S Social Sensing for i l S i f Epidemiological p de o og ca - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

s social sensing for i l s i f epidemiological p de o og
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

S Social Sensing for i l S i f Epidemiological p de o og ca - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

S Social Sensing for i l S i f Epidemiological p de o og ca Behavior Change Presented by: Michal Dobosz Michal Dobosz CS525M: Mobile and CS525M: Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing Spring 2011 Definition of Epidemiology Definition of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

S i l S i f Social Sensing for Epidemiological p de

  • og ca

Behavior Change

Presented by: Michal Dobosz Michal Dobosz

CS525M: Mobile and CS525M: Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing Spring 2011

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Definition of Epidemiology Definition of Epidemiology

  • “Epidemiology is the study of

Epidemiology is the study of patterns of health and illness and associated factors at the population associated factors at the population level.”

Outbreak investigation – Outbreak investigation – Biology Biostatistics

2

– Biostatistics – Social Science disciplines

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction Introduction

  • How is individual behavior affected

How is individual behavior affected by illness and stress?

  • Measure characteristic behavior
  • Measure characteristic behavior

change in symptomatic individuals

M bil h li ti – Mobile phone application

  • Co-location
  • Communication

3

  • Communication
  • Predict health status of an individual

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Benefits Benefits

  • Understanding how people behave

Understanding how people behave when they are infected

Lack of realistic social interaction data – Lack of realistic social interaction data and spatio-temporal data

  • Modeling can be made more accurate
  • Modeling can be made more accurate

– Results can be used in the SIR model

Number and frequency of contacts on

4

  • Number and frequency of contacts on

Susceptible -> Infected transition

– Face-to-face interaction in contagion

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 4

Face to face interaction in contagion process

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Experiment The Experiment

  • Two months of data from an

Two months of data from an undergraduate residence hall

– Individuals surveyed daily for symptoms y y y p – Behavioral changes when individuals are sick

  • Total communication, communication

patterns, network diversity, entropy of movement

5

movement

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Related Work Related Work

  • Mobile Phones as Social Sensors

Mobile Phones as Social Sensors

– Eagle and Pentland

  • Reality Mining – social network structure,

y g and recognition of patterns in daily user activity

Gonzalez et al – Gonzalez et. al

  • Call detail records used to characterize

spatio-temporal regularity

6

  • Google Flu Trends

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Related Work Cont. Related Work Cont.

  • Sociometric

Sociometric Badge

– Identify human y activity patterns and analyze con ersational conversational prosody features – Vocal features

7

– Vocal features, body motion, relative location

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Data Source Data Source

  • Undergraduate Dormitory

Undergraduate Dormitory

– 80% participated in the study, most of the remaining 20% were spatially isolated – Pro-technology orientation – Even distribution among academic years – 54% males and most were Engineering, Mathematics, and Science majors

8

  • Incentives

– Windows Mobile Phones and $1 a survey

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Data Sets Data Sets

  • Social Interaction Data from Mobile

Social Interaction Data from Mobile Phones

– Call data records – SMS logs – Bluetooth proximity and WLAN location p y sensing (every 6 minutes)

  • Symptom Data via Daily Self-Report

9

y p y p

– Physical and Emotional Symptoms – 20/69 participants FLU immunized

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 9

p p

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Survey Questions Survey Questions

  • Do you have a sore throat or cough?

y g

  • Do you have a runny nose, congestion or

sneezing?

  • Do you have a fever?
  • Have you had any vomiting, nausea or

diarrhea? diarrhea?

  • Have you been feeling sad, lonely or

depressed

10

p

  • lately?
  • Have you been feeling stressed out lately?

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 10

y g y

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Survey Data Survey Data

  • Immunized Participants not

Immunized Participants not considered

  • Survey Data

Survey Data

– 63% survey completion rate – Grouped into 48-hour periods Grouped into 48 hour periods – Symptoms labeled as FLU by medically trained epidemiologist

11

p g

  • 12 cases identified, lasting 5-7 days

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Sensor Data Sensor Data

  • Total Communication – Phone Calls and

SMS

  • Communication (10PM – 9AM on weekdays)
  • Communication Diversity
  • Physical Bluetooth Proximity day and night

(10PM – 9AM on weekdays)

  • Physical Bluetooth Proximity excluding

t d t

12

students

  • University WLANs and non-University

WLANs

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 12

WLANs

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Behavioral Effects of Low Intensity Symptoms (Runny y p ( y Nose, Sore Throat and Cough)

13 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Behavior Effects of Higher-Intensity Symptoms (Fever and Influenza) Symptoms (Fever and Influenza)

14 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Behavior Effects of Fever Behavior Effects of Fever

15 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Behavior effects of CDC- d fi d i fl defined influenza

16 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Symptom Classification Using B h i l F t Behavioral Features

  • Cell phones can predict illness

p p

  • K-nearest-neighbor-clustering

– stress + depression p – runny nose + sore throat – fever + influenza – runny nose + sore throat + fever + influenza

17

  • Bayesian-network classifier with MetaCost

– Accuracy between 60% - 80%

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Temporal Flux Between Behavior, St d Ph i l S t Stress and Physical Symptoms

  • Granger causality

Granger causality test

– Poor noise immunity

  • Phase Slope

p Index (PSI) Method

18 Worcester Polytechnic Institute 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions Conclusions

  • Limitations

Limitations

– Bluetooth signal strength – Statistical tests assume independent Statistical tests assume independent samples

  • Doctors and nurses can use

diagnostic information

– Early detection of conditions

19

y – Better healthcare – Lower costs

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

References References

  • Social Sensing for Epidemiological

g p g Behavior Change, Anmol Madan, Manuel Cebrian, David Lazert and Alex Pentland, MIT Media Lab and Harvard University MIT Media Lab and Harvard University, Cambridge MA

  • http://hd media mit edu/badges/
  • http://hd.media.mit.edu/badges/
  • http://www.google.org/flutrends/
  • http://en wikipedia org/wiki/Epidemiology

20

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 20