SECTOR CODE 08 March 2017 Background B-BBEE Fronting Practices - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sector code
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SECTOR CODE 08 March 2017 Background B-BBEE Fronting Practices - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PERSPECTIVE OF THE B-BBEE COMMISSION ON THE FINANCIAL SECTOR CODE 08 March 2017 Background B-BBEE Fronting Practices Commission Misalignment s13B Inconsistent interpretation Constitution B-BBEE 1 May 2015 24 October 24 October of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PERSPECTIVE OF THE B-BBEE COMMISSION ON THE FINANCIAL SECTOR CODE 08 March 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

2 Constitution

  • f South

Africa 1996 Bill of Rights B-BBEE Act 53 of 2003 B-BBEE Amendment Act 46 of 2013 24 October 2014 Amendment 1 May 2015 Codes of Good Practice 24 October 2015 Trumping Provision 6 June 2016 Regulations

Redress = Equity – Equality – Inclusive Economy Fronting Practices Misalignment Inconsistent interpretation B-BBEE Commission s13B

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Challenges experienced

  • Once

Once Emp Empow

  • wer

ered ed, Alw Always ays Empowe Empowere red principle principle cre create ates reg regressi ression

  • n of
  • f

transform sformati tion  Must not be allowed in any of the sector codes

  • Sector

tor Codes that are not not finali lise sed create ate confu fusio sion in in the markets kets  Some entities denied benefits arising from revised generic codes

  • Acce

Access ss to to fun funding co continue tinues to to be be a ch challe lenge for for bla lack ck people le cre creati ting a fertil fertile ground nd for fronting nting  Most vendor-financed deals impact net value realisation/economic benefits

  • Lack

ack of

  • f imp

implementatio ementation by by Gove Governm rnmen ent and and its its en entities tities affects affects pa pace ce of

  • f

transform sformati tion

  • Abuse of
  • f B-BBEE

BEE Arrange angeme ments nts and and Concep epts ts in in the implemen mentatio tation  Such a definition of black person, modified flow through principle, and collective ownership schemes

  • Lack of
  • f integrity

rity in in the verifi ifica catio tion process ss and and conduct ct of

  • f profe

fessi ssionals ls  Recognition process mired with flaws resulting in invalid certificates

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ge Gene neral al con

  • nce

cerns rns on

  • n se

sector ctor cod

  • des

es

  • Deadline for

for finalisa isatio tion of

  • f sector
  • r codes necessar

sary – Confusion created in the market as old codes are still applicable

  • Disc

iscon

  • nne

nect ct bet etwe ween en th the tr transf nsfor

  • rma

matio ion cha hall llen enges ges in in th the sect sector

  • r and

and th the interv rventi ention

  • ns in

in the the sector

  • r codes

– Lack of progress report from previous implementation and link to how revised targets in sector code will advance B-BBEE

  • Lack of
  • f consiste

stency ncy in in the the approach ch and and draftin ting of

  • f sector
  • r codes

– Loopholes, regulatory nightmare and open for litigation

  • Reasons for

for deviatio tions ns not not substa tantia ntial enough enough to to warrant nt a sector code – High barriers, lack of competition, no black suppliers

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ge Gene neral al con

  • nce

cerns rns on

  • n se

sector ctor cod

  • des

es

  • Changing or
  • r introdu

ducin cing new new principl iples es contra rary ry to to State teme ment nt 003 003 – Exemptions, automatic approvals to deviate, equity equivalent

  • App

pplic licati ation

  • n of
  • f sector

ector cod

  • des

es to to or

  • rgans

ns of

  • f st

stat ate and nd publi blic entiti ntities es co contr ntrary ry to to sectio ions ns 10 10(2) and and 9(6) – Organs of state and public entities must set high targets in relevant areas

  • Overarc

archi hing ng and and confusi using ng role of

  • f Sector
  • r Councils

ls – Ultra vires powers to exempt, revise thresholds

  • Recognitio

ition of

  • f ordinary

ry course transa sactio ctions ns or

  • r activi

vitie ties – Points awarded for ordinary business, bonus points allocated

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

6

  • Application and Principles

 Introduces exemptions and exclusions for multinationals  Creates automatic approval of equity equivalent without legislative mandate  Application to organs of state and public entities – specialised score card and sections 10 (2) and 9(6) compromised  No timelines set for review of the targets – despite them being already very low

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

7

  • Priority Elements (000)

 Introduces compulsory compliance with skills development for EMEs and QSEs with enhanced recognition status  Results in verification requirements and discounting principle applicable to exempted entities  Creates monitoring and compliance challenges for entities and the regulator  No substantial motivation for this deviation from the exemption

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

8

  • Ownership (100)

 Despite worrying ownership patterns in the sector, target of 25+1% set in generic code is retained  Further diluted by introduction of equity equivalent through empowerment financing and access to financial services in lieu

  • f ownership

 Bonus points for exceeding already low and diluted targets based on black industrialist funding and empowerment financing  Multiple application of modified flow through, meaning 51% black owned entity can be recognised more than once

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

9

  • Management Control (200)

 Sector avers that management control has an element

  • f creating quotas contrary to the Solidarity vs SAPS –

reference drawn to SAPS vs Solidarity obo Barnard (2014) ZACC 23 to address this  Targets set deviate from generic codes, but do not show how the address the existing challenges of low percentage of top and senior management within the sector  Grants exemptions to branches of multinationals and external companies from board representation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

10

  • Skills Development (300)

 Segments grouping into senior management (2%), middle management (3%), junior management (5%) and black people (non-management) (8%)  Targets do not align to challenges in financial sector where white people occupy 68.4% of top management, 60.6% of senior management, 46.7% of professionally qualified and 26.9% of skilled work force  Motivation for categorisation and deviation not convincing given the lack of transformation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

11

  • Preferential Procurement and Supplier Development

(400)

 Deviates downwards with 75% (not 80%) all procurement spend from empowering suppliers, 14% (not 15%) from empowering suppliers that are QSEs, 8% (not 15%) from empowering suppliers that are EMEs, 20% (not 40%) from suppliers that are at least 51% black owned, and 9% (not 30%) from suppliers that are black women owned.  Further deviation from skills transfer and multiplying recognisable spend resulting in multiple dipping with rights for entities to claim

  • ver a three year period.

 Recognition is made for attempts to empower black stockbrokers, fund managers and intermediaries.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Fi Financial nancial Se Sector ctor Co Code de

12

  • Socio-economic Development (500)

 Target is 1% NPAT but split into 0.60% SED and 0.40% for consumer education  Consumer education is already a requirement under the National Credit Act, Consumer Protection Act and the legislation administered by Financial Services Board  This is ordinary course business and entities should not be recognised for such activities.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Co Conclusion nclusion

 Financial sector code in its current form does not advance radical economic transformation, but rather regresses it  Additional elements referred to are Empowerment Finance and Access to Financial Services, but not expressed provisions are

  • utlined to highlight how these are not ordinary business activities

for this sector  Sector code appears to compromise the incentive for financial sector players to compete by subjecting products on which they should compete on to transformational interventions  Financial sector impacts a number of sectors from the perspective of financing, and if lending is to be recognised for points, it must be at seriously preferential rates or conditions for black people  Concerns raised must be addressed before the sector code can be approved for gazetting, failing which generic codes must apply

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Contact ntact Details tails

B-BBEE Commission Private Bag X84 Pretoria 0001 Telephone: +27 12 394 1535 Facsimile: + 27 12 394 2535 Email: mramare@beecommission.gov.za Website: www.bbbeecommission.co.za

14