saving texas largest freshwater marshes mcfaddin nwr
play

Saving Texas Largest Freshwater Marshes: McFaddin NWR Presented By: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Saving Texas Largest Freshwater Marshes: McFaddin NWR Presented By: Stephanie L. Gonzales, PE LJA Engineering, Inc. Overview ! ! Project Area and Background ! ! Marsh Impacts ! ! Protection Berm ! ! Design ! ! Construction ! ! Beach and Dune


  1. Saving Texas’ Largest Freshwater Marshes: McFaddin NWR Presented By: Stephanie L. Gonzales, PE LJA Engineering, Inc.

  2. Overview ! ! Project Area and Background ! ! Marsh Impacts ! ! Protection Berm ! ! Design ! ! Construction ! ! Beach and Dune Nourishment ! ! Sand Source Investigation ! ! Preliminary Design ! ! Dredging Method ! ! Sediment Delivery

  3. Project Area and Background ! ! McFaddin Beach and National Wildlife Refuge

  4. Project Area and Background Need ! ! Salt Bayou Watershed – 100,000 ac. of Fresh and Brackish Marsh ! ! Feeding and resting habitat for waterfowl ! ! Protective buffer between the Gulf of Mexico and the GIWW Purpose • ! Reduce frequency of saltwater inundation into the interior marshes • ! Protect the marshes from high tide and low energy storm events. • ! Reduce Erosion to that of typical sandy beaches

  5. Marsh Impacts: Storm Events September 9, 2008 October 2, 2008 September 15, 2008

  6. Marsh Impacts: Annual Erosion Rates Erosion Rates Entire Shoreline: Aug ‘05 to Feb ‘09 = -21.4 ft/yr Feb ‘09 to Apr ‘10 = -34.0 ft/yr White’s to Perkins: Aug ‘05 to Feb ‘09 = -25.6 ft/yr Feb ‘09 to Apr ’10 = -33.4 ft/yr

  7. Design of Protection Berm ! ! 5 yr. Storm Approximation with +5ft NAVD88 Protection Berm

  8. !"#$%&'#()*%"+,

  9. Beach and Dune Nourishment Alternatives Analysis ! ! Key Points ! ! Borrow Source Identification ! ! Sediment Configuration ! ! Dredge Type ! ! Sediment Delivery ! ! Screening Factors ! ! Costs ! ! Construction Time ! ! Impacts to the Environment ! ! Navigation

  10. Sand Source Investigation Investigation Area

  11. Sand Source Investigation

  12. Preliminary Design

  13. Trailing Suction Hopper Dredge • ! Low Mobilization & Operating Costs • ! Utilizes Short Pipelines • ! Can “Bottom Dump” Overburden • ! Can work in Adverse Conditions • ! Higher Risk to Endangered Species • ! Lower Production Rates

  14. Sediment Delivery – Hopper Dredge

  15. Cutter Suction Dredge • ! High Mobilization & Operating Costs • ! Operates in Fair Weather • ! High Production • ! Low Risk to Endanger Species • ! Works Well in Various Sediments • ! Continuous Pumping ! ! ! ! ! !

  16. Sediment Delivery - CSD

  17. Beach and Dune Nourishment

  18. Interagency Efforts Protection Berm (Phase I & II): • ! US Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) and Jefferson County providing funding for construction (CIAP) • ! Texas General Land Office (GLO) providing management and oversight • ! Jefferson County and GLO Disaster Recovery (DR) providing funding for engineering & environmental management (CIAP) Beach and Dune Nourishment (Phase III): • ! CIAP providing initial funding for construction • ! Texas General Land Office providing management and oversight • ! GLO providing funding for engineering (CEPRA)

  19. Questions / Comments? Contact Information: Stephanie Gonzales slgonzales@ljaengineering.com

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend