SECTION 106 CONSULTING PARTY REQUEST ADMINISTRATION Phil Logsdon, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

section 106 consulting party request administration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SECTION 106 CONSULTING PARTY REQUEST ADMINISTRATION Phil Logsdon, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SECTION 106 CONSULTING PARTY REQUEST ADMINISTRATION Phil Logsdon, Division of Environmental Analysis National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 of the Act Federal Agencies must consider effects of their actions on historic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SECTION 106 CONSULTING PARTY REQUEST ADMINISTRATION

Phil Logsdon, Division of Environmental Analysis

slide-2
SLIDE 2

National Historic Preservation Act

 Section 106 of the Act

 Federal Agencies must consider effects of their

actions on historic properties

 Provides a mechanism for interested parties to

consult

 These participants are termed Consulting Parties  Typically notified by advertising and through project

public involvement

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Commitment

 2011 FHWA-KYTC-SHPO Section 106

Programmatic Agreement

 Provide Opportunity for Consultation on “Small

Projects”

 Web Based Application to Identify Projects and

Request Consulting Party Status

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Application Process

 Public Can Navigate to Application from

 KYTC Homepage  “How Do I?”  DEA Website  SHPO Website

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Application Process

 List of Projects that are

“Active” for Section 106

 Federally Funded,

Design Authorized

 S106/NEPA not

complete

 Projects can be sorted

by County

 Click on Project

Number to start

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Application

 Pre-Populated with Project Info  Applicant Provides Contact Info  Stated Interest  Security

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Application Review Process

 SharePoint Work Flow  Automatic E-mail notification to KYTC/DEA

Reviewers

 KYTC On-line Approval  Automatic E-Mail notification to SHPO Reviewers  SHPO eApproval Generates Notice of Acceptance

to KTYC Reviewers

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Data Management

 Does Not Generate Response to Applicant!!!  Keeps Permanent Record for Approved Users

(DEA and District Environmental Coordinators)

 Can Be Queried, Sorted, Exported

 Track Application and Approval Dates  Create Mailing List

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Live as of Mid-July!!

 Statewide Historic Preservation Groups  Main Street Managers  Local Historical Societies

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Challenges

 Doesn’t Address State-Funded Projects with other

Federal involvement (Corps Permits, etc.)

 Complicated to filter through 6YP projects to keep

Active Projects list up-to-date

 No elegant way to incorporate Consulting Parties

already approved prior to July 2013

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Benefits

 Useful for both large-scale and small scale

projects

 Could apply on the spot if laptop and internet

connection are available at a public meeting

 Applicant keys in information – better accuracy  Accelerated review times  Robust record storage

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Thank You InfoTech Staff!

Tom Cantrell Stephen Wire Jim Fisher Kim Wells Jay Clifton