Shaping the Evolution of Information Infrastructures: Architecture, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

shaping the evolution of information infrastructures
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Shaping the Evolution of Information Infrastructures: Architecture, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Shaping the Evolution of Information Infrastructures: Architecture, Governance Regime, Process Strategy Towards a Theory of Information Infrastructures A Theories of Information Infrastructures (Evolution & Design) Assemblage Theory


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Shaping the Evolution of Information Infrastructures: Architecture, Governance Regime, Process Strategy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Towards a Theory of Information Infrastructures

A Theories of Information Infrastructures (Evolution & Design) Assemblage Theory

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Infrastructure evolution

  • Evolution

– Adoption – Scaling – Innovation – Harmonization/restructuring/consolidation – Crumbling/fragmentation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Innovation

  • Of, in, on
  • W. Brian Arthur

– The nature of technology. What it is and how it evolves

  • Out of a material
  • (re-)combination
  • Structural deepening
  • Re-domaing
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Successful information infrastructures = Generative information infrastructure

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tuesday, September 16, 2014 Department of Informatics 6

The Generative Internet

  • Generativity =

– ”.. A technology’s overall capacity to produce unprompted change driven by large, varied, and uncoordinated audiences.”

  • Capacity for leverage
  • Adaptability
  • Ease of mastery
  • Accessibility

– Computers – PC & Internet – Opposite: Appliances

  • Telecom: intelligent network + appliances
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Generative relationships

  • Innovation = exaptive bootstrapping
  • aligned directedness
  • heterogeneity
  • mutual directedness.
  • permissions structures
  • action opportunities
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Manuel DeLanda: A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity

  • Realist ontology, Gilles Deleuze
  • Relations of exteriority, capacities to interact

(not properties)

  • Material – expressive
  • Stabilizing/territorializing – destabilizing/de-

territorializing

  • Thresholds, emergence, non-linearity
slide-9
SLIDE 9

A self-reinforcing installed base

).

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Processes

Self-reinforcing Reflexive Stabilizing De-stabilizing

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Platforms & apps

Apps Platform (iOS, Android, ..)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Medakis project (and others)

  • Strategy:

– Specification driven, big bang appraoch – Tight couplings – Centrlized control

  • Outcome? Refelxivity!!

– Trying to stabilize (requirements, solution, use) – => de-stabilization

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Reflexive Standardization

slide-14
SLIDE 14

II development strategy

  • Strategy: management, regulation, ..
  • Theories of regulation

– Julia Black:

  • From command and control to cultivation

– Larry Lessig:

  • Regulatory modalities

– Law – Technology/architecture (”code is law”) – Market (prices) – Social norms

  • ISO standards are law!
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Examples: Internet and telecom

Internet Telecom Process strategy Experiemntal, evolutionary, bottom-up Specification driven, top- down, ”anticipatory standardization” Architecture Distributed ”End-2-end” Cetralized ”Intelligence in the center” Governance regime Loosely coordinated network, open source, communication technology Hierarchical, open standards + proprieatary technology (patents)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Infrastructure Evolution &Innovation

  • Shaping the evolution of infrastructures =
  • Innovation

– Of – In – On

infrastruture

slide-17
SLIDE 17

MyHealthRecord

Communikasjon between patients and health care insititutions

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2002-2004 2005-2009 2009-2012

Phase I Conceptual design

  • 2002: Design of MyRec as

component in the Clinical Portal.

  • Clinical portal prioritise

existing fragmentation of IS in the hospital, MyRec not further included .

  • 2003: first Initial sketches

as independent solution with focus on providing trusted information and access to document from hospital systems.

  • 2004: first mockups with

various suggested functionalities

  • 2004: idea to design of

secure messaging service to address the illegal use of email in patient-hospital communication Phase II Initial experiences

  • 2005: Creation of unit for

”research and patient services” (MyRec), new unit manager, new member hired

  • 2005: first functional

version implemented

  • 2005: secure messaging

designed and implemented

  • Design of Request-change
  • f appoitments services and

diversification in

  • pen/closed services
  • Benefits
  • Some functionalities

dismissed

  • 2008: change of security

solution to a more user friendly one Phase III Consolidation

  • MyRec is contacted by

departments and patient

  • rganizations
  • development of a number of

modules addressing specific problems of hospital-patient communication and focus on solving concrete specific problems.

