heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
play

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Advances in Heart - PDF document

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Advances in Heart Failure CME Course Jonathan D Davis, MD, MPHS Director, Heart Failure Program Assistant Clinical Professor | Division of Cardiology Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital


  1. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Advances in Heart Failure CME Course Jonathan D Davis, MD, MPHS Director, Heart Failure Program Assistant Clinical Professor | Division of Cardiology Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital Department of Medicine | University of California, San Francisco jonathan.davis@ucsf.edu | @JonathanDavisHF December 6, 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General 1 Disclosures § I have no financial disclosures Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 2 2 1 | [footer text here]

  2. Overview Definitions 1. Demographics and Epidemiology 2. Mortality 3. Pathophysiology 4. Diagnosis 5. Clinical Trials 6. Guidelines 7. Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 3 3 Definitions Zuckerberg San Francisco General 4 2 | [footer text here]

  3. Ejection Fraction Terminology § Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (<40%) § Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction (EF 40- 49%) § Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (≥50%) Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 5 5 Issues with “Systolic” and “Diastolic” § Often have an increase in LV wall thickness and/or increased LA size as a sign of increased filling pressures. § Most have ‘evidence’ of impaired LV filling or suction capacity, also classified as diastolic dysfunction. § Most patients with HFrEF also have diastolic dysfunction. § HFpEF patients have subtle abnormalities of systolic function. Ponikowski et al. EHJ. Volume 37, Issue 27, 14 July 2016 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 6 6 3 | [footer text here]

  4. Definition of HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) Direct Quote from the 2013 ACC/AHA HF Guidelines “Also referred to as diastolic HF. Several different criteria have been used to further define HFpEF. The diagnosis of HFpEF is challenging because it is largely one of excluding other potential noncardiac causes of symptoms suggestive of HF. To date, efficacious therapies have not been identified.” Yancy et al. Circulation . 2013;128:e240-e327 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 7 7 Definition of HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) From the 2016 ESC HF Guidelines § Signs/symptoms of heart failure § Elevated levels of natriuretic peptides (BNP>35 pg/ml and/or NT-proBNP>125 pg/mL) § At least 1 of the following: - Relevant structural heart disease (LVH and/or LAE) - Diastolic dysfunction Ponikowski et al. EHJ. Volume 37, Issue 27, 14 July 2016 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 8 8 4 | [footer text here]

  5. The 1 Common HFpEF Denominator Elevated filling pressures In the LV In diastole Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 9 9 Demographics and Epidemiology Zuckerberg San Francisco General 10 5 | [footer text here]

  6. How Common is HFpEF? § Framingham: 12,857 person-observations, 1985-2014 § The frequency of: - HF with reduced EF (EF <40%) decreased over time - HF with mid-range EF (40% to <50%) remained stable - HF with preserved EF (EF ≥50%) increased over time Vasan et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11:1–11 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 11 11 Increasing Hospitalizations for HFpEF Distribution of EF Over Time HFpEF 33% (EF ≥50%) 35% 35% 36% 38% 39% HFmEF 15% 14% 14% 14% (EF 40% - ≤50% 13% 14% HFrEF Get with the 52% 51% 50% 51% 49% (EF <40%) 47% Guidelines – HF 110,621 patients hospitalized with HF 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Steinberg BA et al. Circulation. 2012; 126:65–75. Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 12 12 6 | [footer text here]

  7. HFpEF Demographics Pooled Data from CHARM-preserved, I-PRESERVE, and TOPCAT § CHARM-Preserved: candesartan, Lancet 2003, LVEF >40% § I-PRESERVE: irbesartan, NEJM 2013, LVEF ≥45% § TOPCAT: spironolactone, NEJM 2014, LVEF ≥45% § Excluded patients with an LVEF <45% from CHARM- preserved and patients from Russia and Georgia in TOPCAT due to doubts about the reliability of diagnosis of HFpEF Tromp, J. et al. JACC. 2019;74(5):601-12 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 13 13 Younger Older patients: patients: More often More often obese black white women or Asian men with a higher with a lower comorbidity comorbidity burden. burden, yet had worse quality of life. Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 14 14 7 | [footer text here]

  8. Mortality Zuckerberg San Francisco General 15 Poor Survival Regardless of EF 2005-2014 100 80 HFrEF 60 HFmrEF 40 HFpEF 20 1.9 2.3 3.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years 235 154 121 96 66 Vasan RS, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 16 16 8 | [footer text here]

  9. Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 17 17 Mortality Data from CHARM-preserved, I-PRESERVE, and TOPCAT § Age ≤55 years: 30 (6%) died after 5 years - Event rate: 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.7) per 100 patient-years § Age ≥85 years: 190 (47%) died after 5 years - Event rate: 16.7 (95% CI: 14.5 to 19.3) per 100 patient-years Tromp, J. et al. JACC. 2019;74(5):601-12 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 18 18 9 | [footer text here]

  10. Tromp, J. et al. JACC. 2019;74(5):601-12 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 19 19 Pathophysiology Zuckerberg San Francisco General 20 10 | [footer text here]

  11. Neurohormonal Activation in HFrEF Myocardial injury to the heart (CAD, HTN, CMP, valvular disease) Initial ê in LV performance, é wall stress Activation of RAAS and SNS Fibrosis, apoptosis, hypertrophy, Peripheral vasoconstriction, Remodeling and progressive cellular/molecular alterations, hemodynamic alterations worsening of LV function myotoxicity Morbidity and mortality Heart Failure symptoms - Fatigue Arrhythmias - Decreased activity Pump failure - Chest congestion - Edema RAAS = renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; SNS = sympathetic nervous system - Shortness of breath Adapted from Goodman & Gillman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 2011. McGraw-Hill Education/Medical Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 21 21 Obokata, et al. JACC: CV Imaging 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 22 22 11 | [footer text here]

  12. Obokata, et al. JACC: CV Imaging 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 23 23 LV Diastolic Dysfunction § Definition: Impairment in relaxation and/or an increase in chamber stiffness § Symptoms caused by elevated filling pressures at rest or with exertion § Declines in LV relaxation and compliance seen with normal aging or with cardiometabolic comorbidities (e.g., obesity, insulin resistance, and HTN) § Not all patients with diastolic dysfunction have or will develop clinical HFpEF Obokata, et al. JACC: CV Imaging 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 24 24 12 | [footer text here]

  13. LV Systolic Dysfunction § LV systolic performance is not normal in HFpEF - Abnormal endocardial and midwall shortening, twisting, or circumferential and longitudinal shortening using tissue Doppler or strain imaging § Subtle impairments in systolic function at rest become dramatic during exercise in patients with HFpEF - Decreased exercise capacity, impaired early diastolic recoil and LV suction, impaired cardiac output, and elevation in LV filling pressures Obokata, et al. JACC: CV Imaging 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 25 25 Pulmonary Hypertension § Seen in ~ 80% of HFpEF patients § Predominantly related to LA hypertension § Substantial number develop pulmonary vascular disease (elevation in PVR and reduction in PA compliance) - Adverse outcomes, worse exercise capacity - During exercise can see impaired recruitment of LV preload due to excessive R-heart congestion and blunted RV systolic reserve § May only see during exercise Obokata, et al. JACC: CV Imaging 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 26 26 13 | [footer text here]

  14. Making the Diagnosis Zuckerberg San Francisco General 27 Making the Diagnosis § Invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing has emerged as the gold standard to definitively identify or exclude HFpEF as the cause of dyspnea § Filling pressures are often normal at rest but become elevated only during the stress of exercise Obokata, et al. JACC: CV Imaging 2019 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 28 28 14 | [footer text here]

  15. Definition of HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) From the 2016 ESC HF Guidelines § Signs/symptoms of heart failure § Elevated levels of natriuretic peptides (BNP>35 pg/ml and/or NT-proBNP>125 pg/mL) § At least 1 of the following: - Relevant structural heart disease (LVH and/or LAE) - Diastolic dysfunction Ponikowski et al. EHJ. Volume 37, Issue 27, 14 July 2016 Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 29 29 Making the Diagnosis at Mayo Clinic § Consecutive patients with unexplained dyspnea referred for invasive hemodynamic exercise testing - Derivation cohort: 414 consecutive patients (267 HFpEF and 147 controls - Test cohort: 100 consecutive patients (61 HFpEF) § HFpEF Definition: Elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at rest (≥15 mmHg) or during exercise (≥25 mmHg) Reddy YNV, et al. Circulation. 2018 Aug 28; 138(9): 861–870. Zuckerberg San Francisco General HFpEF Overview 30 30 15 | [footer text here]

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend