SDHCAL Data Acquisition Status and Plans C.Combaret, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

sdhcal data acquisition status and plans
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

SDHCAL Data Acquisition Status and Plans C.Combaret, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SDHCAL Data Acquisition Status and Plans C.Combaret, G.Baulieu,L.Mirabito L.Mirabito 02-02-2015 Current Status Hardware 50 planes (1m2 each) of GRPC equipped with HR2 chips, inside a stainless steel structure Clock and synchronous


slide-1
SLIDE 1

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

SDHCAL Data Acquisition Status and Plans

C.Combaret, G.Baulieu,L.Mirabito

slide-2
SLIDE 2

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

Current Status

Hardware

50 planes (1m2 each) of GRPC equipped with HR2 chips, inside a stainless steel structure

Clock and synchronous commands are sent using HDMI cables between a central SDCC and 7 DCC boards (1 DCC for 8 plane)

Three new DIF firmwares: The central DIF of each plane fan in/out clock, command and busy to the 2 lateral ones. Only one HDMI connection per plane

Data is readout through USB2

A dedicated mezzanin is plugged on each DIF with USB2 FTDI chips

 Same firmware and software as with USB1 FTDI chip

Software

Raspberry pi micro PC equipped with 12-ports homemade USB Hub as Daq frontend

150 usb2 links to 13 Raspberry micro PCs (1 PC for 4 planes)

XDAQ not yet supported on Raspberry PI

DAQ software migrated to DIM for communication between PCs

Possibility to keep XDAQ (or Eudaq) architecture in the backend

Same Data structure and DB configuration

slide-3
SLIDE 3

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

December 2014 Beam Test Setup

Unique HDMI connection per plane Flat cable connection to lateral DIFs 13 RPI with 12-ports USB hub

slide-4
SLIDE 4

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015 DIF_G DIF_M DIF_D ASU ASU ASU ASU ASU 6x 24 HR2 ASU

USB Hub RPi USB2 DCC SDCC RPi USB

1 hub+Rpi for 4 cassettes 1 DCC for 8 cassettes (1 spare)

Trigger

Beam Start/Stop

Hardware General View of m3

Boards and asics configurations Acquisition data

Homemade protocol HDMI medium USB/USB2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

Software General View of m3

USB Device Driver DIF Data Handler Dif and asics conf. Configuration DB (Oracle) DIM DB Manager DIM interface DIF SDCC USB Device Driver DIM DIF Server CCC Manager DIM CCC Server DIF Readout CCC Readout Running on DAQ RpIs Shm DIM Writer Running anywhere on the DAQ network Online Analysis Run control Archived data DIM DIF Client

slide-6
SLIDE 6

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

Plans

What is in progress (ILC)

 Common beam test with other CALICE detectors  light(?!) adaptation of software, hardware and firmware to make it compliant with other

detectors

Main issue is the clock and command compatibility

What we plan to build very soon (ILC)

A few (4) GRPC detectors (2 or 3 m2) equipped with HR3 chips One (new) DIF per plane Data is readout through TCP/IP links Clock and fast commands are sent to the DIF using dedicated TTC protocol Software still based on DIM

What we plan to build very soon (CMS)

A few (tbd) GRPC inside leak tights cassettes with TDC/Petiroc electronics Eventually Daq will need to be CMS compliant (GBT use?) and integrate inside the CMS

DAQ/Trigger framework

Soon, a TTC compliant DAQ is sufficient.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

TCP/IP +TTC solution

Advantages

No need of HW implementation, all TCP stack is already implemented in the Wiznet chip TTC protocol well known, many hardware and software implementations already exist TTC hardware well known, many boards already exist and are available (especially at CERN

pool)

Could be compliant quite easily with m3 prototype (tbc) to be used as tail catcher Current baseline for ILC SDHCAL

Disadvantages

Require 1 ethernet cable per DIF for data and 1 for TTC TTC technology becomes old Not compliant with CMS upgrade plans

slide-8
SLIDE 8

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

GBT solution

Advantages :

 CMS upgrades compliant technology  Lighter in term of cables (everything on 2 fibers)  More modern technology

Disadvantages

 Requires more expensive hardware (tbc)  Designed for CMS -> overkill for ILC in terms of bandwidth  Power consumption quite high for ILC (even if LP-GBT exists with <1W dissipation)  Both Hardware and Software high quality work has already been performed in the CMS

collaboration Ideas

 Can be used as 1 GBT link per « super module » if someone design a concentrator board

to accommodate DIFs

 Maybe a lighter (slower, lower bw, less consumption) GBT can be imagined between DIFs

and concentrator (but is it really neededl?)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

L.Mirabito 02-02-2015

Summary: What will/could be done?

ILC : Develop HR3 system with current baseline (TTC & TCP/IP DIF).

  • > mandatory to have a technological prototype of SDHCAL with HR3

CMS : Use the new DIF as a GBT experimentation platform to read Petiroc+TDC Otherwise use a Glib board (FMC board to accommodate ASU link required).