S O C I A L I N T E R A C T I O N S & E C O N O M I C O U T C - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

s o c i a l i n t e r a c t i o n s e c o n o m i c o u t
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

S O C I A L I N T E R A C T I O N S & E C O N O M I C O U T C - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

S O C I A L I N T E R A C T I O N S & E C O N O M I C O U T C O M E S I I MPA 612: Economy, Society, and Public Policy January 16, 2019 Fill out your reading report on Learning Suite P L A N F O R T O D A Y Game theory Stags,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

S O C I A L I N T E R A C T I O N S & E C O N O M I C O U T C O M E S I I

MPA 612: Economy, Society, and Public Policy January 16, 2019

Fill out your reading report

  • n Learning Suite
slide-2
SLIDE 2

P L A N F O R T O D A Y Stags, hares, and prisoners Fixing collective action problems Game theory Preference falsification

slide-3
SLIDE 3

G A M E T H E O R Y

slide-4
SLIDE 4

W H Y D O T H E S E U N - F U N G A M E S ?

We need formal language + an analytical framework for looking at those interactions “Economics is the study of how people interact with each other… in providing for their livelihoods”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

K E Y V O C A B U L A R Y

Game Zero-sum

Model of strategic interaction Only one winner

Non-zero-sum

Both players can win; requires cooperation

Pareto efficiency

Outcome can’t be improved without hurting another player

slide-6
SLIDE 6

S T R A T E G I E S

Nash equilibrium Dominant

Choice where no player has incentive to change Choice where you gain no matter what the other player does

Pure

Choice you make every time

Mixed

You gain or lose based on probabilities

  • f other player’s choices
slide-7
SLIDE 7

I N V I S I B L E H A N D

Bala

Rice Cassava

Anil

Rice

1, 3 2, 2

Cassava

4, 4 3, 1

Non-zero-sum One dominant equilibrium

slide-8
SLIDE 8

B A C H O R S T R A V I N S K Y

Friend 2

Chinese Italian

Friend 1

Chinese

2, 1 0, 0

Italian

0, 0 1, 2

Non-zero-sum Two equilibria Mixed strategy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

C H I C K E N

Racer 2

Keep going Swerve

Racer 1

Keep going

−100, −100 5, −5

Swerve

−5, 5 0, 0

Non-zero-sum Two equilibria Mixed strategy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

P R I S O N E R ’ S D I L E M M A

Bala

Magic bugs Poison

Anil

Magic bugs

3, 3 1, 4

Poison

4, 1 2, 2

Non-zero-sum One dominant equilibrium Not socially optimal!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S TAG S , H A R E S , A N D P R I S O N E R S

slide-12
SLIDE 12

P R I S O N E R ’ S D I L E M M A

Bala

Magic bugs Poison

Anil

Magic bugs

3, 3 1, 4

Poison

4, 1 2, 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

C O O P E R A T I O N I N P D L A N D

Repetition + iteration

One-shot vs. repeated People cooperate even though the dominant strategy is always defect

Infinitization

Defect at t - 1

PD games underpredict voluntary cooperation

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

S T A G H U N T

Bala

Hunt stag Hunt hare

Anil

Hunt stag

10, 10 0, 2

Hunt hare

2, 0 2, 2

Non-zero-sum Two pure equilibria Not socially optimal! Mixed strategy Not Pareto optimal

slide-16
SLIDE 16

C O O P E R A T I O N I N S T A G H U N T L A N D

The payoffs for cooperation are greater than the payoffs for defection There’s still an incentive to defect

slide-17
SLIDE 17

B E T T E R M O D E L O F S O C I A L D I L E M M A S

Negative political campaigns Points in soccer tournaments Climate change Arriving on time Real estate agents

slide-18
SLIDE 18

P R E F E R E N C E FA L S I F I C AT I O N

slide-19
SLIDE 19

E V E R Y O N E L O V E S T H E D I C T A O R

slide-20
SLIDE 20

T H R E E C O M P O N E N T S O F U T I L I T Y

Intrinsic

We like what we like because we just do

Reputational

Our happiness is determined by what other people think Distance between intrinsic and reputational (cognitive dissonance)

Expressive

slide-21
SLIDE 21

F A L S I F I C A T I O N Someone finds intrinsic utility in some opinion They get reputational utility from having the opposite public opinion They lie about their public preferences

Unless they have high expressive utility—then they speak out

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Public opinion = the sum of everyone’s fake public preferences

A A A A A A H H H H H H H H H H ! ! !

slide-23
SLIDE 23

S O C I A L D E S I R A B I L I T Y B I A S Bradley effect

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

U P W A R D R E V I S I O N If you believe that 100% of the country supports the regime, you’ll publicly support the regime, even if you only support it 40% Everyone revises their public opinion upward and it looks like the whole country loves the regime

slide-28
SLIDE 28

You guess 40% support You see more You adjust up

(with everyone else)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

You guess 25% support You see less You adjust down

(with everyone else)

Revolutionary cascade

slide-30
SLIDE 30

F I X I N G C O L L E C T I V E AC T I O N P R O B L E M S

slide-31
SLIDE 31

W H A T S T O P S U S F R O M C O O P E R A T I N G ?

Uneven payoffs Lack of assurance Preference falsification Dishonesty Selfishness

These are all rational things that utility-maximizing people do!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Altruism Repetition and iteration Infinitization Punishment Norms Institutions

H O W D O W E F I X T H I S ?