gauge higgs models using the worm algorithm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Simulation of Gauge-Higgs models using the worm algorithm Y. Delgado - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Simulation of Gauge-Higgs models using the worm algorithm Y. Delgado , C. Gattringer, A. Schmidt Karl-Franzens-Universitt Graz Sarajevo, February 2013 Y. Delgado (KFU) Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 1 / 19 Motivation: Sign problem of QCD


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Simulation of Gauge-Higgs models using the worm algorithm

  • Y. Delgado, C. Gattringer, A. Schmidt

Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz

Sarajevo, February 2013

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 1 / 19

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation: Sign problem of QCD

Expectation value of observables: O = 1 Z

  • D[φ, φ, U] O[U, φ, φ] e−S[φ,φ,U]

Use Monte-Carlo method. Generate configurations with probability: 1 Z e−S[φ,φ,U] At finite density: e−S(µ) is complex for µ > 0 e−S(µ) = |e−S(µ)|eiθ = ⇒ sign problem

x

  • 2
  • 1

1 2

f(x)

  • 1
  • 0.5

0.5 1

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 2 / 19

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivation: Sign problem of QCD

Way out:

Taylor expansion in terms of µ/T (not exact). Complex Langevin (exact). [G. Aarts, F

.A. James]

Rewrite the partion sum using new variables: Dual representation (exact).

P . de Forcrand (2010) (review LQCD and sign problem )

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 3 / 19

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Motivation: Sign problem of QCD

Way out:

Taylor expansion in terms of µ/T (not exact). Complex Langevin (exact). [G. Aarts, F

.A. James]

Rewrite the partion sum using new variables: Dual representation (exact).

Test new methods using full QCD is too complicated!! Use “toy models”:

SU(3) spin model (last excited QCD) [Y. D., C. Gattringer (2012)] Relativistic Bose gas [C. Gattringer, T. Kloiber (2013)] Z3 gauge-Higgs model [C. Gattringer, A. Schmidt (2012)] U(1) gauge-Higgs model (this talk) [Y .D., C. Gattringer, A. Schmidt (2013)

P . de Forcrand (2010) (review LQCD and sign problem )

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 3 / 19

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The U(1) Gauge-Higgs model

In the continuum S =

  • d4x {−φ(x)∗[∂ν + iAν(x)][∂ν + iAν(x)]φ(x)

+ [m2 − µ2]|φ(x)|2 + iµN +

  • d4x1

4FµνFµν On the lattice SG = −β 2

  • x
  • ν<ρ
  • Ux,νρ + U ∗

x,νρ

  • SH

= κ

  • x

|φx|2 −

  • x,ν
  • e−µδν4φ∗

x Ux,νφx+ˆ ν + eµδν4φ∗ x U ∗ x−ˆ ν,νφx+ˆ ν

  • φx

∈ C Ux,ν = eiAν ∈ U(1), Aν ∈ [−π, π] Ux,νρ = Ux,νUx+ˆ

ν,ρU ∗ x+ˆ ρ,νU ∗ x,ρ

  • µ

U (x)

a

φ(x)

µρ

U (x)

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 4 / 19

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Dual representation-1

Rewrite terms of partition sum: A single nearest neighbor term: ee−µδν4φ∗

xUx,νφx+ˆ ν =

  • lx,ν

(e−µδν4)lx,ν lx,ν! (Ux,ν)lx,ν(φ∗

x)lx,ν(φx+ˆ ν)lx,ν

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 5 / 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Dual representation-1

Rewrite terms of partition sum: A single nearest neighbor term: ee−µδν4φ∗

xUx,νφx+ˆ ν =

  • lx,ν

(e−µδν4)lx,ν lx,ν! (Ux,ν)lx,ν(φ∗

x)lx,ν(φx+ˆ ν)lx,ν

A single plaquette term: eβUx,νUx+ˆ

ν,ρU ∗ x+ˆ ρ,νU ∗ x,ρ =

  • px,νρ

βpx,νρ px,νρ!

  • Ux,νUx+ˆ

ν,ρU ∗ x+ˆ ρ,νU ∗ x,ρ

px,νρ

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 5 / 19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Dual representation-1

Rewrite terms of partition sum: A single nearest neighbor term: ee−µδν4φ∗

xUx,νφx+ˆ ν =

  • lx,ν

(e−µδν4)lx,ν lx,ν! (Ux,ν)lx,ν(φ∗

x)lx,ν(φx+ˆ ν)lx,ν

A single plaquette term: eβUx,νUx+ˆ

ν,ρU ∗ x+ˆ ρ,νU ∗ x,ρ =

  • px,νρ

βpx,νρ px,νρ!

  • Ux,νUx+ˆ

ν,ρU ∗ x+ˆ ρ,νU ∗ x,ρ

px,νρ Partition sum: Z =

  • {p,l}
  • x,νρ

(e−µδν4)lx,νβpx,νρ lx,ν!px,νρ!

  • dUx,νdφxdφ∗

xF(U, φ, φ∗, lx,ν, px,νρ, κ)

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 5 / 19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Dual representation-2

Integrate out U(1) fields → new degrees of freedom:

Links: lx,ν ∈ Z Plaquettes: pxνρ ∈ Z

New partion sum: Z ∝

  • {p,l}

W[p, l] CS[l] CL[p, l]

W[p, l]: positive weight factor (sign problem solved). CS[l]: site constraint → matter loops. CL[p, l]: link constraint → gauge surfaces.

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 6 / 19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Site constraint

Site constraint (matter loops): CS[l]=

  • x

δ 4

  • ν=1

[lx,ν − lx−ˆ

ν,ν]

  • ν

ν1

2

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 7 / 19

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Link constraint

Link constraint (gauge surfaces): CL[p, l]=

  • x

4

  • ν=1

δ

ρ:ν<ρ

[px,νρ − px−ˆ

ρ,νρ] −

  • ρ:ν>ρ

[px,ρν − px−ˆ

ρ,ρν] + lx,ν

  • ν

ν

+ +

2 1

+

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 8 / 19

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MC simulation

We used two algorithms:

Local Metropolis update Worm algorithm

Advantages of the worm algorithm:

Most suitable algorithm (for constrained variables). Local updates of the configurations. Smaller autocorrelation time in critical regions.

  • N. Prokof’ev and B. Svistunov (2001),
  • Y. Deng, T. M. Garoni and A. D. Sokal (2007).
  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 9 / 19

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Local Metropolis Update

Plaquette update: ν ν

+ −

2 1

Cube update:

ν3 ν ν

+ + + + + +

2 1

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 10 / 19

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Elements of the WA

Take smallest unit of the local update: ν ν

+ −

2 1

Relax the constraints in 2 elements → segments

ν ρ

− − + + + + + + − − − −

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 11 / 19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Updating scheme

1

One link is inserted at a random position of the lattice L0.

ν3 ν ν

2 1

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 12 / 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Updating scheme

1

One link is inserted at a random position of the lattice L0.

2

The worm may insert a new segment at Lv, healing the constraints at this position and then move to one of other three links of the segment.

ν3 ν ν

+ = + +

2 1

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 12 / 19

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Updating scheme

1

One link is inserted at a random position of the lattice L0.

2

The worm may insert a new segment at Lv, healing the constraints at this position and then move to one of other three links of the segment.

ν3 ν ν

+ + =

2 1

+

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 12 / 19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Updating scheme

1

One link is inserted at a random position of the lattice L0.

2

The worm may insert a new segment at Lv, healing the constraints at this position and then move to one of other three links of the segment.

ν3 ν ν

= + + +

2 1

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 12 / 19

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Updating scheme

1

One link is inserted at a random position of the lattice L0.

2

The worm may insert a new segment at Lv, healing the constraints at this position and then move to one of other three links of the segment.

ν3 ν ν

= + + + +

2 1

+

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 12 / 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Updating scheme

1

One link is inserted at a random position of the lattice L0.

2

The worm may insert a new segment at Lv, healing the constraints at this position and then move to one of other three links of the segment.

3

The worm ends modifying the link occupation number at Lv.

ν3 ν ν

+ = + + +

2 1

+

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 12 / 19

slide-21
SLIDE 21

WA vs. LMA

Verify correctness of WA (µ = 0 case).

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 β 0.2 0.4 0.6 <U>

SWA LMA conventional

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 β 1 2 3 χU

κ = 5; λ = 1 κ = 8; λ = 1 κ = 9; λ = 1

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 13 / 19

slide-22
SLIDE 22

WA vs. LMA: κ = 5, β = 0.65, V = 84

Close to the 1st order transition U function of plaquettes. |φ|2 function of links.

<U>LMA |φ|

2 LMA

<U>SWA |φ|

2 SWA

1 10 100 1000 τ’int cubes: 25%

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 14 / 19

slide-23
SLIDE 23

WA vs. LMA: κ = 8, β = 1.1, V = 84

Configurations dominated by closed surfaces (links are expensive). U function of plaquettes. |φ|2 function of links.

<U>LMA |φ|

2 LMA

<U>SWA |φ|

2 SWA

1 10 100 1000 τ’int cubes: 99%

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 15 / 19

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Scalar electrodynamics with two flavors

Conventional action on the lattice: SG = −β

  • x
  • µ<ν

Re Ux,µ Ux+ˆ

µ,ν U ⋆ x+ˆ ν,µ U ⋆ x,ν

SH =

  • x
  • κ1 |φ1

x|2 +κ2 |φ2 x|2

  • x

µ

  • eδµ4µ1φ1

x ⋆ Ux,µ φ1 x+ µ + e−δµ4µ1φ1 x ⋆ U ⋆ x− µ,µ φ1 x− µ

  • x

µ

  • eδµ4µ2φ2

x ⋆ U ⋆ x,µ φ2 x+ µ + e−δµ4µ2φ2 x ⋆ Ux− µ,µ φ2 x− µ

  • Dual form of the partition sum:

Z =

  • {p,l1,l2}

W(p, l1, l2) CL(p, l1, l2) CS(l1, l2)

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 16 / 19

slide-25
SLIDE 25

An admissible configuration

time space Chemical potential favors flux forward in time.

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 17 / 19

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Phase diagram at µ = 0, κ1 = κ2

  • A. Schmidt.
  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 18 / 19

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Summary

Considerable progress was made towards rewriting several systems in the dual representation, where the sign problem is solved. We have proposed an extension of the worm algorithm to simulate abelian gauge theories. Outlook:

Implement the worm algorithm for the 2 flavor case. Phase diagram at finite density. Dual representation of non-abelian theories??

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 19 / 19

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Summary

Considerable progress was made towards rewriting several systems in the dual representation, where the sign problem is solved. We have proposed an extension of the worm algorithm to simulate abelian gauge theories. Outlook:

Implement the worm algorithm for the 2 flavor case. Phase diagram at finite density. Dual representation of non-abelian theories??

Thank you for your attention!

  • Y. Delgado (KFU)

Worm algorithm Excited QCD 2013 19 / 19