Sili Silicon Valley Silicon Valley ll Energy Storage Symposium - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Sili Silicon Valley Silicon Valley ll Energy Storage Symposium Energy Storage Symposium gy g y p May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California , Media Partners Media Partners Event Partners Event Partners Exhibitors
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
Silicon Valley Energy Storage Symposium
May 30, 2012 Mountain View California Mountain View, California
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
E St I ti C t l t E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst
E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst Do ug Da ve npo rt, L BNL dtda ve npo rt@ lb l g o v dtda ve npo rt@ lb l.g o v Pa ul F ra nke l Ca lCE F Pa ul F ra nke l, Ca lCE F pa ul.fra nke l@ c a lc e f.o rg p g
E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst
L BNL Ca lCE F a nd a fe w fo unding pa rtne rs will L BNL , Ca lCE F , a nd a fe w fo unding pa rtne rs will la unc h Ca lCharg e to a c c e le ra te the pa c e o f la unc h Ca lCharg e to a c c e le ra te the pa c e o f b tt i ti i C lif i b a tte ry inno va tio n in Ca lifo rnia .
n-L a b Co llab o ratio n
T ra ining & T e c hno lo g y
Co llab o ratio n
g E duc a tio n g y
De ve lo pme nt
De ve lo pme nt p k t
Po lic y
Re g io na l Ma rke ts &
I nte llig e nc e
Cluste r Po lic y
g E i
c o no mic Re so urc e s
6
Our Go a l: F
Our Go a l: F
b atte ry inno vatio n in S ilic o n Valle y. b atte ry inno vatio n in S ilic o n Valle y. T h iti l i di t ll h T he c ritic a l ing re die nts a re a ll he re g
30+ e me rg ing b a tte r te c hno lo g c o mpa nie s 30+ e me rg ing b a tte ry te c hno lo g y c o mpa nie s W
ld l R D d i tit ti
Wo rld-c la ss R&D re so urc e s a nd institutio ns 1st in Cle a nT
e c h inve stme nt a nd pa te nt filing s p g
E
nlig hte ne d po lic y, e a rly a do pte r c ulture
E
nlig hte ne d po lic y, e a rly a do pte r c ulture
L
e a de rship in c le a n te c hno lo g y de ve lo pme nt
L
e a de rship in c le a n te c hno lo g y de ve lo pme nt
Ca lCharg e strive s to b ring the m to g e the r Ca lCharg e strive s to b ring the m to g e the r
7
C
ll b ti ith l di b tt i ti t
Co lla b o ra tio n with le a ding b a tte ry sc ie ntists Ac c e ss la b -g ra de re so urc e s fo r de ve lo pme nt
g p
Ne w de ve lo pme nt pa rtne rships a nd c o lla b o ra tio ns Ne w de ve lo pme nt pa rtne rships a nd c o lla b o ra tio ns L
inks to inc ub a to rs c o mme rc ia liza tio n a nd fie ld tria l pa rtne rs
L
inks to inc ub a to rs, c o mme rc ia liza tio n, a nd fie ld tria l pa rtne rs
T ra nspo rta tio n Co nsume r E le c tric a l Co su e E le c tro nic s Grid 8
L
t f b tt d l t i ti t h
L
a rg e st g ro up o f b a tte ry de ve lo pme nt sc ie ntists, a nywhe re
T
rue e xpe rts in L i-io n c e lls, flo w c e lls, a nd a dva nc e d b a tte rie s
L
a b -sc a le b a tte ry fa b ric a tio n, te sting , a nd de ve lo pme nt fa c ilitie s
L
a b sc a le b a tte ry fa b ric a tio n, te sting , a nd de ve lo pme nt fa c ilitie s
Wo rld-c la ss use r fa c ilitie s in ma te ria ls de ve lo pme nt a nd mic ro sc o py Wo rld-c la ss use r fa c ilitie s in ma te ria ls de ve lo pme nt a nd mic ro sc o py I
ndustry o rie nte d a ppro a c h to c o lla b o ra tio n
I
ndustry-o rie nte d a ppro a c h to c o lla b o ra tio n
I t
di i li t i l h i t t li ti
I
nte rdisc iplina ry ma te ria ls, c he mistry, syste ms, a pplic a tio ns
9
Bring ing T e c hnic a l Ma rke t a nd Po lic y Bring ing T e c hnic a l, Ma rke t, a nd Po lic y tt i t ti ith b ma tte rs into c o nve rsa tio n with me mb e rs i i
y y
Adva nc e d tra ining in b a tte ry de sig n &
g y g a pplic a tio ns a pplic a tio ns
nfo rma tive we b ina rs & ne two rking
nfo rma tive we b ina rs & ne two rking
C i S S S i 20 3
Co re pa rtne r in SV E
ne rg y Sto ra g e Summit 2013
L
L
10
C ll b i h i f b
E
limina te s c o ntra c ting de la ys a ssure s c o nfide ntia lity
E
limina te s c o ntra c ting de la ys, a ssure s c o nfide ntia lity
f C lCh ll b ti fo r Ca lCharg e c o lla b o ra tio n
in the wo rks
lCh ill ti i t i d ANL / L BNL
/ L BNL
E ne rg y Sto ra g e Hub le d DOE E ne rg y Sto ra g e Hub
11
Initially r eaching… Initially r eaching…
E
i B tt C i d l i i ti f d i
E
me rg ing Batte ry Co mpanie s: de ve lo ping inno va tio ns fo r de vic e s, t t id tra nspo rt, g rid
L
arg e Batte ry Pro duc e rs: inte re ste d to suppo rt de ve lo pme nt o f g y pp p te c hno lo g y a nd ta le nt g y
Potential Additional Member s
Majo r Batte ry Use rs: tra nspo rta tio n g rid c o nsume r se c to r c o mpa nie s Majo r Batte ry Use rs: tra nspo rta tio n, g rid, c o nsume r se c to r c o mpa nie s
tha t drive ne e ds a nd o ppo rtunitie s tha t drive ne e ds a nd o ppo rtunitie s i i i i i f
Po lic y Make rs: g o ve rnme nt le a de rship sha ping the dire c tio n o f e ne rg y
i i sto ra g e a pplic a tio ns
L
c o no mic De ve lo pme nt: b usine ss inc ub a to rs a nd a c c e le ra to rs
L
c o no mic De ve lo pme nt: b usine ss inc ub a to rs a nd a c c e le ra to rs, wo rkfo rc e de ve lo pme nt wo rkfo rc e de ve lo pme nt
12
i F
Do ug Da ve npo rt a t L BNL g p dtda ve npo rt@ lb l.g o v dtda ve npo rt@ lb l.g o v Pa ul F ra nke l a t Ca lCE F Pa ul F ra nke l a t Ca lCE F pa ul fra nke l@ c a lc e f o rg pa ul.fra nke l@ c a lc e f.o rg
E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst E ne rg y Sto ra g e I nno va tio n Ca ta lyst
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
Silicon Valley Energy Storage Symposium
May 30, 2012 Mountain View California Mountain View, California
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
Silicon Valley Energy Storage Symposium
May 30, 2012 Mountain View California Mountain View, California
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
l Managing Partner, Strategen Consulting, LLC Executive Director, California Energy Storage Alliance , gy g
We combine strategic thinking with deep industry expertise to create profitable businesses
Strategen Core Team
Clean Tech Manufacturers / S i P id
Strategen Core Team
Service Providers
Partners
Technology Specialists Corporations Exploring Clean Technology Specialists St t d Fi Corporations Exploring Clean Energy Opportunities Structured Finance Energy Opportunities Controls & Smart Grid Project Developers Private Equity / VC Firms Tariff and Rate Specialists q y / Investing in Clean Tech p
A sampling of our clients: A sampling of our clients:
U.S. Department of Department of Energy
Confidential
20
Energy Storage is fundamental to many key California policy Energy Storage is fundamental to many key California policy i i i i initiatives
» BIG: 13% of US GDP, 8th largest economy in the world, ahead of Canada and Spain. » ‘Foundational’ Legislation
S lf G i I i P SGIP (SB 412 AB1150))
S t G id S t (SB 17)
» Pro storage policy makers: Governor’s office CPUC CAISO CEC & CARB » Pro‐storage policy makers: Governor s office, CPUC, CAISO, CEC & CARB » Incentives available for customer sited applications via SGIP (~$450M) and PLS ($32M) » Incentives available for customer sited applications via SGIP ( $450M) and PLS ($32M) » Storage key to renewable integration – new wholesale products under development (CAISO) » Storage key to renewable integration – new wholesale products under development (CAISO) » Many CA storage projects currently underway » Many CA storage projects currently underway
CESA is driving results oriented change in all of these areas CESA is driving results‐oriented change in all of these areas
Confidential
21
Our Mission: Expand the role of storage technology to promote the growth of renewable p f g gy p g f energy and create a cleaner, more affordable and reliable electric power system gy , ff p y
» Core principles for a healthy market – diversity is important! Core principles for a healthy market diversity is important!
Technology neutrality
» Explicit support of renewable energy in our mission and our membership » Explicit support of renewable energy in our mission…and our membership » Philosophy of ‘coalition building’ with all stakeholders (especially utilities) – strength in diversity g y W h li it d d t b f d i ff t » We have limited resources, and so must be very focused in our efforts l f l
CARB
Confidential
22
Steering Committee Steering Committee General Members General Members
Confidential
23
Technology Classes Energy Storage Examples
S di S lf B tt Sodium Sulfur Battery
improved, and new battery technologies are becoming available.
Chemical Storage
Chill d W t St Chilled Water Storage
Thermal
Thermal Storage
the air before intake.
High Speed Flywheel High Speed Flywheel
Mechanical
are ideal for power conditioning and short‐term storage.
Mechanical Storage
g
Below Ground Compressed Air Below Ground Compressed Air
Bulk Mechanical
underground cavern. The compressed air is used to spin turbines when electricity is needed.
Bulk Mechanical Storage
g
Pumped Hydro Pumped Hydro
Bulk Gravitational
water can run down through turbines, much like a traditional hydroelectric dam.
Bulk Gravitational Storage
Confidential
24
Storage creates a more efficient, cleaner, smarter grid! g , , g
Current Grid Infrastructure Future Grid Infrastructure
h l f i
d i (M ) d i that occur only a few times per year reducing unevenness (Mura) andri
y
( )
system
Fossil Fuel
Fossil delivery infrastructure R bl d Base Load Generation Renewable and Traditional Generation Base Load Generation Storage-Optimized Storage-Optimized Regulation & Transmission Oversized Transmission Grid Peaking & Regulation Storage-Optimized g g p Distribution Oversized Distribution Grid On-site renewables + storage + storage
Confidential
25
ild b k d i » Build a Robust Market Foundation (CPUC)
» Implement AB 2514 ‐ Comprehensive Storage Rulemaking (CPUC): appropriate procurement targets, applications, priorities, cost‐effectiveness » Achieve multi‐year procurement – Resource Adequacy Rulemaking y p q y g
» Behind the Meter Incentives and Value Proposition (CPUC) » Behind the Meter Incentives and Value Proposition (CPUC)
I l S lf G i I i P $400M b d » Implement Self‐Generation Incentive Program ~$400M budget » Implement Permanent Load Shifting Program ~$32M budget » Access Ancillary Services markets (with CAISO)
» Comparable Treatment in Wholesale Markets (CAISO) » Comparable Treatment in Wholesale Markets (CAISO)
» Implement Pay for Performance robust implementation of FERC Order 755 » Implement Pay for Performance robust implementation of FERC Order 755 » Various Flexible Dispatch Initiatives ‐ REM, flexible dispatch, FERC Order 745 demand response
» Promote Energy Storage as a Mainstream Energy Resource (all): educate policymakers and
stakeholders in all relevant proceedings, legislation:
p g
* with ESA Advocacy Council Confidential
26
AB 2514 considers procurement targets for new storage capacity AB 2514 considers procurement targets for new storage capacity
» Considers establishing Energy Storage Procurement Targets for 2015 and 2020 (2016 and 2021 for POUs) » IF cost‐effective » IF commercially available » Sponsored by Jerry Brown, former California Attorney General, now Governor p y y y » Authored by Assembly member Nancy Skinner, Chair, Assembly Rules Committee y y y , , y » Directs CPUC to convene a proceeding to evaluate energy storage procurement targets: » Directs CPUC to convene a proceeding to evaluate energy storage procurement targets:
key to implementation
stomer o ned and third part o ned are eli ible
A li i ll d f 1/1/10
demand side management
» Status – signed into law 9/29/10, implementation underway at CPUC!!
Confidential
27
The CPUC is has been very proactive in implementing the Storage Bill The CPUC is has been very proactive in implementing the Storage Bill.
March 9 March 9, 2011 – 1st Workshop December 31 2021– December 31, 2016 – October 1, 2014 October 1, 2013 ‐ June 28, 2011 – 2nd W k h 31, 2021 Deadline for 2016 Deadline for 2014 ‐ Deadline for 2013 ‐ Deadline for Workshop POUs to meet 2nd POUs to meet 1st POUs to adopt any CPUC to adopt any Dec 12, 2011 – Draft meet 2 procurement 1 procurement any procurement adopt any procurement , Staff Proposal targets. targets p targets. targets. A il 3 2012 April 3, 2012 – Final Staff Final Staff Procuremen t Proposal
2011 2012 2014 2015 2013 2020 2021 2016 2011 2012 2014 2015 2013 2020 2021 2016
December 31, December 31, By March 2012, the CPUC and December 31, 2020, Deadline December 31, 2015 ‐ Deadline By March 2012, the CPUC and POUs must begin to consider for IOUs to meet 2nd for IOUs to meet 1st energy storage procurement targets meet 2nd procurement meet 1 procurement targets. targets targets
Happened Key: Legislative Milestone
Confidential 28
1 Fi l E St F k St ff P l i d 4/3/12
2 I f l ll b ti ti ith CPUC t ff d i t
y A hi t i l /d fi iti
pp methodology/analysis methodology/analysis B i b i / li i
3 N t t
Then on to Phase 2! Then on to Phase 2!
Confidential
29
Distributed storage has many value streams that can’t be directly g y y monetized by the end user monetized by the end user
I ti Incentives Storage System Cost
Fair Margin
T&D
Incentives
T&D O ti
Incentives
Overgeneration Losses
Storage
Energy
g System Cost
Energy Emissions
TOU Savings TOU Savings TOU Savings
Emissions Capacity Ancillary Services
Total Benefits Monitized Benefits Monitized Benefits Sytem Costs
y TOU Savings
Total Benefits Monitized Benefits Monitized Benefits w/Incentives Sytem Costs
TOU Savings
/
Market transformational incentives for distributed storage will enable Market transformational incentives for distributed storage will enable h i i f C lif i ’ f l l the vision for California’s future clean energy supply
Confidential 30
Evolution of the SGIP Evolution of the SGIP
AB 2778
D.08‐11‐044 AB 1150
Extended SGIP through 1/1/12
SGIP established to implement AB 970. Creates financial incentives for Energy storage systems eligible only when Clarifies intent
through 1/1/12 Limited eligibility
Creates financial incentives for distributed generation technologies that provide “energy conservation eligible only when coupled with eligible wind or fuel cells
energy storage and
Limited eligibility to wind and fuel
that provide energy conservation demand‐side management and other i i i i i d d d d wind or fuel cells, including pre‐existing i d f l ll j storage, and extends f d b
cell DG technologies
initiatives in order to reduce demand for electricity and reduce load during wind or fuel cell projects funding by three years
technologies
peak demand periods.” (2012‐2014)
2001 2002 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2005 2011
D 02 04 004 l f d D.02‐04‐004
CPUC O i i l th t
D.06‐01‐047 California Solar Initiative SB 412 Signed Final Decision ‐ SB 412
CPUC Opinion reveals that “Legislature expressed no
Solar Initiative Established
Extends program through 12/16 and
SB 412 Implementation
guidance on the extent or scope of incentives for Removes all PV incentives
through 12/16 and restores CPUC th it t dd
p
CPUC Final Decision
p distributed generation.” from SGIP and creates CSI program, also administered by
authority to add new technologies to Implementing SB412 Standalone storage
the CPUC
1/1/10 Standalone storage and storage + PV is 1/1/10 eligible!
Confidential 31
Funding Structure Funding Structure
System Size Incentive Renewable and Waste Non‐renewable Emerging Technologies Structure Energy Recovery Conventional CHP
Engine – CHP Energy (CHP or
Storage Electric Turbine*
Only) 0‐1 MW 100% $1.25 $0.50 $2.00 $2.25 0 1 MW 100% $1.25 $0.50 $2.00 $2.25 1 2 MW 50% $0 63 $0 25 $1 00 $1 13 1‐2 MW 50% $0.63 $0.25 $1.00 $1.13 $ $ $ $ 2‐3 MW 25% $0.31 $0.13 $0.50 $0.56
*Includes, but is not limited to any small turbine generator installed in an existing, man‐made channel for delivery of water, steam or natural gas.
50% of the incentive is paid upfront, 50% is a performance‐based‐incentive (PBI) paid over 5 years Systems under 30kW get all incentive payments upfront. For more program details, see: http://energycenter.org/index.php/incentive‐programs/self‐generation‐incentive‐program
‐ AES can participate in either bucket depending on if it is standalone or coupled with renewable or non‐renewable generation! ‐ Any installation provided by a California supplier will receive an additional 20% incentive. ‐ Incentives in the “Emerging Technologies” category decline at 10% per year beginning 2013.
Confidential
32
Current SGIP handbook is very favorable to Energy Storage. y gy g
AES G l R i t AES General Requirements » Maximum size: A standalone system can be no larger than the host t ’ i 12 th l k d d t th d Size Restriction: customer’s previous 12‐month annual peak demand at the proposed site A generation‐paired system can be no larger than the generation
system it is paired with. y p » Must meet onsite load – Max. 25% export to grid » Rated Capacity = average discharge kW over 2 hours Discharge Capacity Criteria: p y g g » Standalone systems must be able to discharge once per day. Discharge Capacity Criteria: » Wind‐coupled projects must be able to handle “hundreds” of partial di h l d discharge cycles per day. Incentive Payment Method: » Tech Based, 50 % up front, 50 % PBI (100% up front if <30kW) I ti l l ti t f i t h l i y » Incentive calculations are separate for companion technologies Minimum Required Round Trip Efficiency (AC t AC) 67.9% (AC to AC) Capacity Factor (% total yearly capacity th t i i ti ) 10% the system is in operation) Cost Cap » Applicants must pay a minimum of 40% of the eligible project cost $5 illi i i ti t j t p » $5 million maximum incentive amount per project W t R i t » All SGIP‐eligible systems must have a minimum 10 year warranty on all j t f th t th t li ibl f th i ti hi h Warranty Requirement major components of the system that are eligible for the incentive which covers the cost of repair or replacement covers the cost of repair or replacement.
All systems must meet the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc interconnection standards and comply with all local All systems must meet the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. interconnection standards and comply with all local environmental and air quality requirements. Confidential
33
AES
AES Standalone,
Remaining CCSE Funding $*
P Ad i i t t (PA) A l B d t* , $1,003,200 Program Administrator (PA) Annual Budget* Pacific Gas and Electric Company $33,480,000 AES Plus PV, $2 055 640 Remaining Southern California Edison $26 040 000 $2,055,640 Remaining Renewable, Southern California Edison $26,040,000 Pressure $7,729,412 California Center for Sustainable Energy $10,230,000 Pressure Reduction Southern California Gas Company $7,440,000 Turbine, $ Remaining p y $ , , T l $77 190 000 $1,037,500 g Non‐ Total $77,190,000
**
Fuel Cell Renewable, $5 416 484
Renewable Bucket
**Each PA’s annual budget allocation is divided into two categories ‐ 75% in Renewable and Emerging Technologies; 25% in Non‐Renewable
Fuel Cell, $729,000 $5,416,484
Non‐Renewable Bucket
g g g ;
are added to their respective annual budget allocations for the following are added to their respective annual budget allocations for the following year.
Number of CCSE SGIP Applications* CCSE kW to be Installed* Number of CCSE SGIP Applications CCSE kW to be Installed
Pressure Reduction Turbine Pressure Reduction Turbine Pressure Reduction Turbine Pressure Reduction Turbine Fuel Cell Fuel Cell AES Pl PV AES Pl PV AES Plus PV AES Plus PV AES Standalone AES Standalone 10 20 30 40 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 kW Applications kW Applications * CCSE data as of 4/30/12 Confidential
34
AB 1150 authorized new funding and extend the SGIP beyond 2012 AB 1150 authorized new funding and extend the SGIP beyond 2012
» Signed into law by Governor Brown September 22, 2011 $ » Authorizes the extension $83M/year of rate‐payer based funding through December 31, 2014 ($249 million, total) December 31, 2014 ($249 million, total) » Statutorily clarifies eligibility of energy storage (Section 1. 379.6 a(1)): Statutorily clarifies eligibility of energy storage (Section 1. 379.6 a(1)):
It is the intent of the Legislature that the self-generation incentive program g g p g increase deployment of distributed generation and energy storage systems increase deployment of distributed generation and energy storage systems to facilitate the integration of those resources into the electrical grid improve to facilitate the integration of those resources into the electrical grid, improve efficiency and reliability of the distribution and transmission system and efficiency and reliability of the distribution and transmission system, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases peak demand and ratepayer costs reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, peak demand, and ratepayer costs.
Confidential
35
» New category created by CPUC in 2006 recognizing that storage (particularly thermal storage) is similar to DR but » New category created by CPUC in 2006 recognizing that storage (particularly thermal storage) is similar to DR but has different benefits, costs, markets and performance.* , , p » PLS programs reauthorized and significantly increased by IOUs and CPUC 4/19/12 to $32 million for 2012‐2014 p g g y y / / $ (rough doubling of current annual budgets).
months
SONGS h td d d f dditi l PLS ) SONGS shutdown underscores need for additional PLS resources)
PLS t d i ti t f ld d i t b d t t /i ti h h i AB » PLS category and incentives may get folded into broader storage category/incentives when comprehensive AB 2514 authorized storage rulemaking is completed 2514‐authorized storage rulemaking is completed.
IOU 2012‐14 Budgets g P ifi G d El i $15 000 000 Pacific Gas and Electric $15,000,000. Southern California Edison $14 000 000 Southern California Edison $14,000,000. San Diego Gas & Electric $3,000,000. g , , Total $32,000,000.
* “…PLS involves [on a recurring basis] storing electricity produced during off peak hours and using the stored energy during peak hours to support …PLS involves [on a recurring basis] storing electricity produced during off peak hours and using the stored energy during peak hours to support loads.” Confidential
36
Confidential
37
Top California storage applications will become increasingly attractive p g pp g y as economic incentives and markets come online as economic incentives and markets come online
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Now
er Mete $2/W Incentive
SGIP
the M Program
SGIP
e of t 30% Investment Tax Credit if ESS Paired with
FITC
r Side PV
FITC
ESS R t il P ti i ti i CAISO A/S M k t (P D d R )
WHOLESALE
Custo ESS Retail Participation in CAISO A/S Market (Proxy Demand Response)
WHOLESALE ENERGY MKT.
C
WHOLESALE
ESS participation in CAISO F/R Market (2012: REM 2014: Pay for Performance)
WHOLESALE F/R MKT
*R Ad
the
*Resource Adequacy contracts
Utility/IPP ESS Peakers bid into CAISO Capacity Markets
WHOLESALE CAPACTIY MKT.
e of ter
contracts are procured on an
y Sid Met
annual basis. All th h l l
T/D and imbalance penalties associated with 33% RPS RPS Utility
All other wholesale markets are
U
markets are day ahead.
ESS owners/developers sell R.A. via bi‐lateral contracts with utilities Resource Adequacy Adequacy FERC creates accounting standards for storage to facilitate ratebasing
FERC Accounting FERC Accounting Standards
ratebasing
Standards
Confidential
38
California’s regulatory framework is rapidly evolving to accelerate g y p y g deployment of grid storage deployment of grid storage
» CAISO Flexibility Implementation REM Flexible Ramping Flexible Capacity » CAISO Flexibility Implementation, REM, Flexible Ramping, Flexible Capacity » CAISO Pay for Performance Implementation regulation (FERC Order 755) y p g ( ) CPUC St R l ki t t AB 2514 » CPUC Storage Rulemaking pursuant to AB 2514 » CPUC Long Term Procurement Planning (LTPP) Renewable Integration » CPUC Long Term Procurement Planning (LTPP), Renewable Integration » CPUC Resource Adequacy (RA) » CPUC Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) » CPUC Self‐Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) » CPUC Standard Offer for Permanent Load Shifting (PLS) g ( ) CPUC S t G id D l t » CPUC Smart Grid Deployment » CPUC General Rate Cases – Storage friendly tariffs » CPUC General Rate Cases Storage friendly tariffs » CEC Integrated Energy Policy Report – includes storage
Be the master of your own destiny, get involved! y y g
Confidential 39
Janice Lin Janice Lin
Co Founder & Executive Director O 510 665 7811 2150 Allston Way Suite 210 O 510 665 7811 M 415 595 8301 2150 Allston Way, Suite 210 Berkeley, CA 94704 M 415 595 8301 F 888 453 0018 Berkeley, CA 94704 l www.strategen.com jlin@strategen.com
For more information about CESA membership, public filings, and p p g
www.storagealliance.org g g
Confidential
40
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
Silicon Valley Energy Storage Symposium
May 30, 2012 Mountain View California Mountain View, California
Si-Valley 05– 30-12
Renew ables ( not capacity factor adjusted)
9
Renew ables ( not capacity factor adjusted)
8 7 6
W
Wi d
M
Wind
5
Wind (proj)
5
Lo
Solar PV Solar PV (proj)
4
Hydro
4
Hydro (proj) y (p j) World Consumption
3
World Consumption
3 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040
Y
G G k 2011
Year
Worldwide CNESA
Worldwide – CNESA
2011 May 370MW
2011 May 370MW 2011 Aug 455MW
2011 Aug. 455MW 2011 N 545MW
2011 Nov. 545MW 2012 F b 580MW
2012 Feb. 580MW (Pike Research) 2012 Apr. 590MW ( )
Feb 24 2007: 500MW / 2 5hr; 30x Spotprices Coincident BPA Wind Ramps
NREL: ∆ = 25% @ 2days ∆ = 50% @ 1 week Coincident BPA Wind Ramps NREL: ∆ = 25% @ 2days, ∆ = 50% @ 1 week
Installing a 25 MW / 3hr battery plant for the Installing a 25 MW / 3hr battery plant for the
Modesto Irrigation District in CA providing Modesto Irrigation District in CA, providing equivalent flex capacity to 50 MW of natural gas equivalent flex capacity to 50 MW of natural gas i ti $73M engines costing $73M
4MW/12MWh incremental “Plug & g Play” deployment y y
High power High power metal electrodes
Fully self-contained, hermetically 250kW/750kWh y , y sealed flow battery modules EnergyPods™ y gy
8 MW / 4 hr battery plant for wind integration at Tehachapi, CA. y p g p ,
8MW Storage Plant under Construction g A Tehachapi Wind Field p
Largest North American Installation with Wind g
L ti O h HI Location Oahu, HI Application Wind Application Wind DPR™ 15 MW / 10 MWh DPR™ 15 MW / 10 MWh COD Q1 2011 COD Q1 2011 S C Services Ramp Control, Voltage Regulation
This DPR™ will operate on a 30 MW wind farm on the island of Oahu This DPR will operate on a 30 MW wind farm on the island of Oahu to meet PPA ramp control and smoothing requirements to meet PPA ramp control and smoothing requirements.
Kirby 2004 Kirby 2004
Current method to balance constantly shifting load fluctuation is Current method to balance constantly shifting load fluctuation is to vary the frequency and periodically adjust generation in response to vary the frequency and periodically adjust generation in response to an ISO signal Fast storage can respond instantaneously! to an ISO signal. Fast storage can respond instantaneously!
When additional renewables are planned a certain amount of storage or fast When additional renewables are planned, a certain amount of storage or fast- ramping generation is also needed to firm the variable renewable power ramping generation is also needed to firm the variable renewable power. – For every unit of wind capacity power, approximately 0.08 to 0.15 units of y p y p pp y intra-hour balancing (minute-to-minute variability) need to be added. g ( y)
Intra hour balancing power requirements caused by wind variability only Intra-hour balancing power requirements caused by wind variability only f
MW
as a percentage of as a percentage of as a percentage of
storage
as a percentage of as a percentage of installed wind
storage
average demand peak demand installed wind capacity capacity AZ NM AZ-NM- SNV 174.08 1.0 0.5 12.8 SNV 7 .08 .0 0.5 .8 CA-MX 943.65 2.5 1.4 14.4 NWPP 1 071 26 2 1 1 5 11 0 NWPP 1,071.26 2.1 1.5 11.0 RMPA 504 89 5 6 3 6 8 0 RMPA 504.89 5.6 3.6 8.0
DOE Loan Guarantee – Beacon:
20MW Flywheel Storage for 20MW Flywheel Storage for Frequency Regulation in NY-ISO Frequency Regulation in NY ISO 20MW commissioned July 2011 20MW commissioned July 2011
DOE Loan Guarantee AES / A123: DOE Loan Guarantee – AES / A123:
20MW Lithi I B tt f 20MW Lithium Ion Battery for Frequency Regulation in NY-ISO 8MW on Line!
57
Inexpensive Off-Peak Power to Compress Air Inexpensive Off-Peak Power to Compress Air for Storage in Aq ifers Salt Domes Ca erns for Storage in Aquifers, Salt Domes, Caverns,
Compressed Air is used as Input for Gas Compressed Air is used as Input for Gas Turbine Compressor increasing Efficiency Turbine Compressor, increasing Efficiency
Huntdorf, Germany, 1978, 290 MW McIntosh, Alabama, 1991, 110 MW Huntdorf, Germany, 1978, 290 MW McIntosh, Alabama, 1991, 110 MW
300 MW / 10hr Compressed Air Depleted Gas Wells p Energy Storage Facility in p G Pi Li Energy Storage Facility in Tehachapi CA Gas Pipe Line Tehachapi, CA E i ti 500kV T i i Li Existing 500kV Transmission Line 4 500 MW New Wind in 4 5 Years 4 500 MW New Wind in 4-5 Years
Location of Wind Resources Location of Depleted Gas Fields
Ultrabattery A nd VRLA Battery 1C 1 Capacity After H RPSoC Cycling
After H RPSoC Cycling.
110500kW 2 5MWh for smoothing of
90 Capacity500kW, 2.5MWh for smoothing of 500kW PV installation; Using
80 Of Initial C500kW PV installation; Using E tP L d C b T h l
70 % AG M V RLA (A fter C ycling at 1C R ate)EastPenn Lead-Carbon Technology
50 60 AG M V RLA (A fter C ycling at 1C R ate) 50 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 H R PS oC C ycle Num berPbC Testing at Sandia PbC Testing at Sandia
3MW Frequency Reg for PJM q y g 1MW 1-4hrs Load Management 1MW 1 4hrs Load Management during Peak Periods during Peak Periods
Commissioned Sep. 24, 2011 Integrator: Ecoult Integrator: Ecoult Commissioning June 2012 Commissioning June 2012
M i C t Monrovia County Community College Dow Kokam Battery S&C Inverter Dow Kokam Battery S&C Inverter
250kW/4hr Fe-Cr Flow Battery for PV y
PV: 300 kW Storage: 250 KW Storage: 250 KW Peak output: 450kW Peak output: 450kW Storage Cost: +16% Storage Cost: +16% Storage Value: +84% Storage Value: +84%
Tracking PV in Almond Grove Fl B tt P t t L i PV ith St Flow Battery Prototype Leveraging PV with Storage
2 it t b t ti i S
S
j
Winner, 2010
, World Technology Award
World Technology Award
Lifetime cost: $0.10/kWh
Ubiquitous, low cost precursors
5000 c cles demonstrated
120 100
y)
100
Charge Capacity
acity
80
Charge Capacity Discharge Capacity
ity Capa
60
g p y
pac ial C
40
Cap init
20
% of
20
(%
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Cycle #
Awards: GE Ecomagination,
g , Clean Tech 100 in 2010 / 11
Clean Tech 100 in 2010 / 11 A site-anywhere solution – eliminates A site anywhere solution eliminates lengthy siting and risk associated with lengthy siting and risk associated with geologic storage geologic storage Superior thermodynamics – eliminates reliance on natural gas Isothermal efficiency of 95% compared Isothermal efficiency of 95% compared with 54% for adiabatic technique with 54% for adiabatic technique Higher pressure and efficiency make pipe-type Higher pressure and efficiency make pipe type storage cost effective storage cost effective A patented and demonstrated low cost long A patented and demonstrated, low-cost, long lif ti t l ti lifetime energy storage solution
Clickable States to
Clickable States to display more detailed information
A publicly accessible database of energy storage projects world-wide,
Rollover Pop out
as well as state and federal
Pop-out boxes with
legislation/policies
summaries
h // h / http://www.energystorageexchange.org/.
M k d ti Markers denoting projects and points p j p
Partnership with EPRI and NRECA to develop a definitive energy storage handbook: Partnership with EPRI and NRECA to develop a definitive energy storage handbook:
Matches applications to technologies
Info on sizing, siting, interconnecting
Includes a cost database
facilitate planning for ESS infrastructure: Hi h l l t h i l d i
i f t t h l i review of storage technologies D t i d i li bl
storage resources storage resources
stakeholders and the general public on stakeholders and the general public on energy storage technologies energy storage technologies
http://www.sandia.gov/ess/esselect.html
I f l t b t St b fit
P id i f ti t h i l t f E St S t
Id tif l t h ll t i d St S t d l t
Suggest possible responses/solutions to challenges
D l d d i h bl
O i t t h l l
Suggest possible responses/solutions to challenges
Develop model PUC submissions requesting approval of rate base addition
Advisory Committee comprised of industry and government experts
R li bl i d d t thi d t t ti d ifi ti f Reliable, independent, third party testing and verification of advanced energy technologies from cell to MW scale systems
Expertise to design test plans for technologies and their potential applications Expertise to design test plans for technologies and their potential applications Cell, Battery and Module Testing Cell, Battery and Module Testing
Testers to accommodate a wide range of testing applications including: – 14 channels from 36 V, 25 A to 72 V, 1000 A for battery to module-scale tests – Over 125 channels; 0 V to 10 V, 3 A to 100+ A for cell tests Energy Storage Test Pad (ESTP) 100+ A for cell tests
S t T ti System Testing
S f C
1 MW/1 MVAR l d b k f ith ll l
microgrid or series UPS operations microgrid, or series UPS operations
Subcyc e e e g eede b ea e s o sys e identification and transient analysis
72 V 1000 A Bitrode (2 Parallel Channels)
David Rose Summer Ferreira dmrose@sandia.gov srferre@sandia.gov
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
Silicon Valley Energy Storage Symposium
May 30, 2012 Mountain View California Mountain View, California
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners
Silicon Valley Energy Storage Symposium
May 30, 2012 Mountain View California Mountain View, California
May 30, 2012 Microsoft Auditorium Mountain View, California ,
Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners Event Partners Exhibitors Media Partners