SEARHCING FOR NEW PHYSICS WITH THE HIGGS DANIEL STOLARSKI DS, R. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

searhcing for new physics with the higgs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SEARHCING FOR NEW PHYSICS WITH THE HIGGS DANIEL STOLARSKI DS, R. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SEARHCING FOR NEW PHYSICS WITH THE HIGGS DANIEL STOLARSKI DS, R. Vega-Morales, Phys.Rev.D.86, 117504 (2012) [arXiv:1208.4840], Yi Chen, DS, R. Vega-Morales, [arXiv:1505.01168], B. Batell, M. McCullough, DS, C. B. Verhaaren,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

SEARHCING FOR 
 NEW PHYSICS 
 WITH THE HIGGS

DANIEL STOLARSKI

GGI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015

DS, R. Vega-Morales, Phys.Rev.D.86, 117504 (2012) [arXiv:1208.4840], Yi Chen, DS, R. Vega-Morales, [arXiv:1505.01168],
  • B. Batell, M. McCullough, DS, C. B. Verhaaren, [arXiv:1508.01208],
and work in progress.
slide-2
SLIDE 2 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

A NEW PARTICLE

2

h → γγ h → 4e/4µ/2e2µ

July 2012:

slide-3
SLIDE 3 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

IS IT THE HIGGS?

3

Consistent with the Higgs, but could 
 also be something else. Neutral pion decays to two photons and 
 four electrons, but its much more boring.

slide-4
SLIDE 4 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

WARM UP EXERCISE

4

h Z Z s s Z Z Z γ

OR

s ZµνZµν s ZµνFµν h ZµZµ Assume parity even scalar:

slide-5
SLIDE 5 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

KINEMATIC DISTRIBUTIONS

5 ˆ xCM ˆ zCM Z1(k1) Z2(k2) −1 ⇡ − 2 ✓1 ✓2 `1(p1) ¯ `1(p2) `2(p3) ¯ `2(p4)

Each event is characterized by five different variables. Study :

h → 4e/4µ/2e2µ

Compare to . h → γγ

slide-6
SLIDE 6 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

KINEMATIC DISTRIBUTIONS

6 ˆ xCM ˆ zCM Z1(k1) Z2(k2) −1 ⇡ − 2 ✓1 ✓2 `1(p1) ¯ `1(p2) `2(p3) ¯ `2(p4)

Distributions encode information about tensor structure.

1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 cosΘ 1
  • d
dcosΘ aZΓ as ah 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 M a a a 20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 M2 1
  • d
dM2 aZΓ as ah DS, R. Vega-Morales, Phys.Rev.D.86, 117504 (2012) [arXiv:1208.4840].
slide-7
SLIDE 7 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

MATRIX ELEMENT METHOD

7

P(~ |ai) = |M(~ )|2 R d~ |M(~ )|2

For a given event, can compute probability of that even given underlying theory. h → 4` Phase space point Underlying model

slide-8
SLIDE 8 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

MATRIX ELEMENT METHOD

8

P(~ |ai) = |M(~ )|2 R d~ |M(~ )|2

For a given event, can compute probability of that even given underlying theory. h → 4` For N events, can compute likelihood for different underlying theories.

L(ai) =

N

Y

j=1

P(~ j |ai)

slide-9
SLIDE 9 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

LIKELIHOOD DISTRIBUTION

9
  • as
ah 40 20 20 40 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
  • Can do pseudo-

experiments to see separation power of N events.

20 30 40 50 60 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

MC MC theory

Λ = 2 log[L(a1)/L(a2)].

Example for 50 events:

slide-10
SLIDE 10 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

KINEMATIC DISTRIBUTIONS

10

Get better discrimination with more events.

  • a
a 40 20 20 40 95 99 ah vs. as 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N Σ 95 99 a 10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N 95 99 ah vs. aZΓ 10 20 30 40 50 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N Σ

Today’s data

slide-11
SLIDE 11 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

DATA

11 ) + / L h + ln(L ×
  • 2
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10
10 20 30 Pseudoexperiments 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 CMS preliminary
  • 1
= 8 TeV, L = 19.6 fb s
  • 1
= 7 TeV, L = 5.1 fb s + h + CMS data

= as = ah

Evidence for 
 the Higgs:

slide-12
SLIDE 12 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

RATE MEASUREMENTS

12 SM σ / σ Best fit
  • 4
  • 2
2 4 6 bb (ttH tag) → H bb (VH tag) → H (ttH tag) τ τ → H (VH tag) τ τ → H (VBF tag) τ τ → H (0/1 jet) τ τ → H WW (ttH tag) → H WW (VH tag) → H WW (VBF tag) → H WW (0/1 jet) → H ZZ (2 jets) → H ZZ (0/1 jet) → H (ttH tag) γ γ → H (VH tag) γ γ → H (VBF tag) γ γ → H (untagged) γ γ → H 0.14 ± = 1.00 µ Combined

CMS

(7 TeV)
  • 1
(8 TeV) + 5.1 fb
  • 1
19.7 fb = 125 GeV H m = 0.84 SM p
slide-13
SLIDE 13 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

BIG PICTURE

13

At discovery, rate measurements pointed to 4 lepton coming from tree level and 2 photon at one loop. Could imagine a tuned model:

cB H†H BµνBµν cW H†H W aµνW a

µν

Worthwhile to test SM and rule out all 


  • ther logical possibilities.

Techniques become extremely important if 
 there is an anomaly.

slide-14
SLIDE 14 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

LOOP PROCESSES

14 Z/γ Z/γ

h

h W Z/γ Z/γ

h

Kinematic distributions can reveal more than just rates measurements can. Put this to use with loop processes.

slide-15
SLIDE 15 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

TOP YUKAWA

15 Z/γ Z/γ

h

Start with just top, keep all other couplings fixed.

h ¯ t

  • yt + i ˜

y γ5 t

Can probe CP nature of top Yukawa coupling.

slide-16
SLIDE 16 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

EDM BOUNDS

16
  • neutr. EDM
  • el. EDM
Hg EDM Higgs prod. SM
  • 1.0
  • 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0
  • 0.4
  • 0.2
0.0 0.2 0.4 kt k é t ku,d,e=1 neutr. EDM
  • el. EDM
Higgs HLHC 3000 fb-1L SM 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10
  • 0.0004
  • 0.0002
0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 kt k é t ku,d,e=1

Can place strong bounds on CP violation from EDMs.

Brod, Haisch, Zupan, [arXiv:1310.1385].
slide-17
SLIDE 17 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI
  • neutr. EDM
Higgs prod. SM
  • 1.0
  • 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0
  • 1.0
  • 0.5
0.0 0.5 1.0 kt k é t ku,d,e=0
  • neutr. EDM
Higgs HLHC 3000 fb-1L SM 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10
  • 0.010
  • 0.005
0.000 0.005 0.010 kt k é t ku,d,e=0

EDM BOUNDS

17

Depend on knowing Higgs coupling to first generation.

Brod, Haisch, Zupan, [arXiv:1310.1385].
slide-18
SLIDE 18 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

SENSITIVITY

18 S N 2 10 3 10 4 10 ) t y ~ ( σ ) or t (y σ 1 10 )
  • 1
(fb ∈ × 14 TeV L 2 10 3 10 (float ZZ couplings) t y (fix ZZ couplings) t y (float ZZ couplings) t y ~ (fix ZZ couplings) t y ~ Current time is Thu Apr 30 09:36:51 2015 Working dir /Users/yichen/PhysicsWorkspace/HiggsProperties/MiscellaneousPlots/14156_LoopPlots Host N/A This is the scaled version!

Measurement gets better with more events. Better sensitivity to pseudo-scalar coupling. Need large number of events.

Chen, DS, Vega-Morales, [arXiv:1505.01168].
slide-19
SLIDE 19 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

EXPERIMENTAL CUTS

19

CMS cuts optimized for discovery: Want to gain sensitivity to NLO effects. M1 > 40, M2 > 12, M`` > 4

h

γ γ

(GeV) 1 M 20 40 60 80 100 120 (GeV) 2 M 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 0.022 (GeV) 1 M 20 40 60 80 100 120 (GeV) 2 M 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01
slide-20
SLIDE 20 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

EXPERIMENTAL CUTS

20

CMS cuts optimized for discovery: Modified “Relaxed - Υ” S/B gets worse, but sensitivity improves. M1 > 40, M2 > 12, M`` > 4

4l M 100 150 200 250 300 a.u.
  • 6
10
  • 5
10
  • 4
10
  • 3
10
  • 2
10
  • 1
10 1 10 Total 4l → ZZ 4l → γ Z 4l → γ γ Madgraph 4l → Z Example signal

M`` > 4, M``(OSSF) 62 (8.8, 10.8)

Chen, Harnik, Vega-Morales, [arXiv:1503.05855].
slide-21
SLIDE 21 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

SENSITIVITY

21 t y
  • 10
  • 5
5 10 15 t y ~
  • 10
  • 5
5 10 15 , Signal-only) Υ Golden channel (Relaxed - ) Υ Golden channel (Relaxed - Golden channel (CMS - tight) ) σ 1 ± direct search ( γ γ → h ) σ 1 ± direct search ( γ Z → h ) σ 1 ± h direct search ( t t Standard model Current time is Thu Apr 30 09:38:37 2015 Working dir /Users/yichen/PhysicsWorkspace/HiggsProperties/MiscellaneousPlots/14156_LoopPlots Host N/A

800 events ~ 300 fb-1 Non-trivial constraint.

slide-22
SLIDE 22 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI t y
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 4 5 t y ~
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 4 5 , Signal-only) Υ Golden channel (Relaxed - ) Υ Golden channel (Relaxed - Golden channel (CMS - tight) ) σ 1 ± direct search ( γ γ → h ) σ 1 ± direct search ( γ Z → h ) σ 1 ± h direct search ( t t Standard model Current time is Thu Apr 30 09:38:38 2015 Working dir /Users/yichen/PhysicsWorkspace/HiggsProperties/MiscellaneousPlots/14156_LoopPlots Host N/A

HIGH LUMINOSITY

22

8,000 events ~ 
 3,000 fb-1 Better constraint. If there is anomaly, will help characterize.

slide-23
SLIDE 23 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI t y
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 4 5 t y ~
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
1 2 3 4 5 , Signal-only) Υ Golden channel (Relaxed - ) Υ Golden channel (Relaxed - Golden channel (CMS - tight) ) σ 1 ± direct search ( γ γ → h ) σ 1 ± direct search ( γ Z → h ) σ 1 ± h direct search ( t t Standard model Current time is Thu Apr 30 09:38:39 2015 Working dir /Users/yichen/PhysicsWorkspace/HiggsProperties/MiscellaneousPlots/14156_LoopPlots Host N/A

100 TEV?

23

20,000 events ~ 
 3,000 fb-1 @ 100 TeV Further improved.

slide-24
SLIDE 24 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

CUSTODIAL SYMMETRY

24

Can measure deviations from custodial symmetry. Can rule out at LHC.

Work in progress with 

  • R. Vega-Morales and Y. Chen.
S N 2 10 3 10 4 10 ) W λ ( σ
  • 1
10 1 10 W λ t + y W λ t y ~ + W λ t y ~ + t + ZZ + y W λ t y ~ + ZZ + W λ Current time is Mon Jun 8 19:22:48 2015 Working dir /Users/yichen/PhysicsWorkspace/HiggsProperties/MiscellaneousPlots/14174_GWWCandidatePlots Host N/A = gW W gZZ

λW = −1

slide-25
SLIDE 25 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

BREAK FLAT DIRECTIONS?

25

Can simultaneously measure t and W couplings. Absolute flat direction in . Can disfavor h → γγ

W λ
  • 1
  • 0.5
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 t y
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2
2 4 6 8 10 Υ Relaxed - (Signal-only) Υ Relaxed - CMS - tight Current time is Mon Jun 8 19:47:31 2015 Working dir /Users/yichen/PhysicsWorkspace/HiggsProperties/MiscellaneousPlots/14174_GWWCandidatePlots Host N/A

λW = −1 8,000 events ~ 3,000 fb-1

slide-26
SLIDE 26 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

BSM PHYSICS

26

Can use Higgs coupling to stop to directly probe other fields that couple to Higgs.

Work in progress with 

  • R. Vega-Morales and Y. Chen.

Z/γ Z/γ

˜ t ˜ t ˜ t Independent of decay, do not have to carry color.

slide-27
SLIDE 27 DANIEL STOLARSKI March 3, 2015 Carleton University Colloquium

HIGGS PRODUCTION

slide-28
SLIDE 28 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

HIGGS PRODUCTION

28

Dominant Higgs production mechanism via loop process. What if other colored particles couple to the Higgs? Naturalness is a guiding hint…

  • g

g H Q

  • g

g H Q

~

slide-29
SLIDE 29 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

EXCLUSIONS

29 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
  • mh tuning
... rG 10% tuning 200 400 600 800 1000 200 400 600 800 1000 mt é 1@GeVD mt é 2@GeVD

1σ 2σ 3σ

Fan and Reece [arXiv:1401.7671].

Can use this diagram to exclude light stops. Have to make assumption about 
 mixing angle.

λ˜ t1˜ t1h ' p 2 v " m2 t + 1 2 sin 2θtmtXt #

|µ(gg → h) − 1| . 20%

slide-30
SLIDE 30 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

DI-HIGGS PRODUCTION

30 g H g H g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 h0,H0 q ~

Di-Higgs production also loop process at LHC. Two diagrams, strong destructive interference —amplitude vanishes at threshold. Perhaps can be sensitive to new physics?

Li and Voloshin [arXiv:1311.5156].
slide-31
SLIDE 31 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

LHC PROSPECTS

Preliminary studies by experiments show that measurement is possible but difficult at high-lumi.

Expected yields (3000 fb−1) Total Barrel End-cap Samples H(b¯ b)H(γγ)(λ/λS M = 1) 8.4±0.1 6.7±0.1 1.8±0.1 H(b¯ b)H(γγ)(λ/λS M = 0) 13.7±0.2 10.7±0.2 3.1±0.1 H(b¯ b)H(γγ)(λ/λS M = 2) 4.6±0.1 3.7±0.1 0.9±0.1 H(b¯ b)H(γγ)(λ/λS M = 10) 36.2±0.8 27.9±0.7 8.2±0.4 b¯ bγγ 9.7±1.5 5.2±1.1 4.5±1.0 c¯ cγγ 7.0±1.2 4.1±0.9 2.9±0.8 b¯ bγ j 8.4±0.4 4.3±0.2 4.1±0.2 b¯ b j j 1.3±0.2 0.9±0.1 0.4±0.1 j jγγ 7.4±1.8 5.2±1.5 2.2±1.0 t¯ t(≥ 1 lepton) 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 t¯ tγ 3.2±2.2 1.6±1.6 1.6±1.6 t¯ tH(γγ) 6.1±0.5 4.9±0.4 1.2±0.2 Z(b¯ b)H(γγ) 2.7±0.1 1.9±0.1 0.8±0.1 b¯ bH(γγ) 1.2±0.1 1.0±0.1 0.3±0.1 Total Background 47.1±3.5 29.1±2.7 18.0±2.3 S/ √ B(λ/λS M = 1) 1.2 1.2 0.4

ATLAS bbγγ CMS bbγγ CMS bbWW

31
slide-32
SLIDE 32 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

LHC PROSPECTS

Theorist studies are more optimistic (still need HL). Studies in bbγγ, bbττ, bbWW, 4b, 
 ranging from 2-6σ significance.

[76] U. Baur, T. Plehn, and D. L. Rainwater, Phys.Rev. D69, 053004 (2004), hep-ph/0310056. [77] J. Baglio, A. Djouadi, R. Grber, M. Mhlleitner, J. Quevillon, et al., JHEP 1304, 151 (2013), 1212.5581. [78] W. Yao (2013), 1308.6302. [79] V. Barger, L. L. Everett, C. Jackson, and G. Shaughnessy, Phys.Lett. B728, 433 (2014), 1311.2931. [80] A. Azatov, R. Contino, G. Panico, and M. Son (2015), 1502.00539. [81] A. J. Barr, M. J. Dolan, C. Englert, and M. Spannowsky, Phys.Lett. B728, 308 (2014), 1309.6318. [82] A. Papaefstathiou, L. L. Yang, and J. Zurita, Phys.Rev. D87, 011301 (2013), 1209.1489. [83] D. E. Ferreira de Lima, A. Papaefstathiou, and M. Spannowsky, JHEP 1408, 030 (2014), 1404.7139. 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

NON-RESONANT DI-HIGGS

33 g H g H g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 h0,H0 q ~

Most studies focus on measuring Higgs self coupling. Here I will assume its SM like and focus on new physics in loops.

slide-34
SLIDE 34 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

STOPS

34 h0,H0 g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ h0,H0 g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ i q ~ j q ~ i q ~ i g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ j q ~ i q ~ i

No cancellation in the presence of new physics. Effects could 
 be large.

Balyaev et. al., 
 hep-ph/9905266. Barrientos Bendezu and Kniehl, hep-ph/0103182.
slide-35
SLIDE 35 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

CAN PROBE BLIND SPOTS?

35 h0,H0 g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ h0,H0 g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ i q ~ j q ~ i q ~ i g Hi,A0 g Hj,A0 q ~ j q ~ i q ~ i

Di-Higgs sensitive to different couplings than single Higgs.

λ˜

t1˜ t1hh ' m2 t

v2

slide-36
SLIDE 36 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

SPECTRA

36 1000 500 2000 300 1500 700 0.001 0.005 0.010 0.050 0.100 0.500 1.000 mhh @GeVD dΣêdmhh @fbê GeVD 14 TeV SM A B C

Often get spectra 
 with huge 
 enhancements at 
 low invariant mass. They are almost 
 always excluded. EXCLUDED!

slide-37
SLIDE 37 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

EFFECTIVE FIELD THEORY

37 g g h h h λ g g h h

⇠ ⇣ c1 Λ2 |H|2 + c2 Λ4 |H|4 + . . . ⌘ GµνGµν

If usual rules of EFT apply: descends down to:

h p 2v ✓ cSM + 2c1v2 Λ2 + 4c2v4 Λ4 + . . . ◆ GµνGµν+ + h2 4v2 ✓ cSM + 2c1v2 Λ2 + 12c2v4 Λ4 + . . . ◆ GµνGµν

Run I implies this must be small. Won’t see big effects in di-Higgs.

slide-38
SLIDE 38 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

LOW ENERGY THEOREM

38

Stops can be non-decoupling: gives

L ⊃ αsbc 16π ⇥ log det M2

˜ t

⇤ GµνGµν L = αs 12 √ 2πv(κh

t + κh ˜ t )h GµνGµν −

αs 48πv2 (κhh

t

+ κhh

˜ t )h2 GµνGµν.

κh

˜ t = 1

4 m2

t
  • m2
1 + m2 2 X2 t
  • m2
1m2 2

  • = κh
˜ t (8 κh ˜ t 1)

m4

t

m2

1m2 2

,

κhh

˜ t

Small effects if at least one stop is heavy.

slide-39
SLIDE 39 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

LET AND EFT

39

Deviations in single 
 and di-Higgs are 
 anti-correlated. Non decoupling 
 theories can give 
 larger effects.

  • κ1
h κ t h
  • κ
σ/ []
slide-40
SLIDE 40 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

RESULTS

40

No stop mixing = no effects in di-Higgs.

slide-41
SLIDE 41 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

RESULTS

41

Equal soft masses. Tuned region with ~30% modification. Larger modifications excluded.

slide-42
SLIDE 42 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

RESULTS

42

Fix heavy stop mass. Tuned region with ~50% modification.

slide-43
SLIDE 43 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

CHANGE INVARIANT MASSS

43

Can do better with different invariant mass cuts.

slide-44
SLIDE 44 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

SPECTRA

44

A: m = 325, 500 GeV sinθ = 0.4 B: m=200, 1000 GeV sinθ=0.223 C: m=150, 1000 GeV sinθ=0 EXCLUDED! Tuned

slide-45
SLIDE 45 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

CONCLUSIONS 1

45
  • Kinematic distributions in can provide

information that is independent from and complimentary to rate measurements.

  • NLO contributions make this channel sensitive to

large Higgs couplings.

  • Can measure CP violation in top Yukawa or violations
  • f custodial symmetry.
  • Use to place model-independent bounds (or discover)

new fields which couple to Higgs. h → 4`

slide-46
SLIDE 46 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

CONCLUSIONS 2

46
  • Higgs produced in loop process at LHC. Production

rate can be sensitive to colored new physics.

  • Measurement of rate in Run I already puts strong

constraints on new physics.

  • EFT arguments say it will be difficult to see large

effects in non-resonant double Higgs production.

  • Future measurements can place constraints on

difficult regions of parameters space.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

T H A N K

YOU

slide-48
SLIDE 48 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

4 LEPTON DETAILS

48
  • 115 GeV < M4` < 135 GeV
  • pT > (20, 10, 5, 5) GeV for lepton pT ordering,
  • |⌘`| < 2.4 for the lepton rapidity,
  • M`` > 4 GeV, M``(OSSF) /
2 (8.8, 10.8) GeV, L µ(tth) µ(h → γγ) µ(h → Zγ) Current 2.8 ± 1.0 [5] 1.14 ± 0.25 [103] NA 300 fb−1 1.0 ± 0.55 [105] 1.0 ± 0.1 [104] 1.0 ± 0.6 [106] 3000 fb−1 1.0 ± 0.18 [105] 1.0 ± 0.05 [104] 1.0 ± 0.2 [106] µ(tth) ' y2 t + 0.42 ˜ y2 t µ(h ! ) ' (1.28 0.28 yt)2 + (0.43 ˜ yt)2 µ(h ! Z) ' (1.06 0.06 yt)2 + (0.09 ˜ yt)2,
slide-49
SLIDE 49 DANIEL STOLARSKI SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 GGI

100 TEV DI-HIGGS

49