  • development of a number of

general modules.

  • development of modules

according to a generic logic for re-use.

  • wider implementation of generic

functionalites

  • participation in EU project
  • Other hospitals take MyRec into

use

slide-19
SLIDE 19

MyHealthRecord – 1st design

slide-20
SLIDE 20

2nd version

  • Stand-alone infrastructure

– iKnowBase platform – A few basic services

  • Secure logon
  • Secure email

– A few specialized services

slide-21
SLIDE 21

3rd version

  • Emergning
  • Tools and services for diabetes patients
  • ”plaform for disease management”
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Evolution

  • Innovations

– Of: 3 versions – In: BankID as security system – On: specialized services, generification, a new layer emerging

  • Architecture: 3 versions, ”experimental architecting”
  • Process strategy: experimental development, early

use (bootstrapping)

  • Governance regime: small, independent team

(”under the radar”)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

EU: Pan-European eGovernment solutions

  • Domains:

– Customs – Health care – Immigration – Judiciary – ......

  • European Interoperability Strategy
  • Interoperbility solutions for Euorpean Public

Administrations

  • European Interoperability Architecture
slide-24
SLIDE 24

eCustoms

  • Harmonizing, streamlining customs

declarations in EU

  • Aim:

– 25% cost reductions for traders: ”Single window”

  • Increased trade/globalization

– New risks: Mad cow, terror, counterfeit, .. – Containers, big hubs – New customs control procedures

  • From transaction to system based control
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Figure 6. Development of the European e-Customs information infrastructure 2000-2010

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Figure 5. Information flows in an export process

System abbreviations: ECS: Export Control System EORI: European Operators Registration and identification system ASS: Agriculture Subvention System EMCS: European Movement Control System CRMS: Customs Risk Management Systems

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Figure 4. Organization of e-Customs projects at EU, national, and trader level.

EU Domain

Strategy/Programme Projects

EU Domain

Strategy/Programme Projects NCTS NCTS Multi-Annual Strategic Plan Multi-Annual Strategic Plan Customs 2002 Customs 2007 Customs 2013 ECS ECS ICS ICS AEO AEO EORI EORI ... ...

Danish Domain

Projects/Subprojects

Danish Domain

Projects/Subprojects e-Customs Project e-Customs Project NCTS NCTS ECS ECS ICS ICS AEO AEO EORI EORI ... ...

Arla Domain

Projects

Arla Domain

Projects Adaption projects Adaption projects ECS ECS ICS ICS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TGB15 International Trade Single Window TBG14 International Supply Chain Model & TBG2 UNeDocs Data Model TBG17 UN/CEFACT Core Component Library United Trade Data Elements Directory (UNTED) TBG18 Agriculture TBG2 Digital Paper TBG15 Trade Facilitation TBG8 Insurance TBG19 eGov TBG1 Supply Chain TBG4 WCO DM TBG3 Transport TBG13 Environment TBG5 Finance

Figure 3. UN/CEFACT International Trade and Business Processes Group (TBG) and key relationships between these working groups. Redrawn from Dill (2007).

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Development activities

  • First step: Export system

– Aim: One common export system – Extensive adaptation to national installed base

  • Next: Transit system

– Developed one system in each country (=27 independent implementation of the same spec.)

  • Next …

– Aim: One common system …

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Plus

  • For each new system:

– Control systems build on top of customs systems – Additional data collected for control purposes

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Dynamics

  • More trade, more risk, more needs for control
  • New systems for customs declaration

– => new opportunities for building new control systems

  • Adapted to (national) installed base

– => more stability – => more fragmentation

  • Traders need to adapt their system to 27 diff.

National IIs

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The shaping of the evolution of the eCustoms II

  • Process strategy: Specification driven, one

system at the time

  • Architecture: tight coupling within national IIs,

loose coupling between national IIs

  • Governance: Loosely coupling between tightly

coupled national projects, traders detached

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Alternative?

  • Process strategy: Evolutionary, learning

focused

  • Architecture: loose coupling within national

IIs, tight coupling between national IIs, (minimum data), traders connected through

  • ne European portal/gateway
  • Governance: Tight coupling between loosely

coupled national projects, traders integrated