shock reflection diffraction and multidimensional
play

Shock Reflection-Diffraction and Multidimensional Conservation Laws - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Shock Reflection-Diffraction and Multidimensional Conservation Laws Gui-Qiang Chen Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University Email: gqchen@math.northwestern.edu Website: http://www.math.northwestern.edu/gqchen/preprints Mikhail


  1. Shock Reflection-Diffraction and Multidimensional Conservation Laws Gui-Qiang Chen Department of Mathematics, Northwestern University Email: gqchen@math.northwestern.edu Website: http://www.math.northwestern.edu/˜gqchen/preprints Mikhail Feldman University of Wisconsin-Madison NSF-FRG 2003-07: S. Canic, C. M. Dafermos, J. Hunter, T.-P. Liu C.-W. Shu, M. Slemrod, D. Wang, Y. Zheng Website: http://www.math.pitt.edu/˜dwang/FRG.html 12th International Conference on Hyperbolic Problems University of Maryland at College Park, June 9–13, 2008 Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 1 / 45

  2. Bow Shock in Space generated by a Solar Explosion Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 2 / 45

  3. Shock Waves generated by Blunt-Nosed and Shape-Nosed Supersonic Aircrafts Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 3 / 45

  4. Blast Wave from a TNT Surface Explosion Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 4 / 45

  5. Shock Wave from an Underwater Nuclear Explosion Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 5 / 45

  6. ����� ���� ��� ��� ��� ? Shock Wave Patterns Around a Wedge (airfoils, inclined ramps, · · · ) Complexity of Reflection-Diffraction Configurations Was First Identified and Reported by Ernst Mach 1879 Experimental Analysis: 1940s= ⇒ : von Neumann, Bleakney, Bazhenova Glass, Takyama, Henderson, · · · Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 6 / 45

  7. Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 7 / 45

  8. Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 8 / 45

  9. Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 9 / 45

  10. Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 10 / 45

  11. 0.4108 0.4106 Subsonic 0.4104 y/t Supersonic 0.4102 0.41 0.4098 1.0746 1.0748 1.075 1.0752 1.0754 1.0756 x/t Guderley Mach Reflection : A. M. Tesdall and J. K. Hunter: TSD, 2002 A. M. Tesdall, R. Sanders, and B. L. Keyfitz: NWE, 2006; Full Euler, 2008 B. Skews and J. Ashworth: J. Fluid Mech. 542 (2005), 105-114 Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 11 / 45

  12. Shock Reflection-Diffraction Patterns Gabi Ben-Dor Shock Wave Reflection Phenomena Springer-Verlag: New York, 307 pages, 1992. Experimental results before 1991 Various proposals for transition criteria Milton Van Dyke An Album of Fluid Motion The parabolic Press: Stanford, 176 pages, 1982. Various photographs of shock wave reflection phenomena Richard Courant & Kurt Otto Friedrichs Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves Springer-Verlag: New York, 1948. Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 12 / 45

  13. Scientific Issues Structure of the Shock Reflection-Diffraction Patterns Transition Criteria among the Patterns Dependence of the Patterns on the Parameters wedge angle θ w , adiabatic exponent γ ≥ 1 incident-shock-wave Mach number M s · · · · · · Interdisciplinary Approaches: Experimental Data and Photographs Large or Small Scale Computing Colella, Berger, Deschambault, Glass, Glaz, .... Anderson, Hindman, Kutler, Schneyer, Shankar, ... Yu. Dem’yanov, Panasenko, .... Asymptotic Analysis : Keller, Lighthill, Hunter, Majda, Rosales, Tabak, Gamba, Harabetian, Morawetz.... Rigorous Mathematical Analysis (Global Analysis?) Existence, Stability, Regularity, Bifurcation, · · · · · · Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 13 / 45

  14. 2-D Riemann Problem for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws x = ( x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ R 2 ∂ t U + ∇ · F ( U ) = 0 , U 3 U 2 t=0 U 1 0 U N U N-1 Books and Survey Articles Glimm-Majda 1991, Chang-Hsiao 1989, Li-Zhang-Yang 1998 Zheng 2001, Chen-Wang 2002, Serre 2005, Chen 2005, · · · Numerical Simulations Glimm-Klingenberg-McBryan-Plohr-Sharp-Yaniv 1985 Schulz-Rinne-Collins-Glaz 1993, Chang-Chen-Yang 1995, 2000 Lax-Liu 1998, Kurganov-Tadmor 2002, · · · Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 14 / 45

  15. Riemann Solutions I Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 15 / 45

  16. Riemann Solutions II Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 16 / 45

  17. Riemann Solutions vs General Entropy Solutions Asymptotic States and Attractors Observation ( C–Frid 1998) : Let R ( x t ) be the unique piecewise Lipschitz continuous Riemann solution with Riemann data: R | t =0 = R 0 ( x | x | ) Let U ( t , x ) ∈ L ∞ be an entropy solution with initial data: U | t =0 = R 0 ( x R 0 ∈ L ∞ ( S d − 1 ) , P 0 ∈ L 1 ∩ L ∞ ( R d ) | x | )+ P 0 ( x ) , The corresponding self-similar sequence U T ( t , x ) := U ( Tt , Tx ) is loc ( R d +1 compact in L 1 ) + � for any Ω ⊂ R d = ⇒ ess lim | U ( t , t ξ ) − R ( ξ ) | d ξ = 0 t →∞ Ω Building Blocks and Local Structure Local structure of entropy solutions Building blocks for numerical methods Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 17 / 45

  18. Full Euler Equations (E-1): ( t , x ) ∈ R 3 + := (0 , ∞ ) × R 2  ∂ t ρ + ∇ · ( ρ v ) = 0    ∂ t ( ρ v ) + ∇ · ( ρ v ⊗ v ) + ∇ p = 0 ∂ t (1 (1 2 ρ | v | 2 + ρ e ) + ∇ · 2 ρ | v | 2 + ρ e + p ) v  � �  = 0  Constitutive Relations : p = p ( ρ, e ) ρ –density, v = ( v 1 , v 2 ) ⊤ –fluid velocity, p –pressure e –internal energy, θ –temperature, S –entropy γ = 1 + R For a polytropic gas: p = ( γ − 1) ρ e , e = c v θ, c v κ p = p ( ρ, S ) = κρ γ e S / c v , γ − 1 ρ γ − 1 e S / c v , e = e ( ρ, S ) R > 0 may be taken to be the universal gas constant divided by the effective molecular weight of the particular gas c v > 0 is the specific heat at constant volume γ > 1 is the adiabatic exponent, κ > 0 is any constant under scaling Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 18 / 45

  19. Euler Equations: Isentropic or Isothermal (E-2) � ∂ t ρ + ∇ · ( ρ v ) = 0 ∂ t ( ρ v ) + ∇ · ( ρ v ⊗ v ) + ∇ p = 0 where the pressure is regarded as a function of density with constant S 0 : p = p ( ρ, S 0 ) . For a polytropic gas, p ( ρ ) = κ 0 ρ γ , γ > 1 ( γ = 2 also for the shallow water equations) For an isothermal gas, p ( ρ ) = κ 0 ρ ( i . e . γ = 1) where κ 0 > 0 is any constant under scaling Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 19 / 45

  20. Euler Equations for Potential Flow (E-3): v = ∇ Φ � ∂ t ρ + ∇ · ( ρ ∇ Φ) = 0 , γ − 1 = ρ γ − 1 2 |∇ Φ | 2 + ρ γ − 1 ∂ t Φ + 1 γ − 1 ; 0 or, equivalently, � � ∂ t ρ ( ∇ Φ , ∂ t Φ , ρ 0 ) + ∇ · ρ ( ∇ Φ , ∂ t Φ , ρ 0 ) ∇ Φ = 0 , with − ( γ − 1)( ∂ t Φ + 1 1 ρ γ − 1 γ − 1 . 2 |∇ Φ | 2 ) � � ρ ( ∇ Φ , ∂ t Φ , ρ 0 ) = 0 Celebrated steady potential flow equation of aerodynamics : ∇ · ( ρ ( ∇ Φ , ρ 0 ) ∇ Φ) = 0 . This approximation is well-known in transonic aerodynamics. We will see the Euler equations for potential flow is actually EXACT in an important region of the solution to the shock reflection problem. Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 20 / 45

  21. ����� ���� ��� ��� ��� Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 21 / 45

  22. Initial-Boundary Value Problem: 0 < ρ 0 < ρ 1 , v 1 > 0 Initial condition at t = 0: � (0 , 0 , p 0 , ρ 0 ) , | x 2 | > x 1 tan θ w , x 1 > 0 , ( v , p , ρ ) = ( v 1 , 0 , p 1 , ρ 1 ) , x 1 < 0; Slip boundary condition on the wedge bdry: v · ν = 0 . X 2 (0) (1) Shock X 1 Invariant under the Self-Similar Scaling: ( t , x ) − → ( α t , α x ) , α � = 0 Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 22 / 45

  23. Seek Self-Similar Solutions ( ξ, η ) = ( x 1 t , x 2 ( v , p , ρ )( t , x ) = ( v , p , ρ )( ξ, η ) , t )  ( ρ U ) ξ + ( ρ V ) η + 2 ρ = 0 ,   ( ρ U 2 + p ) ξ + ( ρ UV ) η + 3 ρ U = 0 ,      ( ρ UV ) ξ + ( ρ V 2 + p ) η + 3 ρ V = 0 ,   ( U (1 γ − 1)) ξ + ( V (1 γ p γ − 1)) η + 2(1 γ p γ p  2 ρ q 2 + 2 ρ q 2 + 2 ρ q 2 +  γ − 1) = 0 ,    √ U 2 + V 2 and ( U , V ) = ( v 1 − ξ, v 2 − η ) is the pseudo-velocity. where q = λ ± = UV ± c √ q 2 − c 2 λ 0 = V Eigenvalues : U (repeated) , , U 2 − c 2 � where c = γ p /ρ is the sonic speed When the flow is pseudo-subsonic: q < c , the system is hyperbolic-elliptic composite-mixed Gui-Qiang Chen (Northwestern) Shock Reflection-Diffraction Hyp08, June 12, 2008 23 / 45

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend