shifing the thresold of phase transition in 2 sat and
play

Shifing the thresold of phase transition in 2-SAT and random graphs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Lower bound for 2-SAT Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Related results Shifing the thresold of phase transition in 2-SAT and random graphs Sergey Dovgal 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Vlady Ravelomanana 2 1


  1. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Lower bound for 2-SAT Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Related results Shifing the thresold of phase transition in 2-SAT and random graphs Sergey Dovgal 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 Vlady Ravelomanana 2 1 Université Paris-13, 2 Université Paris-Diderot 3 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 4 Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Moscow Acknowledgements: Élie de Panafieu, Fedor Petrov, ipython+sympy+cpp May 19, 2017 D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 1 / 40

  2. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Lower bound for 2-SAT Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Related results Outline 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints 1 Lower bound for 2-SAT 2 3 Saddle-point method and analytic lemma 4 Related results D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 2 / 40

  3. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Outline 1 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints 2 Lower bound for 2-SAT 3 Saddle-point method and analytic lemma 4 Related results D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 3 / 40

  4. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition in Erdős–Rényi random graphs n vertices, m edges, m = 1 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) “gas” µ → −∞ : planar graph, trees and unicycles, max 1 component size O ( log n ) . “liquid” | µ | = O ( 1 ) : complex components appear, max 2 component size O ( n 2 / 3 ) . “crystal” µ → + ∞ : non-planar, complex compontnes, max 3 component size linear O ( n ) . D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 4 / 40

  5. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition in Erdős–Rényi random graphs n vertices, m edges, m = 1 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) “gas” µ → −∞ : planar graph, trees and unicycles, max 1 component size O ( log n ) . “liquid” | µ | = O ( 1 ) : complex components appear, max 2 component size O ( n 2 / 3 ) . “crystal” µ → + ∞ : non-planar, complex compontnes, max 3 component size linear O ( n ) . D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 4 / 40

  6. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition in Erdős–Rényi random graphs n vertices, m edges, m = 1 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) “gas” µ → −∞ : planar graph, trees and unicycles, max 1 component size O ( log n ) . “liquid” | µ | = O ( 1 ) : complex components appear, max 2 component size O ( n 2 / 3 ) . “crystal” µ → + ∞ : non-planar, complex compontnes, max 3 component size linear O ( n ) . D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 4 / 40

  7. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition :: largest component, n = 1000 D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 5 / 40

  8. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition :: planarity, n = 1000 D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 6 / 40

  9. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition :: diameter, n = 1000 D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 7 / 40

  10. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Phase transition :: connected components, n = 1000 D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 8 / 40

  11. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results 2SAT Transition 1 [Bollobás, Borgs, Chayes, Kim, and Wilson ’99] 2SAT Transition 2 [Coppersmith, Gamarnik, Hajaghayi, Sorkin ’03] MAX 2-SAT Transition 3 [Cooper, Freize, Sorkin ’07] 2SAT with degree sequence constraints D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 9 / 40

  12. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Shifing the phase transition m = 1 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 1 Achlioptas percolation process ( α = 0 . 535?) 2 Degree sequence models (less detailed information) 3 Degree set constraint :: current talk D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 10 / 40

  13. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Shifing the phase transition m = 1 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 1 Achlioptas percolation process ( α = 0 . 535?) 2 Degree sequence models (less detailed information) 3 Degree set constraint :: current talk D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 10 / 40

  14. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Shifing the phase transition m = 1 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 1 Achlioptas percolation process ( α = 0 . 535?) 2 Degree sequence models (less detailed information) 3 Degree set constraint :: current talk D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 10 / 40

  15. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Example of graph with degree constraints 21 9 10 23 13 5 24 12 11 14 3 17 20 25 8 2 7 26 19 1 4 18 16 6 15 22 Figure: Random labeled graph from G 26 , 30 , Ω with the set of degree constraints Ω = { 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 } . D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 11 / 40

  16. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Constant of phase transition Ω — the set of degree constraints 1 Random graphs m = 1 ? 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 2 Random 2-CNF ? m = 1 · n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = 2 α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 3 How to compute α depending on Ω ? D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 12 / 40

  17. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Constant of phase transition Ω — the set of degree constraints 1 Random graphs m = 1 ? 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 2 Random 2-CNF ? m = 1 · n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = 2 α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 3 How to compute α depending on Ω ? D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 12 / 40

  18. 2-SAT, phase transitions and degree constraints Phase transition Lower bound for 2-SAT Shifing the phase transition Saddle-point method and analytic lemma Graphs with degree constraints Related results Experimental results Constant of phase transition Ω — the set of degree constraints 1 Random graphs m = 1 ? 2 n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 2 Random 2-CNF ? m = 1 · n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) ⇒ m = 2 α n ( 1 + µ n − 1 / 3 ) 3 How to compute α depending on Ω ? D., Ravelomanana Shifing the phase transition 12 / 40

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend