Serelaxin, A Novel Treatment for Acute Heart Failure- The RELAX-AHF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

serelaxin a novel treatment for acute heart failure the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Serelaxin, A Novel Treatment for Acute Heart Failure- The RELAX-AHF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Serelaxin, A Novel Treatment for Acute Heart Failure- The RELAX-AHF Trial Prof. John R. Teerlink, MD, FAHA University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Center Prof. Marco Metra, MD University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Serelaxin, A Novel Treatment for Acute Heart Failure- The RELAX-AHF Trial

  • Prof. John R. Teerlink, MD, FAHA

University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco VA Medical Center

  • Prof. Marco Metra, MD

University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

  • n behalf of the RELAX-AHF Executive and Steering

Committees, Investigators & Patients

Embargoed for 4:51pm PT, Tuesday, Nov. 6 LBCT-06 - J. Teerlink - RELAX-AHF

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pregnancy & the Heart

Baylis, C. Am J Kid Dis 1999; Schrier, RW, et al. Am J Kid Dis 1987; Jeyebalan, A, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007; Teichman SL et al. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2010;7:75–82. Helal I, et al. Nature Reviews 2012;293-300. PARAMETER PREGNANCY Cardiac Output (L/min) 20% Increase Systemic Vascular Resistance (dyn.s.cm2) 30% Decrease Global Arterial Compliance (mL/mm Hg) 30% Increase Renal Blood Flow (mL/min/ 1.73m2) 50-85% Increase Creatinine Clearance (mL/ min/1.73m2) 40-65% Increase

  • Relaxin has been shown to mediate these changes, as well as to have

anti-ischemic, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic effects.

  • Relaxin is elevated through 9 months of pregnancy and mediates

physiologic hemodynamic adjustments to growing baby

  • Pharmacologic use of serelaxin may produce these beneficial effects in

acute heart failure

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Pre-RELAX-AHF

Teerlink JR, et al. Lancet 2009;373:1429-39.

  • 234 patient, dose finding Phase II

study

  • Optimal dose across multiple clinical
  • utcome domains was 30mcg/kg/d
  • Serelaxin had trends to:
  • Improved dyspnea relief
  • Decreased congestion
  • Reduced diuretic use
  • Less worsening of heart failure
  • Shorter length of stay
  • Reduced days alive out of hospital
  • Improved cardiovascular and all-

cause survival

  • No significant adverse events
  • No hypotension SAEs;

Hypotension AEs similar to placebo

16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 60 120 180 62 52 29 16 Placebo 172 149 91 32 Serelaxin

Placebo (n=42) Serelaxin (n=172)

Events n (KM%) 7 (14%) 5 (3%)

HR 0.25 (0.08-0.79) P=0.019

Days

CV Death (KM)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objectives and Hypothesis

  • Based upon the hypothesis-generating results of

Pre-RELAX-AHF, the RELAX-AHF trial was designed to test the efficacy and safety of serelaxin in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

  • We hypothesized that serelaxin (30 mcg/kg/d iv)

would improve dyspnea to a greater extent than placebo by one or both measures at 24 hours (Likert) and/or 5 days (VAS AUC), and improve

  • ther clinical outcomes.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Hospitalized for AHF

– Dyspnea at rest or with minimal exertion – Pulmonary congestion on chest radiograph – BNP ≥ 350 pg/mL or NT-pro-BNP ≥ 1400 pg/mL

  • Received ≥40 mg IV furosemide (or

equivalent) at any time between admission to emergency services (either ambulance or hospital, including the ED) and the start of screening for the study

  • Systolic blood pressure > 125 mmHg
  • Impaired renal function on admission

(sMDRD eGFR 30-75 mL/min/1·73 m2)

  • Randomised within 16 hours from

presentation

  • Age ≥ 18 years of age
  • Body weight < 160 kg

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Current or planned treatment with any IV

therapies [i.e. other vasodilators, (nesiritide), positive inotropic agents and vasopressors] or mechanical circulatory, renal, or ventilatory support, with the exception of IV furosemide (or equivalent),

  • r of IV nitrates if patient has screening

SBP >150 mmHg

  • AHF and/or dyspnea from arrhythmias or

non-cardiac causes, such as lung disease, anemia, or severe obesity

  • Infection or sepsis requiring IV antibiotics
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Stroke within 60d; ACS within 45d; major

surgery within 30d

  • Presence of acute myocarditis, significant

valvular heart disease, hypertrophic/ restrictive/ constrictive cardiomyopathy

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Key Efficacy Measures

D180 Treatment Likert Timeline: VAS AUC D1 D5 D14/Index Days Alive Out

  • f Hospital

CV death+ HF/RF Re-hospitalization LoS (index/ICU) WHF D2 D60

In-hospital benefits Out-patient benefits

D0 CV death 6, 12, 24 h

Serelaxin/Placebo

0-100 mm; 0, 6, 12, 24h, D2-D5

Primary EP Secondary EP p<0.025 for either 1° Dyspnea EP

  • r p<0.05 for both 1° Dyspnea EPs

Biomarkers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Patient population (1)

Parameter Placebo (N=580) Serelaxin (N=581)

Age (years) Mean 72.5 71.6 Systolic BP at baseline (mmHg) Mean 142.1 142.2 Heart Rate at Baseline (bpm) Mean 80.4 78.9 Respiratory Rate at baseline (breaths/ min) Mean 22.0 21.8 HF Hospitalization (in the past year) % 31.2 37.2* Most Recent Ejection Fraction Mean 38.7 38.6 < 40% % 54.9 54.7 NYHA (1 month prior to admission) % III % 46.7 43.7 IV % 17.0 14.4 Medical History Hypertension % 87.9 85.4 Hyperlipidemia % 54.0 52.3 Stroke or Other Cerebrovascular event % 14.5 12.6 Atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter at presentation % 42.4 40.1 Diabetes Mellitus % 46.9 48.0

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Patient population (2)

Parameter (n’ placebo/n’ serelaxin) Placebo (N=580) Serelaxin (N=581)

Concomitant Heart Failure Meds at Baseline ACE inhibitors % 55.2 53.9 ARB % 16.7 15.1 Beta-blocker % 70.2 66.6 Aldosterone antagonist % 29.8 33.2 Digoxin % 18.6 20.7 Time from present. to random. (hr) Mean 7.9 7.8 Duration of study drug administration (hr) Mean 43.8 41.2 IV nitrates at randomisation % 7.2 6.7 NT-proBNP (mg/L)**

Geometric Mean

5003 5125 Troponin T (pg/ml)**

Geometric Mean

0.036 0.034 eGFR (MDRD; mL/kg/1.73m2) Mean 53.3 53.7

** Core lab values

slide-9
SLIDE 9

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

1 2 3 4 5

1° Endpoint: Dyspnea Relief (VAS AUC)

AUC with placebo, 2308 ± 3082 AUC with serelaxin, 2756 ± 2588 *P=0.0075

Change from baseline (mm)

19.4% increase in AUC with serelaxin from baseline through day 5 (Mean difference of 448 mm-hr) Days 6 Serelaxin Placebo 12 hrs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1° Endpoint: Dyspnea Relief (Likert)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 6 hr 12 hr 24 hr 6, 12, and 24 hr

Placebo Serelaxin

p=0.086 p=0.051 p=0.113 p=0.702

n=150 n=156 n=205 n=180 n=256 n=288 n=362 n=389

Proportion of subjects with moderately or markedly better dyspnea by Likert by time point

p value by Chi-square test

slide-11
SLIDE 11

14 12 2 4 6 8 10 60

2° Endpoint: CV Death or HF/RF Re-hospitalization through Day 60

Composite event components (%) K-M estimate for time to first event (%)

1 2 3 4 5 6 Placebo Serelaxin CV death: % subjects HR=0.7 p=0.236 2 4 6 8 10 12 Placebo Serelaxin HF/RF re-hospitalization: % subjects HR=1.2 p=0.300

n=27 n=19 n=50 n=60

Time in trial (days)

45 30 14

HR 1.03 ( 0.75, 1.42) p=0.862

Placebo Serelaxin

580 559 539 522 501 581 563 531 514 498

* p value by log rank test **HR estimate by Cox model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2° Endpoint: Days Alive and Out

  • f Hospital through Day 60

Data from Chris Bush

9.5 8.9 47.7 48.3

1.9 2.6 1.8 1.2

Placebo Serelaxin

N=(581) N=(580) Average days alive and out of hospital Average days of index hospitalization Average days re-hospitalized Average days dead

*p=0.35 Days Alive Out of Hospital = total follow-up time (D60) - days in hospital or dead *p value by 2-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test

Average days alive and out of hospital

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CV Death through Day 180

0 0 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 K-M estimate CV death (ITT) (%) 14 30 60 90 120 150 180

HR 0.63 (0.41, 0.96); p=0.028

55 (9.5%) 35 (6.0%)

Placebo (N=580) Serelaxin (N=581)

Number of Events, n (%)*

NNT = 29

Days

580 567 559 547 535 523 514 444 Placebo 581 573 563 555 546 542 536 463 Serelaxin

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Signs and Symptoms of Congestion

100 80 60 40 20

Patients %

DOE

p=0.02

Orthopnea

p=0.002

Edema

p=0.01

Rales

p=0.008

JVP

p=0.06

None Mild Moderate Severe None 1 pillow 2 pillows >30 None 1+ 2+ 3+ None <1/3 1/3-2/3 >2/3 <6 cm 6-10 cm >10 cm

Signs and Symptoms of Congestion at Day 2

p value by 2-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test of change from baseline

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Cumulative proportion of worsening heart failure to Day 5 (%)

Worsening of Heart Failure

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 6 hr 12 hr Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

Placebo (N=573) Serelaxin (N=570)

Kaplan-Meier estimate D14 for time to WHF (%)

11 3 16 4 31 10 44 17 57 25 64 69 37 36

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Day 5 Day 14

573 570

**HR 0.7 (0.51, 0.96); p=0.024

(Numbers of subjects with WHF shown for each time point)

Worsening Heart Failure (WHF) was defined as worsening signs and/or symptoms of HF that required an intensification of IV therapy for heart failure or mechanical ventilatory or circulatory support.

n= 573 570

*p<0.001 through Day 5 *p value by Wilcoxon test **p value by log rank test for Serelaxin vs. Placebo; HR estimate by Cox model, HR<1.0 favors Serelaxin

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5

Placebo Serelaxin

*p=0.0078 *p=0.0003 *p=0.0103

572 570 573 571 573 572 573 572 573 574

Intravenous Diuretic Use

Total daily dose IV diuretics (mg) IV diuretics use (cumulative total dose from day 1-5 (mg))

50 100 150 200 250

N= N=573 N=572

*p=0.0057

*p value by t test

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2 4 6 8 10 12

Index Hospitalization Length of Stay (Days) *p=0.039

*p value by 2-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Placebo Serelaxin *p=0.029 Length of ICU/CCU Stay (Days)

Patients still in the hospital at Day 60 are censored at Day 60. Patients who died in-hospital are imputed as the maximum +1 day.

n=578 n=574 n=580 n=581

Index Hospitalization LOS

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Incidence of AEs/SAEs to Day 14

Placebo (N=570) n (%) Serelaxin (N=568) n (%) Subjects with any AE 320 (56.1) 305 (53.7) Subjects with any drug-related AE[1] 46 (8.1) 47 (8.3) Subjects with AE leading to study drug d/c 22 (3.9) 26 (4.6) Hypotension-related AE (through day 5) 25 (4.4) 28 (4.9) Renal Impairment-related AE (through day 5) 49 (8.6) 26 (4.6)* Subjects with any SAE 78 (13.7) 86 (15.1) Subjects with any drug-related SAEs 2 (0.4) 3 (0.5) Subjects with SAE leading to drug d/c 3 (0.5) 5 (0.9) Serious AE with an outcome of death 15 (2.6) 10 (1.8)

The number of subjects with any AE includes all AEs and SAEs reported through Day 14. Non-serious AEs were collected through Day 5, SAEs through Day 14

Hypotension-related AE (through day 5) 25 (4.4) 28 (4.9) Renal Impairment-related AE (through day 5) 49 (8.6) 26 (4.6)*

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Biomarkers

Criteria Placebo Serelaxin

NT-proBNP (≥30% decrease at Day 2) Yes 315 ( 58.0%) 371 ( 69.0%)* No 228 ( 42.0%) 167 ( 31.0%) Creatinine (≥0.3 mg/dl Increase at Day 2) Yes 108 ( 19.8%) 59 ( 10.9%)** No 437 ( 81.2%) 482 ( 89.1%) Troponin T (≥20% Increase at Day 2) Yes 145 ( 27.2%) 86 ( 16.5%)** No 389 ( 72.8%) 436 ( 83.5%) ALT (Change at Day 2) mg/dL

  • 2.3
  • 6.4***

*p = 0.0002 **p < 0.0001 ***p < 0.0010

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusions

In selected patients with AHF, early treatment with serelaxin for 48 h improved:

  • Dyspnea relief: VAS AUC
  • In-hospital signs and symptoms of AHF
  • In-hospital end organ dysfunction/ damage
  • In-hospital worsening of heart failure
  • 180-day CV and all-cause mortality

but had no effect on rehospitalizations. Serelaxin use in AHF was safe with few hypotensive events and adverse events similar to placebo

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Study Organization

  • Co-PIs: M Metra (IT), JR Teerlink (US)
  • Executive Committee: G Cotter (US), BA Davison (US),

GM Felker (US), G Filipatos (GR), BH Greenberg (US), P Ponikowski (PL), TM Severin (CH), SL Teichman (US), E Unemori (USA), AA Voors (NL).

  • Steering Committee: KF Adams (US), M Dorobantu (RO),

L Grinfeld (AR), G Jondeau (FR), A Marmor (IL), J Masip (ES), PS Pang (US), K Werdan (DE).

  • DSMB: BM Massie-Chair (US), M Böhm (DE), E Davis (US),

G Francis (US), S Goldstein (US).

  • Sponsor: Corthera, Inc. (a Novartis affiliate company)
  • Coordinating Center: Momentum Research, Inc.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

RELAX-AHF Investigators

  • Argentina (71 patients): GM Ferrari; A Quiroga; A Fernandez; E Perna; MS Ramos;

L Guzman; G Cursack; O Allall; MG Masuelli; C Rapallo.

  • France (21): A Cohen-Solal; M Galinier; G Jondeau; R Isnard.
  • Germany (78): H-G Olbrich; V Mitrovic; K Werdan; S Felix; T Heitzer; G Cieslinski;

K Stangl.

  • Hungary (151): J Tomcsányi; D Apró; K Tóth; A Vértes; G Lupkovics; Z László; A Cziraki.
  • Israel (210): A Marmor; S Goland; A Katz; R Zimlichman; D Aronson; A Butnaru;

M Omary; XA Piltz; D Zahger.

  • Italy (77): M Metra; A Mortara; M Balbi; F Cosmi; S DiSomma; MC Brunazzi.
  • Netherlands (10): AA Voors; PEF Bendermacher; G-J Milhous; PL van Haelst;

P Dunselman.

  • Poland (258): P Ponikowski; P Jankowski; A Wysokinski; M Dluzniewski; J Stepinska;

W Tracz; M Krzeminska-Pakula; J Grzybowski; K Loboz-Grudzien.

  • Romania (153): D-D Ionescu; CS Stamate; M Dorobantu; C Pop; A Matei; T Nanea;

M Radoi; A Salajan.

  • Spain (18): J Masip; D Pascual; MG Bueno; R Muñoz.
  • United States of America (114): S Meymandi; P Levy; PS Pang; C Clark; G Fermann;

KF Adams, Jr.; B Bozkurt; J Fulmer; D Mancini; T Vittorio; R Zolty; BH Greenberg; E Chung; V Florea; J Heilman III; A Storrow; MR Costanzo; G Lamas; M Greenspan; M Klapholz; J Martinez-Arraras; WF Peacock; N Saleh; R Small; JR Teerlink; D Wencker.

slide-23
SLIDE 23