salt nutrient management plan snmp
play

Salt/Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) for the Central Basin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Salt/Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) for the Central Basin &West Coast Basin (CBWCB) October 21, 2013 CEQA Scoping Meeting 1 Presentation Overview Background on Basins SNMP Water Quality Assessment Implementation Measures


  1. Salt/Nutrient Management Plan (SNMP) for the Central Basin &West Coast Basin (CBWCB) October 21, 2013 CEQA Scoping Meeting 1

  2. Presentation Overview • Background on Basins • SNMP Water Quality Assessment • Implementation Measures • CEQA Analysis and Environmental Impacts 2 2

  3. The Central Basin and West Coast Basin (CBWCB) are highly managed and monitored by multiple stakeholder agencies SANITATION DISTRICTS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY 3

  4. SNMP Study Area (CBWCB) Area ≈ 420 square miles San Gabriel Mtns 43 Cities (highly urbanized) Merced Hills San Gabriel Valley Puente Hills Santa Monica Mtns Los Coyote Hills Angeles San Gabriel River Los Angeles River Long Beach Palos Verdes ~4 Million people Hills (>10% of California’s population ) Managed Aquifer Recharge conducted to Pacific Ocean supplement natural groundwater recharge 4

  5. Sources of Water in CBWCB • IMPORTED WATER: 60% from State Water Project, Colorado River, or LA Aqueduct • GROUNDWATER: 40% >400 Active Production Wells Pump ~245,000 acre-feet/yr • RECYCLED WASTEWATER: Growing uses (irrigation, industrial applications, groundwater recharge) 5

  6. Overpumping between 1900 and 1950s caused groundwater levels to be below sea level in significant portions of the basins Resulting in seawater intrusion along the coast Ocean 6

  7. Major Salinity Control Measures West Coast Basin Goldsworthy Barrier Project Desalter 1950s 2002 Alamitos Gap Barrier Project 1960s Brewer Residual Desalter “Saline 1993 Plume” Dominguez Gap Barrier Project Nearly 300 injection 1970s wells and 16 miles long 7

  8. Main Groundwater Recharge Areas Surface Recharge Coastal Injection 8

  9. SNMP Water Quality Assessment • Compiled all available WQ data • WQ assessed by Subareas/Model Layers Mon Monteb tebello Los A s Angeles s Foreb rebay • Existing regional Foreb rebay GW model (USGS) • Developed mixing Wh Whitt ttier r Area rea Pres ressu sure re Area rea We West st Coast st model Basin sin 9

  10. SNMP Implementation Measures • 2 Types of Implementation Measures: – Current: Existing implementation measures – Planned: Implementation measures that begin operations before 2025 • Categories of Implementation Measures: 1. Improve Surface Water Quality 2. Improve Imported Water Quality 3. Improve Recycled Water Quality 4. Improve Groundwater Quality 5. Increase Surface Water Capture 6. Increase Recycled Water Use 10 10

  11. SNMP Implementation Measures Category of Examples of Examples of Implementation Existing Implementation Measures Planned Implementation Measure Measures Improve Surface TMDLs, Stormwater BMPs, Low Impact Additional LID projects & Water Quality Development (LID), MS4 Permit, WQ stormwater BMPs, stormwater monitoring, outreach & education capture projects MWD’s Salinity Source Water Control Improve Continue with existing Imported Water Program, outreach & education (Southern implementation measures Quality California Salinity Coalition), WQ monitoring Improve Nitrogen treatment, industrial source controls, Expansion & modifications of Recycled Water public education on water softeners, WQ existing treatment plants Quality monitoring, existing permits and regulations Improve Seawater intrusion barriers, desalters, LA Increase advanced recycled Groundwater County First Flush Policy, WQ monitoring, water at seawater barriers, Quality Basin Adjudication expansion of desalter Improve Surface Montebello Forebay Spreading Grounds Improvements at MFSG & Water Capture (MFSG), Dominguez Gap Spreading DGSG, Additional LID projects & Grounds (DGSG), Torrance stormwater stormwater BMPs retention ponds Increase Advanced treated recycled water at seawater Groundwater Reliability Recycled Water barriers, recycled water at MFSG, recycled Improvement Project, irrigation, 11 Use water for irrigation and industrial uses seawater barriers 11

  12. Proposed Projects in Central Basin • 100% Advanced treated (AWT) Recycled Water (RW) @ Alamitos Gap Barrier, increased Spreading Spreading recharge volume Los Angeles Los Angeles Grounds Grounds Forebay Forebay • MFSG Groundwater Reliability Montebello Montebello Whittier Whittie Improvement Project (GRIP): Forebay Forebay Area r Area Pressure Pressure Area Area – GRIP A – Replace delivery of Central Central 21,000 AFY of imported water Basin Basin West with 11,000 AFY tertiary RW & West Coast Coast 10,000 AFY AWT RW Basin Spreading Basin Grounds – GRIP B – Replace delivery of Alamitos Alamitos Gap Gap 21,000 AFY of imported water Barrier Barrier with 21,000 AFY tertiary RW San San Pedro Pedro • I ncreased RW for irrigation Bay Bay 12

  13. Proposed Projects in West Coast Basin • 100% Advanced Treated Recycled Water @ West Coast Basin Barrier, increased recharge volume West Coast Central Basin • 100% Advanced Treated Recycled Barrier Basin Water @ Dominguez Gap Barrier, increased recharge volume Desalters West Santa Coast Monica Dominguez Gap Bay • Expansion of Goldsworthy Desalter Spreading Basin Grounds Dominguez Gap Barrier • Increased recharge at Dominguez Gap Spreading Grounds San Pedro Bay • Increased recycled water for irrigation 13

  14. Summary of SNMP Results • In Central Basin, salt and nutrient concentrations are below Water Quality Objectives and will not be exceeded in the future • In West Coast Basin, water quality is improving and salt & nutrient concentrations will be below Water Quality Objectives in the future • Current and planned implementation measures (desalters, increased use of advanced treated recycled water) are improving groundwater quality in CBWCB • Proposed projects that potentially increase salt concentrations in groundwater are more than offset by implementation measures that decrease concentrations in groundwater • Nitrate concentrations increase very slightly in the CBWCB, but concentrations remain significantly below the Water Quality Objective & the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), so nitrate is not a water quality concern 14

  15. Environmental Checklist  Water Quality  Natural Resources  Earth  Energy  Noise  Air  Archeological / Historical  Greenhouse Gas Emissions  Plant and Animal Life  Risk of Upset  Light and Glare  Human Health  Transportation / Circulation  Population  Recreation  Housing  Land Use  Public Service  Aesthetics  Utilities and Service Systems 15 15

  16. Potential Environmental Impacts  Water Quality Will the proposed project result in: a. Changes in currents or direction of water b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage, or runoff c. Flow of flood waters d. Amount of surface water e. Alteration of surface water quality f. Alteration of direction or flow rate of groundwater g. Change in quantity or quality of groundwater h. Reduction in water for public supplies i. Water related hazards such as flooding 16 16

  17. Potential Environmental Impacts  Earth Will the proposed project result in: a. Unstable earth b. Soil disruptions or compaction c. Change in topography d. Modification of geologic features e. Wind and water erosion f. Modification of channels, bays etc. g. Geologic hazards (e.g., landslides) 17 17

  18. Potential Environmental Impacts  Noise Will the proposed project result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels 18 18

  19. Potential Environmental Impacts  Archeological / Historical Will the proposed project result in: a. Alteration of a significant archaeological or historical site, object, or structure 19 19

  20. Potential Environmental Impacts  Plant Life and Animal Life Will the proposed project result in: a. Change in diversity or number of plant or animal species b. Reduction of unique, rare or endangered plant or animal species c. Introduction of new species d. Reduction in agricultural acreage e. Deterioration of existing habitat 20 20

  21. Potential Environmental Impacts  Light and Glare Will the proposed project result in: a. Produce new light and glare 21 21

  22. Potential Environmental Impacts  Transportation / Circulation Will the proposed project result in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement b. Impact on existing parking, new parking c. Impact on transportation systems d. Alterations to patterns of movement of people or goods e. Alterations to water, rail or air traffic f. Increase in traffic hazards 22 22

  23. Potential Environmental Impacts  Recreation Will the proposed project result in: a. Impacts to quality or quantity of recreational opportunities 23 23

  24. Potential Environmental Impacts  Land Use Will the proposed project result in: a. Alteration of land use 24 24

  25. Potential Environmental Impacts  Aesthetics Will the proposed project result in: a. Obstruction of scenic vista open to the public b. Creation of offensive site open to public view 25 25

  26. Potential Environmental Impacts  Natural Resources Will the proposed project result in: a. Increased rate of use of natural resources b. Depletion of nonrenewable natural resource 26 26

  27. Potential Environmental Impacts  Energy Will the proposed project result in: a. Use of substantial fuel or energy b. Increase in demand or development of new sources of energy 27 27

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend