scientific computing i part i
play

Scientific Computing I Part I Module 5: Heat Transfer Discrete and - PDF document

Scientific Computing I Part I Module 5: Heat Transfer Discrete and Contiuous Models Discrete Models Michael Bader Lehrstuhl Informatik V Winter 2006/2007 Motivation: Heat Transfer A Wiremesh Model consider rectangular plate as fine


  1. Scientific Computing I Part I Module 5: Heat Transfer – Discrete and Contiuous Models Discrete Models Michael Bader Lehrstuhl Informatik V Winter 2006/2007 Motivation: Heat Transfer A Wiremesh Model consider rectangular plate as fine mesh of wires objective: compute the temperature distribution of compute temperature x ij at nodes of the mesh some object under certain prerequisites: temperature at object boundaries given x i,j+1 heat sources material parameters x i−1,j x i,j x i+1,j observation from physical experiments: x i,j−1 q ≈ k · δ T heat flow proportional to temperature differences h y h x Wiremesh Model (2) A Finite Volume Model object: e.g. a rectangular metal plate model as a collection of small connected rectangular model assumption: temperatures in equilibrium at cells every mesh node for all temperatures x ij : x ij = 1 � � x i − 1 , j + x i + 1 , j + x i , j − 1 + x i , j + 1 4 temperature known at (part of) the boundary; for example: x 0 , j = T j h y task: solve system of linear equations h x examine the heat flow across the cell edges

  2. Heat Flow Across the Cell Boundaries Temperature change due to heat flow Heat flow across a given edge is proportional to temperature difference ( T 1 − T 0 ) between the in equilibrium: total heat flow equal to 0 adjacent cells but: consider additional source term F ij due to length h of the edge external heating e.g.: heat flow across the left edge: radiation q ( left ) F ij = f ij h x h y ( f ij heat flow per area) � � = k x T ij − T i − 1 , j h y ij equilibrium with source term requires q ij + F ij = 0: heat flow across all edges determines change of � � f ij h x h y = − k x h y 2 T ij − T i − 1 , j − T i + 1 , j heat energy: � � − k y h x 2 T ij − T i , j − 1 − T i , j + 1 q ij = k x � T ij − T i − 1 , j � h y + k x � T ij − T i + 1 , j � h y � � � � + k y T ij − T i , j − 1 h x + k y T ij − T i , j + 1 h x Finite Volume Model A Time Dependent Model divide by h x h y : − k x idea: set up ODE for each cell f ij = � 2 T ij − T i − 1 , j − T i + 1 , j � h x no external heat sources or drains: f ij = 0 − k y � � change of temperature per time is proportional to 2 T ij − T i , j − 1 − T i , j + 1 h y heat flow into the cell (no longer 0): again, system of linear equations κ x ˙ � � T ij ( t ) = 2 T ij ( t ) − T i − 1 , j ( t ) − T i + 1 , j ( t ) how to treat boundaries? h x κ y prescribe temperature in a cell � � + 2 T ij ( t ) − T i , j − 1 ( t ) − T i , j + 1 ( t ) h y (e.g. boundary layer of cells) prescribe heat flow across an edge; solve system of ODE for example insulation at left edge: q ( left ) = 0 ij From Discrete to Contiuous remember the discrete model: − k x � � f ij = 2 T ij − T i − 1 , j − T i + 1 , j Part II h x − k y � 2 T ij − T i , j − 1 − T i , j + 1 � A Continuous Model – The Heat h y Equation assumption:heat flow accross edges is proportional to temperature difference q ( left ) � � = k x T ij − T i − 1 , j h y ij in reality: heat flow proportional to temperature gradient T ij − T i − 1 , j q ( left ) ≈ kh y ij h x

  3. From Discrete to Contiuous (2) Derivation of the Heat Equation replace k x by k / h x , k y by k / h y , and get: finite volume model, but with arbitrary control − k volume D � � f ij = 2 T ij − T i − 1 , j − T i + 1 , j h 2 change of heat energy (per time) is a result of x − k transfer of heat energy across D ’s surface, � � 2 T ij − T i , j − 1 − T i , j + 1 h 2 heat sources and drains in D (external influences) y resulting integral equation: consider arbitrary small cells: h x , h y → 0: ∂ � � � � ∂ 2 T � ∂ 2 T k ∇ T · � � � ρ cT dV = qdV + ndS f ij = − k − k ∂ t ∂ x 2 ∂ y 2 D D ij ij ∂ D leads to partial differential equation (PDE): density ρ , specific heat c , and heat conductivity k are material parameters � ∂ 2 T ( x , y ) + ∂ 2 T ( x , y ) � − k = f ( x , y ) heat sources and drains are modelled in term q ∂ x 2 ∂ y 2 Derivation of the Heat Equation (2) Heat Equations according to theorem of Gauß: Different scenarios: � � vanishing external influence, q = 0: k ∇ T · � ndS = k ∆ T dV D ∂ D T t = κ ∆ T leads to integral equation for any domain D : alternate notation � ρ cT t − q − k ∆ T dV = 0 � ∂ 2 T ∂ x 2 + ∂ 2 T ∂ y 2 + ∂ 2 T ∂ T � D ∂ t = κ · ∂ z 2 hence, the integrand has to be identically 0: equilibrium solution, T t = 0: T t = κ ∆ T + q κ := k ρ c , ρ c 0 = κ ∆ T + q − ∆ T = f − → ρ c κ > 0 is called the thermal diffusion coefficient (since the Laplace operator models a (heat) diffusion “Poisson’s Equation” process) Boundary Conditions Dirichlet boundary conditions: fix T on (part of) the boundary T ( x , y , z ) = ϕ ( x , y , z ) Neumann boundary conditions: fix T ’s normal derivative on (part of) the boundary: ∂ T ∂ n ( x , y , z ) = ϕ ( x , y , z ) special case: insulation ∂ T ∂ n ( x , y , z ) = 0

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend