Self-Referral and Its Effect on Use of Imaging
David C. Levin, M.D. 215-955-6271 david.levin@jeffersonhospital.org
Raleigh, NC, 3/18/14
Self-Referral and Its Effect on Use of Imaging David C. Levin, M.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Self-Referral and Its Effect on Use of Imaging David C. Levin, M.D. 215-955-6271 david.levin@jeffersonhospital.org Raleigh, NC, 3/18/14 Frequency of imaging per episode of illness Ratio of imaging frequency, self- Clinical presentation
Raleigh, NC, 3/18/14
*Hillman et al, JAMA 1992; 268: 2050
MRI 3.06 CT 1.95 US 5.13 Nuc Med 4.52 X-ray 2.10
Gazelle GS et al, Radiology 2007;245:517
Hughes DR, Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH, Health Affairs 2010;29:2244 data from Medicare 5% Research Identifiable Files, 04-07 from evaluation of 733,459 Medicare episodes of care, grouped into 20 combos of a clinical problem + an imaging technique
Sunshine J, Bhargavan M, Health Affairs 2010;29:2237
Use of IMRT to treat prostate ca by urologists who acquired IMRT and became self-referring vs. urologists who did not self-refer for IMRT. Were 2 separate study groups, each with their own matched control groups.
Mitchell JM, NEJM 2013;369:1629
* Litt, Radiology 2005; 235: 142
*Hemenway, NEJM 1990; 322: 1059
Levin DC, Rao VM et al, JACR 2008;5:105 (data in paper through 2005)
*Levin DC, Rao VM et al, JACR 2008;5:1206 data in paper through 2006
Levin DC et al, JACR 2013;10:198
Amrhein, Kilani et al, AJR 2013;201:605
Lungren, Kilani et al, Radiology 2013;269:810