semiconductor sc contracts
play

Semiconductor SC - Contracts Cathal Heavey Enterprise Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Semiconductor SC - Contracts Cathal Heavey Enterprise Research Centre, University of Limerick Ireland Contributions from: Konstanze Knoblich and Peter Williams Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 Overview Introduce contracts, present


  1. Semiconductor SC - Contracts Cathal Heavey Enterprise Research Centre, University of Limerick Ireland Contributions from: Konstanze Knoblich and Peter Williams Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  2. Overview • Introduce contracts, present classifications • Then present semi-conductor characteristic with regard to contracts • Present three topics on contracts applied to semiconductors: • Implementation of contracts in companies • Examination of RHF contracts • Work on option contracts Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 2

  3. Why contracts in SC • Centralized or integrated supply chain - a single decision maker • Decentralized supply chain - multiple decision makers • Decentralized SC increasing due to globalization and outsourcing • Contracts aim to align incentives so optimal SC efficiency can be achieved • Share risk due to uncertainty, mainly demand • Can promote long-term partnerships • Makes legally explicit expectation of each party Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 3

  4. SC Contracts • A supply chain contract is a coordination mechanism in decentralized supply chains to motivate the supply chain partners to behave like an integrated supply chain and to benefit therefore from improved operational performance • Contracts capture three types of flow: material, information and financial Material Funds Information Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  5. Zhao, Y., Meng, X., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. E. (2015) • Zhao, Y., Meng, X., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. E. (2015). Contract Analysis and Design for Supply Chains with Stochastic Demand (Vol. 234). Springer. • Lots of literature “no commonly accepted taxonomy is available” on operational aspects Economics Inventory SC Contracts • Chapter 1: Categorizes based on the newsvendor model: Price-Dependent, Effort Dependent, Competition, Information Asymmetry, Flexibility, Risk Aversion, Empirical Research Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 5

  6. Tsay, Andy A., Steven Nahmias, and Narendra Agrawal 1999 • Review by Tsay, Andy A., Steven Nahmias, and Narendra Agrawal. "Modeling supply chain contracts: A review." Quantitative models for supply chain management. Springer US, 1999. 299-336. • Classification proposed was: Specification of decision rights • Pricing • Minimum purchase commitments • Quantity flexibility • Buybacks or return policies • Allocation rules • Lead times • Quality • • 4 chapters devoted to contracts Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 6

  7. Anupindi, Ravi. and Bassok, Yehuda 1999 • Review by Anupindi, Ravi. and Bassok, Yehuda. “Supply Contracts with Quantity Commitments and Stochastic Demand" Quantitative models for supply chain management. Springer US, 1999. 299-336. • SCM contracts classified into: Horizon Length – duration of contract • Pricing – financial flows • Periodicity of ordering – how often a buyer can place orders • Quantity commitment: • • Total minimum commitment – commits to purchase a certain quantity • Periodical commitment – purchase a certain quantity every period Flexibility – specifies the magnitude and frequency of adjustments • Delivery Commitment – service level agreement on delivery • Quality • Information sharing • Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 7

  8. Semiconductor SC Contracts • Publications on Semiconductor SC Contracts • Mallik, S., & Harker, P. T. (2004). Coordinating supply chains with competition: Capacity allocation in semiconductor manufacturing. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 330–347. – incentives for capacity allocation among managers • Terwiesch, C., Ren, J. Z., Ho, T. H., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). An Empirical Analysis of Forecast Sharing in the Semiconductor Equipment Supply Chain. Management Science, 51(2), 208-220 – sharing between set of equipment suppliers Contracts to suppliers of tools to semiconductor • manufacturers Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  9. Implementation of Contract • Process for Contract  Contract Request  Internal Alignment and Contract Creation  Contract Negotiation  Contract Approval & Signature Procedure  Archiving  Distribution and Execution of Contract • Implementation of contract within company Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 9

  10. Semiconductor SC Characteristics  Long cycle times  Capital intensive and long investment cycles  Utilization of tools needs to be high  High velocity low flow factors  Typically short product life-cycles  High product variety  Highly volatile  Low forecast accuracy Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  11. A Study of Semiconductor SC RHF Contracts Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  12. Literature Review • Tsay (1999) quantity flexibility in RHF – examined incentives for buyer and seller • Bassok and Anupindi (2008) studied heuristics and examined flexibility, showing order variability decreases • Walsh et al (2008) examined fill rate and bullwhip • Wang (2008) added delivery lead time flexibility • Kim (2011) examined flexibility for customer and supplier, benefit constant as flexibility increases Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 12

  13. Focus of Work • Capture production and delivery lead time in case study company • Incorporate forecast error – linear regression • Unbiased • Over-planning • Under-planning • Model incorporates long-term forecasting 12 months in advance • Assume capacity provider has unlimited capacity Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 13

  14. Customer Forecast Accuracy Use SMAPE3 (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error) Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  15. Over Planning Demand Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  16. Demand Generator Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  17. Analyzed Using Simulation Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 17

  18. Performance Measures • Delivery Performance (DP) Performance index of customer satisfaction • Delivery Reliability Noting that: • Provides insights into a supplier’s capability to meet delivery schedules promised to the customer Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 18

  19. Results Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  20. Quantitative Values Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  21. Comparison of Standard with Options Contract • Compare against RHF contract (standard contract) • Purchase options for window o at price p o • p e to exercise within window o • Two sources available:  Contract market ( p o +p e )  Spot market, cost p s  p o = a third p std =p o +p e ; p s = p std + p d + i (estimated from case study company)  Non exercised options transferred to spot market • If p e =0, then p o is the wholesaler price • if p o =0 - standard contract with non binding forecast • Analyzed using simulation Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  22. Description Options Contact • Assuming window o =1 week p s p e =0 Buys options p o Spot Market Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  23. Preliminary Results Options versus Standard Contract • Profit for case study company, based on unbiased demand • Risk moving from buyer to seller Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016

  24. Conclusions • A lot of literature on operational contracts – applicable to semiconductor? • Few results on semiconductor SC, some on semiconductor equipment • Important topic to examine • Embedding operational contracts is important • Examined RHF and option contracts, other types of contracts also possible Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 24

  25. References • Knoblich, Konstanze, Cathal Heavey, and Peter Williams. "Quantitative analysis of semiconductor supply chain contracts with order flexibility under demand uncertainty: A case study." Computers & Industrial Engineering 87 (2015): 394-406. • Knoblich, Konstanze, Cathal Heavey, and Prince Williams. "An evaluation of an option contract in semiconductor supply chains." Simulation Conference (WSC), Proceedings of the 2012 Winter . IEEE, 2012. Schloss Dagstuhl, February 8-12 2016 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend