sigmaphi sigmaphi raccam magnet design raccam magnet
play

SIGMAPHI SIGMAPHI RACCAM magnet design RACCAM magnet design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SIGMAPHI SIGMAPHI RACCAM magnet design RACCAM magnet design Damien Neuvglise Thomas Planche Jean-Luc Lancelot PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque Summary Summary Part 1 :


  1. SIGMAPHI SIGMAPHI RACCAM magnet design RACCAM magnet design � Damien Neuvéglise � Thomas Planche � Jean-Luc Lancelot PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  2. Summary Summary � Part 1 : project presentation Part 1 : project presentation � � Part 2 : magnet design Part 2 : magnet design � � Part 3 : tune shift correction Part 3 : tune shift correction � � Part 4 : cost reduction Part 4 : cost reduction � See also posters TUPAN 07 and TUPAN 08 See also posters TUPAN 07 and TUPAN 08 PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  3. Project presentation Project presentation � RACCAM is a collaboration between RACCAM is a collaboration between � – SIGMAPHI, SIGMAPHI, Vannes Vannes (France) (France) – – IN2P3 / LPSC, Grenoble (France) IN2P3 / LPSC, Grenoble (France) – – Grenoble Hospital, Grenoble (France) Grenoble Hospital, Grenoble (France) – � Build a spiral FFAG magnet prototype of a Build a spiral FFAG magnet prototype of a � proton medical machine 17 – – 180 180 MeV MeV proton medical machine 17 PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  4. Project presentation Project presentation Spiral Scaling Proton FFAG ring E injection 17 [MeV] E extraction 180 [MeV] Injection radius 3.2 [m] Extraction radius 3.9 [m] B field at extraction 1.5 [T] Field index K ≈ 4.8 Spiral Angle ζ ≈ 49.5 [°] PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  5. Project presentation Project presentation Radial field law in an FFAG is B=B 0 (r/r 0 ) K Two solutions are being studied Constant gap with distributed Gap shaping curents on the pole Studied by LPSC Studied by SIGMAPHI (+) variable k (+) the most economical solution (+) better vertical dynamics (not proved) (-) k is not tuneable (-) cost (large amount of (-) vertical dynamics power needed) becomes difficult PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  6. Magnet design Magnet design Fisrt step : automated 2D calculation of gap shape step : automated 2D calculation of gap shape Fisrt � It converges rapidly (about ten iterations) and gives a relative field homogeneity better than 10 -4 in the good field region PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  7. Magnet design Magnet design Second step : automated 3D calculation Second step : automated 3D calculation → After several of these iterations (3 to 8) a 3D model with a relative field homogeneity in its center of few 10 -4 is obtained PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  8. Magnet design Magnet design Reaching the correct magnetic spiral Reaching the correct magnetic spiral � Effective length is measured at different radii on both sides of the magnet centre � Spiral shape is tilted so that the effective length corresponds to the theoretical value at every radius 3 on � A relative precision of 10 A relative precision of 10 - on -3 � effective length is reached after few effective length is reached after few iterations iterations PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  9. Tune shift correction Tune shift correction Major problem of gap shaped magnet : vertical Major problem of gap shaped magnet : vertical tune variation with energy tune variation with energy � Analytical model in Analytical model in � red red � Calculated from 3D Calculated from 3D � maps in blue maps in blue � Tracking done with Tracking done with � Zgoubi code by J. code by J. Zgoubi Fourrier Fourrier PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  10. Tune shift correction Tune shift correction Variable chamfer : increasing height with radius Variable chamfer : increasing height with radius � flattens the tune behaviour flattens the tune behaviour � Still not sufficient ! Still not sufficient ! PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  11. Tune shift correction Tune shift correction Adding field clamps on previous model Adding field clamps on previous model � Reduce by a factor 2 vertical tune Reduce by a factor 2 vertical tune � variation variation Return yoke Pole Clamps Return yoke Variable chamfer PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  12. Cost reduction Cost reduction � Maximum Maximum � saturation imposes saturation imposes a very thick base a very thick base plate (600mm) plate (600mm) � Magnet Magnet weigth weigth � about 20t about 20t � Needed iron Needed iron weigth weigth � bloc : 50t bloc : 50t PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  13. Cost reduction Cost reduction � Enlarged the base Enlarged the base � plate to reduce plate to reduce thickness (480mm) thickness (480mm) � Magnet weight Magnet weight � about the same about the same � Iron bloc 31t Iron bloc 31t � � No major influence No major influence � on beam dynamics on beam dynamics PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  14. Cost reduction Cost reduction � Other ways to reduce magnet cost Other ways to reduce magnet cost � – Increase k factor Increase k factor � � decrease orbit excursion decrease orbit excursion – and so pole width and so pole width – Increase maximum field in gap and yoke Increase maximum field in gap and yoke – � These solutions change machine working point These solutions change machine working point � � needs to validate beam optics needs to validate beam optics � PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  15. Cost reduction Cost reduction Examples of previous considerations Examples of previous considerations Estimated Estimated Cases Cases weight (t) weight (t) K=4.8 Bmax Bmax and and Bmax Bmax iron 1.5T iron 1.5T 19.7 K=4.8 19.7 K=4.8 Bmax Bmax and and Bmax Bmax iron 1.7T iron 1.7T 15.7 K=4.8 15.7 K=7.6 Bmax Bmax and and Bmax Bmax iron 1.5T iron 1.5T 13.5 K=7.6 13.5 K=7.6 Bmax Bmax and and Bmax Bmax iron 1.7T iron 1.7T 12 K=7.6 12 PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  16. Conclusion Conclusion � Developed efficient tools to model in 3D spiral Developed efficient tools to model in 3D spiral � magnets magnets � Found solutions to almost satisfy tunes Found solutions to almost satisfy tunes � constancy constancy � Integrated cost reduction problem and found Integrated cost reduction problem and found � efficient solutions efficient solutions � Need to finalize the design and build a Need to finalize the design and build a � prototype magnet prototype magnet PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

  17. Thank you for your attention Thank you for your attention PAC 07 Albuquerque June June 25 25 – – 29, 2007 29, 2007 PAC 07 Albuquerque

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend