sarah taub nci webinar
play

Sarah Taub/NCI Webinar: Friendship and Life Outcomes for Adults - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sarah Taub/NCI Webinar: Friendship and Life Outcomes for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities November 3, 2016 Agenda Introductions NCI Data Creating our Commonwealth and Widening the Circle Larry Tummino


  1. Sarah Taub/NCI Webinar: Friendship and Life Outcomes for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities November 3, 2016

  2. Agenda • Introductions • NCI Data • Creating our Commonwealth and Widening the Circle  Larry Tummino  Emily Lauer  Christine Clifford  Jim Ross National Core Indicators (NCI)

  3. Methods: WHAT IS NATIONAL CORE INDICATORS™ (NCI)? • Multi-state collaboration of state DD agencies • Measures performance of public systems for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities • Assesses performance in several areas, including: employment, community inclusion, choice, rights, and health and safety • Launched in 1997 in 13 participating states • Supported by participating states • NASDDDS – HSRI Collaboration National Core Indicators (NCI)

  4. National Core Indicators State Participation NH WA ME VT MT ND MA MN NY OR WI RI SD ID MI CT WY PA NJ IA OH* NE DE NV IN IL MD WV UT VA Wash DC CO CA* MO KY KS NC TN OK SC AR AZ NM AL GA MS As of 2016-17: LA TX 46 states, the District of FL AK Columbia and 22 sub-state HI regions

  5. WHAT IS NCI? Adult Consumer Survey •  In-person conversation with a sample of adults receiving services to gather information about their experiences  Keyed to important person-centered outcomes that measure system-level indicators related to: employment, choice, relationships, case management, inclusion, health, etc. Adult Family, Child Family, and Family/Guardian Surveys Mail • surveys – separate sample from Adult Consumer Survey Other NCI state level data: Staff Stability • National Core Indicators (NCI)

  6. What Do NCI Data Show About Friendship and Life Outcomes for Adults With IDD? National Core Indicators (NCI)

  7. Types of Friendships • Expanded friendships  Reported being friends with people other than staff and family • Limited friendships  Those reported having no friends  Those who reported having friends who were all either family or staff

  8. Sample: 2014-15 Adult Consumer Survey • The total sample includes data from 32 states, the District of Columbia, and one regional council “Do you have friends you like to talk to or do things with?,”  Yes, has friends who are not staff or family  Yes, all friends are staff or family, or cannot determine  No, does not have friends  Don’t know • No proxy responses permitted • Only individuals who responded to this question were included in the sample • Respondents for whom this question was left blank or coded as “Don’t know” were excluded from the final dataset. • The final dataset includes 16,626 people. All relationships in this presentation are significant at the p<=.05 level National Core Indicators (NCI)

  9. Demographics Expanded Friendships by Mental Illness/Psychiatric Diagnosis by Friendship Status Gender 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 76% 80% 73% 70% 70% 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 35% 32% 40% 30% 27% 26% 30% 24% 30% 20% 15% 12% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% Mood Anxiety Psychotic Behavior Females Males Disorder Disorder Disorder Challenges Proportion with expanded friendships Limited Friendships Expanded Friendships National Core Indicators (NCI)

  10. Type of Residence by Friendship Status 100% 90% 91% 80% expanded 70% friendships said they 60% like where 50% 41% 40% they live. 40% 30% 27% 30% 21% 89% 20% 16% limited 6% 10% 6% 5% 4% 2% 2% friendships 0% said they ICF or Group Hope Independent Parent or Foster Other Institutional Home or Relative's Home Care/Host like where Setting Apartment Home they live. Limited friendships Expanded Friendships National Core Indicators (NCI)

  11. Paid Job in Community by Friendship Status 34% expanded 100% friendships report 90% volunteering 25% limited 80% friendships report 70% volunteering 60% 50% 40% 30% 23% 20% 15% 10% 0% Limited Friendships Expanded Friendships National Core Indicators (NCI)

  12. Rights and Respect by Friendship Status 100% 93% 92% 91% 91% 90% 89% 89% 86% 90% 85% 84% 79% 79% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% People Let People Let Has Enough Mail is Never Can Be Alone Can Use Phone Know Before Know Before Privacy At Read Without With Visitors at or Internet Entering Home Entering Home Permission Home Whenever Bedroom Wants Limited Friendships Expanded Friendships National Core Indicators (NCI)

  13. Participation in Community Activities by Friendship Status Exp. Friendships also reported 100% 92% 89% more frequent 87% 90% 85% 82% 81% participation in 80% 73% community 70% 63% 60% 55% 49% 50% 45% 41% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Shopping Errands Entertainment Eat out Religious or Exercise Spiritual Practice Limited Friendships Expanded Friendships National Core Indicators (NCI)

  14. Relationships by Friendship Status 100% 90% 81% 80% 74% 72% 70% 58% 60% 50% 39% 37% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Can See Friends Can Go On Date Without Sometimes or Often Whenever Wants Restriction Feels Lonely Limited Friendships Expanded Friendships National Core Indicators (NCI)

  15. Questions? Alixe Bonardi abonardi@hsri.org What did they say? Dorothy Hiersteiner dhiersteiner@hsri.org For questions about NCI, please email dhiersteiner@hsri.org National Core Indicators (NCI)

  16. Fostering social inclusion and community engagement: Massachusetts’s Creating Our Common Wealth Initiative Emily Lauer, MPH, CDDER Larry Tummino, MA DDS Christine Clifford, MHP, CDDER 16

  17. Context - Massachusetts • Over the last 45 years, DDS has built a sophisticated community-based service system. – From serving >10,000 individuals in nine large institutional settings – To serving >35,000 individuals supported in a variety of community settings. • DDS Mission: To provide supports that address individual needs based on a person-centered plan and that are provided in ways that draw upon a person's gifts while promoting full engagement as a contributing member of a local community. – Ultimate goal: To have those served feel valued, have lives that are rich in experiences and which have a bounty of friendships and relationships. 17

  18. Remaining Challenges “ Isolation, one of the building blocks in the old service foundation, continues to persist in ways that often leave people lonely and disengaged from their community. Yes, individuals live in the community but too often are not yet of the community .” – Commissioner Elin Howe • Today: – Much of a person’s time is spent with paid staff and family members. – People often do things in groups and in ways that separate them from the community around them. • To achieve the DDS’s "ultimate goal“ steps need to be taken that will move the system into the next stage of its evolution. – After moving to community settings, next frontier is to bring people into the real mainstream of community life with their fellow citizens. • Takes commitment and effort from all stakeholders! 18

  19. Using Data to Assess Progress DDS utilizes data from the National Core Indicators and other sources to understand issues related to social inclusion such as friendship, community activities and participation and loneliness to assess and compare progress in these areas. Licensure and Certification Data 19

  20. Friendship Satisfaction Percentage of people indicating 'yes' 100% Has friends other than 90% family or staff (avg 76%) 80% Has a best friend (may be 88% 70% family or staff) avg 79% 81% 78% 60% 78% Sees friends when they 50% want (avg 78%) 58% 40% 30% Can date or can date with some restrictions (avg 20% 83%) 10% Talks with their neighbors at least some of the time 0% MA DDS Respondents (avg 65%) Source: National Core Indicators www.nationalcoreindicators.org 20

  21. And yet… 4 out of 10 people feel lonely at least half of the time (Source: NCI FY14) Does not feel Feels lonely lonely 21

  22. DDS Quality Council • Consists of a variety of stakeholders who meet quarterly to review data from CDDER in order to consider how it can inform policies and practices at the Department. • One father’s story on friendship. 22

  23. Creating Our Common Wealth • Partnership between: – MA Department of Developmental Services (DDS) – Center for Developmental Disability Evaluation and Research (CDDER), University of Massachusetts Medical School – Involves a range of talented experts from across the country • Leadership development initiative for 100 emerging leaders from provider and advocacy organizations, DDS Area Offices 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend