Septic Tanks of the Future Allan Mason Scottish Water Sustainable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

septic tanks of the future
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Septic Tanks of the Future Allan Mason Scottish Water Sustainable - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Septic Tanks of the Future Allan Mason Scottish Water Sustainable Rural Communities - Household Water Usage B uilding and providing the assets, infrastructure and service that enable us to meet our needs now without jeopardising our ability to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Septic Tanks of the Future

Allan Mason

Scottish Water

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Household Water Usage Sustainable Rural Communities -

Building and providing the assets, infrastructure and service that enable us to meet our needs now without jeopardising our ability to meet future needs. It is about building the consistent, upgradable assets that do not damage the environment and do not break the bank to implement.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Scottish Water has over 1000 Septic Tanks for primary treatment in rural

locations.

  • The Future
  • Low sludge production or treatment locally
  • Energy generation
  • Able to incorporate food waste to increase energy generation
  • Able to manage surface water flows to provide local flood attenuation
  • Water Reuse

Background

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenges

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Household Water Usage

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Issues in Scotland

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Septic Tank of the Future

A Scottish Water & Cranfield University Collaboration Prof Bruce Jefferson Dr Gabriela Dotro Mr Gareth Brown

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Septic Tanks of the Future flowsheet

The aim of this project was to provide an outline design and cost estimates for the novel sewage treatment flowsheet

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Descriptive consents Septic Tank vs Anaerobic Pond

Descriptive consents

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Numeric consents Anaerobic Pond + Wetland vs SAF plant

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Adding value

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Highlights

Based on example 100 pe works

  • Sites with descriptive consents can be upgraded to an anaerobic pond to improve

effluent quality, improving the desludging interval and future proof.

  • Breakeven point is 3 to 7 years.
  • Transport carbon emissions savings of >80%
  • Relaxed consents and medium consents can be met with either AP+ VF wetland or

AP + aerated HF wetland

  • Both wetland flowsheets have similar WLC and are c. 70% lower CAPEX, OPEX

and WLC compared against the SAF

  • VF systems offer off-grid operation potential (lower WLC)
  • Operational carbon emissions savings of 88% and 98% for AHF and

VF

  • Adding the tertiary SF system provides additional benefits without impacting WLC
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Results

Aerobic wetland air Anaerobic Pond Surface wetland

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Benchmarking against standard options Relaxed and medium consents

£50K £100K £150K £200K £250K £300K CAPEX OPEX WLC Cost AP + AHF AP + VF PT+SAF+HT

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Benchmarking against standard options Descriptive consents

£10K £20K £30K £40K £50K £60K 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Whole life cost Desludging interval (years) Anaerobic Pond Septic Tank (6-month) Septic Tank (12-month)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Impact on carbon emissions - Transport

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Operational carbon emissions

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Anaerobic ponds:
  • Impact of baffles on solids removal efficiency
  • Solids accumulation rates at low temperature wastewater
  • Treatment performance under flow variations
  • Biogas production rates and quality
  • Impact of biowaste addition on methane production and performance
  • Engaging with potential suppliers on design needed (GRP & soil)
  • Wetlands:
  • Performance with AP effluent
  • Impact of depth on AHF performance
  • Hydraulic limits with locally sourced materials
  • Configurations to achieve TN removal*
  • Passive alkalinity amendments*

Key uncertainties to resolve

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Doctorial Research - Aim

The overall aim of the project is to deliver a robust design approach for the novel flowsheet by resolving areas of uncertainty and risk.

1. Establishing the specific hydrolysis rate under low temperatures and assessing options to enhance it. 2. Establishment of the size and settling rate of particles within the pond and trial methods to increase the removal rate. 3. Establishment the benefit and impact of adding bio-waste to the pond. 4. Trial and determine the most appropriate configuration of wetland to meet different discharge consents. 5. Revise and adapt the initially proposed design standard

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Inclusion of Bio-wastes

  • Impact
  • How to include
  • Benefits and dis-benefits
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Integration in urban designs

Image from Molle (2017) at 6th Low Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Conference, Cranfield University.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Community perspectives on sustainable wastewater services for rural areas

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Gracey’s Journey

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Overall aim and individual objectives

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

WaterTestNetwork@scottishwater.co.uk www.nweurope.eu/water-test-network/

The funding call is now open!

Goal: Speed up market uptake of innovative water technology Tool: Fully-funded tailored support to access the transnational network of 14 operational testing facilities SMEs can develop, test and verify innovative technology in a real environment

The European test facility network for water innovation